CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04761874TELECAST-CSCUpdated Apr 22, 2021

Telestroke at Comprehensive Stroke Center During the COVID-19 Pandemic

An interventional study of Telestroke in Stroke, Acute, sponsored by University of Minnesota. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-22.

Sponsored by University of Minnesota · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2019, registered Feb 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
296
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

TELEstroke to CAre for STroke Patients at a Comprehensive Stroke Center (TELECAST-CSC) during the COVID-19 pandemic is a pre-post study evaluating guideline-based acute ischemic stroke care following the implementation of inpatient telestroke at a comprehensive stroke center during the COVID-19 global pandemic. TELECAST-CSC compares two cohorts: the "in-person phase" (December 1, 2019-March 15, 2020), when all inpatient stroke team care was delivered conventionally in-person and the "telestroke phase" (March 16, 2020-June 29, 2020) when all inpatient stroke team care was delivered exclusively via telestroke as part of our healthcare system's pandemic response. We studied the following primarily clinical endpoints: diagnostic stroke evaluation, secondary stroke prevention, health screening and evaluation, stroke education, mortality, and stroke recurrence and readmission rates.

Read the detailed description

The SARS-Cov-2 virus originated in Wuhan China in 2019 and rapidly became a global pandemic. Beyond the pandemic, stroke care is further impacted directly by COVID-19-induced systemic inflammatory response and coagulopathy which leads to increased risk of embolic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage.

In the United States, the highest level of stroke care is provided to the most critically ill stroke patients at comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs). Many CSCs also utilize telestroke to deliver remote stroke care externally to partnering spoke hospitals without local stroke expertise in order to improve time-sensitive, emergent stroke interventions such as thrombolysis and thrombectomy. Conceptually, telestroke may also surmount pandemic-related barriers to stroke care delivery internally at CSCs and workflows incorporating telestroke have been adopted out of necessity. However, the efficacy of remote patient care via telestroke for stroke patients hospitalized at CSCs remains unclear. The aim of the TELECAST-CSC trial was to prospectively evaluate whether inpatient stroke specialist care provided via telestroke was equivalent to stroke care provided in-person during the COVID-19 pandemic.

TELECAST-CSC compares two cohorts: the "in-person phase" (December 1, 2019-March 15, 2020), when all inpatient stroke team care was delivered conventionally in-person and the "telestroke phase" (March 16, 2020-June 29, 2020) when all inpatient stroke team care was delivered exclusively via telestroke as part of our healthcare system's pandemic response. We studied the following primarily clinical endpoints: diagnostic stroke evaluation, secondary stroke prevention, health screening and evaluation, stroke education, and stroke recurrence rates.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke, Acute

Keywords

  • Comprehensive stroke center
  • Ischemic stroke
  • Telestroke
  • Telemedicine
  • Secondary stroke prevention
  • COVID-19
  • SAR-Cov-2
  • pandemic
03

In context

COVID-19

7,640 studies on the registry are indexed under COVID-19; 488 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 296 is above the median of 100 across 4,099 interventional studies indexed under COVID-19.

Browse COVID-19 studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota is the lead sponsor of 1,184 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 132 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 91 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 and above
  • Patients with the primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke admitted to Fairview Southdale Hospitals
  • Evidence of stroke on MRI or CT or clinical diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke by the treating stroke service.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients less than 18 years old
  • Patients who leave the hospital against medical advice
  • Patients with goals of care that impact the stroke evaluation (i.e. comfort measures)
  • Patients who have an alternative diagnosis
  • Patients who opt out of the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
296 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    In-Person (Conventional) Stroke Care

    Ischemic stroke patients admitted to a single academic, comprehensive stroke center from December 1, 2019-March 15, 2020 that were evaluated, managed, and treated by the stroke care team in person.

  • Experimental
    Telestroke Stroke Care

    Ischemic stroke patients admitted to a single academic, comprehensive stroke center from March 16, 2020-June 29, 2020 that were evaluated, managed, and treated by the stroke care team remotely via telestroke.

    Other: Telestroke

Interventions

  • OtherTelestroke

    In the telestroke cohort, acute ischemic stroke patients at a single comprehensive stroke center received their stroke care and management exclusively via telestroke.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Guideline-Based Inpatient Stroke Care

    A 24-item global assessment of fundamental inpatient acute ischemic stroke care informed by 2019 AHA guidelines comprising 4 categories: Diagnostic evaluation: Neurologist evaluation, head CT or brain MRI, intracranial vascular imaging, cervical vascular imaging, LDL, HgA1C, troponin, EKG, telemetry, echocardiogram, and outpatient prolonged cardiac monitoring. Secondary prevention: antiplatelet, dual antiplatelet, anticoagulation, statin, anti-hypertensives, diabetes management, symptomatic carotid revascularization. . Health screening and evaluation: swallow evaluation, cognitive assessment, rehabilitation evaluation Stroke evaluation: tobacco cessation counseling, exercise/ lifestyle counseling, signs of stroke. Each subject will be assessed for completion of these metrics. When a metric is not applicable for a specific patient, it will not be included in the analysis of guideline-based inpatient stroke care (e.g. tobacco cessation in a non-smoker).

    Time frame: Inpatient hospitalization defined as the patient's admission through their discharge date (on average < 1 week)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Stroke Recurrence

    The composite rate of recurrent TIA, ischemic stroke, or hemorrhagic stroke 30 and 90 days post-discharge

    Time frame: 30 and 90 days post-hospital discharge

  2. Readmission Rate

    Rates of 30 and 90 day readmission

    Time frame: 30 and 90 days post-hospital discharge

Other outcomes

  1. Transfer Rate

    Transfer rate

    Time frame: Inpatient hospitalization defined as the patient's admission through their discharge date (on average < 1 week)

  2. Diagnostic Stroke Evaluation

    The 11-item Diagnostic Stroke Evaluation assessment is one of four sub-components of the primary outcome. Diagnostic evaluation metrics: Neurologist evaluation, head CT or brain MRI, intracranial vascular imaging, cervical vascular imaging, LDL, HgA1C, troponin, EKG, telemetry, echocardiogram, and outpatient prolonged cardiac monitoring. Each subject will be assessed for completion of these metrics. When a metric is not applicable for a specific patient, it will not be included in the analysis of guideline-based inpatient stroke care (e.g. tobacco cessation in a non-smoker).

    Time frame: Inpatient hospitalization defined as the patient's admission through their discharge date (on average < 1 week)

  3. Secondary Stroke Prevention

    The 8-item Secondary Stroke Prevention assessment is one of four sub-components of the primary outcome. Secondary prevention: antiplatelet, dual antiplatelet, anticoagulation, statin, anti-hypertensives, diabetes management, symptomatic carotid revascularization. Each subject will be assessed for completion of these metrics. When a metric is not applicable for a specific patient, it will not be included in the analysis of guideline-based inpatient stroke care (e.g. tobacco cessation in a non-smoker).

    Time frame: Inpatient hospitalization defined as the patient's admission through their discharge date (on average < 1 week)

  4. Health Screening & Evaluation

    The 3-item Health Screening \& Evaluation assessment is one of four sub-components of the primary outcome. Health screening and evaluation: swallow evaluation, cognitive assessment, rehabilitation evaluation Each subject will be assessed for completion of these metrics. When a metric is not applicable for a specific patient, it will not be included in the analysis of guideline-based inpatient stroke care (e.g. tobacco cessation in a non-smoker).

    Time frame: Inpatient hospitalization defined as the patient's admission through their discharge date (on average < 1 week)

  5. Stroke Education

    The 3-item Stroke Education assessment is one of four sub-components of the primary outcome. Each subject will be assessed for completion of these metrics. Stroke evaluation: tobacco cessation counseling, exercise/ lifestyle counseling, signs of stroke. When a metric is not applicable for a specific patient, it will not be included in the analysis of guideline-based inpatient stroke care (e.g. tobacco cessation in a non-smoker).

    Time frame: Inpatient hospitalization defined as the patient's admission through their discharge date (on average < 1 week)

  6. Length of Stay

    Length of patient hospitalization

    Time frame: Inpatient hospitalization defined as the patient's admission through their discharge date (on average < 1 week)

  7. Death

    Death rate 30 and 90 days post admission

    Time frame: 30 and 90 days post-admission

  8. Time to antiplatelet administration

    Time from admission to antiplatelet administration

    Time frame: From admission time until the first dose of antiplatelet administered in patients where antiplatelet treatment for secondary stroke prevention was indicated (assessed up to 1 week)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • M Health Fairview Southdale Hospital
    Edina, Minnesota 55435, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, Bruno A, Connors JJ, Demaerschalk BM, Khatri P, McMullan PW Jr, Qureshi AI, Rosenfield K, Scott PA, Summers DR, Wang DZ, Wintermark M, Yonas H; American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Clinical Cardiology. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013 Mar;44(3):870-947. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e318284056a. Epub 2013 Jan 31. PubMed 23370205 ↗
  • Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, Coffey CS, Hoh BL, Jauch EC, Johnston KC, Johnston SC, Khalessi AA, Kidwell CS, Meschia JF, Ovbiagele B, Yavagal DR; American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Focused Update of the 2013 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Regarding Endovascular Treatment: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015 Oct;46(10):3020-35. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000074. Epub 2015 Jun 29. PubMed 26123479 ↗
  • Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, Bravata DM, Chimowitz MI, Ezekowitz MD, Fang MC, Fisher M, Furie KL, Heck DV, Johnston SC, Kasner SE, Kittner SJ, Mitchell PH, Rich MW, Richardson D, Schwamm LH, Wilson JA; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014 Jul;45(7):2160-236. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000024. Epub 2014 May 1. Erratum In: Stroke. 2015 Feb;46(2):e54. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000059. PubMed 24788967 ↗
  • Demaerschalk BM, Berg J, Chong BW, Gross H, Nystrom K, Adeoye O, Schwamm L, Wechsler L, Whitchurch S. American Telemedicine Association: Telestroke Guidelines. Telemed J E Health. 2017 May;23(5):376-389. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0006. Epub 2017 Apr 6. PubMed 28384077 ↗
  • Alberts MJ, Wechsler LR, Jensen ME, Latchaw RE, Crocco TJ, George MG, Baranski J, Bass RR, Ruff RL, Huang J, Mancini B, Gregory T, Gress D, Emr M, Warren M, Walker MD. Formation and function of acute stroke-ready hospitals within a stroke system of care recommendations from the brain attack coalition. Stroke. 2013 Dec;44(12):3382-93. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002285. Epub 2013 Nov 12. PubMed 24222046 ↗
  • Wechsler LR, Demaerschalk BM, Schwamm LH, Adeoye OM, Audebert HJ, Fanale CV, Hess DC, Majersik JJ, Nystrom KV, Reeves MJ, Rosamond WD, Switzer JA; American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Telemedicine Quality and Outcomes in Stroke: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2017 Jan;48(1):e3-e25. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000114. Epub 2016 Nov 3. PubMed 27811332 ↗
  • Kepplinger J, Barlinn K, Deckert S, Scheibe M, Bodechtel U, Schmitt J. Safety and efficacy of thrombolysis in telestroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2016 Sep 27;87(13):1344-51. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003148. Epub 2016 Aug 26. PubMed 27566746 ↗
  • Muller-Barna P, Hubert GJ, Boy S, Bogdahn U, Wiedmann S, Heuschmann PU, Audebert HJ. TeleStroke units serving as a model of care in rural areas: 10-year experience of the TeleMedical project for integrative stroke care. Stroke. 2014 Sep;45(9):2739-44. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006141. PubMed 25147327 ↗
  • Tarnutzer AA, Lee SH, Robinson KA, Wang Z, Edlow JA, Newman-Toker DE. ED misdiagnosis of cerebrovascular events in the era of modern neuroimaging: A meta-analysis. Neurology. 2017 Apr 11;88(15):1468-1477. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003814. Epub 2017 Mar 29. PubMed 28356464 ↗
  • Ovbiagele B, Schwamm LH, Smith EE, Hernandez AF, Olson DM, Pan W, Fonarow GC, Saver JL. Recent nationwide trends in discharge statin treatment of hospitalized patients with stroke. Stroke. 2010 Jul;41(7):1508-13. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.573618. Epub 2010 May 27. PubMed 20508182 ↗
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, Brown M, Demaerschalk BM, Hoh B, Jauch EC, Kidwell CS, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Ovbiagele B, Scott PA, Sheth KN, Southerland AM, Summers DV, Tirschwell DL; American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):e46-e110. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158. Epub 2018 Jan 24. Erratum In: Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):e138. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000163. Stroke. 2018 Jun;49(6):e233-e234. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000172. PubMed 29367334 ↗
  • Lavallee PC, Meseguer E, Abboud H, Cabrejo L, Olivot JM, Simon O, Mazighi M, Nifle C, Niclot P, Lapergue B, Klein IF, Brochet E, Steg PG, Leseche G, Labreuche J, Touboul PJ, Amarenco P. A transient ischaemic attack clinic with round-the-clock access (SOS-TIA): feasibility and effects. Lancet Neurol. 2007 Nov;6(11):953-60. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70248-X. PubMed 17928270 ↗
  • Rothwell PM, Giles MF, Chandratheva A, Marquardt L, Geraghty O, Redgrave JN, Lovelock CE, Binney LE, Bull LM, Cuthbertson FC, Welch SJ, Bosch S, Alexander FC, Silver LE, Gutnikov SA, Mehta Z; Early use of Existing Preventive Strategies for Stroke (EXPRESS) study. Effect of urgent treatment of transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke on early recurrent stroke (EXPRESS study): a prospective population-based sequential comparison. Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1432-42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61448-2. Erratum In: Lancet. 2008 Feb 2;371(9610):386. Carasco-Alexander, Faye [corrected to Alexander, Faye C]. PubMed 17928046 ↗
  • Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, Brown M, Demaerschalk BM, Hoh B, Jauch EC, Kidwell CS, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Ovbiagele B, Scott PA, Sheth KN, Southerland AM, Summers DV, Tirschwell DL. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. Epub 2019 Oct 30. Erratum In: Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e440-e441. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000215. PubMed 31662037 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 22, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04761874
Lead sponsor
University of Minnesota
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 21, 2021
Start date
Dec 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 29, 2020
Completion
Sep 29, 2020
Last update
Apr 22, 2021

Study contacts

Christopher Streib, MD
principal investigator · The University of Minnesota

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion