CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04827992Updated Jun 24, 2026Results posted

Evaluation of Medical Cannabis and Prescription Opioid Taper Support for Reduction of Pain and Opioid Dose in Patients With Chronic Non-Cancer Pain

An interventional study of Cannabis and Prescription Opioid Taper Support (POTS) in Opioid Use, Pain and Marijuana Use, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-24.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
87
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will use a randomized controlled design to test whether medical marijuana use by adults on high-dose chronic opioid therapy (COT) for chronic non-cancer pain is associated with reduced opioid dose and improved pain intensity and interference when added to a 24-week behavioral intervention (POTS).

Read the detailed description

This trial is a randomized, six-month study of cannabis (CB) on opioid use that will: (1) evaluate whether adults with chronic, non-cancer pain on COT assigned to CB, compared with those assigned to a waitlist control condition (WL), have greater reduction in opioid dose and/or pain intensity and interference, (2) assess whether participants assigned to CB, compared with those assigned to WL, have improved quality of life, depression, and anxiety; and reduced self-reported opioid dose, (3) evaluate whether those assigned to CB develop symptoms of CUD and have a reduced number of OUD symptoms over the 24-week intervention, as well as at the 12-month time point.

Participants will be randomly assigned to either an active CB arm (n = 60), or to a waitlist control arm (WL) (n = 60). Participants will be assessed at baseline, every 4 weeks for 6 months, and at a 12-month follow-up for opioid use, development of CUD, development or resolution of OUD, and neurocognitive performance. Urine collected will be assessed with quantitative assays.

02

Conditions studied

  • Opioid Use
  • Pain
  • Marijuana Use

Keywords

  • Opioid
  • Marijuana
  • Pain
  • neurocognition
  • Dependence
  • Behavioral treatment
03

In context

Pain

2,219 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 917 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 87 is above the median of 70 across 1,904 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,536 studies on the registry; 446 are open to participants now.

Of its 214 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 161 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Men and women aged 18-75, inclusive.
  2. Endorsing > 6 months of chronic, non-cancer pain.
  3. On stable prescription opioid doses of 25 MME or greater for >90 days, verified by the Prescription Monitoring Program.
  4. Either no prior use or current light cannabis use (weekly or less in the past 12 months).
  5. Plans to use medical cannabis for pain to control pain and/or reduce opioid dose.
  6. Competent and willing to provide written informed consent in English.
  7. Potential participants of childbearing potential must not be pregnant at enrollment. They will be asked to self-report pregnancy status and the start date of their most recent menstrual period and agree to use effective contraception: abstinence; hormonal contraception; intra-uterine device, sterilization; or double barrier contraception, during the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current cannabis use (including inhaled or ingested CBD products) of greater than weekly on average in the past 12 months, assessed via self-report (no more than 10 times in the past 90 days).
  2. Current cannabis use disorder; current moderate to severe substance use disorder for any substance by structured interview, EXCEPT nicotine and opioids (OUD).
  3. Current uncontrolled major medical illness, such as cancer, symptomatic hypothyroidism/hyperthyroidism or severe respiratory compromise.
  4. Use of non-prescribed opioids, by self-report.
  5. Dose change or initiation of medications with significant analgesic effects (e.g., tricyclic antidepressants, SSRIs, gabapentin, NSAIDs) in the past 4 weeks.
  6. Concomitant medications will be discussed at each study visit, and any medications that may interact with cannabinoids (e.g., warfarin) will be discussed with a study clinician prior to enrollment or continued participation.
  7. Actively suicidal and/or suicide attempt or psychiatric hospitalization in past year, or current suicidal ideation with specific plan or intent.
  8. History of intellectual disability (e.g., Down's syndrome) or other severe developmental disorder or IQ \< 70.
  9. Current diagnosis of delirium, dementia, amnestic, or other cognitive disorder; current diagnosis of bipolar II disorder; lifetime diagnosis of bipolar I disorder, schizophrenia spectrum, or other psychotic disorder.
  10. Surgery within the past month or planned during the next 6 months.
  11. Pregnant or trying to get pregnant or breastfeeding.
  12. In the opinion of the investigator or study physicians, not able to complete study procedures or safely participate in this study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
87 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cannabis (CB)

    Participants assigned to the cannabis group were allowed to initiate cannabis use immediately. Participants selected cannabis product type(s), dose(s), and frequency of use from commercial sources. All study participants were offered weekly group Prescription Opioid Taper Support (POTS), a behavioral intervention promoting pain self-management and gradual, voluntary opioid tapering, for 24 weeks.

    Drug: Cannabis · Behavioral: Prescription Opioid Taper Support (POTS)

  • Active comparator
    Waitlist (WL)

    Participants assigned to the waitlist control group agreed to delay cannabis use for 24 weeks. All study participants were offered weekly group Prescription Opioid Taper Support (POTS), a behavioral intervention promoting pain self-management and gradual, voluntary opioid tapering, for 24 weeks.

    Behavioral: Prescription Opioid Taper Support (POTS)

Interventions

  • DrugCannabis

    Participants assigned to the cannabis group were allowed to initiate cannabis use immediately. Participants selected cannabis product type(s), dose(s), and frequency of use from commercial sources.

  • BehavioralPrescription Opioid Taper Support (POTS)

    All participants were offered weekly group Prescription Opioid Taper Support (POTS) sessions for 24 weeks. POTS is behavioral intervention promoting pain self-management and gradual, voluntary opioid tapering. This intervention was adapted for this trial to include group-based delivery. Sessions are one hour delivered via teleconference and incorporated cognitive behavioral, mindfulness-based, and motivational interviewing strategies.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Difference in Prescription Monitoring Program Verified Opioid Dose at Baseline and Week 24

    Median opioid dose verified by the Prescription Monitoring Program, in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per day, over monthly interval preceding study visit.

    Time frame: Week 24

  2. Mean Difference in Pain, Enjoyment, General Activity (PEG) Scale Summed Score Over Post-baseline to Week 24 Interval

    The Pain, Enjoyment, General Activity (PEG) scale assesses pain intensity and interference. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating greater pain intensity and interference. PEG score was assessed daily through week 24 via daily self-report survey. From model fit to all post-baseline timepoints, adjusted marginal means at week 24 were computed as a summary measure.

    Time frame: Every post-baseline day until week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Difference in Self-Reported Opioid Dose Over Post-baseline to Week 24 Interval

    Self-reported opioid dose in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per day. Self-reported opioid dose was assessed daily through week 24 via daily self-report survey. From model fit to all post-baseline timepoints, adjusted marginal means at week 24 were computed as a summary measure.

    Time frame: Every post-baseline day until week 24

  2. Mean Difference in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form Summed Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

    Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form assesses changes in quality of life measures. The scale ranges from 14 - 70, with a lower score indicating greater dissatisfaction with life. Q-LES-SF score was assessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. From model fit to all post-baseline timepoints, adjusted marginal means at week 24 were computed as a summary measure.

    Time frame: Week 4, week 8, week 12, week 16, week 20, week 24

  3. Mean Difference in PROMIS-29 Depression Subscale Summed Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

    The 8-item depression subscale of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 will be used to assess depression symptoms. The scale uses a t-score metric (mean of 50, SD of 10). Higher scores indicate worse depression. PROMIS-29 depression subscale score was assessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. From model fit to all post-baseline timepoints, adjusted marginal means at week 24 were computed as a summary measure.

    Time frame: Week 4, week 8, week 12, week 16, week 20, week 24

  4. Mean Difference in PROMIS-29 Anxiety Subscale Summed Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

    The 7-item anxiety subscale of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 will be used to assess anxiety symptoms. The scale uses a t-score metric (mean of 50, SD of 10). Higher scores indicate worse anxiety. PROMIS-29 anxiety subscale score was assessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. From model fit to all post-baseline timepoints, adjusted marginal means at week 24 were computed as a summary measure.

    Time frame: Week 4, week 8, week 12, week 16, week 20, week 24

  5. Mean Difference in Opioid Use Disorder Symptoms at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

    Number of opioid use disorder (OUD) symptoms present was assessed via the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual- 5th Edition (DSM-V) checklist. As all participants were taking prescribed opioids under the supervision of a clinician, symptom counts exclude tolerance and withdrawal. Number of symptoms range from 0 to 9. A score of 2 or more indicates a current opioid use disorder diagnosis. Number of opioid use disorder symptoms were assessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. From model fit to all post-baseline timepoints, adjusted marginal means at week 24 were computed as a summary measure.

    Time frame: Week 4, week 8, week 12, week 16, week 20, week 24

  6. Mean Difference in Cannabis Use Disorder Symptoms at Weeks 12 and 24

    Number of cannabis use disorder (CUD) symptoms present was assessed via the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual- 5th Edition (DSM-V) checklist. Number of symptoms range from 0 to 11. A score of 2 or more indicates a current cannabis use disorder diagnosis. The number of cannabis use disorder symptoms were assessed at weeks 12 and 24. From model fit to all post-baseline timepoints, adjusted marginal means at week 24 were computed as a summary measure.

    Time frame: Week 12, Week 24

07

Results

Posted Jun 24, 2026
Limitations and caveats
Limitations include the reliance on self-reported cannabis use, variability in cannabis products, and potential underpowering to detect small effect sizes.

Participant flow

Recruitment took place at three academic medical centers in the Northeastern United States (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, MA; Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCannabis (CB)Waitlist (WL)
Started4245
Completed4245
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Difference in Prescription Monitoring Program Verified Opioid Dose at Baseline and Week 24

Median opioid dose verified by the Prescription Monitoring Program, in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per day, over monthly interval preceding study visit.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · MME/day
Mean Difference in Prescription Monitoring Program Verified Opioid Dose at Baseline and Week 24
MME/dayCannabis (CB)Waitlist (WL)
Mean Difference in Prescription Monitoring Program Verified Opioid Dose at Baseline and Week 24113.3 (84.7 to 141.9)97.9 (70.2 to 125.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Cannabis (CB) vs Waitlist (WL) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.45 · Median difference (final values): 15.4 · 95% CI -24.4 to 55.3Co-primary outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed effects models, specifying a main effect for treatment group and adjusting for baseline.
PrimaryMean Difference in Pain, Enjoyment, General Activity (PEG) Scale Summed Score Over Post-baseline to Week 24 Interval

The Pain, Enjoyment, General Activity (PEG) scale assesses pain intensity and interference. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating greater pain intensity and interference. PEG score was assessed daily through week 24 via daily self-report survey. From model fit to all post-baseline timepoints, adjusted marginal means at week 24 were computed as a summary measure.

Time frame:
Every post-baseline day until week 24
Reported as:
Mean · score
Mean Difference in Pain, Enjoyment, General Activity (PEG) Scale Summed Score Over Post-baseline to Week 24 Interval
scoreCannabis (CB)Waitlist (WL)
Mean Difference in Pain, Enjoyment, General Activity (PEG) Scale Summed Score Over Post-baseline to Week 24 Interval5.35 (4.98 to 5.73)5.30 (4.89 to 5.72)
Statistical analysis
  • Cannabis (CB) vs Waitlist (WL) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.85 · Median difference (net): 0.05 · 95% CI -0.46 to 0.57Co-primary outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed effects models, specifying a main effect for treatment group and adjusting for baseline.
SecondaryMean Difference in Self-Reported Opioid Dose Over Post-baseline to Week 24 Interval

Self-reported opioid dose in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per day. Self-reported opioid dose was assessed daily through week 24 via daily self-report survey. From model fit to all post-baseline timepoints, adjusted marginal means at week 24 were computed as a summary measure.

Time frame:
Every post-baseline day until week 24
Reported as:
Mean · MME/day
Mean Difference in Self-Reported Opioid Dose Over Post-baseline to Week 24 Interval
MME/dayCannabis (CB)Waitlist (WL)
Mean Difference in Self-Reported Opioid Dose Over Post-baseline to Week 24 Interval84.0 (68.4 to 99.6)89.6 (71.1 to 108.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Cannabis (CB) vs Waitlist (WL) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.75 · Mean difference (net): -5.6 · 95% CI -29.0 to 17.9A longitudinal linear mixed effects model was fit with analogous specification as the primary PEG score analysis and additional baseline adjustment.
SecondaryMean Difference in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form Summed Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form assesses changes in quality of life measures. The scale ranges from 14 - 70, with a lower score indicating greater dissatisfaction with life. Q-LES-SF score was assessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. From model fit to all post-baseline timepoints, adjusted marginal means at week 24 were computed as a summary measure.

Time frame:
Week 4, week 8, week 12, week 16, week 20, week 24
Reported as:
Mean · Raw score
Mean Difference in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form Summed Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Raw scoreCannabis (CB)Waitlist (WL)
Mean Difference in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form Summed Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 2445.5 (42.9 to 48.0)47.3 (44.6 to 49.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Cannabis (CB) vs Waitlist (WL) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.49 · Mean difference (net): -1.8 · 95% CI -4.9 to 1.3A longitudinal linear mixed effects model was fit with analogous specification as the primary PEG score analysis and additional baseline adjustment.
SecondaryMean Difference in PROMIS-29 Depression Subscale Summed Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

The 8-item depression subscale of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 will be used to assess depression symptoms. The scale uses a t-score metric (mean of 50, SD of 10). Higher scores indicate worse depression. PROMIS-29 depression subscale score was assessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. From model fit to all post-baseline timepoints, adjusted marginal means at week 24 were computed as a summary measure.

Time frame:
Week 4, week 8, week 12, week 16, week 20, week 24
Reported as:
Mean · score
Mean Difference in PROMIS-29 Depression Subscale Summed Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
scoreCannabis (CB)Waitlist (WL)
Mean Difference in PROMIS-29 Depression Subscale Summed Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 2452.7 (50.8 to 54.5)52.4 (50.5 to 54.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Cannabis (CB) vs Waitlist (WL) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.79 · Mean difference (net): 0.3 · 95% CI -2.0 to 2.6A longitudinal linear mixed effects model was fit with analogous specification as the primary PEG score analysis and additional baseline adjustment.
SecondaryMean Difference in PROMIS-29 Anxiety Subscale Summed Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

The 7-item anxiety subscale of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 will be used to assess anxiety symptoms. The scale uses a t-score metric (mean of 50, SD of 10). Higher scores indicate worse anxiety. PROMIS-29 anxiety subscale score was assessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. From model fit to all post-baseline timepoints, adjusted marginal means at week 24 were computed as a summary measure.

Time frame:
Week 4, week 8, week 12, week 16, week 20, week 24
Reported as:
Mean · score
Mean Difference in PROMIS-29 Anxiety Subscale Summed Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
scoreCannabis (CB)Waitlist (WL)
Mean Difference in PROMIS-29 Anxiety Subscale Summed Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 2453.2 (51.2 to 55.3)50.1 (48.0 to 52.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Cannabis (CB) vs Waitlist (WL) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.047 · Mean difference (net): 3.2 · 95% CI 0.7 to 5.7A longitudinal linear mixed effects model was fit with analogous specification as the primary PEG score analysis and additional baseline adjustment.
SecondaryMean Difference in Opioid Use Disorder Symptoms at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

Number of opioid use disorder (OUD) symptoms present was assessed via the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual- 5th Edition (DSM-V) checklist. As all participants were taking prescribed opioids under the supervision of a clinician, symptom counts exclude tolerance and withdrawal. Number of symptoms range from 0 to 9. A score of 2 or more indicates a current opioid use disorder diagnosis. Number of opioid use disorder symptoms were assessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. From model fit to all post-baseline timepoints, adjusted marginal means at week 24 were computed as a summary measure.

Time frame:
Week 4, week 8, week 12, week 16, week 20, week 24
Reported as:
Mean · Number of symptoms
Mean Difference in Opioid Use Disorder Symptoms at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Number of symptomsCannabis (CB)Waitlist (WL)
Mean Difference in Opioid Use Disorder Symptoms at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 241.14 (0.82 to 1.47)1.27 (0.93 to 1.61)
Statistical analysis
  • Cannabis (CB) vs Waitlist (WL) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.69 · Mean difference (net): -0.13 · 95% CI -0.51 to 0.25A longitudinal linear mixed effects model was fit with analogous specification as the primary PEG score analysis and additional baseline adjustment.
SecondaryMean Difference in Cannabis Use Disorder Symptoms at Weeks 12 and 24

Number of cannabis use disorder (CUD) symptoms present was assessed via the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual- 5th Edition (DSM-V) checklist. Number of symptoms range from 0 to 11. A score of 2 or more indicates a current cannabis use disorder diagnosis. The number of cannabis use disorder symptoms were assessed at weeks 12 and 24. From model fit to all post-baseline timepoints, adjusted marginal means at week 24 were computed as a summary measure.

Time frame:
Week 12, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · Number of symptoms
Mean Difference in Cannabis Use Disorder Symptoms at Weeks 12 and 24
Number of symptomsCannabis (CB)Waitlist (WL)
Mean Difference in Cannabis Use Disorder Symptoms at Weeks 12 and 240.54 (0.36 to 0.72)0.03 (-0.13 to 0.19)
Statistical analysis
  • Cannabis (CB) vs Waitlist (WL) · Regression, Linear · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): 0.51 · 95% CI 0.30 to 0.72A longitudinal linear mixed effects model was fit with analogous specification as the primary PEG score analysis and additional baseline adjustment.

Adverse events

Collected over From enrollment until end of intervention, up to 24 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cannabis (CB)0/42 (0%)7/42 (16.7%)36/42 (85.7%)
Waitlist (WL)0/45 (0%)5/45 (11.1%)35/45 (77.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent serious events
EventCannabis (CB)Waitlist (WL)
Diabetic ketoacidosisMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/420/45
Dog biteInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/420/45
HospitalizationsSurgical and medical procedures1/421/45
HypotensionVascular disorders1/420/45
Opiate withdrawal symptomsGeneral disorders1/420/45
Osteomyelitis (acute)Infections and infestations1/420/45
Rib fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/420/45
Transient ischemic attackNervous system disorders1/420/45
Intrathecal Pump InsertionSurgical and medical procedures0/421/45
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders0/421/45
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 25
Most frequent other events
EventCannabis (CB)Waitlist (WL)
Pain and discomfortGeneral disorders13/4216/45
Anxiety symptomsPsychiatric disorders12/424/45
Non-site specific injuriesInjury, poisoning and procedural complications11/424/45
Depressive disordersPsychiatric disorders10/4210/45
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue pain and discomfortMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders8/429/45
Analgesia supportive careSurgical and medical procedures6/425/45
General signs and symptomsGeneral disorders6/425/45
Withdrawal and rebound effectsGeneral disorders6/424/45
Dental and gingival therapeutic proceduresSurgical and medical procedures0/426/45
Emotional and mood disturbancesPsychiatric disorders5/420/45

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Cannabis (CB)Waitlist (WL)Total
Mean56.4 ± 10.657.6 ± 9.957.1 ± 10.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cannabis (CB)Waitlist (WL)Total
Female272754
Male151833
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cannabis (CB)Waitlist (WL)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American235
White393675
More than one race011
Unknown or Not Reported145
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cannabis (CB)Waitlist (WL)Total
Hispanic or Latino336
Not Hispanic or Latino394180
Unknown or Not Reported011
Prescription Monitoring Program-verified daily opioid dose
Prescription Monitoring Program-verified daily opioid dose(Morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/day)Cannabis (CB)Waitlist (WL)Total
Mean96.8 ± 11399.7 ± 120.698.3 ± 116
Opioid use disorder (OUD) symptoms
Opioid use disorder (OUD) symptoms(Number of symptoms)Cannabis (CB)Waitlist (WL)Total
Mean1.6 ± 1.51.5 ± 1.41.5 ± 1.4
Pain, Enjoyment, and General Activity (PEG) Scale Score
Pain, Enjoyment, and General Activity (PEG) Scale Score(Score)Cannabis (CB)Waitlist (WL)Total
Mean5.68 ± 1.825.66 ± 1.955.67 ± 1.87
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Maine Medical Center
    Portland, Maine 04102, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114-2523, United States
  • Cambridge Health Alliance
    Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Jashinski J, Grossman E, Quaye A, Cather C, Potter K, Schoenfeld DA, Evins AE, Gilman JM. Randomised, pragmatic, waitlist controlled trial of cannabis added to prescription opioid support on opioid dose reduction and pain in adults with chronic non-cancer pain: study protocol. BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 9;12(6):e064457. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064457. PubMed 35680252 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Nov 3, 2025
  • Informed consent form · Sep 10, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All data, code, and materials used in the analyses can be provided by Jodi Gilman and Massachusetts General Hospital pending scientific review and a completed data use agreement/material transfer agreement beginning one year after publication of the results. Requests for all materials should be submitted to Jodi Gilman at jgilman1@mgh.harvard.edu.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Analytic code

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04827992
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Collaborators
Cambridge Health Alliance, MaineHealth, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Responsible party
Jodi Gilman (Associate Professor, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 1, 2021
Start date
Aug 23, 2021
Primary completion
May 1, 2025
Completion
Oct 31, 2025
Results posted
Jun 24, 2026
Last update
Jun 24, 2026

Study contacts

Jodi Gilman, PhD
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital
A. Eden Evins, MD
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion