ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT04679662Updated Aug 10, 2026

EXPLORE DMR: Early Feasibility Study of the PLAR Implant and Delivery System to Treat Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

An interventional study of Transcatheter mitral valve repair (PLAR Implant and Delivery System) in Degenerative Mitral Valve Disease, sponsored by Polares Medical SA. Withdrawn at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-10.

Sponsored by Polares Medical SA · Not applicable, Interventional, and Device feasibility

Why this study was withdrawn
product refinement
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

An early feasibility study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the PLAR Implant and Delivery System to treat severe degenerative mitral regurgitation and to gather preliminary data on its performance thereby providing guidance for future clinical development. The study is a single-arm registry with the last follow-up visit at 5 years post-intervention. The study will enroll up to 10 patients at one (1) center in Brazil.

Read the detailed description

Percutaneous approaches to treat MR promise to provide a sufficient reduction in MR without the risks typically associated with open heart surgery. Furthermore there is an unmet clinical need for patients with severe MR who are refused or denied surgery due to high risk. Percutaneous therapy provides a novel alternative treatment option for these patients with the aim of reducing morbidity and mortality over and above current medical therapy. The Polares Medical PLAR Implant and Delivery System is a catheter-based technology designed to permanently implant a prosthesis using a transvenous / transseptal approach to augment the posterior mitral valve leaflet and improve coaptation with the anterior leaflet. Approved edge-to-edge repair has already been shown to be a viable alternative for high risk MR patients. However treatment with these devices is limited to specific anatomies and often requires multiple devices which increases clinical risk, adds to procedural time, and can result in residual MR. The PLAR Implant and Delivery System has been designed to overcome and mitigate some of these shortfalls.

02

Conditions studied

  • Degenerative Mitral Valve Disease
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Polares Medical SA is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. 18 years of age or older
  2. Greater than moderate degenerative mitral regurgitation (Grade 3+ or higher) as confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) within 90 days prior to study procedure
  3. Patient must present with an STS Score less than 10%
  4. High surgical risk for conventional mitral repair or replacement due to morphological criteria (e.g. leaflet or annulus calcifications), but operable, as assessed by the local heart team comprised of a cardiac surgeon experienced in mitral valve surgery and a cardiologist experienced in treating mitral valve disease and heart failure
  5. (NYHA) Functional Class III or IV
  6. Patient willing to participate in study and provide signed IRB/EC-approved
  7. Treating physician and patient agree that patient is able to return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe tricuspid regurgitation
  2. Severe aortic stenosis or insufficiency
  3. Severe mitral annulus calcification
  4. Diseased mitral anterior leaflet such as flail / prolapse/ heavy calcification
  5. Implanted vena cava filter
  6. Femoral veins with severe angulation and calcification
  7. for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or MDCT scan
  8. Active infection or endocarditis
  9. Previous mitral valve surgery
  10. Prior orthotopic heart transplantation
  11. Pulmonary artery systolic hypertension > 70mmHg
  12. Evidence of intra-cardiac, inferior vena cava (IVC) or femoral venous thrombus
  13. (LVEF) \< 30%
  14. Implant or revision of any pacing device \< 30 days prior to intervention
  15. Symptomatic coronary artery disease treated \< 30 days prior to study procedure
  16. Myocardial infarction requiring intervention \< 30 days prior to study procedure
  17. Infiltrative cardiomyopathies (e.g., amyloidosis, hemochromatosis, sarcoidosis), hypertrophic or restrictive cardiomyopathies, and constrictive pericarditis
  18. Active peptic ulcer or upper gastrointestinal bleeding \< 90 days prior to study procedure
  19. Stroke \< 180 days prior to study procedure
  20. Severe renal insufficiency (creatinine > 3.0 mg/dL) or patient requiring dialysis
  21. Cardiogenic shock at time of enrolment
  22. Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical heart assistance
  23. Concurrent medical condition with a of less than 2 years
  24. Pregnancy at time of enrolment
  25. History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or leukopenia (WBC \< 3,000 mcL) or acute anemia ( \< 9 g/dL) or thrombocytopenia ( \< 50,000 cells mcL)
  26. Known or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, ticlopidine or clopidogrel, nitinol, tantalum or allergy to contrast agents that cannot be pre-medicated
  27. Severe dementia or lack of capacity due to conditions that result in either inability to provide for the trial/procedure, prevent independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up assessments
  28. Emergency situations
  29. Company employees or their immediate family members
  30. Patient is under guardianship
  31. Patient is participating in another clinical study for which follow-up is currently ongoing
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Single-arm study of PLAR Implant and Delivery System to treat severe mitral regurgitation

    All enrolled patients will receive the study device

    Device: Transcatheter mitral valve repair (PLAR Implant and Delivery System)

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscatheter mitral valve repair (PLAR Implant and Delivery System)

    The PLAR Implant is placed mitral valve posterior annulus using its delivery system via femoral vein access and a transeptal puncture

    Also known as: TMVr

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of all-cause mortality following treatment with the PLAR Implant and Delivery System

    Primary safety outcome

    Time frame: 30-days follow-up

  2. Incidence of change from severe mitral regurgitation at baseline (Grade 3+ or more) to moderate or less mitral regurgitation (Grade 2+ or less) following treatment with the PLAR Implant and Delivery System as evaluated by 2D TTE

    Primary performance endpoint

    Time frame: 30-days follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of major safety events as defined by MVARC2 definitions

    Secondary safety endpoint

    Time frame: Follow-up at 30 days, at 6 and 12 months, and at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years

  2. Technical success rate per MVARC2 definitions

    All of the following must be present for technical success: * Absence of procedure mortality * Successful access, delivery and retrieval of investigation delivery system * Successful deployment and correct positioning of intended implant(s) * Freedom from emergency surgery/re-intervention related to device or access procedure

    Time frame: Technical success is measured immediately following the procedure

  3. Procedure success rate per MVARC2 definitions

    Both of the following must be present for procedure success: * Device success * Absence of major device or procedure-related serious adverse events as below: * Death * Stroke * Life-threatening bleed * Major vascular complication * Major cardiac structural complication * Stage 2 or 3 AKI * MI or coronary ischemia requiring PCI or CABG * Shock, heart or respiratory failure requiring IV vasopressors, mechanical intervention or prolonged intubation * Valve-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication requiring surgery or repeat intervention

    Time frame: Procedure success is measured at 30 days follow-up

  4. Device success rate per MVARC 2 definitions

    All of the following must be present for device success: * Absence of procedure mortality or stroke * Proper placement and positioning of device * Freedom from unplanned re-intervention related to device or access procedure * Continued intended safety and performance of the device as below: * No evidence of structural or functional failure * No device technical failure issues/complications * MR reduction to moderate or less without stenosis

    Time frame: Device success is measured at 30 days, at 6 and 12 months, and at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years follow-up

  5. Patient success rate per MVARC2 definitions

    All of the following must be present for patient success: * Device success * Patient returned to pre-procedure setting * No rehospitalization or reintervention for mitral regurgitation or heart failure • Functional improvement from baseline by one or more NYHA class * 6MWT improvement from baseline by 50 metres or more

    Time frame: Patient success is measured at 12 months follow-up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • InCor - Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
    São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-900, Brazil
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Clinical trial results will be shared with investigators once study is enrolled and trial data is prepared for presentation at a medical conference or for publication in a medical journal.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Apr 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2022, 11 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 8, 2020
First posted
Dec 22, 2020
StartActual
Apr 30, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2022
CompletionEst.
Dec 2026
Last update
Aug 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04679662
Lead sponsor
Polares Medical SA
Collaborators
Polares Medical, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 22, 2020
Start date
Apr 30, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 10, 2026

Study contacts

Laura A Brenton
study director · Polares Medical

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion