ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04759417Updated Jul 29, 2024

Comparison of CHOKAI vs STONE Score to Predict the Presence of Ureteric Stones in Patients With Renal Colic: A Multi-center Prospective Observational Study

An observational study in Ureteric Stone, sponsored by Zayed Military Hospital. Completed at 3 sites in United Arab Emirates. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-29.

Sponsored by Zayed Military Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
92
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: The STONE score has traditionally been used as a clinical prediction tool to predict the presence of ureteric stones in patients presenting with renal colic. More recently, the CHOKAI score was introduced and found to have superior diagnostic accuracy on both internal and external validation.

Objective: Our study aims to externally validate and compare the use of both the CHOKAI and STONE score in a population of UAE patients presenting to the Emergency Department for renal colic.

Methods: Over a period of approximately 6 months, the study will follow Emergency Department Physicians at each institution and retrieve data from their encounters with patients presenting with renal colic. Parameters for both CHOKAI and STONE scores will be logged, extracted and matched against a reference standard of CT scan to compare diagnostic accuracy of both scores to predict the presence of ureteric stones in this population.

Goals: Evaluation of the findings will discern applicability of scores to the UAE population and contribute to reducing unnecessary radiation exposure.

To our knowledge, no studies have compared the use of these scores to diagnose urolithiasis in the United Arab Emirates. Furthermore, this will be the first study to externally validate the CHOKAI score outside of Japan using a controlled, prospective design.

Read the detailed description

Over a period of approximately 6 months, the study will follow Emergency Department Physicians at each of three separate institutions and retrieve data from their encounters with patients presenting with renal colic. Parameters for both CHOKAI and STONE scores will be logged, extracted and matched against a reference standard of CT scan to compare diagnostic accuracy of both scores to predict the presence of ureteric stones in this population

Full-time ED Physicians from each institution will be recruited to participate in the study as follows:

Each ED Physician shall be provided with Data Collection Sheet. This form will provide them with a standardized option to enter the components of the STONE and CHOKAI score using data normally conducted in the history taking and physical examination of patients suspected to have ureteric stones. Additional items have also been included to investigate for other variables that could influence clinical prediction of presence of ureteric stones.

Those patients suspected to have ureteric stones will have confirmation of urolithiasis by non-contrast CT scan. Though the investigators will log the data in their respective data collection sheets per patient, they will not be involved in entering this data onto the study's database.

Data will be collected for a period of approximately 6 months from February 1, 2021 onward, with a target sample size of 200 patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ureteric Stone

Keywords

  • ureteric stone
  • CHOKAI
  • STONE
  • UAE
  • renal colic
03

In context

Ureterolithiasis

84 studies on the registry are indexed under Ureterolithiasis; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 92 is below the median of 136 across 13 observational studies indexed under Ureterolithiasis.

Browse Ureterolithiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Zayed Military Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department with symptoms suspicious of urolithiasis

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult population (≥18 years of age) presenting to the Emergency Department with symptoms determined by the investigating ED Physician to be suspicious of urolithiasis (e.g. flank pain, lower abdominal pain, back pain and/or hematuria)
  • Patients suspected to have ureteric stone who underwent CT scan to confirm diagnosis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Complicated ureteric colic:

  • Abnormal vital signs - body temperature > 37.7 °C or systolic blood pressure ˂90 mmHg)
  • Active
  • Abnormal kidney function (abnormal levels of creatinine/BUN)
  • Recent (within past 6 months) trauma or urologic surgery
  • Age \<18 years
  • Pregnant patient
  • Patient with incomplete interview/documentation data (e.g. missing US/CT/ UA)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
92 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic accuracy comparison

    Compare the diagnostic accuracies of the CHOKAI and STONE scores in predicting the presence of ureteric stones by using differences in the area under the curve (AUC) between the CHOKAI and STONE scores, calculated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Determine optimal cut-off point

    Point on ROC analysis where maximum sensitivity and specificity exist. Calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio at this point

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Rate of admission for patients

    Frequency of admission disposition for patients, to evaluate for any association of high risk on predictor scores to admission dispositions

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City
    Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • Tawam Hospital
    Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • Zayed Military Hospital
    Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The protocol for selection of patients used for prospective data collection shall be made available for the entirety of the study duration, including the Informed Consent Form we will use during patient encounters. The Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) will be shared after results are compiled (approximately in 6 months from study start date) and processed by the biostatistician for a period of 3 months

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Protocol and Informed Consent data will be available for 6 months from study start date Study Analysis Plan (SAP) will be available for 3 months once data collection is completed and results compiled for analysis

Access criteria: Any interested researcher can approach the Principal Investigator, Mohammad Anzal Rehman, at chokai.study@outlook.com for any of the details listed above within the time frames mentioned for access to the same.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04759417
Lead sponsor
Zayed Military Hospital
Responsible party
Mohammad Anzal Rehman (Emergency Medicine Resident, Zayed Military Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 18, 2021
Start date
Feb 1, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2022
Completion
Jul 25, 2024
Last update
Jul 29, 2024

Study contacts

Mohammad Anzal Rehman, MD
principal investigator · Zayed Military Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion