CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04680169Updated Jun 21, 2021

I-gel vs AuraGain for Bronchoscopic Intubation Through SGA

An interventional study of Bronchoscopic intubation through AuraGain LMA and Bronchoscopic intubation through I-gel SGA in Airway Management, sponsored by Nordsjaellands Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-21.

Sponsored by Nordsjaellands Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This trial compares two different second generation supraglottic airway devices (AuraGain and I-gel) used as a conduit for bronchoscopic tracheal intubation during continuous oxygenation in order tο determine time to successful tracheal intubation and ease of use.

Read the detailed description

A prospective randomized controlled trial in the Department of Anesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Nordsjællands Hospital-Hillerød Denmark. The study is approved by the Ethics Committee, capital region of Denmark. The aim of the study is to compare bronchoscopic tracheal intubation during continuous oxygenation through the AuraGain and I-gel supraglottic airway device. One hundred patients will be randomly allocated into two groups, group A (AuraGain) and group B (I-gel). Study outcomes are time to tracheal intubation confirmed by capnography as well as anesthesiologists reports of ease of use. Twenty-five anesthesiologists participates in this study, and are allocated four patient each. In random order, each physician will perform two bronchoscopic tracheal intubations with each SGA.

In the preoperative setting, a complete anesthetic evaluation will be performed, including a detailed airway assessment determining predictors for difficulties of face mask ventilation, insertion of SGA and tracheal intubation. Participants are scheduled to undergo elective surgery under general anesthesia. Before induction, all patients will be preoxygenated with 100% oxygen. After induction, rocuronium 0.6mg/kg will be used to facilitate neuromuscular blockade. Sufficient face mask ventilation will be performed before intervention.

Group A: AuraGain:

Time is measured from when the anesthesiologist reaches for the AuraGain LMA until the mask is placed and adequate ventilation is confirmed by capnography. The AuraGain LMA will be used as conduit for bronchoscopic intubation during continuous oxygenation, and time is measured until placement of the tracheal tube verified by capnography.

Group B: I-gel:

Time is measured from when the anesthesiologist reaches for the I-gel LMA until the mask is placed and adequate ventilation is confirmed by capnography.The I-gel LMA will be used as conduit for bronchoscopic tracheal intubation during continuous oxygenation, and time is measured until placement of the tracheal tube verified by capnography.

In both groups (A and B) up to two attempts of SGA placement and up to three attempts of tracheal intubation are allowed.

In case of an emerging unpredicted difficult airway and a concurrent unsuccessful SGA placement, the difficult airway algorithm, DAS, UK will be followed. Video- assisted laryngoscopy will be the first option.

02

Conditions studied

  • Airway Management

Keywords

  • Intubation
  • Bronchoscopic
  • Supraglottic airway device
  • I-gel
  • AuraGain
  • Flexible
  • Fiberoptic
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Nordsjaellands Hospital is the lead sponsor of 88 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients scheduled for a non-acute ENT, gynaecological, gastrointestinal or orthopaedic surgical procedure for which general anaesthesia including oral intubation with an endotracheal tube will be provided

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age\<18 years
  • Inter-incisional distance \<30mm
  • Pregnant and BMI>40kg/m2
  • ASA physical status classification system grade >3
  • Earlier laryngeal or pharyngeal surgery
  • Increased risk of aspiration (e.g. nasogastric tube inserted, planned Rapid Sequence Induction)
  • Informed consent cannot be obtained
  • Patients with stridor
  • Patients with hypoxemia defines by saturation \<90 without oxygen at arrival to the operating room
  • Use of oxygen supply at home
  • Need of one of the following special endotracheal tubes for scheduled surgery: neural integrity monitor (NIM) electromyogram (EMG) tracheal tubes, wire tubes
  • Patients scheduled for any awake approach to secure the airway e.g. awake videolaryngoscopy, awake fiberoptic bronchoscope intubation
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A: Bronchoscopic intubation using AuraGain LMA as conduit

    A group of 50 patients randomly allocated to bronchoscopic intubation using AuraGain

    Device: Bronchoscopic intubation through AuraGain LMA

  • Active comparator
    Group B: Bronchoscopic intubation with I-gel SGA as conduit

    A group of 50 patients randomly allocated to bronchoscopic intubation using I-gel

    Device: Bronchoscopic intubation through I-gel SGA

Interventions

  • DeviceBronchoscopic intubation through AuraGain LMA

    Comparing two different SGAs as conduit for bronchoscopic tracheal intubation

  • DeviceBronchoscopic intubation through I-gel SGA

    Comparing two different SGAs as conduit for bronchoscopic tracheal intubation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total time for airway management

    Total time from reaching the SGA with hands to ended bronchoscopic tracheal intubation confirmed by the end of first curve on capnography

    Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to placement of SGA

    Time measured from reaching SGA with hands to correct placement of SGA confirmed by end of first curve on capnography

    Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months

  2. Time to trans-device tracheal intubation

    time measured from confirmed placement of SGA until successful tracheal intubation confirmed by end of first curve on capnography

    Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months

  3. Number of attempts needed for correct placement of SGA

    two attempts at correct placement allowed. Attempt is failed if no curve appears on capnography.

    Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months

  4. Number of attempts needed for correct intubation

    Attempt of bronchoscopic intubation begins when entering aScope in swivel. Attempt is failed if airway is not visualised, if tracheal tube can not be advanced in trachea, if SpO2 is \<85% or if total time exceeds 6 minutes. Three attempts of intubation is allowed.

    Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months

Other outcomes

  1. Reason for failed intubation

    if failed (as described in outcome 4), reason of failure is described

    Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months

  2. Feeling of resistance during tracheal intubation

    Physician will be asked to report resistance as: none, mild, severe, impossible

    Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months

  3. Feasibility of SGA placement

    Physician will be asked to report feasibility at a scale 1-10, 1=easy, 10=very difficult

    Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months

  4. Feasibility of intubation

    Physician will be asked to report feasibility at a scale 1-10, 1=easy, 10=very difficult

    Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months

  5. Feasibility of total airway management

    Physician will be asked to report feasibility of the whole procedure at a scale 1-10, 1=easy, 10=very difficult

    Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months

  6. Best Brimacombe score

    Class 1: Unable to see the vocal cords. Class 2: the vocal cords and the anterior aspect of the epiglottis are visualized. Class 3: the vocal cords and the posterior aspect of the epiglottis are observed. Grade 4: only vocal cords were observed.

    Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Nordsjaellands Hospital
    Hillerød, 3400, Denmark
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 21, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04680169
Lead sponsor
Nordsjaellands Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 22, 2020
Start date
Jan 18, 2021
Primary completion
May 4, 2021
Completion
May 4, 2021
Last update
Jun 21, 2021

Study contacts

Charlotte V Rosenstock, Ph.d
principal investigator · Nordsjaellands Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion