CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04797429DiabPeerSUpdated May 21, 2025

Improving Glycaemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Through Peer Support Instant Messaging

An interventional study of Peer Support Intervention via Instant Messaging Service Tool (IMS-Tool) and antidiabetic therapy according to the current guidelines in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Peer Support and Instant Messaging Service, sponsored by St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences. Completed at 1 site in Austria. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-21.

Sponsored by St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2020, registered Mar 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
68
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Diabetes mellitus is one of the four priority non-communicable diseases worldwide. Globally, 425 million adults suffered from diabetes mellitus (7.2-11.3%) in 2017 and the International Diabetes Federation estimates an increase of 48% of the prevalence until 2045. Type 2 diabetes, which is the most common type of diabetes, is mainly seen in adults older than 40 years. Diabetes can lead to serious long-term complications as well as a lower quality of life, worse mental health, and a reduced life expectancy. Due to the chronical character of diabetes, the disease requires continuous therapy, regular medical appointments, and good adherence of those suffering. Therefore, diabetes self-management education (DSME) plays a significant role to increase patient's self-management capacity and improve diabetes therapy. Research indicates that these outcomes might be difficult to maintain and seem to decline soon after DSME ends. Consequently, effective strategies to preserve the positive effects of DSME are needed. Preliminary results show that peer support, which means support from a person who has experiential knowledge of a specific behaviour or stressor and similar characteristics as the target population, is associated with better outcomes in terms of HbA1c, cardiovascular disease risk factors or self-efficacy at lower cost compared to standard therapy. Although those results are promising, research on peer support in diabetes care is still in its infancy and the influence of various factors is unclear. Peer support instant messaging services (IMS) approaches have significant potential for diabetes management because support can be provided easily and prompt, is inexpensive, and needs less effort to attend compared to standard therapy. Furthermore, almost half of the 40-69-year-old age group, which is mostly affected by the onset of type 2 diabetes, use IMS. The major objective of the project is to analyse the impact of a peer supported IMS intervention in addition to a standard diabetes therapy on the glycaemic control of type 2 diabetic patients. A total of 205 participants (196 participants and 9 moderators) with type 2 diabetes mellitus, older than 40 years will be included and randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Both groups will receive standard therapy, but the intervention group will use the peer support IMS tool, additionally. The duration of the intervention will last for seven months, followed by a follow-up of seven months. Biochemical, behavioural, and psychosocial parameters will be measured before, in the middle, and after the intervention as well as after the follow-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
  • Peer Support
  • Instant Messaging Service

Keywords

  • Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
  • Online Intervention
  • Peer Support
  • Instant Messaging Service
  • Glycaemic Control
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 68 is below the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria participants exclusive moderators:

  • diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus according to the Austrian definition
  • HbA1c of ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) at the last measurement
  • receive the antidiabetic therapy according to the current guidelines
  • older than 40 years
  • living in Lower Austria
  • get oral hyperglycaemic agents for maximum three years
  • understand the individual commitments during trial
  • must be able to visit training and measurements

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria moderators:

  • diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus according to the Austrian definition
  • HbA1c of ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) at the last measurement
  • receive the antidiabetic therapy according to the current guidelines
  • get oral hyperglycaemic agents for three years minimum
  • older than 60 years
  • living in the vicinity of the training location in St. Pölten, which means residing in St. Pölten, St. Pölten Land, Melk, Krems, or Lilienfeld
  • engaged participating (= regular participation) in the Austrian disease management program 'Therapie aktiv - Diabetes im Griff'
  • understand the individual commitments during trial
  • must be able to visit training and measurements
  • commitment to undergo the moderator training

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria for all participants:

  • hospitalization of more than 3 weeks during the intervention
  • eye disorders that severely limit vision and, hence, inability to read the display (e.g., proliferative retinopathy or macular edema)
  • severe illnesses such as kidney, liver, heart disease, or malignant cancer, neurological of mental illness which make a longer hospitalization likely
  • substance abuse
  • pregnancy
  • limitation in the German language
  • unable to visit training and measurements
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
68 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    intervention group

    The intervention group will receive antidiabetic therapy according to the current guidelines but with the additional opportunity to use the peer support IMS tool. Peer support and moderation of the intervention group will be provided by moderators. Moderators will be supervised by a dietitian.

    Other: Peer Support Intervention via Instant Messaging Service Tool (IMS-Tool)

  • Active comparator
    control group

    The control group receives the antidiabetic therapy according to the current guidelines, but without having access to the IMS tool. This means that participants receive medical treatment by their practitioner according to the Austrian recommendations.

    Other: antidiabetic therapy according to the current guidelines

Interventions

  • OtherPeer Support Intervention via Instant Messaging Service Tool (IMS-Tool)

    Peer Support via the IMS-tool increases diabetes self-management, improves self-efficiacy, adherence and glycaemic control

  • Otherantidiabetic therapy according to the current guidelines

    In contrast, the control group has to manage their diabetes mellitus type 2 with standard support and without online exchange.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. HbA1c [%] (change over a period of 7 months intervention and 7 months follow-up with 4 measurement dates)

    HbA1c = glycated haemoglobin reflects average plasma glucose over the previous 8-12 weeks. It can be tested at any time of the day and does not require special preparation like fasting

    Time frame: at baseline, three months after the start of the intervention, at the end of the intervention = seven months after the start of the intervention, follow-up = 14 months after the start of the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of life measured by Short-Form-Health Survey (SF-12) (change over a period of 7 months intervention and 7 months follow-up with 4 measurement dates)

    Quality of life will be measured using the 'Short-Form-Health Survey' (SF-12): the SF-12 includes eight dimensions ('physical functioning', 'role limitations due to physical problems', 'bodily pain', 'vitality', 'general health perceptions' , 'social functioning', 'role limitations due to emotional problems', 'mental health'). The summary scores 'physical component summary' and 'mental component summary' (0-100 scales) can be calculated from the specified scales.

    Time frame: at baseline, three months after the start of the intervention, at the end of the intervention = seven months after the start of the intervention, follow-up = 14 months after the start of the intervention

  2. Medication adherence measured by A-14 (change over a period of 7 months intervention and 7 months follow-up with 4 measurement dates)

    Medication adherence will be measured using the 'A14-scale': the A14 consists of 14 items of non-adherent behaviors phrased in a non-threatening and non-judgemental way using a five-item Likert scale with the endpoints '4' (never) to '0' (very often).

    Time frame: at baseline, three months after the start of the intervention, at the end of the intervention = seven months after the start of the intervention, follow-up = 14 months after the start of the intervention

  3. Diabetes self-management behaviors measured by 'Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities German' (SDSCA-G) (change over a period of 7 months intervention and 7 months follow-up with 4 measurement dates)

    Diabetes self-management behaviors will be measured using the 'Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities German' (SDSCA-G): the SDSCA-G focuses on the past seven days related to the diabetes self-care activities 'nutrition', 'physical activities', 'blood glucose testing', 'foot care', and 'smoking'.

    Time frame: at baseline, three months after the start of the intervention, at the end of the intervention = seven months after the start of the intervention, follow-up = 14 months after the start of the intervention

  4. Diabetes knowledge will be measured using the 'Diabetes Knowledge Test' (DKT)

    DKT consists of 20 statements about diabetes which have to be rated as 'true', 'false' or 'don't know'. Based on the answers, a difficulty index (percent of patients who scored correctly) is calculated.

    Time frame: at baseline, three months after the start of the intervention, at the end of the intervention = seven months after the start of the intervention, follow-up = 14 months after the start of the intervention

  5. Diabetes distress will be measure using the 'Diabetes Distress Scale' (DDS)

    the DDS includes for dimensions of distress ('emotional burden', 'regimen distress', 'interpersonal distress', 'physician distress'). The DDS consists of 17 items using a six-point Likert scale with the endpoints '1' (not a problem) and '5' (a very serious problem).

    Time frame: at baseline, three months after the start of the intervention, at the end of the intervention = seven months after the start of the intervention, follow-up = 14 months after the start of the intervention

  6. Depression will be measured using the 'Patient Health Questionnaire-9' (PHQ-9)

    PHQ-9 asks for all nine criteria of depression as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) using a four-point Likert scale with the endpoints '0' (not at all) and '3' (nearly every day).

    Time frame: at baseline, three months after the start of the intervention, at the end of the intervention = seven months after the start of the intervention, follow-up = 14 months after the start of the intervention

  7. Social support will be measured using the 'Fragebogen zur Sozialen Unterstützung' (F-SozU)

    F-SozU operationalizes social support as perceived or anticipated support from the social environment. The short form consists of the following subscales: 'emotional support', 'practical support', 'social integration', 'stress from the social network'. The F-SozU involves of 14 items using a five-point Likert scale with the endpoints '1' (does not apply) and '5' (accurate).

    Time frame: at baseline, three months after the start of the intervention, at the end of the intervention = seven months after the start of the intervention, follow-up = 14 months after the start of the intervention

  8. Dietary behaviour will be measured using a Food Frequency Questionnaire

    Asses the dietary behaviour during the last month

    Time frame: at baseline, three months after the start of the intervention, at the end of the intervention = seven months after the start of the intervention, follow-up = 14 months after the start of the intervention

  9. Physical activity will be measured using the 'International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form' (IPAQ-SF)

    IPAQ-SF asks seven questions to assess 'vigorous-intensity' and 'moderate-intensity' physical activity as well as 'walking' and 'sitting'. Participants indicate the time in minutes or hours for each activity level. Based on this information, three levels of physical activity (low, moderate, high) are calculated and expressed in metabolic equivalent of task (MET) minutes per week.

    Time frame: at baseline, three months after the start of the intervention, at the end of the intervention = seven months after the start of the intervention, follow-up = 14 months after the start of the intervention

  10. Biochemical parameters

    fasting blood glucose \[mg/dl\], total cholesterol \[mg/dl\], high-density lipoprotein \[mg/dl\], low-density lipoprotein \[mg/dl\], blood pressurge \[mmHg\], body height \[cm\], body weight \[cm\], body fat \[%\]

    Time frame: at baseline, three months after the start of the intervention, at the end of the intervention = seven months after the start of the intervention, follow-up = 14 months after the start of the intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sankt Pölten University of Applied Sciences
    St. Pölten, Lower Austria 3100, Austria
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hold E, Grublbauer J, Wiesholzer M, Wewerka-Kreimel D, Stieger S, Kuschei W, Kisser P, Gutzer E, Hemetek U, Ebner-Zarl A, Pripfl J. Improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus through a peer support instant messaging service intervention (DiabPeerS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2022 Apr 14;23(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06202-2. PubMed 35422003 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 21, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04797429
Lead sponsor
St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences
Collaborators
Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Austrian Health Insurance Fund
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 15, 2021
Start date
Nov 1, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2024
Completion
Mar 1, 2025
Last update
May 21, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion