CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04852549Updated Apr 21, 2021

Effects of Oculomotor Exercises on Volleyball Players

An interventional study of Oculomotor exercise in Athlete, sponsored by Istanbul Medipol University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to female participants aged 16 Years to 26 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-21.

Sponsored by Istanbul Medipol University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2020, registered Apr 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 26 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The researcher aimed to investigate the effects of oculo-motor exercises on dynamic visual acuity, balance and performance of volleyball players whose performance can be improved with visual skills training.

H0: Oculo-motor exercises applied to volleyball players are effective on dynamic visual acuity, balance and performance.

H1: Oculo-motor exercises have no effect on dynamic visual acuity, balance and performance in volleyball players.

Read the detailed description

This study on the Effect of Oculo-Motor Exercises on Dynamic Visual Acuity, Balance and Performance in Volleyball Players was ethically approved by the "Istanbul Medipol University Non-Invasive Ethics Committee" with file number 10840098-604.01.01-E.14171 on 16.04.2020. The study included 52 female volleyball players aged 16-26 who played participants for at least 3 years without interruption. Power analysis was performed using the 3.1.9.5 version of the G-Power program to determine the number of individuals to be included in the study. Type-1 was accepted as 0.05 and power ratio as 80%. Effect size 0.8 was taken. According to the results of the power analysis, the number of participants required to be included in the study was determined as 52.

Participants; Age, height, weight, gender, body mass index, dominant side, position played in volleyball, number of weekly training, daily training time, previous sports injuries, education status, smoking and alcohol use, accompanying illnesses were questioned. FBT and YBT were used for balance evaluations, and Nelson's Hand Reaction Test was used for reaction times. In addition, Dynamic Visual Acuity and Vertical Jumping distances were evaluated twice before and after treatment.

Participants included in the study, the control group continued their routine ball training after the evaluations, while the intervention group continued with the oculo-motor training for 4 weeks, 6 days a week, in the morning and evening, for 10 minutes, 2 times a day, in addition to normal ball training. they did the exercises. While doing the exercises, individuals were taught to focus on the purpose they held in their hands, move their head, and aim fast enough to see the image clearly. Two repetitions each week were added to the exercise numbers. Ten seconds rest between two sets and five seconds rest between movements.

02

Conditions studied

  • Athlete

Keywords

  • Volleyball
  • Balance
  • Performance
  • visual acuity
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Istanbul Medipol University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 350 studies on the registry; 58 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 26 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Being in the age range of 16-26
  • Playing licensed volleyball for at least 3 years without interruption
  • Have normal vision and hearing

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a direct blow to the lower or upper extremity in the past month
  • People with musculoskeletal disorders may experience balance (forward head posture).
  • Refractive defects
  • History of ankle fracture
  • Double-sided ankle sprain
  • Vision problems
  • History of lower extremity surgery in the last 6 months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
52 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    No intervention group

    The control group continued with routine training after evaluations.

  • Experimental
    Oculomotor exercise group

    After the evaluation, the intervention group performed oculo-motor exercises for 4 weeks, 6 days a week, morning and evening, twice a day for 10 minutes, in addition to normal ball training. While doing the exercises, individuals were taught to focus on the purpose they held in their hands, move their head, and aim fast enough to see the image clearly. Two repetitions each week were added to the exercise numbers. Ten seconds rest between two sets and five seconds rest between movements.

    Other: Oculomotor exercise

Interventions

  • OtherOculomotor exercise

    1. While holding the head in the middle position, holding two colored objects in both hands, looking at the object in the right hand without turning the head, counting up to 10 and looking at the object in the left hand and counting up to 10, 2. While holding a fixed head in the middle position and holding a colored object in the right hand, following the object with the eyes while moving the right hand from right to left without turning the head and returning, 3. With the head fixed in the middle position, with the right hand on the left, eyes are fixed on the hand-held colored object and turn the head to the right and left. 4. The head will be fixed in the middle position, the eyes will be fixed on the colored object held in the right or left hand and the arm and the head will be turned to opposite directions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Balance

    Static balance of the individuals was evaluated by Flamingo Balance Test (FDT). A wooden stick of 50 cm length, 5 cm height and 3 cm width was used in the test. Dynamic balance changes of individuals were evaluated with YDT. In the measurement of dynamic balance with Y Balance Test (YDT), the amount of reaching out on the dominant sides of all individuals was measured.

    Time frame: The evaluation will be made after 4 weeks of training.

  2. Reaction time

    Reaction time Nelson hand reaction test was used.

    Time frame: The evaluation will be made after 4 weeks of training.

  3. Dynamic visual acuity

    In fact, dynamic vision is defined as the ability to detect details when there is a relative movement between the observer and the target object. It was measured by reading the numbers during neck rotation. A PowerPoint containing 10 slides, each of which randomly had 5 numbers, was used to measure dynamic vision (the size of all numbers was 12 to 20 at the center of the page). Each page had 5 numbers with the same font and each person evaluated 10 pages

    Time frame: The evaluation will be made after 4 weeks of training.

  4. Vertical jump

    Vertical jump test was used.

    Time frame: The evaluation will be made after 4 weeks of training.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Elif Aleyna Yazgan
    İstanbul, 3434, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 21, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04852549
Lead sponsor
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
Responsible party
elif yazgan (Principal investigator, Istanbul Medipol University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 21, 2021
Start date
Nov 20, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 5, 2021
Completion
Apr 6, 2021
Last update
Apr 21, 2021

Study contacts

Pınar Kaya Ciddi
study director · İstanbul Medipol University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion