An interventional study of Conventional caudal block and Ultrasound-guided caudal block in Conventional Caudal Block, Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block and Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block, sponsored by Tanta University. Status unknown at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-20.
Sponsored by Tanta University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This study will be conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound guided erector spinae block , ultrasound guided caudal block and conventional caudal block for pain management after pediatric hip surgery.
Tanta University is the lead sponsor of 963 studies on the registry; 304 are open to participants now.
Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients of this group will receive the conventional method (blind technique without ultrasound) of caudal block
Procedure: Conventional caudal block
Patients of this group will receive caudal block using ultrasound.
Procedure: Ultrasound-guided caudal block
Patients of this group will receive ultrasound guided erector spinae plane Block at the level of the transverse process of the second lumbar vertebrae(L2) .
Procedure: Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane Block
Patients of this group will receive (0.5ml/kg) (plain bupivacaine 0.25% injected in the caudal epidural space) by the conventional method (blind technique without ultrasound).
Using ultrasound, patients of this group will receive (0.5ml/kg) (plain bupivacaine 0.25% injected in the caudal epidural space).
Under ultrasound guidance, patients of this group will receive (0.5ml/kg) (plain bupivacaine 0.25% injected beneath the erector spinae muscle sheath) at the level of the transverse process of the second lumbar vertebrae(L2).
Degree of pain intensity
To evaluate the pain scores by (FLACC) scale. (FLACC) scale will be assessed after surgery over 24 hours where (0 = Relaxed and comfortable, 1-3 = Mild discomfort, 4-6 = Moderate pain ,7-10 = Severe discomfort /pain)
Time frame: First 24 hours postoperative
Changes in mean arterial blood pressure
Mean arterial blood pressure will be recorded before block performance at T0, intraoperatively at 15 and 30 minutes, then every 30 min till the end of surgery and after surgery at T (0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 h).
Time frame: Intraoperative and first 24 hours postoperative
Changes in heart rate
Heart rate will be recorded before block performance at T0, intraoperatively at 15 and 30 minutes, then every 30 min till the end of surgery and after surgery at T (0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 h).
Time frame: Intraoperative and first 24 hours postoperative
Amount of Analgesic required in the first day after surgery
The total dose of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen 15 mg/kg if FLACC scores between 2 and 4 at the first 24 h after surgery, and total dose of tramadol 1 mg/kg (IV) in case of FLACC score \> 4.
Time frame: First 24 hours postoperative
Time to first rescue analgesic demand after surgery.
measured from the end of surgery till patient require analgesia.
Time frame: First 24 hours postoperative
Success rate of block
a successful block is defined as absence of significant changes in heart rate following surgical induction. Heart rate increase is not\>20% of the basal levels. If the increase is\>20%, the block is accepted as unsuccessful.
Time frame: Intraoperative duration
Duration of performing the block
Block performing time is defined as the period between the insertion of the needle and termination of local anesthetic administration
Time frame: Intraoperative duration
Incidence of complications
Hypotension, bradycardia, postoperative nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, prolonged motor block, pruritus and local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST).
Time frame: Intraoperative and first 24 hours postoperative
Plan to share: Yes — Data will be available upon reasonable request
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Tanta University