CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04779073Updated Jun 15, 2021

Evaluation of Physiotherapists' Knowledge Level of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

An observational study in Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, sponsored by Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University. Status unknown at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-15.

Sponsored by Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2021), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
1,000
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study was planned to determine the physiotherapists' knowledge and qualifications of CPR, their beliefs about the use of CPR in an emergency, and their perception of CPR competence.

Read the detailed description

Cardiopulmonary arrest is a sudden stop of breathing and circulation. Resuscitation is an effort to restore spontaneous heartbeat, respiration and brain functions .Although it is actually a standard algorithm, the approach to cardiopulmonary resuscitation can vary among practitioners.Resuscitation success; practitioner, the state of the arrested person,It depends on several factors such as the resources and equipment available.

The main issue in the success of the resuscitation; how quickly the scene can be reached and how effective CPR can be performed.Guidelines on CPR, including resuscitation information, are updated by the American Heart Association (AHA) and the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) in various time periods.Although there are some differences in resuscitation practices, the importance of early diagnosis and rapid intervention are emphasized in both guidelines. The shortest possible time for the patient to return to life after cardiac arrest Basic Life Support (TYD) and Advanced Life Support (ADS) should be initiated in the period.TYD is applied by non-professional but trained individuals without any material or medication. On the other hand, IDE is applied by a professional team of health professionals using the necessary materials and medicines. It is possible to encounter a cardiac arrest anywhere inside or outside the hospital.

The fact that healthcare workers have been trained on TYD and VBS is an important factor in increasing the chances of arrest cases to come back to life.

Only two published studies on the attitudes of physiotherapists towards CPR have been identified in the literature. One of these was a study involving 140 hospital-based physiotherapists who investigated their knowledge, attitudes and practices in CPR in South-West Nigeria. The authors found that 64% of respondents had insufficient to average theoretical knowledge about CPR and only 45% of respondents held a positive attitude about the importance of CPR.

The second study was conducted with 2,614 healthcare professionals from two Swedish hospitals, where participants filled out a questionnaire about physical / mental discomfort and attitudes towards CPR before and after training. A total of 228 assistant health professionals were included in the sample, including physiotherapists, occupational therapists, psychologists, social workers, and biomedical analysts.

All healthcare professional groups relied more on CPR knowledge after training; however, one limitation of this is that they do not test pre- or post-practice CPR skills. Unfortunately, the applicability of the findings was limited, as the group of physiotherapists was an unidentified subset of 228 allied health professionals in the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Keywords

  • physiotherapist cardiopulmonary resuscitation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University is the lead sponsor of 228 studies on the registry; 53 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Physiotherapists working in various institutions and the private sector in Turkey and senior students studying in the physiotherapy and rehabilitation department

Inclusion criteria

  • Physiotherapists working in various institutions and the private sector in Turkey
  • For senior students studying in the physiotherapy and rehabilitation department
  • Volunteer to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not to be a physiotherapist
  • Those who study in the physiotherapy and rehabilitation department but are not final year students
  • Not volunteering to participate in the study
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Knowledge Level of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

    Cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge level survey result

    Time frame: 5 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University,Faculty of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department
    Ankara, 06760, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sasson C, Rogers MA, Dahl J, Kellermann AL. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Jan;3(1):63-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.889576. Epub 2009 Nov 10. PubMed 20123673 ↗
  • Travers AH, Rea TD, Bobrow BJ, Edelson DP, Berg RA, Sayre MR, Berg MD, Chameides L, O'Connor RE, Swor RA. Part 4: CPR overview: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S676-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970913. No abstract available. PubMed 20956220 ↗
  • Sandroni C, Nolan J; European Resuscitation Council. ERC 2010 guidelines for adult and pediatric resuscitation: summary of major changes. Minerva Anestesiol. 2011 Feb;77(2):220-6. PubMed 21368728 ↗
  • Schneider AP 2nd, Nelson DJ, Brown DD. In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a 30-year review. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1993 Mar-Apr;6(2):91-101. PubMed 8452077 ↗
  • Kiyan S, Yanturali S, Musal B, Gursel Y, Aksay E, Turkcuer I. Determination of advanced life support knowledge level of residents in a Turkish university hospital. J Emerg Med. 2008 Aug;35(2):213-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.02.049. Epub 2007 Jul 20. PubMed 17976765 ↗
  • Jonathon Webber R. Knowledge and perceptions of cardiopulmonary resuscitation amongst New Zealand physiotherapists. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy. 2019;47(2):94-104.
  • Mbada CE, Hakeem BO, Adedoyin RA, Awotidebe TO, Okonji AM. Knowledge, attitude and practive of cardiopulmonary resuscitation among Nigerian physiotherapists. Journal of Respiratory and Cardiovascular Physical Therapy. 2013;2(2):52-62.
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 15, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04779073
Lead sponsor
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
Responsible party
Rabia Tugba Kilic (assistant professor, Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 3, 2021
Start date
Jul 1, 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 15, 2021

Study contacts

Rabia Tugba Kilic
Contact
rtugbakilic@gmail.com
+905303642866
Rabia Tugba Kilic
principal investigator · Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion