CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04766099Updated Dec 12, 2022

Video Education for Labor and Delivery

An interventional study of Childbirth Educational Video in Pregnancy Related and Educational Problems, sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-12-12.

Sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
161
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The second stage of labor or the pushing stage can be challenging and intimidating for patients delivering for the fist time. Among women with neuraxial anesthesia pushing may not be instinctive and therefore various coaching methods are used to maximize maternal expulsive efforts and minimize pushing time. Time intensive strategies including transperineally ultrasound and bio-feedback have been employed to assist with pushing but they are difficult to implement widely. While some women may attend birthing classes or have previously been coached on pushing prior to the onset of labor, many women are unable to access classes prior to labor or do not retain what they learned in a class weeks prior to labor. Previous studies have evaluated the effect of coached pushing on the length of second stage and have indicated that coaching can decrease the second stage up to 13 minutes. In most clinical scenarios, coaching or guidance from the nurse or provider happens once the patient attains complete dilation. There are limitations to this approach as waiting to coach after a potentially long and arduous labor is suboptimal. Therefore, we propose a randomized controlled trial investigating the use of an educational video during the first stage of labor on length of the second stage.

Read the detailed description

Childbirth education is critical to maternal outcomes. Receiving formal education on the birthing process sets the stage for optimal mother/baby bonding, postpartum mood, and future interactions with healthcare professionals. The American Congress of Obstetrics and Gynecology recommends patients attend birthing classes prior to labor and delivery, however previous studies found that attendance is dropping with only 56% of first-time mothers attending childbirth education classes in 2005 compared to 70% in 2001.

Multiple barriers to accessing prenatal childbirth education have been identified. Traditionally, childbirth education classes are structured as in person lectures with multiple sessions over a period of weeks and are taken prior to the onset of labor. Most childbirth education classes have accompanying costs ranging from $20-$50 for hospital classes and hundreds of dollars for private classes. Significant barriers impact patients ability to attend these classes including difficulty obtaining childcare, financial constraints, getting time off from work, and obtaining transportation. The Coronavirus pandemic has further worsened barriers to accessing childbirth education as most in-person group classes have been cancelled due to lack of funding or need for social distancing.

Most childbirth education focuses on preparation for labor and pain management in the first stage of labor neglecting the second stage. This is the stage of labor that requires the most maternal involvement and effort. Among women with epidural anesthesia pushing may not be instinctive and hence, coaching and preparation are integral to success.

The current standard of care for teaching a patient how to push is nurse-led coaching performed at the bedside immediately before the patient starts pushing. At this point, most patients are tired, anxious, and have not had enough time to process the new knowledge learned about how to push. A long or abnormal second stage is associated with adverse outcomes such as cesarean delivery, infection, and hemorrhage. Nulliparous patients are especially vulnerable to these adverse outcomes in the second stage so long as they do not feel empowered, knowledgeable, or involved in their own birth experiences.

Previous literature shows that coached pushing can decrease second stage duration up to 13 minutes. This is important as a prolonged second stage of labor is associated with maternal and neonatal morbidity including higher rates of cesarean delivery, chorioamnionitis, perineal trauma, NICU admission, neonatal sepsis, and APGAR score \< 4 at 5 minutes. In most clinical scenarios, the standard of care is coaching or guidance from the nurse or provider once the patient reaches complete dilation. There are limitations to this approach as waiting to coach after a potentially long and arduous labor course is suboptimal. While physicians and nurses are qualified to coach, they may not be universally available to all patients and the quality of coaching may be impacted by volume and acuity on Labor \& Delivery.

In theory, the advent of video-based education can easily be transferred to the hospital to address this issue and allows for education during labor once an epidural is placed, the patient is comfortable, and well before pushing starts. The average duration of labor and delivery in a first-time mother ranges from 14 to 20 hours. This presents an opportune window of time for video-based childbirth education to narrow gaps in childbirth education disparities and increase maternal involvement without the barriers present in the outpatient setting. The efficacy of this novel way of providing childbirth education has not been tested.

To address this quality gap, we propose a randomized trial comparing an intrapartum video education tool to standard provider-based coaching

02

Conditions studied

  • Pregnancy Related
  • Educational Problems
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Washington University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 1,765 studies on the registry; 271 are open to participants now.

Of its 324 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 212 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Nulliparous women
  • Over 18 year of age
  • Single fetus
  • Term: has completed 36 weeks of pregnancy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • fetal anomalies
  • Prior cesarean delivery
  • contraindication to valsalva
  • blind patients
  • admission in the second stage of labor
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
161 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard Treatment

    Standard bedside coaching by labor and delivery staff

  • Experimental
    Educational Video

    Patients will watch the provided coaching video in addition to standard bedside coaching by labor and delivery staff

    Other: Childbirth Educational Video

Interventions

  • OtherChildbirth Educational Video

    Educational video describing techniques for pushing

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Length of the Second Stage of Labor

    Time from complete dilation to delivery of the fetus

    Time frame: delivery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Labor Satisfaction Scores

    Labor satisfaction as measured by the Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale. Scores are given by patients on a scale from 1-5 with 5 being the highest and 1 being the lowest.

    Time frame: 1 day ( Assessed via survey prior to discharge from the hospital)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Barnes Jewish Hospital
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63108, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Goodman P, Mackey MC, Tavakoli AS. Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. J Adv Nurs. 2004 Apr;46(2):212-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2003.02981.x. PubMed 15056335 ↗
  • Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee Opinion No. 687: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;129(2):e20-e28. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001905. PubMed 28121831 ↗
  • Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, Applebaum S, Herrlich A. Major Survey Findings of Listening to Mothers(SM) III: Pregnancy and Birth: Report of the Third National U.S. Survey of Women's Childbearing Experiences. J Perinat Educ. 2014 Winter;23(1):9-16. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.23.1.9. PubMed 24453463 ↗
  • Lu MC, Prentice J, Yu SM, Inkelas M, Lange LO, Halfon N. Childbirth education classes: sociodemographic disparities in attendance and the association of attendance with breastfeeding initiation. Matern Child Health J. 2003 Jun;7(2):87-93. doi: 10.1023/a:1023812826136. PubMed 12870624 ↗
  • Simpson KR, Newman G, Chirino OR. Patients' perspectives on the role of prepared childbirth education in decision making regarding elective labor induction. J Perinat Educ. 2010 Summer;19(3):21-32. doi: 10.1624/105812410X514396. PubMed 21629391 ↗
  • Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, Hill K, Thom EA, El-Sayed YY, Perez-Delboy A, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Boggess KA, Chauhan SP, Iams JD, Chien EK, Casey BM, Gibbs RS, Srinivas SK, Swamy GK, Simhan HN, Macones GA; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):513-523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566. PubMed 30089070 ↗
  • Fenwick J, Toohill J, Gamble J, Creedy DK, Buist A, Turkstra E, Sneddon A, Scuffham PA, Ryding EL. Effects of a midwife psycho-education intervention to reduce childbirth fear on women's birth outcomes and postpartum psychological wellbeing. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Oct 30;15:284. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0721-y. PubMed 26518597 ↗
  • Cankaya S, Simsek B. Effects of Antenatal Education on Fear of Birth, Depression, Anxiety, Childbirth Self-Efficacy, and Mode of Delivery in Primiparous Pregnant Women: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. Clin Nurs Res. 2021 Jul;30(6):818-829. doi: 10.1177/1054773820916984. Epub 2020 Apr 13. PubMed 32281410 ↗
  • Sperlich M, Gabriel C, St Vil NM. Preference, knowledge and utilization of midwives, childbirth education classes and doulas among U.S. black and white women: implications for pregnancy and childbirth outcomes. Soc Work Health Care. 2019 Nov-Dec;58(10):988-1001. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2019.1686679. Epub 2019 Nov 4. PubMed 31682786 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 12, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04766099
Lead sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Responsible party
Rebecca Rimsza (Clinical Fellow, Washington University School of Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 23, 2021
Start date
May 1, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2022
Completion
Aug 1, 2022
Last update
Dec 12, 2022

Study contacts

Rebecca R Rimsza, MD
principal investigator · Washington University School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion