CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04668287SSEONIUpdated May 10, 2024

Improving Students' Self-esteem With an Online Intervention

An interventional study of Increasing self-esteem in Self Esteem, sponsored by West University of Timisoara. Completed at 1 site in Romania. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-10.

Sponsored by West University of Timisoara · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
33
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to measure the impact of an online intervention on students' self-esteem, using the model outlined by Melanie Fennell.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to test the level of students' self-esteem (explicit and implicit) before and after an online intervention. All selected participants will enjoy one of the online working groups led by a psychologist for five weeks. In these group sessions, students will be trained to identify how their low self-esteem was developed, what are those factors that maintain their low self-esteem and what can they do for improving their low self-esteem, using Fennell model.

02

Conditions studied

  • Self Esteem
03

In context

Lead sponsor

West University of Timisoara is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Low Self-Esteem (Cut-off=35 at Rosenberg self-esteem scale)
  • Being first year student in West University of Timisoara

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe clinical depression symptoms (Cut-off=15 at PHQ9)
  • Severe clinical anxiety symptoms (Cut-off=15 at GAD7)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
33 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Increasing Self-Esteem

    All participants will be included in working groups.

    Behavioral: Increasing self-esteem

Interventions

  • BehavioralIncreasing self-esteem

    During 5 weeks, participants will be part of one of the working groups in which they'll be taught by a counselor about how a low self-esteem develops and what have to be done for improving self-esteem, based on the Melanie Fennel' model.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Rosenberg's Self Esteem Scale

    Rosenberg's Self Esteem Scale is a self-esteem measure widely used in social-science research. It is a ten-item likert-type scale with items answered on a four-point scale-from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The scale measures global self-worth by measuring both positive and negative feelings about the self. The minimum score of Rosenberg's Self Esteem Scale is 10 and the highest one is 40. A higher score means a better outcome.

    Time frame: Change from Pre- to Post-Intervention (5 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Name Letter Test

    Name Letter Test is used to measure implicit self-esteem by testing the tendency to evaluate alphabetical letters in one's name, especially initials, particularly favorably.

    Time frame: Change from Pre- to Post-Intervention (5 weeks)

  2. Academic Burnout Scale

    This scale is designed to measure the level of students' burnout. It contains 3 subscales: Exhaustion (minimum score: 5, maximum: 25), Cynicism (minimum score: 5, maximum: 25), Inefficacy (minimum score: 6, maximum: 30). A higher score means a worse outcome. Beside that, it can be scored Core Burnout, as sum between Exhaustion and Cynicism.

    Time frame: Change from Pre- to Post-Intervention (5 weeks)

  3. Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD7)

    Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment is a self-administered 7 item instrument that uses some of the DSM-V criteria for GAD (General Anxiety Disorder) to identify probable cases of GAD along with measuring anxiety symptom severity. The minimum score of Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment is 0 and the highest one is 21. A higher score means a worse outcome (a higher level of anxiety).

    Time frame: Change from Pre- to Post-Intervention (5 weeks)

  4. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9)

    Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was designed to measure participant's severity of depression using DSM IV criteria. The minimum score of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 is 0 and the highest one is 27. A higher score means a worse outcome (more severe symptoms of depression).

    Time frame: Change from Pre- to Post-Intervention (5 weeks)

  5. Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire is a scale designed to measure the level of students' satisfaction with intervention. The items refer to the content of the intervention, being open and close questions.

    Time frame: Post-Intervention (5 weeks)

  6. Therapeutic factors

    A 9 item questionnaire designed to measure the impact of some of the therapeutic factors as universality, altruism, instillation of hope, etc (Yalom, I. D., \& Leszcz, M. (Collaborator). (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.)). For each of the 9 factors, the minimum score is 1 and the maximum one is 5. A higher score means a better outcome (that factor is relevant for intervention).

    Time frame: Post-Intervention (5 weeks)

  7. System usability

    A 10 item questionnaire designed to measure participants' satisfaction with Zoom, the online platform used for weekly meetings. The minimum score of System Usability Scale is 10 and the highest one is 50. A higher score means a better outcome.

    Time frame: Post-Intervention (5 weeks)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • West University of Timișoara
    Timişoara, 320104, Romania
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 10, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04668287
Lead sponsor
West University of Timisoara
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 16, 2020
Start date
Nov 11, 2020
Primary completion
Nov 13, 2020
Completion
Dec 18, 2020
Last update
May 10, 2024

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion