CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04791319GENESISUpdated Mar 1, 2023Results posted

A Study of Bermekimab (JNJ-77474462) in the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Placebo and Bermekimab in Dermatitis, Atopic, sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Terminated at 42 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-01.

Sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Premature Termination due to Interim Analysis (100 patients at Week 16) meeting futility.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
199
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bermekimab in participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

02

Conditions studied

  • Dermatitis, Atopic
03

In context

Dermatitis, Atopic

1,419 studies on the registry are indexed under Dermatitis, Atopic; 258 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 199 is above the median of 83 across 1,125 interventional studies indexed under Dermatitis, Atopic.

Browse Dermatitis, Atopic studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen Research & Development, LLC is the lead sponsor of 912 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.

Of its 278 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 131 (47%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Be otherwise healthy on the basis of physical examination, medical history, vital signs, and 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) performed at screening. Any abnormalities, must be consistent with the underlying illness in the study population and this determination must be recorded in the participant's source documents and initialed by the investigator
  • Have atopic dermatitis (AD) for at least 1 year (365 days) prior to the first administration of study intervention as determined by the investigator through participant interview and/or review of the medical history
  • Have a history of inadequate response to treatment for AD with topical medications or for whom topical treatments are otherwise medically inadvisable (example [eg], due to important side effects or safety risks)
  • Be considered, in the opinion of the investigator, a suitable candidate for dupilumab (DUPIXENT) therapy according to their country's approved DUPIXENT product labeling
  • Have an eczema area and severity index (EASI) score greater than or equal (>=) to 16 at screening and at baseline
  • Have an investigator global assessment (IGA) score >=3 and involved body surface area (BSA) >=10 percent (%) at screening and baseline

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has a current diagnosis or signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
  • Has unstable cardiovascular disease, defined as a recent clinical deterioration (eg, unstable angina, rapid atrial fibrillation) in the last 3 months or a cardiac hospitalization within the last 3 months
  • Has or has had a serious infection (eg, sepsis, pneumonia, or pyelonephritis), or has been hospitalized or received intravenous (IV) antibiotics for an infection during the 2 months before screening
  • Has or has had herpes zoster within the 2 months before screening
  • Has a history of being human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody-positive, or tests positive for HIV at screening
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
199 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Group 1: Placebo

    Participants will receive subcutaneous (SC) placebo once a week (qw) through Week 15. At Week 16, participants will crossover to receive SC bermekimab Dose 2 qw through Week 31.

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: Bermekimab

  • Experimental
    Group 2: Bermekimab

    Participant will receive SC bermekimab Dose 1 qw from Week 0 through Week 31.

    Drug: Bermekimab

  • Experimental
    Group 3: Bermekimab

    Participants will receive SC bermekimab Dose 2 qw from Week 0 through Week 15. At Week 16, participants who achieve an eczema area and severity index (EASI)-75 response (responders) will be rerandomized either to continue to receive bermekimab Dose 2 qw, or to receive bermekimab Dose 1 qw, through Week 31 and participants who do not achieve an EASI-75 response (non responders) will continue to receive bermekimab Dose 2 qw through Week 31.

    Drug: Bermekimab

  • Active comparator
    Group 4: Dupilumab

    Participants will receive a loading dose of SC dupilumab Dose 1 at Week 0, SC placebo every two week (q2w) from Week 1 through Week 15 and then dupilumab Dose 2 q2w from Week 2 through Week 14. At Week 16, participants who achieve EASI-75 response (dupilumab responders) will continue on dupilumab Dose 2 q2w through Week 30 and placebo q2w from Week 17 through Week 31. Participants who do not achieve an EASI-75 response (dupilumab non-responders) will receive placebo qw from Week 16 through Week 18 (washout period) and bermekimab Dose 2 qw from Week 19 through Week 31.

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: Bermekimab · Drug: Dupilumab

Interventions

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo will be administered subcutaneously.

  • DrugBermekimab

    Bermekimab will be administered subcutaneously.

    Also known as: JNJ-77474462

  • DrugDupilumab

    Dupilumab will be administered subcutaneously.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (Greater Than or Equal to [>=] 75 Percent [%] Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16

    Percentage of participants achieving EASI-75 at Week 16 were reported. EASI-75 response is defined as at least 75% improvement from baseline in EASI total score. The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) and measures erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head/neck, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD.

    Time frame: Week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) of 0 or 1 and a Reduction From Baseline of >=2 Points at Week 16

    Percentage of participants achieving vIGA-AD at Week 16 were reported. It is an assessment instrument used in clinical studies to rate the severity of AD, based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0, where 0=Clear: No inflammatory signs of AD; 1=almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; 2=mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification. No oozing or crusting; 3=moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, oozing or crusting may be present and 4=severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; Oozing or crusting may be present. Higher score indicated more severity of AD.

    Time frame: Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction From Baseline) in Eczema-Related Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of Score >=4 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Itch Value >=4

    Percentage of participants with improvement (reduction from baseline) in eczema-related itch NRS of score \>=4 at Week 16 among participants with a baseline itch value \>=4 were reported. The eczema skin pain and Itch NRS is a 2-item patient-reported outcome that participants used to rate the severity of their eczema-related skin pain and eczema related itch daily. Participants were asked the following questions: Please rate the severity of your eczema-related skin pain at its worst in the past 24 hours; and please rate the severity of your eczema-related itch at its worst in the past 24 hours. Each item was on a 0 to 10 NRS ranging from 0 "none" to 10 "worst possible" and were scored separately. Higher score indicated more severity.

    Time frame: Week 16

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-90 (>= 90% Improvement in EASI From Baseline) at Week 16

    Percentage of participants achieving EASI-90 at Week 16 were reported. EASI-90 response is defined as at least 90% improvement from baseline in EASI total score. The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) and measures erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head/neck, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD.

    Time frame: Week 16

  4. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product, and it does not necessarily indicate only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. TEAEs were AEs with onset during the intervention period or that were a consequence of a pre-existing condition that has worsened since baseline. AEs are presented by individual dose received by participants during placebo-controlled period and by responders individual dose received during active treatment period.

    Time frame: Up to Week 36

  5. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An adverse event is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product, and it does not necessarily indicate only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. Any SAE with onset during the intervention period or that were a consequence of a pre-existing condition that has worsened since baseline was considered to be TESAEs. AEs are presented by individual dose received by participants during placebo-controlled period and active treatment period.

    Time frame: Up to Week 36

  6. Serum Bermekimab Concentration Over Time

    Serum bermekimab concentration over time were reported. Data are presented by individual dose of investigational medicinal product received by participants during active treatment period as preplanned in protocol.

    Time frame: Pre-dose at Week 0, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, Week 28, Week 32, and Week 36

  7. Number of Participants With Anti-Bermekimab Antibodies

    Number of participants with anti-bermekimab antibodies were reported. Data are presented by individual dose of investigational medicinal product received by participants during active treatment period as preplanned in protocol.

    Time frame: Up to Week 36

07

Results

Posted Mar 1, 2023

Participant flow

Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-15)
Participant flow — Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0-15)
MilestonePlaceboBermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mgDupilumabPlacebo Then Bermekimab 700 mgBermekimab 350 mg Then Bermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Non-Responders)Bermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Responders)Bermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 350 mg (Responders)Dupilumab Then Dupilumab 300 mg (Responders)Dupilumab Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Non-Responders)
Started333367660000000
Treated333367650000000
Completed192130380000000
Not completed141237280000000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject42930000000
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10210000000
Withdrew: Trial termination24540000000
Withdrew: Participants who completed only safety follow-up7621190000000
Withdrew: Not treated00010000000
Active Treatment Period (Week 16-31)
Participant flow — Active Treatment Period (Week 16-31)
MilestonePlaceboBermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mgDupilumabPlacebo Then Bermekimab 700 mgBermekimab 350 mg Then Bermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Non-Responders)Bermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Responders)Bermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 350 mg (Responders)Dupilumab Then Dupilumab 300 mg (Responders)Dupilumab Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Non-Responders)
Started0000192122352711
Completed00001631162
Not completed000018151924219
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject00002210003
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up00000000010
Withdrew: Trial termination and covid-19 related00004520192
Withdrew: Participants who completed safety follow-up00001281623114

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (Greater Than or Equal to [>=] 75 Percent [%] Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving EASI-75 at Week 16 were reported. EASI-75 response is defined as at least 75% improvement from baseline in EASI total score. The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) and measures erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head/neck, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (Greater Than or Equal to [>=] 75 Percent [%] Improvement From Baseline) at Week 16
percentage of participantsPlaceboBermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mgDupilumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (Greater Than or Equal to [>=] 75 Percent [%] Improvement From Baseline) at Week 169.516.716.751.2
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Bermekimab 350 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.489 (Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.) · Mh weights: 7.1 · 95% CI -12.1 to 26.2
  • Placebo vs Bermekimab 700 mg · Chi-squared · p = 0.448 · Mh weights: 7.1 · 95% CI -9.4 to 23.7
  • Placebo vs Dupilumab · Chi-squared · p = 0.001 · Mh weights: 42.0 · 95% CI 22.9 to 61.1
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) of 0 or 1 and a Reduction From Baseline of >=2 Points at Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving vIGA-AD at Week 16 were reported. It is an assessment instrument used in clinical studies to rate the severity of AD, based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0, where 0=Clear: No inflammatory signs of AD; 1=almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; 2=mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification. No oozing or crusting; 3=moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, oozing or crusting may be present and 4=severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; Oozing or crusting may be present. Higher score indicated more severity of AD.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) of 0 or 1 and a Reduction From Baseline of >=2 Points at Week 16
percentage of participantsPlaceboBermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mgDupilumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) of 0 or 1 and a Reduction From Baseline of >=2 Points at Week 169.512.511.927.9
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction From Baseline) in Eczema-Related Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of Score >=4 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Itch Value >=4

Percentage of participants with improvement (reduction from baseline) in eczema-related itch NRS of score \>=4 at Week 16 among participants with a baseline itch value \>=4 were reported. The eczema skin pain and Itch NRS is a 2-item patient-reported outcome that participants used to rate the severity of their eczema-related skin pain and eczema related itch daily. Participants were asked the following questions: Please rate the severity of your eczema-related skin pain at its worst in the past 24 hours; and please rate the severity of your eczema-related itch at its worst in the past 24 hours. Each item was on a 0 to 10 NRS ranging from 0 "none" to 10 "worst possible" and were scored separately. Higher score indicated more severity.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction From Baseline) in Eczema-Related Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of Score >=4 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Itch Value >=4
percentage of participantsPlaceboBermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mgDupilumab
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction From Baseline) in Eczema-Related Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of Score >=4 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Itch Value >=410.520.06.332.4
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving EASI-90 (>= 90% Improvement in EASI From Baseline) at Week 16

Percentage of participants achieving EASI-90 at Week 16 were reported. EASI-90 response is defined as at least 90% improvement from baseline in EASI total score. The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) and measures erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head/neck, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-90 (>= 90% Improvement in EASI From Baseline) at Week 16
percentage of participantsPlaceboBermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mgDupilumab
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-90 (>= 90% Improvement in EASI From Baseline) at Week 169.512.511.934.9
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product, and it does not necessarily indicate only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. TEAEs were AEs with onset during the intervention period or that were a consequence of a pre-existing condition that has worsened since baseline. AEs are presented by individual dose received by participants during placebo-controlled period and by responders individual dose received during active treatment period.

Time frame:
Up to Week 36
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsPlaceboBermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mgDupilumabPlacebo Then Bermekimab 700 mgBermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 350 mg (Responders)Dupilumab Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Non-Responders)
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)18264640724
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An adverse event is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product, and it does not necessarily indicate only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. Any SAE with onset during the intervention period or that were a consequence of a pre-existing condition that has worsened since baseline was considered to be TESAEs. AEs are presented by individual dose received by participants during placebo-controlled period and active treatment period.

Time frame:
Up to Week 36
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
ParticipantsPlaceboBermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mgDupilumabPlacebo Then Bermekimab 700 mgBermekimab 350 mg Then Bermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Non-Responders)Bermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Responders)Bermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 350 mg (Responders)Dupilumab Then Dupilumab 300 mg (Responders)Dupilumab Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Non-Responders)
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)01200000000
SecondarySerum Bermekimab Concentration Over Time

Serum bermekimab concentration over time were reported. Data are presented by individual dose of investigational medicinal product received by participants during active treatment period as preplanned in protocol.

Time frame:
Pre-dose at Week 0, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24, Week 28, Week 32, and Week 36
Reported as:
Mean · micrograms per mililiters (mcg/mL)
Serum Bermekimab Concentration Over Time
micrograms per mililiters (mcg/mL)Placebo Then Bermekimab 700 mgBermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Non-responders)Bermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Responders)Bermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 350 mg (Responders)
Week 0—0.00 ± 0.0000.00 ± 0.0000.00 ± 0.0000.00 ± 0.000
Week 1—24.80 ± 10.15644.61 ± 16.94536.88 ± 2.83134.96 ± 11.796
Week 4—37.85 ± 19.34775.65 ± 35.81583.07 ± 46.92771.15 ± 29.254
Week 8—42.33 ± 20.88081.25 ± 41.73480.72 ± 40.37776.88 ± 32.047
Week 12—46.90 ± 19.75981.17 ± 42.87883.89 ± 21.87574.06 ± 32.283
Week 160.00 ± 0.00051.26 ± 19.34980.56 ± 46.64483.35 ± 43.51877.95 ± 47.186
Week 2086.49 ± 43.18250.91 ± 20.00479.51 ± 50.18082.14 ± 21.15138.73 ± 19.023
Week 2490.40 ± 51.61955.55 ± 24.60965.57 ± 31.61445.13 ± 31.29123.93 ± 17.506
Week 2899.41 ± 58.86358.31 ± 24.15062.20 ± 30.87668.88 ± 13.1722.02 ± 1.742
Week 3230.13 ± 23.80748.68 ± 21.93712.95 ± 18.31856.96 ± NA38.84 ± NA
Week 36—7.31 ± 6.8210.57 ± 0.8134.44 ± NA—
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Anti-Bermekimab Antibodies

Number of participants with anti-bermekimab antibodies were reported. Data are presented by individual dose of investigational medicinal product received by participants during active treatment period as preplanned in protocol.

Time frame:
Up to Week 36
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Anti-Bermekimab Antibodies
ParticipantsPlacebo Then Bermekimab 700 mgBermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Non-responders)Bermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Responders)Bermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 350 mg (Responders)
Number of Participants With Anti-Bermekimab Antibodies19202

Adverse events

Collected over From Day 1 up to Week 36 for serious and other (non-serious) adverse events; all-cause mortality: from screening up to end of study (up to Week 40). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo0/33 (0%)0/33 (0%)15/33 (45.5%)
Bermekimab 350 mg0/33 (0%)1/33 (3%)15/33 (45.5%)
Bermekimab 700 mg0/67 (0%)2/67 (3%)29/67 (43.3%)
Dupilumab0/65 (0%)0/65 (0%)20/65 (30.8%)
Placebo Then Bermekimab 700 mg0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)7/19 (36.8%)
Bermekimab 350 mg Then Bermekimab 350 mg0/21 (0%)0/21 (0%)7/21 (33.3%)
Bermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Non-Responders)0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)8/22 (36.4%)
Bermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Responders)0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)2/3 (66.7%)
Bermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 350 mg (Responders)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)2/5 (40%)
Dupilumab Then Dupilumab 300 mg (Responders)0/27 (0%)0/27 (0%)9/27 (33.3%)
Dupilumab Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Non-Responders)0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)7/11 (63.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboBermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mgDupilumabPlacebo Then Bermekimab 700 mgBermekimab 350 mg Then Bermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Non-Responders)Bermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Responders)Bermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 350 mg (Responders)Dupilumab Then Dupilumab 300 mg (Responders)Dupilumab Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Non-Responders)
Dermatitis AtopicSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/331/331/670/650/190/210/220/30/50/270/11
Auricular HaematomaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/330/331/670/650/190/210/220/30/50/270/11
Aspartate Aminotransferase IncreasedInvestigations0/330/331/670/650/190/210/220/30/50/270/11
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 30
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboBermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mgDupilumabPlacebo Then Bermekimab 700 mgBermekimab 350 mg Then Bermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Non-Responders)Bermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Responders)Bermekimab 700 mg Then Bermekimab 350 mg (Responders)Dupilumab Then Dupilumab 300 mg (Responders)Dupilumab Then Bermekimab 700 mg (Non-Responders)
Chest PainGeneral disorders0/330/331/670/650/190/210/221/30/50/271/11
Covid-19Infections and infestations4/332/331/672/655/193/213/221/31/51/272/11
Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestations1/333/334/674/651/191/211/221/30/53/271/11
HeadacheNervous system disorders0/330/335/675/651/190/211/221/30/50/270/11
Gastroenteritis ViralInfections and infestations0/330/330/670/650/190/210/220/31/50/270/11
Pilonidal CystInfections and infestations0/330/330/670/650/190/210/220/31/50/270/11
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations2/333/338/676/651/190/213/220/30/54/272/11
Dermatitis AtopicSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders4/333/3311/674/650/191/214/220/30/51/271/11
ExtrasystolesCardiac disorders0/330/330/670/650/190/210/220/30/50/271/11
Dry EyeEye disorders1/330/330/670/650/190/210/220/30/50/271/11

Baseline characteristics

The full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study intervention.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboBermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mgDupilumabTotal
Mean35.1 ± 14.1834.6 ± 13.3236 ± 12.337.2 ± 15.0236 ± 13.65
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)PlaceboBermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mgDupilumabTotal
From 18 to 64 years33336662194
From 65 to 84 years00134
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboBermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mgDupilumabTotal
Female1314283287
Male20193933111
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboBermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mgDupilumabTotal
Hispanic or Latino00549
Not Hispanic or Latino33316259185
Unknown or Not Reported02024
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboBermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mgDupilumabTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native00000
Asian67141037
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander01001
Black or African American212712
White25205146142
More than one race02002
Unknown or Not Reported02024
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)PlaceboBermekimab 350 mgBermekimab 700 mgDupilumabTotal
CANADA86151544
GERMANY88141444
JAPAN247417
POLAND1012192162
UNITED STATES53121131
08

Study locations

42 sites
  • California Allergy & Asthma Medical Group Inc.
    Los Angeles, California 90025, United States
  • Wolverine Clinical Trials
    Santa Ana, California 92705, United States
  • Park Avenue Dermatology
    Orange Park, Florida 32073, United States
  • Forcare Clinical Research, Inc.
    Tampa, Florida 33613, United States
  • Arlington Dermatology
    Rolling Meadows, Illinois 60008, United States
  • Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46256, United States
  • Grekin Skin Institute
    Warren, Michigan 48088, United States
  • Psoriasis Treatment Center of Central New Jersey
    East Windsor, New Jersey 08520, United States
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • Ohio State University
    Columbus, Ohio 43215, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • Clinical Partners
    Johnston, Rhode Island 02919, United States
  • Arlington Center for Dermatology
    Arlington, Texas 76011, United States
  • Austin Institute for Clinical Research
    Pflugerville, Texas 78660, United States
  • Progressive Clinical Research
    San Antonio, Texas 78213, United States
  • Center for Clinical Studies
    Webster, Texas 77598, United States
  • Virginia Clinical Research
    Norfolk, Virginia 23502, United States
  • Premier Clinical Research
    Spokane, Washington 99202, United States
  • Dermatology Research Institute Inc.
    Calgary, Alberta T2J 7E1, Canada
  • Lynderm Research Inc.
    Markham, Ontario L3P 1X3, Canada
  • DermEdge Research
    Mississauga, Ontario L4Y 4C5, Canada
  • Allergy Research Canada Inc.
    Niagara Falls, Ontario L2H 1H5, Canada
  • Innovaderm Research Inc.
    Montreal, Quebec H2H2B5, Canada
  • Centre De Recherche Dermatologique Du Quebec Metropolitan
    Quebec, G1V 4X7, Canada
  • Fachklinik Bad Bentheim
    Bad Bentheim, 48455, Germany
  • ISA - Interdisciplinary Study Association GmbH
    Berlin, 10789, Germany
  • Goethe Universität Frankfurt
    Frankfurt/ Main, 60590, Germany
  • TFS Trial Form Support GmbH
    Hamburg, 20537, Germany
  • MensingDerma research GmbH
    Hamburg, 22391, Germany
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
    Hannover, 30625, Germany
  • Praxis Dr. med. Beate Schwarz - Germany
    Langenau, 89129, Germany
  • Hautarztpraxis
    Mahlow, 15831, Germany
  • Takagi Clinic
    Obihiro-shi, 080-0013, Japan
  • Kume Clinic
    Osaka Fu, 593-8324, Japan
  • Sapporo Skin Clinic
    Sapporo, 060-0063, Japan
  • Nzoz Przychodnia Specjalistyczna Medica
    Czestochowa, 42-200, Poland
  • Centrum Terapii Wspolczesnej J. M. Jasnorzewska Spolka Komandytowo-Akcyjna
    Lodz, 90-242, Poland
  • DermoDent Centrum Medyczne Aldona Czajkowska Rafał Czajkowski s.c.
    Osielsko, 86031, Poland
  • Klinika Ambroziak Estederm Sp. z o.o
    Warszawa, 02-953, Poland
  • Royalderm Agnieszka Nawrocka
    Warszawa, 02962, Poland
  • Centrum Medyczne Matusiak w CITYCLINICPrzychodnia Lekarsko-Psychologiczna Matusiak Spółka Partnerska
    Wroclaw, 50566, Poland
  • WroMedica I.Bielicka, A.Strzałkowska s.c.
    Wrocław, 51-685, Poland
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jun 2, 2021
  • Statistical analysis plan · Mar 2, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 1, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04791319
Lead sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 10, 2021
Start date
May 3, 2021
Primary completion
Feb 2, 2022
Completion
Mar 31, 2022
Results posted
Mar 1, 2023
Last update
Mar 1, 2023

Study contacts

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion