CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04760496PROXYMAUpdated Dec 26, 2025

Effect of Increased Oxytocin Doses on the Mode of Delivery in Obese Primiparous Women With Spontaneous or Induced Labour

A Phase 4 interventional study of Oxytocin 4 mIU/mL and Oxytocin 2 mIU/mL in Obese, Primiparous Women and Oxytocin, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 12 sites in France. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-26.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
443
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The rate of caesarean section is higher among obese pregnant women, leading to increased morbidity in this already vulnerable population. Oxytocin is the main drug used in obstetrics to optimize progress of labour, but observational studies have suggested that its efficiency may be insufficient in obese women with usual doses.

We design a randomised controlled trial to test the effect of an increased oxytocin dose on the rate of caesarean section in obese primiparous women with spontaneous or induced labour.

Read the detailed description

The hypothesis underlying this trial is that an increase in oxytocin dose can reduce the rate of caesarean sections in primiparous obese patients, with a spontaneous or induced onset of labour, without increasing maternal or neonatal morbidity. This would be a major step forward in reducing morbidity in an at-risk population and in improving the obstetric prognosis for future pregnancies.

The research is a double-blind controlled trial, including primiparous obese women in spontaneous or induced labour, for whom a prescription of oxytocin is decided. Oxytocin is currently indicated for notably "insufficiency of uterine contractions, at the beginning or during labour".The recommended dosage in the market authorization will be used for the control group.

The control group will receive oxytocin at 2 milli-International unit /mL and the intervention group at 4 milli-International unit /mL, controlled by pump (final volume = 500 mL) or electrical syringe (final volume = 50 mL).

The primary objective is to compare the effect of higher doses of oxytocin (intervention group) vs standard doses of oxytocin (control group) on the rate of caesarean sections in obese patients with spontaneous or induced onset of labour.

The secondary objectives will be to compare the effect of higher doses of oxytocin (intervention group) vs standard doses of oxytocin (control group) on maternal and labour complications (length of labour, arrest of labour, interruption of oxytocin perfusion and reason, uterine hyper-stimulation, mode of vaginal delivery, reason for caesarean section, post-partum haemorrhage, maternal blood transfusion, volume of oxytocin infusion, oxytocin side effects), as well as foetal complications and neonatal complications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obese
  • Primiparous Women
  • Oxytocin

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Obese
  • Primiparous women
  • Oxytocin
03

In context

Obesity

6,296 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 1,695 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 443 is above the median of 78 across 4,878 interventional studies indexed under Obesity.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,505 studies on the registry; 1,006 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria are the following:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Nulliparous (no previous childbirth beyond 22 SA)
  • BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² at the beginning of pregnancy
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Spontaneous or induced onset of labour
  • Cephalic presentation
  • Term ≥ 37 weeks of gestation and \< 42 weeks of gestation
  • Medical Indication and absence of medical contraindication for oxytocin during labour: inadequate and/or ineffective uterine contraction and/or delayed cervical dilation
  • Written consent
  • Affiliation to a french social security system

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria are the following:

  • Hypersensitivity to the active substance (oxytocin), to any of its excipients or to latex (risk of cross allergy)
  • Medical contraindication for oxytocin
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Foetal growth restriction (inferior to 5th percentile)
  • Foetal malformation (major)
  • Foetal heart rate anomalies before use of oxytocin (at the time of inclusion)
  • History of uterine surgery (scarred uterus of gynaecological origin)
  • Patient with a disease requiring caesarean section prior to labour (planned caesarean section before labour)
  • Severe renal failure
  • Patient deprived of their liberty (under curatorship or guardianship)
  • Participation in another interventional trial of category 1. Patients included in interventional research with minimal risk and constraints may participate in the study after the investigator's assessment.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
443 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group

    The experimental group will receive oxytocin at 4 mIU/mL

    Drug: Oxytocin 4 mIU/mL

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    The control group will receive oxytocin at 2 mIU/mL

    Drug: Oxytocin 2 mIU/mL

Interventions

  • DrugOxytocin 4 mIU/mL

    Oxytocin at 4 mIU/mL administrated by IV infusion controlled by pump or electric syringe.

  • DrugOxytocin 2 mIU/mL

    Oxytocin at 2 mIU/mL administrated by IV infusion controlled by pump or electric syringe.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of caesarean section during labour

    The decision of caesarean section is made by the responsible obstetrician in charge of the patient, he or she will be blinded of the patient's group (oxytocin dosage) to avoid differential indication for caesarean section. Therefore, the decision to perform (or not) a caesarean section will be only based on foetal/maternal criteria, independently of oxytocin dosage.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of labour phases

    Length of labour phases is measured in minutes (from 2 cm of dilation until delivery)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 month

  2. Arrest of labour

    It will be evaluated if there is two or more hours without cervical dilation (yes/no)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 month

  3. Interruption of oxytocin perfusion and causes

    Interruption of oxytocin perfusion (yes/no) and causes (foetal heart anomalies / uterine hyperkinesia / uterine hypertonia / other)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month

  4. Uterine hyper-stimulation

    Uterine hyper-stimulation (more than 5 uterine contractions per 10 min)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 month

  5. Mode of vaginal delivery

    Spontaneous or operative delivery.If operative vaginal delivery: indication

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 month

  6. Reason for the caesarean section

    foetal heart anomalies / labour arrest / other

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month

  7. Post-partum haemorrhage

    Post-partum haemorrhage (yes/no) and its volume (mL). Post-partum haemorrhage is defined as blood lost ≥ 500 mL in the 2 hours after birth.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 month

  8. Maternal blood transfusion

    Maternal blood transfusion (yes/no) (for the duration of the hospitalization)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 month

  9. Volume of oxytocin infusion

    Volume of oxytocin infusion (mL/H)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 month

  10. Oxytocin side effects

    nausea, vomiting, headaches, increased or decreased heart rate, allergic reaction, skin rash

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 month

  11. Foetal complications

    * Foetal heart rate anomalies requiring second-line monitoring (as pH/lactate blood test at scalp) or emergency delivery (yes / no) * Appearance of meconium (yes / no) * Chorioamnionitis (yes/no): defined as the combination of 2 of the next 3 signs: maternal fever more than 38°5 during labour and/or foetal heart tachycardia and/or biological infection sign

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 month

  12. Neonatal complications

    * Apgar score at 5 min * Umbilical arterial cord pH * Neonatal resuscitation (yes / no): defined by at least artificial ventilation * Transfer to neonatal care unit (yes / no)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 month

07

Study locations

12 sites
  • CHU d'Angers
    Angers, France
  • CHU de Bordeaux (Pellegrin)
    Bordeaux, France
  • Hôpital Béclère
    Clamart, France
  • Hôpital Bicêtre
    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94270, France
  • CHU de Montpellier
    Montpellier, France
  • CHU de Nimes
    Nîmes, France
  • Hôpital Cochin Port Royal
    Paris, France
  • Hôpital Tenon
    Paris, France
  • CHU de Poissy St Germain
    Poissy, France
  • CHU de Saint Etienne
    Saint-Etienne, France
  • CHU de Strasbourg (Centre Médico Chirurgical et Obstétrical)
    Schiltigheim, France
  • CHU de Strasbourg (Hôpital de Hautepierre)
    Strasbourg, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04760496
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 18, 2021
Start date
Oct 2, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2024
Completion
Jan 30, 2025
Last update
Dec 26, 2025

Study contacts

Alexandra BENACHI, PHD, MD
principal investigator · Antoine Béclère Hospital, APHP

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion