CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04790786OPTIMISE-C19Updated Jun 15, 2023Results posted

UPMC OPTIMISE-C19 Trial, a COVID-19 Study

A Phase 4 interventional study of Lilly Bamlanivimab and Regeneron Casirivimab + Imdevimab in Covid19, sponsored by Erin McCreary. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 120 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-15.

Sponsored by Erin McCreary · Phase 4, Interventional, and Other

Why this study was terminated
Emergency Use Authorizations for monoclonal antibodies withdrawn
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
4,571
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 120 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Multiple monoclonal antibodies (mABs) have been shown to reduce viral burden and improve clinical outcomes, have been granted FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for use in select populations, and are routinely used in the UPMC Health System, which has made expanded access a priority. However, the comparative effectiveness of these mABS is unknown. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine has called for expanded access and clinical use of mABs, noting it is "critical to collect data and evaluate whether they are working as predicted". This pragmatic evaluation will determine the relative effects of the EUA-governed mABs versus each other. When U.S. government mAB policies change (e.g., FDA grants or revokes EUAs), UPMC Health System policies and the evaluated mABs will accordingly change.

Read the detailed description

While COVID-19 vaccination will reduce COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality, the learned immune response may vary between individuals. This means interventions such as monoclonal antibodies (mAB) will still be needed to prevent progression of COVID-19 illness. Monoclonal antibodies seek to mimic or enhance the natural immune system response against a pathogen and are often used in the care of patients with cancer or infection.

For viral infections, mABs are created by exposing a white blood cell to a particular viral protein, which is then cloned to mass produce antibodies to target that virus. For SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, IgG1 mABs target the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and block viral attachment and entry into cells.

The SARS-CoV-2 mABs bamlanivimab and etesevimab, and the REGN-COV2 combination (casirivimab + imdevimab) reduce nasopharyngeal viral burden plus clinical outcomes including future emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Each received FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for use in selected populations.

As of February 2021, there are over 60,000 new cases of COVID-19 diagnosed daily in the US, with over 7000 daily COVID-19 related hospital admissions. Although case volumes are currently declining, COVID-19 remains a significant public health threat.

Despite the EUAs, the clinical use of mABs is low due in part to lack of patient access, complexities in drug allocation, and lack of knowledge among providers are contributing factors. Further, the comparative effectiveness of different mABs is unknown and not yet directly studied. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine recently called for expanded access and clinical use of mABs, noting it is "critical to collect data and evaluate whether they are working as predicted". This evaluation seeks to determine their relative effects versus each other, starting with those governed by EUAs.

OPTIMISE-C19 is a quality improvement (QI) study, governed by approvals from both the UPMC QI committee and the University of Pittsburgh IRB. Currently, mAB therapy is approved for use under EUA issued by the FDA. There are no data on the relative benefits of one mAB versus any other. mABs are ordered by UPMC physicians as a generic referral order and the order is filled by UPMC pharmacy via therapeutic interchange. The selection of mABs available within pharmacy is overseen by the UPMC pharmacy and therapeutics committee. OPTIMISE-C19 provides the therapeutic interchange via random allocation. The UPMC Quality Improvement Committee approved the OPTIMISE-C19 study, including the random therapeutic interchange. The University of Pittsburgh IRB considered the randomized therapeutic interchange to be quality improvement and approved the additional data collection and analyses.

Patients provide verbal consent to receive mAB therapy. UPMC requires physicians to provide and review with patients the EUA Fact Sheet for each mAB, and explain that the patient could receive any of the EUA-governed mABs. As per EUA requirements, physicians discuss the risks and benefits of mABs with patients, and patients consent to receive a mAB as part of routine care, should they desire mAB treatment. Patients are told which mAB they are receiving, and physicians and patients can agree to the assigned mAB or request a specific mAB. It is the treating physicians' and patients' choice to accept the assigned mAB or not. The QI committee considered these steps to represent adequate consent to participate. The IRB considered that the provision of mAB therapy therefore fell under quality improvement and only the additional data collection and analyses represented research. The IRB waived any additional consent requirements.

02

Conditions studied

  • Covid19

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • COVID
  • monoclonal antibodies
03

In context

COVID-19

7,640 studies on the registry are indexed under COVID-19; 488 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 4,571 is above the median of 100 across 4,099 interventional studies indexed under COVID-19.

Browse COVID-19 studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Erin McCreary as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 120 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • COVID-19 positive patients
  • Eligible for mAB under FDA EUA

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Death is deemed to be imminent or inevitable
  • Previous participation in this REMAP within the last 90 days
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
4,571 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lilly Bamlanivimab

    The Lilly monoclonal antibody bamlanivimab will be administered according to FDA EUA guidelines. Dosing is 700 mg intravenously times one within 10 days of COVID-19 symptom onset.

    Biological: Lilly Bamlanivimab

  • Experimental
    Regeneron Casirivimab + Imdevimab

    The Regeneron monoclonal antibody cocktail Casirivimab + Imdevimab will be administered according to FDA EUA guidelines. Dosing is 1200 mg of each drug (2400 mg total) administered intravenously times one within 10 days of COVID-19 symptom onset.

    Biological: Regeneron Casirivimab + Imdevimab

  • Experimental
    Lilly Bamlanivimab + Etesevimab

    The Lilly monoclonal antibody cocktail of bamlanivimab + etesevimab will be administered according to FDA EUA guidelines. Dosing is given intravenously times one within 10 days of COVID-19 symptom onset.

    Biological: Lilly Bamlanivimab + Etesevimab

  • Experimental
    Sotrovimab

    The monoclonal antibody of sotrovimab will be administered according to FDA EUA guidelines. Dosing is given intravenously times one within 7 days of COVID-19 symptom onset.

    Biological: Sotrovimab

  • Experimental
    Bebtelovimab

    The monoclonal antibody of bebtelovimab will be administered according to FDA EUA guidelines. Dosing is given intravenously times one within 7 days of COVID-19 symptom onset.

    Biological: Bebtelovimab

Interventions

  • BiologicalLilly Bamlanivimab

    Administration of Lilly Bamlanivimab to COVID positive patients

  • BiologicalRegeneron Casirivimab + Imdevimab

    Administration of Regeneron Casirivimab + Imdevimab to COVID positive patients

  • BiologicalLilly Bamlanivimab + Etesevimab

    Administration of Lilly Bamlanivimab + Etesevimab to COVID positive patients

  • BiologicalSotrovimab

    Administration of Sotrovimab to COVID positive patients

  • BiologicalBebtelovimab

    Administration of Bebtelovimab to COVID positive patients

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hospital-free Days

    Days alive and free from hospitalization. Patients that are both living and not in the hospital will meet criteria to be counted in this outcome. Deaths were rare and therefore the upper and lower end of the IQR are both 28, in addition to the median. This outcome measure does reflect median hospital free days and interquartile ranges for all groups.

    Time frame: 28 days after initial participation

Secondary outcomes

  1. All-cause Mortality at 28 Days

    All-cause mortality at 28 days.

    Time frame: 28 days after initial participation

  2. SARS-CoV-2 Nasopharyngeal Viral Loads

    Where feasible SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal viral loads among participants from baseline and longitudinally through day 28

    Time frame: 28 days after initial participation

  3. SARS-CoV-2 Plasma Viral Loads

    Where feasible SARS-CoV-2 plasma viral loads among participants from baseline and longitudinally through day 28

    Time frame: 28 days after initial participation

  4. SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Titers

    Where feasible SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers at baseline and longitudinally through day 28

    Time frame: 28 days after initial participation

  5. SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Neutralization

    Where feasible SARS-CoV-2 antibody neutralization at baseline and longitudinally through day 28

    Time frame: 28 days after initial participation

  6. SARS-CoV-2 Immune Responses

    Where feasible SARS-CoV-2 immune responses at baseline and longitudinally through day 28

    Time frame: 28 days after initial participation

  7. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Variants Through Next-generation Sequencing

    Where feasible detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants through next-generation sequencing at baseline and longitudinally through day 28

    Time frame: 28 days after initial participation

  8. Duration of SAR-CoV-2 Infectivity

    Where feasible determining the duration of SAR-CoV-2 infectivity among patients with persistent nasopharyngeal swab viral shedding

    Time frame: 28 days after initial participation

  9. Non-culture Surrogates for SARS-CoV-2 Infectivity

    Where feasible determining non-culture surrogates for SARS-CoV-2 infectivity among patients with persistent nasopharyngeal swab viral shedding

    Time frame: 28 days after initial participation

  10. Non-culture Surrogates for SARS-CoV-2 Infectivity

    Where feasible determining non-culture surrogates for SARS-CoV-2 infectivity among patients with persistent nasopharyngeal swab viral shedding

    Time frame: 90 days after initial participation

  11. Duration of SAR-CoV-2 Infectivity

    Where feasible determining the duration of SAR-CoV-2 infectivity among patients with persistent nasopharyngeal swab viral shedding

    Time frame: 90 days after initial participation

  12. ED Visit Within 28 Days

    Time frame: Duration of study

07

Results

Posted Jun 15, 2023
Limitations and caveats
Results are presented before any prespecified statistical trigger was reached. Lack of patient-level variant data limited ability to assess comparative effectiveness relative to variant strains. The EHR eligibility screen identified most, but not all, EUA risk factors and could not identify if a patient was asymptomatic or severely ill. Finally, vaccination status was unable to be ascertained for this cohort which may impact effectiveness of monoclonal antibody therapy.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLilly BamlanivimabRegeneron Casirivimab + ImdevimabLilly Bamlanivimab + EtesevimabSotrovimab
Started12824548851104
Completed12824548851104
Not completed0000

Outcome measures

PrimaryHospital-free Days

Days alive and free from hospitalization. Patients that are both living and not in the hospital will meet criteria to be counted in this outcome. Deaths were rare and therefore the upper and lower end of the IQR are both 28, in addition to the median. This outcome measure does reflect median hospital free days and interquartile ranges for all groups.

Time frame:
28 days after initial participation
Reported as:
Median · days
Hospital-free Days
daysLilly BamlanivimabRegeneron Casirivimab + ImdevimabLilly Bamlanivimab + EtesevimabSotrovimab
Hospital-free Days28 (28 to 28)28 (28 to 28)28 (28 to 28)28 (28 to 28)
Statistical analysis
  • Lilly Bamlanivimab vs Regeneron Casirivimab + Imdevimab vs Lilly Bamlanivimab + Etesevimab vs Sotrovimab · Bayesian cumulative logistic modelBayesian cumulative logistic model, Equivalence between two arms was defined as 95% posterior probability the odds ratio is within a given bound.
SecondaryAll-cause Mortality at 28 Days

All-cause mortality at 28 days.

Time frame:
28 days after initial participation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
All-cause Mortality at 28 Days
ParticipantsLilly BamlanivimabRegeneron Casirivimab + ImdevimabLilly Bamlanivimab + EtesevimabSotrovimab
All-cause Mortality at 28 Days11277
SecondarySARS-CoV-2 Nasopharyngeal Viral Loads

Where feasible SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal viral loads among participants from baseline and longitudinally through day 28

Time frame:
28 days after initial participation

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondarySARS-CoV-2 Plasma Viral Loads

Where feasible SARS-CoV-2 plasma viral loads among participants from baseline and longitudinally through day 28

Time frame:
28 days after initial participation

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondarySARS-CoV-2 Antibody Titers

Where feasible SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers at baseline and longitudinally through day 28

Time frame:
28 days after initial participation

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondarySARS-CoV-2 Antibody Neutralization

Where feasible SARS-CoV-2 antibody neutralization at baseline and longitudinally through day 28

Time frame:
28 days after initial participation

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondarySARS-CoV-2 Immune Responses

Where feasible SARS-CoV-2 immune responses at baseline and longitudinally through day 28

Time frame:
28 days after initial participation

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryDetection of SARS-CoV-2 Variants Through Next-generation Sequencing

Where feasible detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants through next-generation sequencing at baseline and longitudinally through day 28

Time frame:
28 days after initial participation

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryDuration of SAR-CoV-2 Infectivity

Where feasible determining the duration of SAR-CoV-2 infectivity among patients with persistent nasopharyngeal swab viral shedding

Time frame:
28 days after initial participation

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNon-culture Surrogates for SARS-CoV-2 Infectivity

Where feasible determining non-culture surrogates for SARS-CoV-2 infectivity among patients with persistent nasopharyngeal swab viral shedding

Time frame:
28 days after initial participation

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNon-culture Surrogates for SARS-CoV-2 Infectivity

Where feasible determining non-culture surrogates for SARS-CoV-2 infectivity among patients with persistent nasopharyngeal swab viral shedding

Time frame:
90 days after initial participation

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryDuration of SAR-CoV-2 Infectivity

Where feasible determining the duration of SAR-CoV-2 infectivity among patients with persistent nasopharyngeal swab viral shedding

Time frame:
90 days after initial participation

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryED Visit Within 28 Days
Time frame:
Duration of study

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Lilly Bamlanivimab1/128 (0.8%)0/128 (0%)0/128 (0%)
Regeneron Casirivimab + Imdevimab12/2,454 (0.5%)7/2,454 (0.3%)17/2,454 (0.7%)
Lilly Bamlanivimab + Etesevimab7/885 (0.8%)0/885 (0%)12/885 (1.4%)
Sotrovimab7/1,104 (0.6%)4/1,104 (0.4%)6/1,104 (0.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventLilly BamlanivimabRegeneron Casirivimab + ImdevimabLilly Bamlanivimab + EtesevimabSotrovimab
other infusion reactionProduct Issues0/1285/24540/8852/1104
chest painCardiac disorders0/1282/24540/8852/1104
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventLilly BamlanivimabRegeneron Casirivimab + ImdevimabLilly Bamlanivimab + EtesevimabSotrovimab
infusion reactionProduct Issues0/12817/245412/8856/1104

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Lilly BamlanivimabRegeneron Casirivimab + ImdevimabLilly Bamlanivimab + EtesevimabSotrovimabTotal
Mean57 ± 1754 ± 1856 ± 1653 ± 1854 ± 18
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Lilly BamlanivimabRegeneron Casirivimab + ImdevimabLilly Bamlanivimab + EtesevimabSotrovimabTotal
Female6913204705992458
Male5911344155052113
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Lilly BamlanivimabRegeneron Casirivimab + ImdevimabLilly Bamlanivimab + EtesevimabSotrovimabTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native00000
Asian00000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00000
Black or African American15252148161576
White10420896938923778
More than one race00000
Unknown or Not Reported91134451217
08

Study locations

1 site
  • UPMC
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Huang DT, McCreary EK, Bariola JR, Minnier TE, Wadas RJ, Shovel JA, Albin D, Marroquin OC, Kip KE, Collins K, Schmidhofer M, Wisniewski MK, Nace DA, Sullivan C, Axe M, Meyers R, Weissman A, Garrard W, Peck-Palmer OM, Wells A, Bart RD, Yang A, Berry LR, Berry S, Crawford AM, McGlothlin A, Khadem T, Linstrum K, Montgomery SK, Ricketts D, Kennedy JN, Pidro CJ, Nakayama A, Zapf RL, Kip PL, Haidar G, Snyder GM, McVerry BJ, Yealy DM, Angus DC, Seymour CW. Effectiveness of Casirivimab-Imdevimab and Sotrovimab During a SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant Surge: A Cohort Study and Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2220957. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.20957. PubMed 35834252 ↗
  • Hirsch C, Park YS, Piechotta V, Chai KL, Estcourt LJ, Monsef I, Salomon S, Wood EM, So-Osman C, McQuilten Z, Spinner CD, Malin JJ, Stegemann M, Skoetz N, Kreuzberger N. SARS-CoV-2-neutralising monoclonal antibodies to prevent COVID-19. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 17;6(6):CD014945. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014945.pub2. PubMed 35713300 ↗
  • McCreary EK, Bariola JR, Minnier TE, Wadas RJ, Shovel JA, Albin D, Marroquin OC, Kip KE, Collins K, Schmidhofer M, Wisniewski MK, Nace DA, Sullivan C, Axe M, Meyers R, Weissman A, Garrard W, Peck-Palmer OM, Wells A, Bart RD, Yang A, Berry LR, Berry S, Crawford AM, McGlothlin A, Khadem T, Linstrum K, Montgomery SK, Ricketts D, Kennedy JN, Pidro CJ, Haidar G, Snyder GM, McVerry BJ, Yealy DM, Angus DC, Nakayama A, Zapf RL, Kip PL, Seymour CW, Huang DT. The comparative effectiveness of COVID-19 monoclonal antibodies: A learning health system randomized clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;119:106822. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106822. Epub 2022 Jun 11. PubMed 35697146 ↗
  • Kreuzberger N, Hirsch C, Chai KL, Tomlinson E, Khosravi Z, Popp M, Neidhardt M, Piechotta V, Salomon S, Valk SJ, Monsef I, Schmaderer C, Wood EM, So-Osman C, Roberts DJ, McQuilten Z, Estcourt LJ, Skoetz N. SARS-CoV-2-neutralising monoclonal antibodies for treatment of COVID-19. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 2;9(9):CD013825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013825.pub2. PubMed 34473343 ↗
  • Huang DT, McCreary EK, Bariola JR, Wadas RJ, Kip KE, Marroquin OC, Koscumb S, Collins K, Shovel JA, Schmidhofer M, Wisniewski MK, Sullivan C, Yealy DM, Axe M, Nace DA, Haidar G, Khadem T, Linstrum K, Snyder GM, Seymour CW, Montgomery SK, McVerry BJ, Berry L, Berry S, Meyers R, Weissman A, Peck-Palmer OM, Wells A, Bart R, Albin DL, Minnier T, Angus DC. The UPMC OPTIMISE-C19 (OPtimizing Treatment and Impact of Monoclonal antIbodieS through Evaluation for COVID-19) trial: a structured summary of a study protocol for an open-label, pragmatic, comparative effectiveness platform trial with response-adaptive randomization. Trials. 2021 May 25;22(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05316-3. PubMed 34034784 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 2, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jul 26, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified participant-level data underlying the results reported in journal articles, subject to appropriate security controls, may be available for sharing with other researchers.

Supporting information: Sap

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 15, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04790786
Lead sponsor
Erin McCreary
Collaborators
University of Pittsburgh
Responsible party
Erin McCreary (Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Mar 10, 2021
Start date
Mar 10, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 16, 2022
Completion
Jun 16, 2022
Results posted
Jun 15, 2023
Last update
Jun 15, 2023

Study contacts

Erin McCreary, PharmD
study director · University of Pittsburgh
David T Huang, MD, MPH
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion