ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04823884Updated Nov 7, 2023

Short-term Results After Minimally Invasive Chevron Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus Correction

An interventional study of open distal chevron osteotomy and minimally invasive distal chevron osteotomy in Hallux Valgus and Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, sponsored by Dr.Gerhard Kaufmann. Completed at 1 site in Austria. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-07.

Sponsored by Dr.Gerhard Kaufmann · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

By means of clinical satisfaction and clinical scores comparison of an open to a minimally invasive distal chevron osteotomy for correction of a hallux valgus deformity is performed.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to evaluate shortterm clinical outcome after a minimally invasive chevron osteotomy technique for correction of hallux valgus deformity in comparison to the open distal chevron technique. Patients undergoing a distal chevron osteotomy for correction of a hallux valgus deformity are assigned to one of the two groups. Survey is taken preoperatively, after 2, 4, 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. Assessment of the clinical outcome measures in terms of the range of motion (ROM), Visual Analogue Scores (VAS) of pain, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) forefoot Score and a patient satisfaction score and a Life Quality score (SF 12) as well as the evaluation of the Charlson Comorbidity score is performed. It is hypothesized, that clinical outcome with the minimally invasive distal chevron osteotomy is superior to the open technique.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hallux Valgus
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hallux Valgus

157 studies on the registry are indexed under Hallux Valgus; 36 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 58 across 119 interventional studies indexed under Hallux Valgus.

Browse Hallux Valgus studies →

Lead sponsor

Dr.Gerhard Kaufmann is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • all patients undergoing hallux valgus correction by means of a distal chevron osteotomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • surgery on the lesser rays of the same foot
  • mental illness with impossibility to follow the postoperative protocol
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    open distal chevron osteotomy

    Hallux valgus correction is provided by using the traditional open distal v-shaped chevron osteotomy.

    Procedure: open distal chevron osteotomy

  • Active comparator
    minimally invasive distal chevron osteotomy

    Hallux valgus correction is provided by using a minimally invasive distal v-shaped chevron osteotomy.

    Procedure: minimally invasive distal chevron osteotomy

Interventions

  • Procedureopen distal chevron osteotomy

    Through a 4-cm-long dorsomedial skin incision the V-shaped osteotomy with the apex 1-2 mm superior to the center of the metatarsal head is performed. The angle of the chevron is 60° to 90°. The direction of the osteotomy is angled toward the center of the third metatarsal head. After shifting the metatarsal head laterally, fixation is achieved by usage of one cannulated screw (3.0 mm or 2.5mm). Prominent bone ridges are resected with a saw. A distal soft tissue procedure is performed in every case through the same skin incision. The adductor hallucis tendon is detached from its insertion at the phalangeal bone and from the lateral border of the fibular sesamoid. The transverse intermetatarsal ligament is released and a T-shaped capsulotomy is performed to allow reposition of the sesamoids. Sesamoid position is controlled by sight. After closing of the medial capsula skin is closed with nylon sutures.

    Also known as: austin osteotomy

  • Procedureminimally invasive distal chevron osteotomy

    The osteotomy is performed percutaneously through a dorsomedial incision of 3-5 mm. An electric motor-driven machine used for the osteotomy. To prevent overheating the reamer is frequently rinsed with sterile saline. The medial eminence is excised and the V-shaped osteotomy is performed. The apex of the osteotomy is identified by fluoroscopy and centered 1-2 mm superior to the center of the metatarsal head. The angle of the osteotomy amounts to 60-90 degrees as well. Bone debris is washed out with sterile saline. A lateral soft-tissue release is undertaken through a separate lateral incision of 3-5 mm. The distal fragment is shifted laterally and fixed with a canulated screw of 3.5mm. Residual bone ridges are reamed. Position of the metatarsal head and the K-wire is controlled by fluoroscopy. The skin is closed with a nylon sutures.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical outcome after correction of hallux valgus deformity within the first three months after surgery: a comparison of the minimally invasive versus the open distal chevron osteotomy technique .

    Clinical outcome is assessed for both techniques with a clinical score to specific time points. AOFAS Hallux etmatarsophalangeal -interphalangeal Scale \[maximum 100 points, minimum 0 points - higher scores mean better outcome\]

    Time frame: Change of the scores from preoperative to postoperative at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 and 12 weeks is measured

  2. Clinical outcome after correction of hallux valgus deformity within the first three months after surgery: a comparison of the minimally invasive versus the open distal chevron osteotomy technique .

    Clinical outcome is assessed for both techniques with a clinical score to specific time points. Maryland Foot Score \[maximum 100 points, minimum 0 points - higher scores mean better outcome\]

    Time frame: Change of the scores from preoperative to postoperative at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 and 12 weeks is measured

  3. Clinical outcome after correction of hallux valgus deformity within the first three months after surgery: a comparison of the minimally invasive versus the open distal chevron osteotomy technique .

    Clinical outcome is assessed for both techniques with clinical a score to specific time points. JSSF Hallux metatarsophalangeal -interphalangeal Scale \[maximum 100 points, minimum 0 points - higher scores means better outcome\]

    Time frame: Change of the score from preoperative to postoperative at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 and 12 weeks is measured

  4. Clinical outcome after correction of hallux valgus deformity within the first three months after surgery: a comparison of the minimally invasive versus the open distal chevron osteotomy technique .

    Clinical general situation is assessed for both techniques to specific time points by using the SF12 Life Quality Score \[maximum 47 points, minimum 0 points - higher scores mean better clinical situation\]

    Time frame: Change of the SF 12 score from preoperative to postoperative at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 and 12 weeks is measured

  5. Clinical outcome after correction of hallux valgus deformity within the first three months after surgery: a comparison of the minimally invasive versus the open distal chevron osteotomy technique .

    Clinical outcome and therefore the pain level is assessed for both techniques to specific time points by using the Visual Analogue Score for pain \[0-10\])

    Time frame: Change of the VAS from preoperative to postoperative at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 and 12 weeks is measured

  6. Clinical outcome after correction of hallux valgus deformity within the first three months after surgery: a comparison of the minimally invasive versus the open distal chevron osteotomy technique .

    Clinical outcome is assessed for both techniques to specific time points by assessing the Range of motion (normal range 70-0-45 degrees)

    Time frame: Change of the range of motion and therefore the clinical outcome from preoperative to postoperative at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 and 12 weeks is measured

  7. Clinical outcome after correction of hallux valgus deformity within the first three months after surgery: a comparison of the minimally invasive versus the open distal chevron osteotomy technique .

    Clinical outcome and therefore changes of the foot circumference at the level of surgery is assessed for both techniques to specific time points by measuring the foot circumference at the level of surgery (measurement in centimeter).

    Time frame: Change of the foot circumference at the level of surgery from preoperative to postoperative at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 and 12 weeks is measured

Other outcomes

  1. Clinical outcome after correction of hallux valgus deformity within the first three months after surgery: a comparison of the minimally invasive versus the open distal chevron osteotomy technique .

    Clinical fitness of our cohort is assessed by means of the Charlson Comorbidity Index \[maximum 37 points, minimum 0 points - lower scores mean clinical situation\] preoperatively.

    Time frame: This score is used to compare the clinical fitness of both cohorts preoperatively.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Priv-Doz. Dr. Gerhard Kaufmann
    Innsbruck, Tyrol 6020, Austria
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2021 to primary completion in Jun 2023, 26 months.

Of 51 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hallux Valgus, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 55. This study's 26 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 56 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 55.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 14, 2021
First posted
Apr 1, 2021
StartActual
Apr 1, 2021
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2023
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2023
Last update
Nov 7, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 7, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04823884
Lead sponsor
Dr.Gerhard Kaufmann
Responsible party
Dr.Gerhard Kaufmann (Gerhard Kaufmann MD, Clinical Professor, OFZ Innsbruck) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 1, 2021
Start date
Apr 1, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2023
Completion
Jun 30, 2023
Last update
Nov 7, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion