CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04839354STArTUpdated Jun 23, 2026Results posted

Sickle Cell Disease Treatment With Arginine Therapy (STArT) Trial

A Phase 3 interventional study of L-Arginine Hydrochloride and Normal saline in Sickle Cell Disease, sponsored by Claudia R. Morris. Completed at 10 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 21 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-23.

Sponsored by Claudia R. Morris · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
271
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Years to 21 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The trial is designed to test intravenous (IV) arginine therapy in children with sickle cell disease (SCD) and vaso-occlusive painful episodes (VOE) to further knowledge on efficacy and safety of this orphan drug.

Read the detailed description

Pain is a clinical hallmark of sickle cell disease (SCD), and a significant problem in emergency medicine. Vaso-occlusive painful episodes (VOE) are common, debilitating, and a medical emergency. VOE are the leading cause of hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, missed school, and are associated with an increased mortality rate. Symptomatic relief with analgesics and hydration are the only currently available treatments, and these have not changed in decades. Episodic periods of severe pain lead to high use of health care resources, with high readmission rates. A 2010 health care utilization report revealed that 20% of patients with SCD experienced ≥3 ED encounters per year. Hospital admission rates for VOE are approximately 60% for children with SCD and VOE. Many children with SCD also live with daily pain to some extent that their families try to control at home through various methods. It is when the pain becomes acutely worse, and unbearable, that they present to the ED in acute distress.

A significant evidence gap exists for best treatment of VOE and novel approaches to SCD/VOE that can be utilized in the ED and hospital ward are critically needed. Interventions that target underlying mechanisms of SCD pain in addition to providing symptomatic relief are worth pursuing.

Vaso-occlusion is believed to be the root cause of sickle cell pain. Nitric oxide (NO) is a free radical and a potent vasodilator that regulates vascular homeostasis and plays a role in SCD vaso-occlusion. NO has properties that can impact every aspect of SCD, and NO dysregulation is a common denominator among varied mechanisms of sickle vasculopathy. NO is produced in the endothelium from its obligate substrate L-arginine, which is converted to citrulline by a family of enzymes, the NO synthases (NOS). Although NOS expression and activity is increased, SCD is characterized by a state of NO resistance, NO inactivation, and impaired NO bioavailability. Under conditions of increased hemolysis, inflammation or oxidative stress, the compensatory upregulation of NO likely becomes overwhelmed and ineffective. Vascular dysfunction is the end result, due to complex and multifactorial interactions.

SCD is an arginine deficiency syndrome. Normal arginine metabolism is impaired for many reasons. Plasma arginine concentration decreases significantly in both adults and children with VOE and is associated with low nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels (NOx). It was observed that lowest arginine levels were found in children requiring admission for VOE, with arginine levels returning to baseline during convalescence in the hospital. Of interest, low plasma arginine concentration alone was a sensitive predictor for admission, while NOx levels were not, suggesting a function for arginine bioavailability in VOE severity that goes beyond NO. Although adults with SCD are arginine deficient at steady-state, children have plasma levels that are similar to normal controls. Alterations in the arginine metabolome differ in children vs. adults. An arginine deficiency develops with age and is influenced by acute events and chronic end organ damage that worsens over time. Children may therefore be more responsive to arginine therapy during an acute pain event compared to adults.

Arginine is a safe nutritional supplement that is FDA approved in parenteral form for growth hormone stimulation testing, with nearly 50 years of safety experience through its common use by endocrinologists. Experience with both oral and parenteral arginine therapy in sickle cell disease is growing. When arginine is given to SCD patients at steady-state, a paradoxical decrease in NOx occurs that is not overcome by higher doses, clearly indicating that arginine is metabolized differently in SCD compared to controls. However when arginine is given during VOE, a robust dose-dependent increase in NOx is observed. This indicates that arginine is also metabolized differently in SCD at steady-state (baseline) compared to times of acute illness including pain. Low dose arginine therapy is likely to be subtherapeutic in SCD; higher levels of plasma arginine are likely needed to overcome multi-factorial effects on global arginine bioavailability, and accelerated arginine consumption during VOE compared to baseline.

The trial is designed as a double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized, phase 3, multi-center trial of IV arginine therapy in children with VOE in SCD to further knowledge on efficacy and safety of the therapy. The exploratory objective is to more fully characterize the arginine metabolome in children with SCD during VOE, and evaluate the effects of arginine therapy on global arginine bioavailability and mitochondrial function together with important clinical outcomes of time to VOE resolution, pain scores, total parenteral opioid use, Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs), and hospital length of stay in children with SCD and VOE.

Participants are randomized to receive 21 doses of IV arginine or a placebo, administered over 7 to 8 days (depending on what time of day the study drug was first administered on Day 1). Participants will be followed for up to 28 days following hospital discharge.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sickle Cell Disease

Keywords

  • Arginine Therapy
  • Pain management
03

In context

Anemia, Sickle Cell

1,103 studies on the registry are indexed under Anemia, Sickle Cell; 235 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 271 is above the median of 40 across 750 interventional studies indexed under Anemia, Sickle Cell.

Browse Anemia, Sickle Cell studies →

Lead sponsor

Claudia R. Morris is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 21 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 3-21 years of age, inclusive
  2. Established diagnosis of sickle cell disease (any genotype)
  3. Pain requiring medical care in an acute care setting (emergency department, hospital ward, day hospital, clinic) not attributable to non-sickle cell causes, treated with parenteral opioids

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Responds to 2 doses of IV opioids sufficiently for outpatient management
  2. Greater than 12 hours from first dose of intravenous opioids to treat current pain in acute care setting
  3. Hemoglobin less than 5 gm/dL or emergent need for red blood cell transfusion for hemodynamically unstable patient
  4. Ketamine use in the emergency department for treatment of VOE
  5. Glutamine within 30 days
  6. New SCD drug use \< 3 months (e.g. Hydroxyurea, voxelotor, crizanlizumab, etc)
  7. Acute mental status or neurological changes
  8. Acute stroke or clinical concern for stroke
  9. Three or more ED visits for sickle cell related pain receiving parenteral opioids in previous 7 days (not including current emergency department visit)
  10. Hospital discharge within previous 7 days
  11. Hypotension requiring clinical intervention; hemodynamic instability; septic shock
  12. Previous randomization in this arginine phase 3 randomized controlled trial
  13. Use of inhaled nitric oxide, sildenafil or arginine within the last month
  14. Non-English speaking or requires a translator for clinical care
  15. Pregnancy
  16. Allergy to arginine
  17. PI/clinical team concerns for compliance/issues that may adversely impact study participation/outcome
  18. Adults 18 years or older who lack medical decision-making capacity to consent
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
271 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    L-Arginine Hydrochloride

    Participants receiving L-arginine hydrochloride in parenteral form. Participants receive up to 21 doses, with participants who are discharged early receiving fewer doses.

    Drug: L-Arginine Hydrochloride

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants receiving normal saline as a placebo for L-arginine hydrochloride for up to 21 doses, with participants who are discharged early receiving fewer doses.

    Other: Normal saline

Interventions

  • DrugL-Arginine Hydrochloride

    A one-time L-arginine hydrochloride loading dose of 200 mg/kg will be administered intravenously (IV) followed by a standard dose of 100 mg/kg given by IV three times per day (TID).

  • OtherNormal saline

    A placebo of normal saline will be administered by IV with a loading dose of 2ml/kg followed by 1ml/kg given by IV three times per day (TID).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time-to-crisis Resolution

    The time-to-crisis resolution is defined as the time in hours from the date and time of the first study drug delivery to time of the last dose of parenteral opioid delivery.

    Time frame: From study drug delivery to last IV opioid treatment (up to 1,724.1 hours)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total Parenteral Opioid Use

    Total parenteral opioid use is assessed as morphine equivalents in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).

    Time frame: From the time of IV placement throughout opioid treatment (up to 1,724.1 hours)

  2. Change in Pain Score

    Pain is assessed using a scale from 0 to 10, where 10 is the highest pain level. Daily highest and lowest pain scores are recorded. The change in score is calculated by subtracting the score at discharge from the score at the time of presentation.

    Time frame: Time of presentation and on the day of discharge (up to 554.8 days)

  3. Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Score

    The PROMIS Pain Interference instrument is an 8-item, self-administered survey that assesses the interference of pain on daily activities. Participants are asked to respond to questions regarding the extent of their pain. Responses range from 1 to 5, where 1 represents "not at all" and 5 represents "very much". Total raw scores are converted to T-scores. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Scores below 50 indicate a lower amount of pain interference compared to the reference population, while scores higher than 50 indicate greater pain interference compared to the reference population. The change in score is calculated by subtracting the score at the time of discharge from the score from within 12 hours of study drug delivery. The change in score is calculated by subtracting the score at discharge from the score within 12 hours of study drug delivery.

    Time frame: Within 12 hours of study drug delivery, and on the day of discharge (up to 554.8 days)

  4. Change in PROMIS Pain Behavior Score

    The PROMIS Pain Behavior instrument is an 8-item, self-administered survey that assesses external manifestations of pain. Participants are asked to respond to questions regarding the extent of their pain. Responses range from 1 to 5, where 1 represents "never" and 5 represents "always". Total raw scores are converted to T-scores. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Scores below 50 indicate a lower amount of pain behavior compared to the reference population, while scores higher than 50 indicate greater pain behavior compared to the reference population. The change in score is calculated by subtracting the score at discharge from the score within 12 hours of study drug delivery.

    Time frame: Within 12 hours of study drug delivery, and on the day of discharge (up to 554.8 days)

  5. Change in PROMIS Fatigue Score

    The PROMIS Fatigue instrument is an 8-item, self-administered survey that assesses fatigue level within the past seven days. Participants are asked to respond to questions regarding fatigue frequency. Responses range from 1 to 5, where 1 represents "never" and five represents "always". Total raw scores are converted to T-scores. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Scores below 50 indicate a lower amount of fatigue compared to the reference population, while scores higher than 50 indicate greater fatigue compared to the reference population. The change in score is calculated by subtracting the score at discharge from the score within 12 hours of study drug delivery.

    Time frame: Within 12 hours of study drug delivery and on the day of discharge (up to 554.8 days)

Other outcomes

  1. Time-to-crisis Resolution By Sex

    The time-to-crisis resolution is defined as the time in hours from the date and time of the first study drug delivery to time of the last dose of parenteral opioid delivery.

    Time frame: From study drug delivery to last IV opioid treatment (up to 1,724.1 hours)

  2. Time-to-crisis Resolution By Race

    The time-to-crisis resolution is defined as the time in hours from the date and time of the first study drug delivery to time of the last dose of parenteral opioid delivery.

    Time frame: From study drug delivery to last IV opioid treatment (up to 1,724.1 hours)

  3. Time-to-crisis Resolution By Ethnicity

    The time-to-crisis resolution is defined as the time in hours from the date and time of the first study drug delivery to time of the last dose of parenteral opioid delivery.

    Time frame: From study drug delivery to last IV opioid treatment (up to 1,724.1 hours)

  4. Medication Quantification Score (MQS)

    Medication Quantification Score (MQS) is a tool to objectively quantify pain. The MQS is a validated score calculated based off of daily doses of pain related medications (including acetaminophen, aspirin, NSAIDs, and antidepressants). The MQS is a single numeric value for a patient's pain medication profile. This number is used to track pain levels through a treatment course.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and on day of discharge (up to 2 months)

  5. Hospital Length of Stay

    Hospital length of stay in days is recorded.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

  6. Pediatric PROMIS Score

    The Pediatric PROMIS assesses five domains of health with in a 35-item instrument. The survey is completed by patients ages 8-17 years of age and parents of children ages 5-17 years of age. The domains included are: pain behavior (8 items), pain interference (8 items), pain intensity (1 item), physical stress experiences (8 items), and fatigue (10 items). Total raw scores are converted to T-scores. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Scores below 50 indicate a lower amount of the concept being measured compared to the reference population, while scores higher than 50 indicate a greater amount of the concept being measured (e.g., more fatigue) compared to the reference population.

    Time frame: Within 12 hours of study drug delivery and on the day of discharge (up to 2 months)

  7. PedsQL SCD Pain and Hurt Scale Score

    The Pain and Hurt scale of the PedsQL SCD module has 9 items asking how much of a problem each item has been during the past month. Responses to items are given on a 5-point Likert scale where 0 = never a problem and 4 = almost always a problem. Items are reversed and transformed to a scale of 0 to 100 then the mean score for the scale is calculated. The total score for the Pain and Hurt scale ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater quality of life and lower SCD symptoms.

    Time frame: Within 12 hours of study drug delivery and on the day of discharge (up to 2 months)

  8. PedsQL SCD Pain Impact Scale Score

    The Pain Impact scale of the PedsQL SCD module has 10 items asking how much of a problem each item has been during the past month. Responses to items are given on a 5-point Likert scale where 0 = never a problem and 4 = almost always a problem. Items are reversed and transformed to a scale of 0 to 100 then the mean score for the scale is calculated. The total score for the Pain Impact scale ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater quality of life and lower SCD symptoms.

    Time frame: Within 12 hours of study drug delivery and on the day of discharge (up to 2 months)

  9. Arginine Bioavailability

    Peak plasma arginine concentration is assessed via pharmacokinetic study.

    Time frame: Pre-Dose, Day 2, after 21 doses (Day 7 or 8) or at discharge (if discharged prior to Dose 21)

  10. Mitochondrial Function

    Mitochondrial respiratory complex activities are measured to estimate mitochondrial function.

    Time frame: Pre-Dose, Day 2, after 21 doses (Day 7 or 8) or at discharge (if discharged prior to Dose 21)

07

Results

Posted Jul 30, 2025

Participant flow

Participants were recruited from ten children's hospitals in the United States. Participant enrollment began June 21, 2021 and all follow-up assessments were completed by July 11, 2024.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneL-Arginine HydrochloridePlacebo
Started129142
Completed129142
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime-to-crisis Resolution

The time-to-crisis resolution is defined as the time in hours from the date and time of the first study drug delivery to time of the last dose of parenteral opioid delivery.

Time frame:
From study drug delivery to last IV opioid treatment (up to 1,724.1 hours)
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Time-to-crisis Resolution
hoursL-Arginine HydrochloridePlacebo
Time-to-crisis Resolution81.5 ± 79.688.6 ± 152.2
SecondaryTotal Parenteral Opioid Use

Total parenteral opioid use is assessed as morphine equivalents in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).

Time frame:
From the time of IV placement throughout opioid treatment (up to 1,724.1 hours)
Reported as:
Mean · milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
Total Parenteral Opioid Use
milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)L-Arginine HydrochloridePlacebo
Total Parenteral Opioid Use2.6 ± 4.51.9 ± 2.8
SecondaryChange in Pain Score

Pain is assessed using a scale from 0 to 10, where 10 is the highest pain level. Daily highest and lowest pain scores are recorded. The change in score is calculated by subtracting the score at discharge from the score at the time of presentation.

Time frame:
Time of presentation and on the day of discharge (up to 554.8 days)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Pain Score
score on a scaleL-Arginine HydrochloridePlacebo
Change in Pain Score3.5 ± 3.33.7 ± 3.3
SecondaryChange in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Score

The PROMIS Pain Interference instrument is an 8-item, self-administered survey that assesses the interference of pain on daily activities. Participants are asked to respond to questions regarding the extent of their pain. Responses range from 1 to 5, where 1 represents "not at all" and 5 represents "very much". Total raw scores are converted to T-scores. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Scores below 50 indicate a lower amount of pain interference compared to the reference population, while scores higher than 50 indicate greater pain interference compared to the reference population. The change in score is calculated by subtracting the score at the time of discharge from the score from within 12 hours of study drug delivery. The change in score is calculated by subtracting the score at discharge from the score within 12 hours of study drug delivery.

Time frame:
Within 12 hours of study drug delivery, and on the day of discharge (up to 554.8 days)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Score
score on a scaleL-Arginine HydrochloridePlacebo
Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Score3.5 ± 3.33.7 ± 3.3
SecondaryChange in PROMIS Pain Behavior Score

The PROMIS Pain Behavior instrument is an 8-item, self-administered survey that assesses external manifestations of pain. Participants are asked to respond to questions regarding the extent of their pain. Responses range from 1 to 5, where 1 represents "never" and 5 represents "always". Total raw scores are converted to T-scores. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Scores below 50 indicate a lower amount of pain behavior compared to the reference population, while scores higher than 50 indicate greater pain behavior compared to the reference population. The change in score is calculated by subtracting the score at discharge from the score within 12 hours of study drug delivery.

Time frame:
Within 12 hours of study drug delivery, and on the day of discharge (up to 554.8 days)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in PROMIS Pain Behavior Score
score on a scaleL-Arginine HydrochloridePlacebo
Change in PROMIS Pain Behavior Score0.8 ± 6.81.0 ± 7.1
SecondaryChange in PROMIS Fatigue Score

The PROMIS Fatigue instrument is an 8-item, self-administered survey that assesses fatigue level within the past seven days. Participants are asked to respond to questions regarding fatigue frequency. Responses range from 1 to 5, where 1 represents "never" and five represents "always". Total raw scores are converted to T-scores. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Scores below 50 indicate a lower amount of fatigue compared to the reference population, while scores higher than 50 indicate greater fatigue compared to the reference population. The change in score is calculated by subtracting the score at discharge from the score within 12 hours of study drug delivery.

Time frame:
Within 12 hours of study drug delivery and on the day of discharge (up to 554.8 days)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in PROMIS Fatigue Score
score on a scaleL-Arginine HydrochloridePlacebo
Change in PROMIS Fatigue Score-0.4 ± 8.10.1 ± 9.1
Other pre-specifiedTime-to-crisis Resolution By Sex

The time-to-crisis resolution is defined as the time in hours from the date and time of the first study drug delivery to time of the last dose of parenteral opioid delivery.

Time frame:
From study drug delivery to last IV opioid treatment (up to 1,724.1 hours)
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Time-to-crisis Resolution By Sex
hoursL-Arginine HydrochloridePlacebo
Female82.23 ± 78.5968.61 ± 59.38
Male80.57 ± 81.49104.15 ± 195.15
Other pre-specifiedTime-to-crisis Resolution By Race

The time-to-crisis resolution is defined as the time in hours from the date and time of the first study drug delivery to time of the last dose of parenteral opioid delivery.

Time frame:
From study drug delivery to last IV opioid treatment (up to 1,724.1 hours)
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Time-to-crisis Resolution By Race
hoursL-Arginine HydrochloridePlacebo
American Indian or Alaska Native126.56 ± 88.90—
Black or African American79.45 ± 79.6290.26 ± 156.31
White109.02 ± 135.1262.76 ± 52.20
More than one race94.30 ± 108.30—
Unknown or not reported86.41 ± 64.9258.96 ± 23.26
Other pre-specifiedTime-to-crisis Resolution By Ethnicity

The time-to-crisis resolution is defined as the time in hours from the date and time of the first study drug delivery to time of the last dose of parenteral opioid delivery.

Time frame:
From study drug delivery to last IV opioid treatment (up to 1,724.1 hours)
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Time-to-crisis Resolution By Ethnicity
hoursL-Arginine HydrochloridePlacebo
Hispanic or Latino90.29 ± 80.9559.86 ± 44.51
Not Hispanic or Latino79.92 ± 79.8890.12 ± 155.73
Unknown or not reported145.30 ± 0—
Other pre-specifiedMedication Quantification Score (MQS)

Medication Quantification Score (MQS) is a tool to objectively quantify pain. The MQS is a validated score calculated based off of daily doses of pain related medications (including acetaminophen, aspirin, NSAIDs, and antidepressants). The MQS is a single numeric value for a patient's pain medication profile. This number is used to track pain levels through a treatment course.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and on day of discharge (up to 2 months)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedHospital Length of Stay

Hospital length of stay in days is recorded.

Time frame:
Up to 6 months

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedPediatric PROMIS Score

The Pediatric PROMIS assesses five domains of health with in a 35-item instrument. The survey is completed by patients ages 8-17 years of age and parents of children ages 5-17 years of age. The domains included are: pain behavior (8 items), pain interference (8 items), pain intensity (1 item), physical stress experiences (8 items), and fatigue (10 items). Total raw scores are converted to T-scores. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Scores below 50 indicate a lower amount of the concept being measured compared to the reference population, while scores higher than 50 indicate a greater amount of the concept being measured (e.g., more fatigue) compared to the reference population.

Time frame:
Within 12 hours of study drug delivery and on the day of discharge (up to 2 months)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedPedsQL SCD Pain and Hurt Scale Score

The Pain and Hurt scale of the PedsQL SCD module has 9 items asking how much of a problem each item has been during the past month. Responses to items are given on a 5-point Likert scale where 0 = never a problem and 4 = almost always a problem. Items are reversed and transformed to a scale of 0 to 100 then the mean score for the scale is calculated. The total score for the Pain and Hurt scale ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater quality of life and lower SCD symptoms.

Time frame:
Within 12 hours of study drug delivery and on the day of discharge (up to 2 months)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedPedsQL SCD Pain Impact Scale Score

The Pain Impact scale of the PedsQL SCD module has 10 items asking how much of a problem each item has been during the past month. Responses to items are given on a 5-point Likert scale where 0 = never a problem and 4 = almost always a problem. Items are reversed and transformed to a scale of 0 to 100 then the mean score for the scale is calculated. The total score for the Pain Impact scale ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater quality of life and lower SCD symptoms.

Time frame:
Within 12 hours of study drug delivery and on the day of discharge (up to 2 months)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedArginine Bioavailability

Peak plasma arginine concentration is assessed via pharmacokinetic study.

Time frame:
Pre-Dose, Day 2, after 21 doses (Day 7 or 8) or at discharge (if discharged prior to Dose 21)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedMitochondrial Function

Mitochondrial respiratory complex activities are measured to estimate mitochondrial function.

Time frame:
Pre-Dose, Day 2, after 21 doses (Day 7 or 8) or at discharge (if discharged prior to Dose 21)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the time of randomization through Day 9 or hospital discharge or emergency department discharge (whichever comes first, up to 9 days). Emergency department revisits and hospital admissions were tracked through 28 days following hospital or emergency discharge and entered as adverse events or serious adverse events (up to 583 days).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
L-Arginine Hydrochloride0/129 (0%)22/129 (17.1%)81/129 (62.8%)
Placebo0/142 (0%)25/142 (17.6%)83/142 (58.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent serious events
EventL-Arginine HydrochloridePlacebo
Sickle cell anaemia with crisisGeneral disorders10/1298/142
PainGeneral disorders6/1299/142
Acute chest syndromeRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/1294/142
AcidosisBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/1290/142
Drug dependenceGeneral disorders1/1290/142
Intensive careGeneral disorders1/1290/142
Intentional overdosePsychiatric disorders1/1290/142
Limb discomfortMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1290/142
PyrexiaGeneral disorders1/1290/142
Respiratory distressRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/1290/142
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventL-Arginine HydrochloridePlacebo
NauseaGeneral disorders23/12923/142
PyrexiaGeneral disorders18/12918/142
HeadacheGeneral disorders15/12914/142
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders10/12914/142
Decreased haemoglobinBlood and lymphatic system disorders12/1295/142
Abdomial painGeneral disorders10/1295/142
Decreased appetiteGeneral disorders10/1295/142
TransfusionBlood and lymphatic system disorders10/1299/142
HypoxemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders7/12911/142
Acute chest syndromeRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders9/12910/142

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)L-Arginine HydrochloridePlaceboTotal
Median14.8 (11.6 to 18.1)15.2 (10.7 to 17.7)15.1 (11.2 to 17.7)
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)L-Arginine HydrochloridePlaceboTotal
Under 12 years old364278
12 to 21 years old93100193
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)L-Arginine HydrochloridePlaceboTotal
Female7062132
Male5980139
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)L-Arginine HydrochloridePlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino13720
Not Hispanic or Latino115135250
Unknown or Not Reported101
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)L-Arginine HydrochloridePlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native202
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American115134249
White358
More than one race202
Unknown or Not Reported7310
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)L-Arginine HydrochloridePlaceboTotal
United States129142271
08

Study locations

10 sites
  • Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    Los Angeles, California 90027, United States
  • UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital
    San Francisco, California 94158, United States
  • Children's National Medical Center
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20010, United States
  • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Hughes Spalding
    Atlanta, Georgia 03322, United States
  • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Washington University/St. Louis Children's Hospital
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital
    Columbus, Ohio 43205, United States
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Texas Children's Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Medical College of Wisconsin/Wisconsin Children's Hospital
    Wauwatosa, Wisconsin 53226, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Korman R, Hatabah D, Brown LA, Harris F, Wilkinson H, Rees CA, Bakshi N, Archer DR, Dampier C, Morris CR. Impact of arginine therapy on kyotorphin in children with sickle cell disease and vaso-occlusive pain. Blood Adv. 2024 Jun 25;8(12):3267-3271. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012209. PubMed 38527291 ↗
  • Onalo R, Cilliers A, Cooper P, Morris CR. Arginine Therapy and Cardiopulmonary Hemodynamics in Hospitalized Children with Sickle Cell Anemia: A Prospective, Double-blinded, Randomized Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Jul 1;206(1):70-80. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202108-1930OC. PubMed 35426778 ↗
  • Reyes LZ, Figueroa J, Leake D, Khemani K, Kumari P, Bakshi N, Lane PA, Dampier C, Morris CR. Safety of intravenous arginine therapy in children with sickle cell disease hospitalized for vaso-occlusive pain: A randomized placebo-controlled trial in progress. Am J Hematol. 2022 Jan 1;97(1):E21-E24. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26396. Epub 2021 Nov 12. No abstract available. PubMed 34724240 ↗
  • Morris CR, Brown LAS, Reynolds M, Dampier CD, Lane PA, Watt A, Kumari P, Harris F, Manoranjithan S, Mendis RD, Figueroa J, Shiva S. Impact of arginine therapy on mitochondrial function in children with sickle cell disease during vaso-occlusive pain. Blood. 2020 Sep 17;136(12):1402-1406. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019003672. PubMed 32384147 ↗
  • Onalo R, Cooper P, Cilliers A, Vorster BC, Uche NA, Oluseyi OO, Onalo VD, Zubairu Y, Ayodele-Kehinde AU, Damilare OM, Figueroa J, Morris CR. Randomized control trial of oral arginine therapy for children with sickle cell anemia hospitalized for pain in Nigeria. Am J Hematol. 2021 Jan;96(1):89-97. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26028. Epub 2020 Nov 20. PubMed 33075179 ↗
  • Morris CR, Kato GJ, Poljakovic M, Wang X, Blackwelder WC, Sachdev V, Hazen SL, Vichinsky EP, Morris SM Jr, Gladwin MT. Dysregulated arginine metabolism, hemolysis-associated pulmonary hypertension, and mortality in sickle cell disease. JAMA. 2005 Jul 6;294(1):81-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.1.81. PubMed 15998894 ↗
  • Morris CR, Kuypers FA, Lavrisha L, Ansari M, Sweeters N, Stewart M, Gildengorin G, Neumayr L, Vichinsky EP. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of arginine therapy for the treatment of children with sickle cell disease hospitalized with vaso-occlusive pain episodes. Haematologica. 2013 Sep;98(9):1375-82. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.086637. Epub 2013 May 3. PubMed 23645695 ↗
  • Sadeghi A, Taherifard E, Dehdari Ebrahimi N, Rafiei E, Hadianfard F, Taherifard E. Effects of l-arginine supplementation in patients with sickle cell disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Health Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 11;6(4):e1167. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1167. eCollection 2023 Apr. PubMed 37064309 ↗
  • Onalo R, Cilliers A, Cooper P. Impact of oral L-arginine supplementation on blood pressure dynamics in children with severe sickle cell vaso-occlusive crisis. Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Feb 15;11(1):136-147. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33815929 ↗
  • Morris CR, Morris SM Jr, Hagar W, Van Warmerdam J, Claster S, Kepka-Lenhart D, Machado L, Kuypers FA, Vichinsky EP. Arginine therapy: a new treatment for pulmonary hypertension in sickle cell disease? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Jul 1;168(1):63-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200208-967OC. Epub 2003 Mar 5. PubMed 12626350 ↗
  • Rees CA, Brousseau DC, Cohen DM, Villella A, Dampier C, Brown K, Campbell A, Chumpitazi CE, Airewele G, Chang T, Denton C, Ellison A, Thompson A, Ahmad F, Bakshi N, Coleman KD, Leibovich S, Leake D, Hatabah D, Wilkinson H, Robinson M, Casper TC, Vichinsky E, Morris CR; SCD Arginine Study Group and PECARN. Sickle Cell Disease Treatment with Arginine Therapy (STArT): study protocol for a phase 3 randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Aug 17;24(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07538-z. PubMed 37587492 ↗
  • Rees CA, Hatabah D, Korman R, Ahmad F, Airewele G, Akinsola B, Alzraikat N, Bakshi N, Brousseau DC, Brown K, Campbell AD, Casper TC, Chang TP, Chumpitazi CE, Cohen D, Coleman KD, Cruz AT, Denton C, Ellison A, Fields ME, Harding M, Leibovich S, Remiker A, Singh NV, Thompson AA, Vichinsky E, Villella A, Wynn B, Dampier C, Morris CR; Pediatric Emergency Care Research Network (PECARN). Hospital Variations in Time-To-Crisis-Resolution Among Children and Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease. Am J Hematol. 2026 Jan;101(1):206-212. doi: 10.1002/ajh.70129. Epub 2025 Nov 5. PubMed 41190764 ↗
  • Bolarinwa AB, Oduwole O, Okebe J, Ogbenna AA, Otokiti OE, Olatinwo AT. Antioxidant supplementation for sickle cell disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 22;5(5):CD013590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013590.pub2. PubMed 38775255 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 1, 2020
  • Informed consent form · Mar 21, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data that underlie the results published for this study will be made available for sharing with other researchers.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04839354
Lead sponsor
Claudia R. Morris
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Responsible party
Claudia R. Morris (Professor, Emory University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 9, 2021
Start date
Jun 21, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 11, 2024
Completion
Jul 11, 2024
Results posted
Jul 30, 2025
Last update
Jun 23, 2026

Study contacts

Claudia Morris, MD
principal investigator · Emory University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion