CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04680910Updated Apr 23, 2026Results posted

Slow Wave Induction by Propofol to Eliminate Depression (SWIPED) I

A Phase 1 interventional study of Propofol and Electroencephalography (EEG) in Treatment-resistant Depression, sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-23.

Sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine · Phase 1, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Our hypothesis is that targeted propofol infusion in treatment-resistant depressed patients will induce slow wave activity during sedation and augment subsequent sleep slow wave activity. We will recruit 15 participants for this open label single arm Phase I trial. All participants will undergo two propofol infusions 2-6 days apart, with each infusion maximizing expression of EEG slow waves. To minimize bias, there will be no specific gender or ethnic background consideration for enrollment. This will be a single site investigation at Washington University Medical Center.

Read the detailed description

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in older adults is a leading cause of disability, excess mortality from suicide, and dementia. Cognitive problems and sleep disturbances are common, contributing to recurrence and poor long-term outcomes. Disrupted slow wave sleep is at the nexus of depression and cognitive dysfunction in older adults. Novel approaches to target this core pathophysiology are lacking. Our mechanistic project is designed to elucidate the relationships between TRD and sleep disturbances in older adults. Through personalized infusions targeting electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns, we aim for a systematic characterization of the relationships between the propofol-induced EEG slow waves and enhancement of slow wave sleep. Through the repurposing of propofol as a therapeutic probe, this innovative proposal will establish whether EEG slow waves are a viable therapeutic target for novel antidepressant approaches.

Study Intervention

Propofol will be infused through a peripheral IV, with the assistance of target-controlled infusion software and pumps, with an anticipated infusion duration of 1-2 hours. Concurrent high-density EEG will be acquired, but with an updated recording rig and sensor nets that use either Elefix conductive gel or salt solution. An Axis P3364LV network camera, synchronized to EEG recordings, will provide video for post-hoc analysis. Participants will be discharged home after nurse monitoring and fulfillment of post-anesthetic care unit criteria.

Patients will be instructed by staff on operation of the Dreem headband for at-home overnight sleep EEG recordings. Patients will demonstrate ability to successfully wear the Dreem and initiate recordings without assistance. The device, charger, instruction sheet, and a link to a 2-minute instructional video will be provided to patients. This paradigm has been successful in the acquisition of preoperative sleep recordings in over 150 geriatric cardiac surgical patients and eight patients who underwent ECT for TRD (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04451135).

Dreem recordings will be obtained prior to the first propofol infusion and on evenings of propofol infusions. Additionally, recordings will be obtained for up to 6 nights within a 2-week period after the final infusion, to evaluate persistence of restoration of sleep architecture. Participants will exchange the device with staff during each in-person visit, to allow device examination and data download.

Planned subgroup analyses include stratification by sex and age. For the purposes of Phase II of the study, additional subgroup analyses will be performed based on baseline sleep structure (e.g. total sleep time and proportion of time in N3 sleep), and time interval separating the two infusions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Treatment-resistant Depression
03

In context

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

461 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant; 147 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 16 is below the median of 52 across 387 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant.

Browse Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant studies →

Lead sponsor

Washington University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 1,765 studies on the registry; 271 are open to participants now.

Of its 324 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 212 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
  • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  • Age 60 or greater
  • English speaking (as an interpreter will not be readily available should a participant need to convey any safety concerns during the propofol infusion sessions or require guidance on conducting at-home sleep recordings)
  • Treatment-resistant Depression (non-responsive to at least two adequate trials of oral antidepressants for current episode).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of symptomatic coronary artery disease
  • Presence of marked congestive heart failure/cardiomyopathy (NYHA > Class III, LVEF \<40%, greater than mild RV systolic dysfunction)
  • Prior reaction to propofol
  • Resting heart rate \< 50 bpm
  • Treatment with Electroconvulsive therapy/Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/vagal nerve stimulation within 6 weeks
  • Body mass index > 35
  • C-SSRS of 4 or greater (active suicidal ideation with some intent and with/without a specific plan)
  • MoCA score \< 23 (at least mild dementia)
  • Non-prescribed used of amphetamines, opioids, marijuana, cocaine, or phencyclidine
  • Intake of > 14 beers/week (or equivalent)
  • Anesthetic exposure in the past 4 weeks
  • Concurrent use of benzodiazepines > 2 mg/day lorazepam or equivalent, trazodone > 50 mg/day, or gabapentin > 600 mg/day.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Propofol infusion

    Serial propofol infusions to maximally and safely induce unconsciousness and EEG slow waves while minimizing burst suppression.

    Drug: Propofol · Diagnostic Test: Electroencephalography (EEG) · Diagnostic Test: Slow-Wave Activity

Interventions

  • DrugPropofol

    Targeted propofol infusion in TRD patients will induce sedation with maximal expression of EEG slow waves and minimal burst suppression.

    Also known as: anesthetic

  • Diagnostic testElectroencephalography (EEG)

    EEG will be recorded during propofol infusion and during overnight sleep. Sleep EEG data will be acquired for a minimum of one night prior to the first sedation session, providing a baseline measure. Additional overnight sleep recordings will be performed on day of sedation and subsequent nights.

  • Diagnostic testSlow-Wave Activity

    Duration of slow waves during sedation will be evaluated using automated approaches. SWA during sedation will be calculated as the total power in the 0.5-4 Hz frequency band/total time in minutes. SWA during N2/N3 sleep will be calculated as the total power in the 0.5-4 Hz frequency band/total time in minutes in the N2 and N3 sleep stages. Delta sleep ratio will be computed from the SWA measured during the first and second N2/N3 cycles.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Without Serious Adverse Events During Propofol Infusions

    Adverse events and serious adverse events, including incidence, severity, and likelihood of relation to intervention. Evaluate whether serial propofol infusions are safe (\<5% serious adverse events directly attributable to infusions)

    Time frame: Up to one week after propofol infusions

  2. Change in SWA During Propofol Infusions Compared to Awake Baseline Before Infusion

    Evaluate in geriatric TRD patients that propofol infusions can efficiently induce EEG slow waves during infusion. Sedation slow wave activity (SWA, frontal EEG power within 0.5-4 Hz frequency band) during propofol sedation compared to frontal EEG SWA during awake eyes closed baseline preceding infusion start. This is an indication of power/density of slow waves induced by propofol. Difference in 0.5-4Hz power (infusion - pre-infusion eyes closed). EEG power estimated using multitaper spectral analysis (Chronux toolbox). Difference values are averaged across the two infusions, leading to one outcome measure per participant.

    Time frame: During two-hour propofol infusion

  3. Proportion of Infusion Completers With Augmentation of Sleep SWA After Propofol Infusion

    Evaluate Change in sleep slow wave activity during N2/N3 Sleep (post-infusion - pre-infusion). Pre-infusion measure of sleep slow wave activity is averaged across multiple recordings. Post-infusion measures are based on average of sleep slow activity from nights of morning propofol infusions. Evaluate whether propofol can augment total sleep SWA in greater or equal to 40% of study completers.

    Time frame: Over three-week period of pre- and post-infusion sleep recordings

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effects on Suicidality

    Evaluate whether propofol infusions are associated with suicidality. Suicidality assessed using Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). The scale for the CSSR-S is as follows: 0-No or Low Risk: No suicidal ideation or behaviors reported, 1-Moderate Risk: Suicidal thoughts with some intent or planning but no action taken, 2-High Risk: Suicidal ideation with intent, plan, or recent suicidal behaviors. C-SSRS was administered approximately 1 week before the first infusion (baseline), and then approximately 1, 3, and 10 weeks after the second infusion. No C-SSRS was obtained during the 2-6 days separating the first and second infusions.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-week Post 2nd-Infusion, 3-week Post 2nd-Infusion, 10-week Post 2nd-Infusion

  2. Changes in N3 Duration, REM Duration, Total Sleep Time (Post-infusion Change Relative to Baseline)

    Baseline measures are averages taken from 2-3 recordings before infusions. Averages for post-infusion are taken for measures derived on recordings on the evenings of morning propofol infusions. Reported difference is calculated from averages of measures from post-infusion recordings and averages of baseline recordings.

    Time frame: 1 week before 1st infusion and recordings taken on both infusion nights

  3. Change in Delta Sleep Ratio (Infusion Nights - Baseline)

    Delta sleep ratio (DSR, calculated as the SWA of the 1st NREM cycle divided by the SWA of the 2nd NREM cycle, is unitless). Baseline measures are averages taken from 2-3 recordings during the week before infusions. Averages for infusion nights are taken for measures derived on recordings taken on the evenings of morning propofol infusions. Reported change is the difference (average of infusion nights - baseline average)

    Time frame: One week before first infusion and on nights after morning infusions

  4. Changes in Proportion of Total Sleep Time in N3, Proportion of Total Sleep Time in REM

    Calculated as total duration in N3/total sleep time and total duration in REM/total sleep time. Baseline measures are averages of taken from 2-3 sleep recordings before infusions. Post-infusion average is averaged from sleep recordings taken on the evenings of morning propofol infusions Reported change is infusion nights average - baseline average.

    Time frame: Baseline pre-infusion and nights of infusions

  5. Evaluate Changes in Cognitive Function (MoCA) Between Pre-infusion Baseline and 3-weeks Post Infusion

    Evaluate changes in cognitive function Change in Cognitive Performance on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Total score of the MoCA is from 0-30, Normal: 26-30, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): 18-25, Moderate Cognitive Impairment: 10-17, Severe Cognitive Impairment: \<10 Examine potential positive or negative changes in cognition that may be associated with propofol infusion. Reported change is post-infusion - baseline. Positive change indicated improvement. Negative change indicates worsening of cognition.

    Time frame: Two time points: baseline measure (approximately 1 week before the first infusion) and 3-weeks after second infusion

  6. Number of Participants Able to Provide Complete Cognitive Assessment (Fluid Cognition) Using NIH Toolbox

    Evaluate the feasibility in evaluating changes in cognitive function using NIH toolbox

    Time frame: pre-infusion baseline and approximately 3-weeks after the 2nd infusion

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Able to Provide Sleep Diary Data on Circadian Rhythms

    Examine feasibility of acquiring propofol-associated changes on circadian rhythms using a sleep diary These measures are important for evaluating feasibility of collection in Phase II.

    Time frame: Three-week period spanning pre- and post propofol infusions

  2. Anhedonia During Study Participation

    Examine the feasibility of acquiring propofol-associated changes on anhedonia Measure of anhedonia with the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), scale: rated on a 4-point Likert scale: 0 = strongly disagree, 1 = disagree, 2 = agree, 3 = strongly agree, Scoring: Items marked with \* (questions 2, 4, 5, 7, 9) are reverse coded with answer choices as follows: definitely agree, agree, disagree, and strongly disagree. All other items are sum-scored. (total score ranges from 0-14). A higher score indicates greater anhedonia (lower pleasure), with scores \<=2 typically considered normal, while scores \>=3 indicate significant anhedonia.Total score is tabulated from summation of subscores, with a greater score indicating more anhedonia. Medians across the population are reported for each time point. These measures are important for evaluating the feasibility of collection in Phase II.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-week Post Infusion, 3-week Post Infusion, and 10-weeks Post Infusion

  3. Depression Severity During the Study Period

    Examine feasibility of acquiring propofol-associated changes on depression symptoms Measure of Depressive Symptoms using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), total score ranges from 0-60, 0-6: No depression, 7-19: Mild depression, 20-34: Moderate depression, and 35-60: Severe depression. Baseline measures were taken within 1-week of the first propofol infusion. This assesses for changes in depression relative to the 2nd infusion of propofol. No assessments were taken during the 2-6 days between the first and second infusions. These measures are important for evaluating feasibility of collection in Phase II.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-week after 2nd Infusion, 3-week after 2nd Infusion and 10-week after the 2nd infusion

  4. Changes in Affect Following Propofol Infusions

    Examine the feasibility of acquiring propofol-associated changes on affect Measure of affect using the Feelings Scale, (-5 to 5) as follows: -5 = Very Bad, -3 = Bad, -1 = Fairly Bad, 0 = Neutral, 1 = Fairly Good, 3 = Good, 5 = Very Good This assesses any affect immediately after propofol infusions These measures are important for evaluating the feasibility of collection in Phase II. Assessments were taken before and after both infusions. Change is the post - pre-infusion score for an individual infusion. Greater change = higher affect. Changes for each individual were the average across both infusions. Median changes are reported across all participants.

    Time frame: within an hour before infusion and within 30-minutes after awakening from infusion

07

Results

Posted Apr 23, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePropofol Infusion
Started16
Completed15
Not completed1
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Without Serious Adverse Events During Propofol Infusions

Adverse events and serious adverse events, including incidence, severity, and likelihood of relation to intervention. Evaluate whether serial propofol infusions are safe (\<5% serious adverse events directly attributable to infusions)

Time frame:
Up to one week after propofol infusions
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Without Serious Adverse Events During Propofol Infusions
ParticipantsPropofol Infusion
Number of Participants Without Serious Adverse Events During Propofol Infusions16
PrimaryChange in SWA During Propofol Infusions Compared to Awake Baseline Before Infusion

Evaluate in geriatric TRD patients that propofol infusions can efficiently induce EEG slow waves during infusion. Sedation slow wave activity (SWA, frontal EEG power within 0.5-4 Hz frequency band) during propofol sedation compared to frontal EEG SWA during awake eyes closed baseline preceding infusion start. This is an indication of power/density of slow waves induced by propofol. Difference in 0.5-4Hz power (infusion - pre-infusion eyes closed). EEG power estimated using multitaper spectral analysis (Chronux toolbox). Difference values are averaged across the two infusions, leading to one outcome measure per participant.

Time frame:
During two-hour propofol infusion
Reported as:
Median · uV squared
Change in SWA During Propofol Infusions Compared to Awake Baseline Before Infusion
uV squaredPropofol Infusion
Change in SWA During Propofol Infusions Compared to Awake Baseline Before Infusion18.6 (0 to 35.7)
PrimaryProportion of Infusion Completers With Augmentation of Sleep SWA After Propofol Infusion

Evaluate Change in sleep slow wave activity during N2/N3 Sleep (post-infusion - pre-infusion). Pre-infusion measure of sleep slow wave activity is averaged across multiple recordings. Post-infusion measures are based on average of sleep slow activity from nights of morning propofol infusions. Evaluate whether propofol can augment total sleep SWA in greater or equal to 40% of study completers.

Time frame:
Over three-week period of pre- and post-infusion sleep recordings
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Proportion of Infusion Completers With Augmentation of Sleep SWA After Propofol Infusion
ParticipantsPropofol Infusion
Proportion of Infusion Completers With Augmentation of Sleep SWA After Propofol Infusion6
SecondaryEffects on Suicidality

Evaluate whether propofol infusions are associated with suicidality. Suicidality assessed using Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). The scale for the CSSR-S is as follows: 0-No or Low Risk: No suicidal ideation or behaviors reported, 1-Moderate Risk: Suicidal thoughts with some intent or planning but no action taken, 2-High Risk: Suicidal ideation with intent, plan, or recent suicidal behaviors. C-SSRS was administered approximately 1 week before the first infusion (baseline), and then approximately 1, 3, and 10 weeks after the second infusion. No C-SSRS was obtained during the 2-6 days separating the first and second infusions.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1-week Post 2nd-Infusion, 3-week Post 2nd-Infusion, 10-week Post 2nd-Infusion
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Effects on Suicidality
units on a scalePropofol Infusion
Baseline1 (1 to 2)
1-Week Post-infusion0 (0 to 1)
3-Weeks Post-Infusion0 (0 to 1)
10-Weeks Post-Infusion0 (0 to 1)
SecondaryChanges in N3 Duration, REM Duration, Total Sleep Time (Post-infusion Change Relative to Baseline)

Baseline measures are averages taken from 2-3 recordings before infusions. Averages for post-infusion are taken for measures derived on recordings on the evenings of morning propofol infusions. Reported difference is calculated from averages of measures from post-infusion recordings and averages of baseline recordings.

Time frame:
1 week before 1st infusion and recordings taken on both infusion nights
Reported as:
Median · minutes
Changes in N3 Duration, REM Duration, Total Sleep Time (Post-infusion Change Relative to Baseline)
minutesPropofol Infusion
N3 Duration (min) (Infusion Nights - Baseline)17.75 (1.79 to 33.25)
REM Duration (min) (Infusion Nights - Baseline)4 (-23.58 to 33.25)
Total Sleep Time (min) (Infusion Nights - Baseline)-5.75 (-42.98 to 68.17)
SecondaryChange in Delta Sleep Ratio (Infusion Nights - Baseline)

Delta sleep ratio (DSR, calculated as the SWA of the 1st NREM cycle divided by the SWA of the 2nd NREM cycle, is unitless). Baseline measures are averages taken from 2-3 recordings during the week before infusions. Averages for infusion nights are taken for measures derived on recordings taken on the evenings of morning propofol infusions. Reported change is the difference (average of infusion nights - baseline average)

Time frame:
One week before first infusion and on nights after morning infusions
Reported as:
Median · unitless
Change in Delta Sleep Ratio (Infusion Nights - Baseline)
unitlessPropofol Infusion
Change in Delta Sleep Ratio (Infusion Nights - Baseline)0.075 (-0.467 to 0.440)
SecondaryChanges in Proportion of Total Sleep Time in N3, Proportion of Total Sleep Time in REM

Calculated as total duration in N3/total sleep time and total duration in REM/total sleep time. Baseline measures are averages of taken from 2-3 sleep recordings before infusions. Post-infusion average is averaged from sleep recordings taken on the evenings of morning propofol infusions Reported change is infusion nights average - baseline average.

Time frame:
Baseline pre-infusion and nights of infusions
Reported as:
Median · percentage of total sleep time
Changes in Proportion of Total Sleep Time in N3, Proportion of Total Sleep Time in REM
percentage of total sleep timePropofol Infusion
% TST in N34.5 (1.3 to 11.2)
% TST in REM2.7 (-0.6 to 6.9)
SecondaryEvaluate Changes in Cognitive Function (MoCA) Between Pre-infusion Baseline and 3-weeks Post Infusion

Evaluate changes in cognitive function Change in Cognitive Performance on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Total score of the MoCA is from 0-30, Normal: 26-30, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): 18-25, Moderate Cognitive Impairment: 10-17, Severe Cognitive Impairment: \<10 Examine potential positive or negative changes in cognition that may be associated with propofol infusion. Reported change is post-infusion - baseline. Positive change indicated improvement. Negative change indicates worsening of cognition.

Time frame:
Two time points: baseline measure (approximately 1 week before the first infusion) and 3-weeks after second infusion
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Evaluate Changes in Cognitive Function (MoCA) Between Pre-infusion Baseline and 3-weeks Post Infusion
score on a scalePropofol Infusion
Evaluate Changes in Cognitive Function (MoCA) Between Pre-infusion Baseline and 3-weeks Post Infusion0.14 ± 2.6
SecondaryNumber of Participants Able to Provide Complete Cognitive Assessment (Fluid Cognition) Using NIH Toolbox

Evaluate the feasibility in evaluating changes in cognitive function using NIH toolbox

Time frame:
pre-infusion baseline and approximately 3-weeks after the 2nd infusion
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Able to Provide Complete Cognitive Assessment (Fluid Cognition) Using NIH Toolbox
ParticipantsPropofol Infusion
Number of Participants Able to Provide Complete Cognitive Assessment (Fluid Cognition) Using NIH Toolbox8
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants Able to Provide Sleep Diary Data on Circadian Rhythms

Examine feasibility of acquiring propofol-associated changes on circadian rhythms using a sleep diary These measures are important for evaluating feasibility of collection in Phase II.

Time frame:
Three-week period spanning pre- and post propofol infusions
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Able to Provide Sleep Diary Data on Circadian Rhythms
ParticipantsPropofol Infusion
Number of Participants Able to Provide Sleep Diary Data on Circadian Rhythms15
Other pre-specifiedAnhedonia During Study Participation

Examine the feasibility of acquiring propofol-associated changes on anhedonia Measure of anhedonia with the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), scale: rated on a 4-point Likert scale: 0 = strongly disagree, 1 = disagree, 2 = agree, 3 = strongly agree, Scoring: Items marked with \* (questions 2, 4, 5, 7, 9) are reverse coded with answer choices as follows: definitely agree, agree, disagree, and strongly disagree. All other items are sum-scored. (total score ranges from 0-14). A higher score indicates greater anhedonia (lower pleasure), with scores \<=2 typically considered normal, while scores \>=3 indicate significant anhedonia.Total score is tabulated from summation of subscores, with a greater score indicating more anhedonia. Medians across the population are reported for each time point. These measures are important for evaluating the feasibility of collection in Phase II.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1-week Post Infusion, 3-week Post Infusion, and 10-weeks Post Infusion
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Anhedonia During Study Participation
score on a scalePropofol Infusion
Baseline4 (1.5 to 9.5)
1 week after 2nd infusion3 (0.5 to 9)
3-weeks after 2nd infusion3 (0.5 to 8)
10-weeks after 2nd infusion1 (1 to 4)
Other pre-specifiedDepression Severity During the Study Period

Examine feasibility of acquiring propofol-associated changes on depression symptoms Measure of Depressive Symptoms using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), total score ranges from 0-60, 0-6: No depression, 7-19: Mild depression, 20-34: Moderate depression, and 35-60: Severe depression. Baseline measures were taken within 1-week of the first propofol infusion. This assesses for changes in depression relative to the 2nd infusion of propofol. No assessments were taken during the 2-6 days between the first and second infusions. These measures are important for evaluating feasibility of collection in Phase II.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1-week after 2nd Infusion, 3-week after 2nd Infusion and 10-week after the 2nd infusion
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Depression Severity During the Study Period
score on a scalePropofol Infusion
Baseline25 (23 to 28)
Week 121 (15 to 28)
Week 317 (12 to 31)
Week 1020 (12 to 26)
Other pre-specifiedChanges in Affect Following Propofol Infusions

Examine the feasibility of acquiring propofol-associated changes on affect Measure of affect using the Feelings Scale, (-5 to 5) as follows: -5 = Very Bad, -3 = Bad, -1 = Fairly Bad, 0 = Neutral, 1 = Fairly Good, 3 = Good, 5 = Very Good This assesses any affect immediately after propofol infusions These measures are important for evaluating the feasibility of collection in Phase II. Assessments were taken before and after both infusions. Change is the post - pre-infusion score for an individual infusion. Greater change = higher affect. Changes for each individual were the average across both infusions. Median changes are reported across all participants.

Time frame:
within an hour before infusion and within 30-minutes after awakening from infusion
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Changes in Affect Following Propofol Infusions
score on a scalePropofol Infusion
Changes in Affect Following Propofol Infusions0 (-1 to 1)

Adverse events

Collected over 13 weeks beginning from the time of enrollment to the completion of the study.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Propofol Infusion0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)8/16 (50%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPropofol Infusion
HypotensionBlood and lymphatic system disorders8/16
Airway ObstructionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders7/16
Relative BradycardiaCardiac disorders5/16
Pain from HD EEG or propofol/HeadacheGeneral disorders4/16
Dry MouthGeneral disorders4/16
Skin Irritation or RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/16
DizzinessNervous system disorders2/16
CoughingGeneral disorders2/16
Pain related to jaw manipulationGeneral disorders1/16
FaintingNervous system disorders1/16

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Propofol Infusion
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years5
>=65 years11
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Propofol Infusion
Female12
Male4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Propofol Infusion
Hispanic or Latino1
Not Hispanic or Latino15
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Propofol Infusion
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White16
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Propofol Infusion
United States16
Years of Education
Years of Education(participants)Propofol Infusion
High School/GED4
Some College4
Bachelors Degree3
Masters/Doctorial Degree5
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes-Jewish Hospital
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Murphy MJ, Peterson MJ. Sleep Disturbances in Depression. Sleep Med Clin. 2015 Mar;10(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2014.11.009. Epub 2014 Dec 12. PubMed 26055669 ↗
  • Duncan WC, Sarasso S, Ferrarelli F, Selter J, Riedner BA, Hejazi NS, Yuan P, Brutsche N, Manji HK, Tononi G, Zarate CA. Concomitant BDNF and sleep slow wave changes indicate ketamine-induced plasticity in major depressive disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013 Mar;16(2):301-11. doi: 10.1017/S1461145712000545. Epub 2012 Jun 7. PubMed 22676966 ↗
  • Doghramji K, Jangro WC. Adverse Effects of Psychotropic Medications on Sleep. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2016 Sep;39(3):487-502. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2016.04.009. Epub 2016 Jun 24. PubMed 27514301 ↗
  • Rios RL, Green M, Smith SK, Kafashan M, Ching S, Farber NB, Lin N, Lucey BP, Reynolds CF, Lenze EJ, Palanca BJA; SWIPED Study Team. Propofol enhancement of slow wave sleep to target the nexus of geriatric depression and cognitive dysfunction: protocol for a phase I open label trial. BMJ Open. 2024 May 30;14(5):e087516. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087516. PubMed 38816055 ↗
  • Rios RL, Kafashan M, Hyche O, Lenard E, Lucey BP, Lenze EJ, Palanca BJA. Targeting Slow Wave Sleep Deficiency in Late-Life Depression: A Case Series With Propofol. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2023 Aug;31(8):643-652. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2023.03.009. Epub 2023 Mar 28. PubMed 37105885 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 30, 2023
  • Informed consent form · May 20, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Study protocol will be released in manuscript form. Outcome data will be uploaded to the NIMH Data Archive on a rolling basis. EEG data will be shared via the National Sleep Research Resource within three years of study completion.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Analytic code

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04680910
Lead sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Responsible party
Ben J.A. Palanca (Associate Professor, Washington University School of Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 23, 2020
Start date
Jan 14, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2024
Completion
Sep 21, 2025
Results posted
Apr 23, 2026
Last update
Apr 23, 2026

Study contacts

Ben Palanca, MD PhD
principal investigator · Washington University School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion