ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04851509TFN-AUpdated Feb 28, 2025

Static Helical Screw Locking of Pertrochanteric Femur Fractures Using the TFN-A

An interventional study of Dynamic Rotational Locking and Static Locking in Pertrochanteric Fracture, sponsored by Fraser Orthopaedic Research Society. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-28.

Sponsored by Fraser Orthopaedic Research Society · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started May 2021; still recruiting 5 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
218
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study will investigate the shortening and collapse of pertrochanteric fractures following surgical management with the TFN-Advanced nailing system. The focus will be on comparing radiographic assessments of nails which have been statically locked versus dynamically locked. This is a randomized control study with the initial invention being randomized to either statically locking or dynamically locking. For a two-month period, all eligible patients will receive the randomized allocated treatment, then treatment will switch to the alternate treatment for the next two months and will continue to alternate treatments for two-month periods until study enrollment has completed.

Read the detailed description

Hip fractures are common injuries in the elderly population that result in significant morbidity and mortality and a significant burden on health care systems. Hip fractures can be treated with arthroplasty or with internal fixation, depending on the fracture pattern. Cephalomedullary nailing (CMN) has become one of the established treatments for intertrochanteric hip fractures with a wide variety of implant designs from many different companies. The TFN-ADVANCED™ Proximal femoral nailing system (TFN-A) is a novel implant for treating intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric proximal femur fractures with a paucity of published literature on the performance of this implant.

A method to decrease the amount of fracture compression is to use the set screw to lock the screw "statically" so it does not slide to the same degree as if the screw is placed in the "dynamic" or sliding position. To the knowledge of the investigators, the role of statically locking the screw to prevent fracture collapse has not been studied. Statically locking CMN to treat hip fractures has become standard of care at the Royal Columbian Hospital with all the investigating surgeons having adopted this practice in an attempt to prevent significant fracture collapse and neck shortening. Anecdotally, the investigators have not seen significant rates of cephalic screw cut-out over the past five years, and believe the investigators' screw cut-out rates are lower than what is reported in the literature. The investigators have been using the Gamma Nail (Stryker) to statically lock the screw as the previous TFN lacked the ability for static locking. However, with the advent of the TFN-A, the investigators have adopted this implant as their long cephalomedullary nail of choice for fixation of pertrochanteric femur fractures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pertrochanteric Fracture
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Fraser Orthopaedic Research Society is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients >18 years of age
  • AO/OTA 31-A fractures who the surgeon deems eligible for treatment with a cephalomedullary nail
  • Open and closed fractures
  • Ambulatory prior to injury (with or without walking aides)
  • Native (non-fractured, no implant) contralateral hip
  • Willing and able to sign consent (substitute decision maker)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contralateral hip fracture or hip arthroplasty
  • Fracture not amenable to treatment with a cephalomedullary nail
  • Non-ambulatory patient
  • Fractures >14 days (time of injury to OR)
  • Bilateral pertrochanteric hip fractures
  • Non-unions
  • Pathologic fractures
  • Periprosthetic fractures
  • Patients with spinal injury
  • Incarceration
  • Pregnancy
  • Limited life expectancy due to significant medical co-morbidities or medical contra-indications to surgery
  • Likely problems, in the judgement of the investigators, with maintaining follow-up (i.e., patients with no fixed address, report a plan to move out of town, or intellectually challenged patients without adequate family support).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
218 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Dynamic rotational locking

    Using a fracture table, the affected leg will be placed into traction and the patient will be prepped and draped in the usual fashion. The fracture will be provisionally reduced using closed techniques. A 3cm incision will be used to gain access to the intramedullary canal and the nail (either a short nail or long nail, at the discretion of the treating surgeon) will be introduced to the femur. The screw will be placed across the fracture and into the femoral head, aiming for a tip-to-apex distance less than 25mm. The compression nut will be used to compress the fracture. The screw will be rotationally locked by using the 5mm hex flexible screwdriver by advancing the set screw until it stops completely. The screw will then be turned counterclockwise by a ½ turn.

    Procedure: Dynamic Rotational Locking

  • Experimental
    Static locking

    Using a fracture table, the affected leg will be placed into traction and the patient will be prepped and draped in the usual fashion. The fracture will be provisionally reduced using closed techniques. A 3cm incision will be used to gain access to the intramedullary canal and the nail (either a short nail or long nail, at the discretion of the treating surgeon) will be introduced to the femur. The screw will be placed across the fracture and into the femoral head, aiming for a tip-to-apex distance of less than 25mm. The compression nut will be used to compress the fracture. The screw will then be statically locked using the 6Nm torque-limiting blue handle with 6mm hex coupling to completely lock the set screw down on the helical screw.

    Procedure: Static Locking

Interventions

  • ProcedureDynamic Rotational Locking

    Performed, as per the Synthes technique guide, using the 5mm hex flexible set screwdriver and then loosening the set screw by one-half turn of the screwdriver.

  • ProcedureStatic Locking

    Performed by using the torque-limiting set screwdriver and locking the set screw down onto the helical screw to prevent dynamic sliding of the screw within the nail.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Radiographic Assessment

    The primary objective of this study will be to investigate how statically locking the TFN-A influences shortening or collapse of pertrochanteric fractures by measuring radiographic shortening or collapse of pertrochanteric fractures treated with the TFN-A implant.

    Time frame: 12 months post treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fracture Reduction Quality

    Assessed through x-rays of the entire proximal femur

    Time frame: Intra-operatively

  2. Femoral Offset

    Measured in a method described by O. Paul et al

    Time frame: 1 day post-op, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months

  3. Tip-Apex distance

    Measured as described by Baumgaertner et al

    Time frame: 1 day post-op, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months

  4. Complications

    SAEs/AEs

    Time frame: intra-operatively, 1 day post-op, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Royal Columbian Hospital/Fraser Health Authority
    New Westminster, British Columbia V3L 3W7, Canada
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kanis JA, Oden A, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Wahl DA, Cooper C; IOF Working Group on Epidemiology and Quality of Life. A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide. Osteoporos Int. 2012 Sep;23(9):2239-56. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-1964-3. Epub 2012 Mar 15. PubMed 22419370 ↗
  • Zickel RE. A new fixation device for subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: a preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1967 Sep-Oct;54:115-23. No abstract available. PubMed 5589594 ↗
  • Stapert JW, Geesing CL, Jacobs PB, de Wit RJ, Vierhout PA. First experience and complications with the long Gamma nail. J Trauma. 1993 Mar;34(3):394-400. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199303000-00015. PubMed 8483181 ↗
  • Lecerf G, Fessy MH, Philippot R, Massin P, Giraud F, Flecher X, Girard J, Mertl P, Marchetti E, Stindel E. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 May;95(3):210-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.03.010. Epub 2009 May 6. PubMed 19423418 ↗
  • Paul O, Barker JU, Lane JM, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Functional and radiographic outcomes of intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with calcar reduction, compression, and trochanteric entry nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Mar;26(3):148-54. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821e3f8c. PubMed 21918483 ↗
  • Yoo JH, Kim TY, Chang JD, Kwak YH, Kwon YS. Factors influencing functional outcomes in united intertrochanteric hip fractures: a negative effect of lag screw sliding. Orthopedics. 2014 Dec;37(12):e1101-7. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20141124-58. PubMed 25437085 ↗
  • Gausden EB, Sin D, Levack AE, Wessel LE, Moloney G, Lane JM, Lorich DG. Gait Analysis After Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture: Does Shortening Result in Gait Impairment? J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Nov;32(11):554-558. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001283. PubMed 30239477 ↗
  • Bishop JA, Palanca AA, Bellino MJ, Lowenberg DW. Assessment of compromised fracture healing. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 May;20(5):273-82. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-20-05-273. PubMed 22553099 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Participant data will be kept confidential. Study findings and de-identified study data will be available to other researchers in the form of a published paper.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started May 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2026, 61 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 14, 2021
First posted
Apr 20, 2021
StartActual
May 17, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2026
CompletionEst.
Jan 2027
Last update
Feb 28, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 28, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04851509
Lead sponsor
Fraser Orthopaedic Research Society
Collaborators
DePuy Synthes
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 20, 2021
Start date
May 17, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 28, 2025

Study contacts

Kyrsten Butterfield, BSc
Contact
kyrsten.butterfield@fraserhealth.ca
604-553-3247
Bertrand Perey, MD, FRCSC
principal investigator · Royal Columbian Hospital/Fraser Health Authority
David Cinats, MD
principal investigator · Orthopaedic Surgeon, Fraser Health Authority

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion