CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04752488Updated Aug 16, 2022

The Effect of Telerehabilitation in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain

An interventional study of Telerehabilitation (TR) and Conventional Rehabilitation (CR) in Chronic Neck Pain, sponsored by Marmara University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-16.

Sponsored by Marmara University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Telerehabilitation offers more efficient follow-up of patients during their home exercise period as a cost-effective and effective treatment model. This study was planned to examine the effectiveness of telerehabilitation in patients with chronic neck pain. The aim of the study is to compare the video-based and telerehabilitation based home-exercise program in patients with chronic neck pain. It is aimed to evaluate the patients in terms of pain, functionality, quality of life, and exercise adherence.

Read the detailed description

With telerehabilitation, patients can easily adapt to home exercise programs and be monitored remotely. In this way, it will be ensured that individuals can apply their exercises at an optimum level in non-clinical settings and to prevent exercise application errors that occur due to the learning effect frequently observed in conventional methods. Exercise is considered a central element in physical therapy and rehabilitation management in patients with chronic neck pain. However, studies have found that improvements after physical therapy and rehabilitation are not preserved in the long term, and recurrence of chronic low back pain is common. With a more cost-effective treatment model, "telerehabilitation", it is aimed that patients can be followed more efficiently during their home exercise period. The aim of the study is to compare the video-based and telerehabilitation based home-exercise program in patients with chronic neck pain. It is aimed to evaluate the patients in terms of pain, functionality, quality of life, and exercise adherence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Neck Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Telerehabilitation
03

In context

Neck Pain

1,232 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 255 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 52 across 1,004 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.

Browse Neck Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Marmara University is the lead sponsor of 576 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients between the ages of 18 - 65
  • Patients who have suffered from neck pain for at least 3 months
  • Signing the consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Situations that prevent the evaluation or communication with the individual
  • Illiterate individuals
  • Individuals who have undergone an operation due to neck pain problem, diagnosed with a tumor, infection, ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis or inflammatory diseases, fracture, cauda equina syndrome
  • Conditions in which specific pathological condition is proven such as malignant condition, fracture, systemic rheumatoid disease
  • Orthopedic and neurological problems that prevent evaluation and/or treatment
  • Complaints of pain and numbness spreading to the upper extremities
  • Individuals with a diagnosed psychiatric disease
  • Individuals who have received physiotherapy in the last 6 months
  • Individuals using another treatment method during the study
  • Individuals with musculoskeletal pain in any other part of the body during work
  • Pregnant participants
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Telerehabilitation (TR) Group

    The TR group will be followed up through the video-based exercise software within the 8-week home exercise program.

    Other: Telerehabilitation (TR)

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Rehabilitation (CR) Group

    The CR group will be trained face-to-face with conventional methods before the 8-week home exercise program, and an exercise program will be prescribed with a visual information form.

    Other: Conventional Rehabilitation (CR)

Interventions

  • OtherTelerehabilitation (TR)

    The home exercise program will be educated to the patient on the first day. Exercises for isometric and isotonic strengthening, stretching, and stabilization of the neck muscles will be given. Exercises will be presented to the patients in audio-video format and detailed instructions with explanations. The exercise protocol will also be the same as in the conventional rehabilitation group. Patients will be asked to do the exercises once a day for 8 weeks and 10 repetitions each.

  • OtherConventional Rehabilitation (CR)

    The home exercise program will be educated to the patient on the first day. Isometric and isotonic strengthening, stretching and stabilization exercises for the neck muscles will be given. Exercise information form including explanation and picture of the exercises will be given to the patients. Patients will be asked to do the exercises once a day for 8 weeks and 10 repetitions each.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    The patients will be asked to mark their pain feelings for rest and activity on a 10 cm numerical line (0: no pain, 10: unbearable pain). It is planned to use numerical VAS in our study. The cut-off values for chronic musculoskeletal pain will be classified as the severity of pain according to VAS as follows: \<3.4 centimeters: mild pain, 3.5-7.4 centimeters: moderate pain, \> 7.5 centimeters: severe pain.

    Time frame: 2 minutes

  2. Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    NDI consists of 10 titles: pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headache, concentration, study, driving, sleeping, and recreation. For each item included in the study; 0 indicates "no disability" and 5 represents "complete disability" Participants will be asked to give points between these scores. The total score ranges between 0 (no disability) and 50 (complete disability).

    Time frame: 5 minutes

  3. Short Form-36 (SF-36)

    SF-36 consists of thirty-six items. These provide measurements of eight dimensions. Subscales evaluate health between 0-100 points; '0' indicates poor health, '100' indicates good health.

    Time frame: 5 minutes

  4. Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia

    The scale is a 17-item. A 4-point Likert scoring (1= strongly disagree, 4= totally agree) is used in the scale. The participant gets a total score between 17-68. The high score obtained by the participant indicates that the kinesiophobia is also high.

    Time frame: 5 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS)

    EARS provides a measurement of commitment to home exercise. This may facilitate the evaluation of interventions that promote self-management, for the treatment of chronic conditions.

    Time frame: 5 minutes

  2. Telemedicine Patient Questionnaire

    Telemedicine Patient Questionnaire evaluates the usability and satisfaction of the patients. The total score is scored between 17 and 85. Higher scores indicate expectation, satisfaction and usability.

    Time frame: 5 minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Training and Research Hospital
    Muğla, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 16, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04752488
Lead sponsor
Marmara University
Responsible party
Fatih ÖZDEN (Principal Investigator, Marmara University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 12, 2021
Start date
Mar 20, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 20, 2022
Completion
Jul 29, 2022
Last update
Aug 16, 2022

Study contacts

Mehmet Özkeskin, PhD
study director · Ege University
İsmet Tümtürk, MSc
principal investigator · Ege University
Cem Yalın Kılınç
principal investigator · Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University
Fatih Özden
study chair · Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion