CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04745299ALSummitUpdated Apr 30, 2026

Evaluation the Efficacy and Safety of Mutiple Lenzumestrocel (Neuronata-R® Inj.) Treatment in Patients With ALS

A Phase 3 interventional study of Lenzumestrocel and Riluzole in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, sponsored by Corestemchemon, Inc.. Completed at 5 sites in South Korea. Open to participants aged 25 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-30.

Sponsored by Corestemchemon, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Oct 2024, 2 years ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
123
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

ALSUMMIT is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-center, parallel, phase III clinical trial to evaluate and confirm the efficacy and long-term safety of repeated Lenzumestrocel (Neuronata-R® inj.) treatment.

Read the detailed description

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by selective and progressive loss of motor neurons. Disease progression leads to death within 2-4 years, but there exists no definite treatment so far.

Based on phase I/II clinical trial(NCT01363401), twice intrathecal autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (Lenzumestrocel) injections showed significant therapeutic benefit lasting at least six months with safety in patients with ALS.

Additionally, the switch from pro- to anti-inflammatory conditions, which was indicated from the inverse correlation between TGF-β1 and MCP-1 levels after Lenzumestrocel injections in the good responder, has been considered a plausible beneficial action mechanism.

This study is designed to investigate the following. First, to reconfirm and evaluate the long-term efficacy of twice injections (single cycle) of Lenzumestrocel, group 1 will receive a single cycle injection with a 26-day interval.

Second, to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of Lenzumestrocel repeated injections, group 2 will receive a single cycle injection a 26-day apart followed by three times injections every three-month interval.

Group 3 will receive comparator injections.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Keywords

  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
  • Mesenchymal stem cell
  • cell therapy
  • ALS
  • neuroprotection
  • Phase 3 clinical trial
03

In context

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

981 studies on the registry are indexed under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; 283 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 123 is above the median of 36 across 667 interventional studies indexed under Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Browse Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Corestemchemon, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

[Inclusion Criteria]

  1. Subjects who show both upper motor neuron signs and lower motor neuron signs at the same time in neurological tests.
  2. Among subjects diagnosed with familial or sporadic ALS, subjects falling into clinically definite ALS, probable ALS and probable ALS-lab supported according to The revised World Federation of Neurology El Escorial Criteria[Rix Brooks, 2000], during 17-weeks period prior to the administration and ALSFRS-R score (progression rate) of 1.03 ± 50%/month (meaning mean value in that total period).
  3. For subjects who are under Riluzole treatment, those who have received stable dose of Riluzole for more than 28 days before screening visit.
  4. Subjects with duration of disease of no more than 2 years from the first diagnosis date.
  5. Subjects whose ALSFRS-R scores are in the range of 31\~46 at the time of screening (P-V0).

[Exclusion Criteria]

  1. Subjects who received tracheostomy or use ventilators (including positive pressure ventilators; subjects who use non-invasive ventilation for sleep apnea may be allowed after review) at the time of screening (P-V0).
  2. Subjects who received gastrotomy at the time of screening (P-V0).
  3. Subjects for whom clinical efficacy evaluation is not possible because pulmonary functional tests cannot be conducted at the time of screening (P-V0) or subjects whose forced vital capacity is found to be not greater than 40%of the expected value.
  4. Subjects who fall into above Class II according to the New York Heart Association's functional classification, who have showed myocardial infarction, unstable arrhythmia and/or other significant cardiovascular diseases such as unstable angina in the past 3 months, or who show electrocardiographic signs of myocardial infarction or angina at the time of screening (P-V0) or who received stent insertion or coronary artery bypass grafting.
  5. Subjects who have received other investigational products or edaravone within 3 month or 5 half-lives at the time of screening (P-V0) and lead in period visit L-V1 (evaluated by whichever is longer).
  6. Subjects who have experienced epileptic seizure.
  7. Subjects with severe renal disorder (serum creatinine: not less than 2.0 mg/dL).
  8. Subjects with severe hepatic disorder (ALT, AST, or bilirubin: over 2.0 times of the normal upper limit).
  9. Subjects who show hemorrhagic tendency at the time of screening (PT and aPTT > 1.5 x ULN)
  10. Subjects who are found to have active viral infections (HBsAg, HCV Ab, HIV Ab, CMV IgM, EBV IgM, HSV IgM and Treponema pallidum) at the time of screening.
  11. Subjects with hypersensitivity to antibiotics (penicillin or streptomycin).
  12. Subjects who have ever received any cell therapy product for the same disease.
  13. Subjects with any malignant tumor in the past 5 years before screening, except malignant tumors with very low risk of metastasis or death.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
123 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Single cycle administration group

    Study drug injections twice in a 26-day interval followed by three times comparator injections every three months.

    Biological: Lenzumestrocel · Drug: Riluzole · Drug: Placebo Comparator

  • Experimental
    Multiple administation group

    Study drug injections twice in a 26-day interval followed by repeated three times study drug injections every three months.

    Biological: Lenzumestrocel · Drug: Riluzole

  • Placebo comparator
    Control group

    Comparator injections twice in a 26-day interval followed by three times comparator injections every three months.

    Drug: Riluzole · Drug: Placebo Comparator

Interventions

  • BiologicalLenzumestrocel

    Single cycle administration group : injections twice in a 26-day interval Multiple administration group : injections twice in a 26-day interval followed by repeated three times injections every three months

    Also known as: Neuronata-R inj, Autologous Bone Marrow derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell

  • DrugRiluzole

    concomitant administration of Riluzole to all groups, except subjects to whom Riluzole administration is deemed impossible owing to adverse events as determined by medical experts

    Also known as: Rilutek

  • DrugPlacebo Comparator

    Single cycle administration group: Placebo comparator is injected three times every three months after injection of Lenzumestrocel twice in a 26-day interval. Control group: Placebo comparator is injected twice in a 26-day interval followed by repeated three times injcections every three months

    Also known as: Normal Saline Inj.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Joint rank scores (CAFS, Combined Assessment of Functional and Survival)

    Joint rank score is derived from Combined Assessment of Function and Survival. Functional assessment is based on ALSFRS-R scores and survival assessment is based on the period from randomization to physical death. Joint rank score will be calculated with ALSFRS-R score data and survival. For each pairwise comparison, a study participant is assigned a score and then the summed scores are ranked for all participants. The higher ranking, the higher score, and the lower ranking, the lower score. And the average rank score is then calculated for each treatment group. A higher mean rank score indicates that participants in that treatment group, on average, fared better. 1. The difference in joint rank scores between multiple administration group and control group at 12 months. 2. The difference in joint rank scores between single cycle administration group and control group at 6 months

    Time frame: at 12 months, and 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Joint rank scores (CAFS, Combined Assessment of Functional and Survival)

    Joint rank score is derived from Combined Assessment of Function and Survival. Functional assessment is based on ALSFRS-R scores and survival assessment is based on the period from randomization to physical death. Joint rank score will be calculated with ALSFRS-R score data and survival. For each pairwise comparison, a study participant is assigned a score and then the summed scores are ranked for all participants. The higher ranking, the higher score, and the lower ranking, the lower score. And the average rank score is then calculated for each treatment group. A higher mean rank score indicates that participants in that treatment group, on average, fared better. The difference in joint rank scores between multiple administration group and control group at 6 months.

    Time frame: at 6 months

  2. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) score

    ALSFRS-R is an instrument designed to evaluate functional status of subjects with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Lou Gehrig's disease), such as gross motor activity, fine motor activity, bulbar function and respiration function. It consists of 12 items; 3 items for mouth functions, 4 items for upper limb and overall fine motor functions, 2 items for lower limb functions and 3 items for respiration functions. Each item is evaluated in 5-point scale (0\~4). A higher score means a better functional status. 1. Change of ALSFRS-R score measured at baseline and 12 months (multiple administration group and control group) 2. Change of ALSFRS-R score measured at baseline and 6 months (single cycle administration and control group)

    Time frame: at 12 months, 6 months

  3. Time to event

    Time to Event is defined as physical death, tracheostomy recognized as the point where disease progression functionally stops or chronic use of ventilator, whichever comes earlier. Chronic use of ventilator means that ventilator is used for more than 20 hours in a day and such use is continued for more than 30 days and that a subject in vegetative state requires full supports from other persons to maintain living. 1. Time to event for 12 months (multiple administration group and control group) 2. Time to event for 6 months (single cycle administration group and control group)

    Time frame: at 12 months, 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Slow Vital Capacity (SVC)

    Change to SVC measured at 6, 12 months and 36 months

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 36 months

  2. Muscular strength

    Change of Muscular strength which is measured by Hand Held Dynamometer (HHD)

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 36 months

  3. Time to event

    Time to event for 36 months

    Time frame: 36 months

  4. Time to death

    Time to death means the period from randomization of a subject to physical death. The comparison with the time to death between treatment groups and control group.

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 36 months

  5. EuroQol Short Form (EQ-5D-5L)

    EQ-5D-5L is designed to measure health conditions and it consists of 5 questions relating to mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. 1\~5 points are given for each question and a higher score means worse condition. Change of EQ-5D-5L from baseline to 6 month, 12 months, and 36 months.

    Time frame: 6 month, 12 months, 36 months

  6. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire (ALSAQ-40)

    ALSAQ-40 is designed to evaluate disease-specific health conditions of subjects with ALS/motor neural disease. It consists of 40 questions to evaluate 5 aspects of health conditions affected by the disease. Subjects are asked to think about the difficulties they may have experienced during the last 2 weeks. Subjects are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (0\~4): never/rarely/sometimes/often/always or cannot do at all.

    Time frame: 6 month, 12 months, 36 months

  7. Biological test

    Tests on blood samples and cerebrospinal fluid samples for exploratory investigation of biological markers in plasma, blood and CSF. Comparison of change before and after treatment. * Measurement cytokines : TGF-β1, IL-10, IL-6, TNF-α, MCP-1, IL-8, IL-1RA, MIP-1β, RANTES and IP-10 etc. * Units of Measure: pg/mL * Comparative Analysis of how much each cytokine increases or decreases after treatment compared to before treatment.

    Time frame: up to 12 months after administration

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
    Yangsan, Kyungsangnam-do 50612, South Korea
  • Hanyang university hospital
    Seoul, Seoul 04763, South Korea
  • Korea University Anam Hospital
    Seoul, 02841, South Korea
  • Samsung Medical Center
    Seoul, 06351, South Korea
  • Seoul National University Hospital
    Seoul, South Korea
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nam JY, Lee TY, Kim K, Chun S, Kim MS, Shin JH, Sung JJ, Kim BJ, Kim BJ, Oh KW, Kim KS, Kim SH. Efficacy and safety of Lenzumestrocel (Neuronata-R(R) inj.) in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALSUMMIT study): study protocol for a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, sham procedure-controlled, phase III trial. Trials. 2022 May 18;23(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06327-4. PubMed 35585556 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04745299
Lead sponsor
Corestemchemon, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 9, 2021
Start date
Feb 24, 2021
Primary completion
Oct 3, 2024
Completion
Nov 13, 2024
Last update
Apr 30, 2026

Study contacts

Seung Hyun Kim, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Hanyang University Seoul Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion