CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04864756Updated Apr 29, 2021

Simulation Based Learning and Academic Performance in Medical School

An interventional study of Simulation based learning in Academic Performance, sponsored by Mbarara University of Science and Technology. Status unknown at 1 site in Uganda. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-29.

Sponsored by Mbarara University of Science and Technology · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2019, registered Apr 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators will use a multi-methods approach, including both qualitative and quantitative methods. In the quantitative methodology, the investigators will use a before and after approach to compare medical student grades/scores before and after the integration of Simulation based learning (SBL) in the curriculum. The hypothesis is that SBL will generally increase knowledge and skills and hence improve the scores from the theory (MCQ) and clinical (OSCE) examinations conducted outside simulated settings in the clinical departments.

Read the detailed description

Simulation faculty development will be measured by retention and engagement in simulation sessions. The investigators will use survival analysis methods and plot Kaplan Meier curves to calculate probability of retention and determine the factors that are associated with retention as derived from participant in-depth interviews and departmental meetings. A faculty member will be considered disengaged if they do not participate in simulation session for at least 6 months post training, despite reminders and opportunities for participation. Reasons for potential disengagement will be explored qualitatively.

In the qualitative approach, the investigators will conduct in-depth key informant interviews (45 minutes to 1 hour) with administrators at the institution, namely Academic Registrar, Deans of Medical School, heads of Departments and Simulation facilitators (the post-graduate student trainers). The investigators will conduct focus group discussions (1 hour) with postgraduate simulation facilitators, the medical and nursing students before, during and after their enrollment in SBL. The interviews and focus group discussions will be audio-recorded and transcribed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Academic Performance
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Mbarara University of Science and Technology is the lead sponsor of 31 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Medical (Medicine and Nursing) students
  • Enrolled in the Faculty of medicine at Mbarara University of Science and Technology
  • Currently attending clinical years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non clinical student years in the Faculty of Medicine
  • not enrolled in Medicine or Nursing programs at Mbarara University of Science and Technology
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Before/After

    Grade performance before and after introduction of simulation based learning

    Other: Simulation based learning

Interventions

  • OtherSimulation based learning

    Learning for medical students using simulation based techniques including scenario execution as a complement to conventional teaching methodologies

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Academic performance

    Change in CGPA scores Before and after introduction of simulation based techniques

    Time frame: 36 months after introduction of simulation based techniques

Secondary outcomes

  1. Retention of academic faculty

    Percentage of faculty retained in the training program

    Time frame: 2 years after initiation of simulation based learning

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Mbarara University of Science and Technology
    Mbarara, 256, Uganda
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data will share with permission from the research ethics committee and Mbarara University Academic Registrar's authorization

Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 29, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04864756
Lead sponsor
Mbarara University of Science and Technology
Collaborators
University of Calgary, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, The ELMA Foundation, Laerdal Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 29, 2021
Start date
Jun 1, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 29, 2021

Study contacts

Data Santorino, MD
Contact
sdata@must.ac.ug
0774500571
Francis Bajunirwe, MD, PhD
Contact
fbaj@must.ac.ug
0772 576 396

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion