CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04728126Updated Jan 29, 2021

Menopausal Symptoms and Burnout: Comparison of Occupational Health Issue Among Health Professionals in UMC Hospitals

An observational study in Menopause and Burnout Syndrome, sponsored by Nazarbayev University Medical Center. Status unknown. Open to female participants aged 45 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-29.

Sponsored by Nazarbayev University Medical Center · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2021), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
320
Ages
45 Years to 64 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study aims at evaluating the burnout in women healthcare providers (physicians and nurses) Kazakhstan settings, and to investigate the potential parameters that play a role in increasing the risk of burnout. This study would apply the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OBI) in a sample of menopausal healthcare providers belonging to the University Medical Center (UMC) - quaternary healthcare institution in Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.

Read the detailed description

Menopause is a complex physiological process that marks the end of the reproductive phase of a woman's life, and some women in that population refer to various symptoms like hot flashes, sleep disturbances, decreased physical strength, mood changes, and bladder irritability. The increasing presence of women in the workplace and the aging of the women's workforce have elicited growing interest in the link between menopause and work. Studies in the occupational-medicine field provide evidence of how certain aspects of the physical work environment exacerbate menopausal symptoms. Furthermore, there are direct and indirect costs from a lack of organizational support for menopausal women in terms of increased absenteeism, presenteeism, and medical checkups.

Occupational Burnout (OB) is a syndrome of physical and psychological exhaustion of health care professionals. It has three dimensions relating to emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and lack of personal achievements. Extant studies in the occupational health psychology (OHP) field have highlighted many factors in the health-care providers work environment that might increase the risk of developing burnout. It has been well-established that among human-service professionals, the most important burnout risk is represented by the emotionally demanding relationships between caregivers and recipients.

Excessive workload and loss of control in one's profession are cited as the top reasons for burnout among physicians. Likewise, among surgeons, a primary contributing factor for burnout is long working hours, with only a third of surgeons feeling their work schedule had left enough time for personal or family life. Work family conflicts are also more common if surgeons are married to another physician or surgeon. Clearly these reasons imply that a primary root of the problem lies with organizations and care delivery systems rather than the individuals. Furthermore, workplace politics can be associated with a higher risk of burnout, depression and coronary artery disease. Adequate staffing, good leadership and support were found to reduce the risk of burnout, highlighting the importance of fair hospital management, policy and practice. Nevertheless, causes of burnout are not always organizational in nature; a proportion are due to the mishandling of stress related to the profession or at work. This is especially evident among vulnerable physicians with traits including idealism, perfectionism and a great sense of responsibility. Early career physicians (i.e. ≤ 5 years in practice) who have these personality traits are at a greater risk, particularly during the first few years immediately after completion of their fellowship. An early presence in academic and private settings and being involved in interventional procedures can be stressful to an early career physician. In addition, certain patient factors may also contribute to burnout; these include unrealistic expectations, declining patient health and aggression from patients. Prolonged patient contact and development of family-like relationships may also result in emotional detachment and burnout.

In summary, contributing factors leading to burnout are poor working conditions with long work shifts, stressful on-call duties, lack of appreciation, and poor social interactions. Burnout can lead to adverse consequences, such as depression, substance use, and suicidal ideation. This can result in poor patient care, increasing total length of stay, re-admissions, and major medical errors. Due to increased scrutiny of patient and healthcare costs, along with increased lawsuits as a result of major medical errors, it is crucial for both the hospital management and healthcare providers to recognize and address burnout. Comprehensive professional training such as Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), stress-reducing activities such as mindfulness and group activities, and strict implementation of work-hour limitations are a few methods that may help to manage burnout and increase productivity in hospitals.This study aims at evaluating the burnout in women healthcare providers (physicians and nurses) Kazakhstan settings, and to investigate the potential parameters that play a role in increasing the risk of burnout. This study would apply the OBI in a sample of menopausal healthcare providers belonging to the UMC - quaternary healthcare institution in Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.

02

Conditions studied

  • Menopause
  • Burnout Syndrome

Keywords

  • Menopause
  • Quality of life
  • Quality of work life
  • Burnout
  • Emotional exhaustion
03

In context

Burnout, Psychological

442 studies on the registry are indexed under Burnout, Psychological; 106 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 320 is above the median of 206 across 113 observational studies indexed under Burnout, Psychological.

Browse Burnout, Psychological studies →

Lead sponsor

Nazarbayev University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Since this study is aimed to investigate and determine the quality of life in menopausal women, the participants are menopausal women aged 45 years and older.

Inclusion criteria

  • menopause

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe chronic diseases, including psychological/psychiatric comorbidities and use of specific drugs for them
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
320 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Study group

    Female health-care givers aged 45 to 64 years. The study participants will be recruited from UMC (Clinical Academic Department (CAD) of Women's Health, Pediatric Clinical Academic Department, Republic Diagnostic Center (RDC) and National Center for Children's Rehabilitation (NCCR)), Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.

    Other: Survey

Interventions

  • OtherSurvey

    The questionnaire will include socio-demographic information (i.e., gender, age, job seniority) and sub-scales for measuring study variables (i.e., menopausal symptoms, social and personal resources, burnout, and work ability). Menopausal symptoms will be assessed using the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire. Job burnout will be measured through OBI inventory, which consists of 16 items describing the states of emotional exhaustion and detachment - two core dimension of burnout, and were developed to meet different occupational groups. The menopause and the quality of working environment will be assessed using the Questionnaire developed by National Health Service in England and Wales.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Menopause Quality of Life Measurement

    Participants will be asked to fill a self-administered Menopause-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire, which comprises 29 items. This Menopause-Specific Quality of Life contains items that assess 4 main types of menopausal symptoms: vasomotor, psychosocial, physical, sexual. Each item is rated as present or not present; if present, how bothersome the items are on a scale of 0 (not bothersome) to 6 (extremely bothersome).

    Time frame: 36 month

  2. Job burnout

    Job burnout will be measured using Oldenburg Burnout Inventory. Oldenburg Burnout Inventory consists of 16 items on the states of emotional exhaustion and detachment, and were developed to meet different occupational groups. The degree of agreement with 16 items of Oldenburg Burnout Inventory uses scale from 1 to 4, where 1- strongly agree and 4 - strongly disagree.

    Time frame: 36 month

  3. The menopause and quality of working environment

    The menopause and quality of working environment will be assessed using a questionnaire developed by National Health Service in England and Wales. This questionnaire will enable information about the menopause experience, how menopause affects the workplace and vice versa. Moreover, it will provide information about the performance management during menopause and enable foundations about the eventual need for possible ways of raising awareness at work.

    Time frame: 36 month

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 29, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04728126
Lead sponsor
Nazarbayev University Medical Center
Collaborators
University of South Florida, Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
Responsible party
Sanja Terzic (Principal Investigator, Nazarbayev University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 28, 2021
Start date
Sep 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 29, 2021

Study contacts

Sanja Terzic
Contact
sanja.terzic@nu.edu.kz
+77083240921
Milan Terzic
study director · Nazarbayev University Medical Center
Gauri Bapayeva
study director · Nazarbayev University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion