CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04757012CALIPREMUpdated Jul 1, 2026

Efficacy Study of a Device Allowing Broadcasting Maternal Voice and Heartbeat in Preterm Newborn (CALIPREM)

An interventional study of calinange in Preterm Newborn, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged Up to 7 Days. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-01.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
Up to 7 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefits of an exposition to a maternal voice and heartbeat recording during hospital stay for preterm newborns. For that, we use of a specific neonatal device "Calinange" able to record maternal voice and heartbeats and to restore it with a sound level control. We hypothesize an improvement of the well being of the newborn under Calinange exposition.

Read the detailed description

Immediately after birth, preterm newborns are immersed in a hostile environment of intensive care unit with light, sound and painful stimulations. Previously, exposure to maternal voice has demonstrated improvement on infants' statements: reduction of bradycardia, desaturation events, improvement of tolerance feeding and sleep. Unfortunatly in most of the N ICU in France, the mothers' presence attendance time is reduced because of the absence of accommodation structure. The use of a specific neonatal device able to daily record maternal voice and hearbeats and to restore it when mother is gone could improve the environment and promote the well-being of the newborn.

02

Conditions studied

  • Preterm Newborn

Keywords

  • Preterm newborn
  • Maternal voice reccording
  • NIPE
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,505 studies on the registry; 1,006 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 7 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • hospitalised premature newborn in Port-Royal NICU
  • age between 3 and 6 daysof life
  • gestational age between 27+0 and 31+6 weeks
  • hospitalisation in one bed room
  • parental consents
  • beneficiaries social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • occurrence of one or more non-inclusion criteria
  • Non-inclusion Criteria:
  • Chromosomal abnormality, severe congenital malformation
  • Toxic substance consumption during pregnancy
  • Sedative medication in progress, High frequencies ventilation in progress
  • Neurological damage: intraventricular haemorrhage stage 3 and 4, bilateral and expanse periventricular leukomalacia lesions
  • Severe infectious state requiring haemodynamic support (inotropic drugs or hemissucinate)
  • Participation to a other intervention research
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Calinage exposition

    exposition to a maternal voice and heartbeat recording during hospital stay for preterm newborns at D2, D4 and D6

    Device: calinange

  • No intervention
    no exposition

    No exposition to a maternal voice and heartbeat recording during hospital stay for preterm newborns at D1, D3 and D5

Interventions

  • Devicecalinange

    calinange

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Heart rate variability / NIPE Index

    Recorded heart rate

    Time frame: Change of the NIPE index before and after intervention. Each baby is his own control. Nipe index is recorded 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the intervention (Calinange (day 2/4/6) or nothing (day 1/3/5))

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of desaturation events

    Change in desaturation events before and after intervention

    Time frame: Change of the NIPE index before and after intervention. Each baby is his own control. Nipe index is recorded 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the intervention (Calinange (day 2/4/6) or nothing (day 1/3/5))

  2. Number of apnoeic events

    Change in apneic events before and after intervention

    Time frame: Change of the NIPE index before and after intervention. Each baby is his own control. Nipe index is recorded 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the intervention (Calinange (day 2/4/6) or nothing (day 1/3/5))

  3. Number of bradycardia events

    Change in bradycardia events before and after intervention

    Time frame: Change of the NIPE index before and after intervention. Each baby is his own control. Nipe index is recorded 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the intervention (Calinange (day 2/4/6) or nothing (day 1/3/5))

  4. Evaluate the benefits for the nurses

    Evaluation questionnaire

    Time frame: To be completed after each use of calinange ether on day 2, 4 and 6

  5. Evaluate the benefits for the mother

    Satisfaction questionnaire

    Time frame: At day 7, after the end of intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • NICU of Port-Royal, Maternity of Port-Royal, Cochin Hospital
    Paris, 75014, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Alexandre C, De Jonckheere J, Rakza T, Mur S, Carette D, Logier R, Jeanne M, Storme L. [Impact of cocooning and maternal voice on the autonomic nervous system activity in the premature newborn infant]. Arch Pediatr. 2013 Sep;20(9):963-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 23. French. PubMed 23890732 ↗
  • Filippa M, Devouche E, Arioni C, Imberty M, Gratier M. Live maternal speech and singing have beneficial effects on hospitalized preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2013 Oct;102(10):1017-20. doi: 10.1111/apa.12356. Epub 2013 Aug 8. PubMed 23848529 ↗
  • Williamson S, McGrath JM. What Are the Effects of the Maternal Voice on Preterm Infants in the NICU? Adv Neonatal Care. 2019 Aug;19(4):294-310. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000578. PubMed 31335378 ↗
  • Provenzi L, Broso S, Montirosso R. Do mothers sound good? A systematic review of the effects of maternal voice exposure on preterm infants' development. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 May;88:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 10. PubMed 29535067 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04757012
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Collaborators
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 16, 2021
Start date
Apr 19, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 18, 2023
Completion
Jun 18, 2023
Last update
Jul 1, 2026

Study contacts

Juliana PATKAI, MD
principal investigator · Service de Médecine et Réanimation néonatales de Port-Royal APHP.Centre - Université de Paris. Site Cochin.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion