CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04677205N2-3SUpdated Jan 9, 2023

Molecular Signature From Tumor to Lymph Nodes

An observational study in Lung Cancer, Stage IIIA-cN2 and Operated With Curative Intent, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Recruiting at 12 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-09.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Nov 2023, 2 years 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2021; still recruiting 5 years 6 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Mediastinal lymph node (LN) involvement (N2) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) concerns 15% of resectable tumors and is associated with a poor prognosis and an overall survival reaching 9 to 49%. Literature fails to provide any definitive consensus regarding the management of these patients, except for the platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. The N2 involvement remains a matter of debate because of its not yet well-classified heterogeneity. Regarding anatomy, the Mountain and Dresler's regional LN classification for lung cancer staging remains the reference. Different studies classified IIIA-N2 disease into 4 groups, in addition to the skip-N2 phenomenon: minimal-N2, N2 single station, N2 multiple stations, and bulky-N2. Other subgroups were recently proposed for the 8th edition of the TNM: N2a1 - single station skip, N2a2 - single station non-skip, N2b - multiple stations.

The French National Cancer Institute (INCa) proposed guidelines, but in case of cN2 staging without mediastinal infiltration, guidelines remained imprecise ("resectability should be discussed for each case") and suggested surgery first, or induction chemotherapy, or concomitant chemoradiation.

Thus, optimal management of cIIIA-N2 remains controversial but complete tumor resection can be related to long-term survival in some patients, including 10 years after surgery [1]. In this situation, the identification of markers that will help select IIIA-N2 patients who will benefit from surgical resection is mandatory.

Read the detailed description

We planned a comprehensive molecular characterization of tumors and lymph nodes to evaluate the impact of molecular signatures and molecular heterogeneity on disease-free survival after surgery in IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients. Identification of specific molecular profiles in primary tumors and evolution profiles in nodes might provide clues to the potential risk of metastatic evolution and trigger specific management.

For patients included prospectively, we planned to analyze cell free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as prognostic marker. Because multiple biopsies are not always available in care settings, ctDNA could also be analyzed as a surrogate marker of molecular heterogeneity. Next generation sequencing (NGS) that was validated in our lab to screen ctDNA using a specific bio-informatics workflow allows accurate and cost effective ctDNA screening

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Cancer
  • Stage IIIA-cN2
  • Operated With Curative Intent
  • Primary Tumor Tissue Available
  • Node Tumor Tissue Available

Keywords

  • NSCLC
  • N2
  • molecular profile
  • prognosis
03

In context

Neoplasms

9,365 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,489 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is close to the median of 204 across 1,683 observational studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,505 studies on the registry; 1,006 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

230 patients in 11 French centers in order to have 200 eligible patients. Objectives are 120 patients recruited retrospectively and 110 prospectively.

Inclusion criteria are: all consecutive patients operated with a curative intent for an IIIA-cN2 NSCLC.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patient, men and women age >18 years
  • Patients operated with a curative intent for an IIIA-cN2 NSCLC
  • Social security affiliation
  • Written informed consent for patient included in part 2 (prospective) or not opposing the use of this data for patient included in part 1 (retrospective)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with T4, R1 or R2 surgical resection, sublobar resection, no radical lymphadenectomy
  • Patient under protectives measures
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 3-year disease-free survival

    To identify a molecular signature based on a comprehensive molecular analysis at genomic and transcriptomic levels linked to 3-year disease-free survival in resected IIIA-N2 NSCLC.

    Time frame: 3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. 5-year disease-free survival

    To identify a molecular signature based on a comprehensive molecular analysis at genomic and transcriptomic levels linked to 5-year disease-free survival in resected IIIA-N2 NSCLC.

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. pathological architectural patterns WHO 2015 classification

    To evaluate the impact of the pathological architectural patterns WHO 2015 classification on the 5-year cancer-specific survival and the 5-year overall survival

    Time frame: 5 years

  3. anatomical lymphatic spread

    To identify tumor molecular patterns associated with specific anatomical lymphatic spread subgroups.

    Time frame: at the end of molecular analyses

  4. ctDNA

    To assess ctDNA prognostic impact, before and after surgery.

    Time frame: 3 years

07

Study locations

1 of 12 sites recruiting
  • Hôpital du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux
    Bordeaux, France
    • Jacques JOUGON, Pr · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Hôpital Militaire Percy
    Clamart, France
    • Bertrand GRAND, Dr · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Hôpital Nord
    Marseille, France
    • Pascal THOMAS, Pr · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice
    Nice, France
    • Jérome MOUROUX, Pr · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Hegp-Aphp
    Paris, 75015, France
    Active, not recruiting
  • Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou
    Paris, 75015, France
    • Françoise LE PIMPEC-BARTHES, Pr · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Hôpital Bichat
    Paris, France
    • Pierre MORDANT, Dr · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Hôpital Cochin
    Paris, France
    • Marco ALIFANO, Pr · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Hôpital Pontchaillou, CHU de Rennes
    Rennes, France
    • Bertrand RICHARD DE LA TOUR, PR · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg
    Strasbourg, France
    • MASSARD Gilbert, Pr · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Hôpital Larrey, CHU de Toulouse
    Toulouse, France
    • Laurent BROUCHET, Pr · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • CHRU de Tours
    Tours, France
    • Antoine LEGRAS, Dr · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Altman DG, McShane LM, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE. Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration. BMC Med. 2012 May 29;10:51. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-51. PubMed 22642691 ↗
  • Legras A, Mordant P, Arame A, Foucault C, Dujon A, Le Pimpec Barthes F, Riquet M. Long-term survival of patients with pN2 lung cancer according to the pattern of lymphatic spread. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Apr;97(4):1156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.12.047. Epub 2014 Feb 26. PubMed 24582052 ↗
  • Lin IF, Chang WP, Liao YN. Shrinkage methods enhanced the accuracy of parameter estimation using Cox models with small number of events. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jul;66(7):743-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Apr 6. PubMed 23566374 ↗
  • Pecuchet N, Rozenholc Y, Zonta E, Pietrasz D, Didelot A, Combe P, Gibault L, Bachet JB, Taly V, Fabre E, Blons H, Laurent-Puig P. Analysis of Base-Position Error Rate of Next-Generation Sequencing to Detect Tumor Mutations in Circulating DNA. Clin Chem. 2016 Nov;62(11):1492-1503. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.258236. Epub 2016 Sep 13. PubMed 27624137 ↗
  • Peduzzi P, Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Dec;48(12):1503-10. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00048-8. PubMed 8543964 ↗
  • Tapak L, Saidijam M, Sadeghifar M, Poorolajal J, Mahjub H. Competing risks data analysis with high-dimensional covariates: an application in bladder cancer. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2015 Jun;13(3):169-76. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 20. PubMed 25907251 ↗
  • Um SW, Joung JG, Lee H, Kim H, Kim KT, Park J, Hayes DN, Park WY. Molecular Evolution Patterns in Metastatic Lymph Nodes Reflect the Differential Treatment Response of Advanced Primary Lung Cancer. Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 15;76(22):6568-6576. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0873. Epub 2016 Sep 13. PubMed 27634761 ↗
  • Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Mar 15;165(6):710-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwk052. Epub 2006 Dec 20. PubMed 17182981 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie results in publication could be shared. IPD detailed in the protocol of a planned metaanalysis could be shared.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Icf

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 9, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04677205
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute, France, Ministry of Health, France, Université de Paris
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 21, 2020
Start date
Mar 30, 2021
Primary completion
Nov 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 9, 2023

Study contacts

Antoine LEGRAS, MD PhD
Contact
antlegras@gmail.com
33 2 47474747
Liliane HAMMANI-BERKANI, MSc
Contact
liliane.berkani@aphp.fr
33 156093762
Helene BLONS, PharmD PhD
principal investigator · Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion