An interventional study of Geriatrics Bundle in Intensive Care Unit Syndrome, sponsored by Yale University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-16.
Sponsored by Yale University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
Despite the known benefits of geriatric care models among hospitalized older adults outside the intensive care unit (ICU), few studies have addressed the needs of older adults in the ICU; for example, sensory impairment, functional decline, and de-prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are rarely addressed in routine ICU practice. This pilot study will evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and barriers to implementation of a geriatrics bundle (occupational therapy, assessment and treatment of hearing impairment, and de-prescribing PIMs) in the ICU.
Outcome 4 was updated 11/8/23.
Yale University is the lead sponsor of 1,724 studies on the registry; 298 are open to participants now.
Of its 210 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 126 (60%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Enrolled participants in the intervention arm will receive all 3 components of the geriatrics bundle: occupational therapy (in addition to physical therapy) upon enrollment in the ICU, a portable amplifying device upon enrollment in the ICU, and a de-prescribing intervention by the ICU pharmacist (in conjunction with the medical team) upon ICU-to-floor transfer.
Other: Geriatrics Bundle
Participants in the control arm will be enrolled prior to implementation of the geriatrics bundle to gather preliminary data about the secondary outcomes.
Enrolled participants in the intervention arm will receive all 3 bundle components: occupational therapy (in addition to physical therapy) upon enrollment in the ICU, a portable amplifying device upon enrollment in the ICU, and a de-prescribing intervention by the ICU pharmacist (in conjunction with the medical team) upon ICU-to-floor transfer.
Feasibility of Bundle Delivery
Feasibility of bundle delivery will be measured by review of electronic medical record (EMR) documentation of each bundle component and a daily-check in with the patient and team. We will determine the proportion of eligible patients receiving each component as well as delivery of the overall bundle. A feasibility threshold of 70% will be used for the individual bundle components, as well as the combined bundle.
Time frame: From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
Acceptability of Bundle Delivery
Acceptability of the bundle among providers will be assessed with a survey using a 5-point Likert scale (range 1-5, where 5 indicates that participants strongly agree the bundle is completely acceptable for use in its current form and are comfortable using it).
Time frame: From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
Barriers and Facilitators to Bundle Implementation
Barriers and facilitators to bundle implementation will be assessed using qualitative methods. Separate focus groups were conducted with members of each health care discipline. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed. Content analysis was then used to identify barriers and facilitators to bundle implementation.
Time frame: From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
Delirium Assessed Using Chart-based Delirium Identification Instrument for ICU (CHART-DEL-ICU)
Incident delirium as measured by the Chart-based Delirium Identification Instrument for ICU (CHART-DEL-ICU). The CHART-DEL-ICU is a validated delirium detection tool for use in critically ill older adults. Charts were manually reviewed and assigned a level of confidence in the detection of delirium for the hospitalization: Level of confidence in detection of delirium 1. Definite (85%+) 2. Probable (60-85%) 3. Possible (40-60%) 4. Uncertain (10-40%) 5. No evidence (\< 10%) Delirium present during the hospitalization = "definite, probable, or possible" Delirium not present during the hospitalization = "uncertain or no evidence" Numbers represented here are participants with delirium.
Time frame: during hospitalization, up to 128 days
Mobility Level - Highest Level
Data about mobility level during hospitalization will be gathered from the physical therapy and occupational therapy flowsheets. This was scored on a scale of 0-6 with 6 being the highest level of mobility. Presented is the highest score by participants during the hospitalization period.
Time frame: From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
Mobility Level - Level at Discharge
Data about mobility level during hospitalization will be gathered from the physical therapy and occupational therapy flowsheets. This was scored on a scale of 0-6 with 6 being the highest level of mobility. Presented is the participant score at discharge.
Time frame: From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
Muscle Strength
Manual muscle testing via the 6-point MRC system: Strength in each of 12 muscle groups is assessed via a 6-point system, in which a score of 0=no contraction, 1=flicker of a contraction, 2=active movement with gravity eliminated, 3=active movement against gravity, 4=active movement against gravity and resistance, 5= normal power. The highest possible score is 60, which would indicate maximum muscle strength.
Time frame: From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
30-day Functional Outcomes
Participants will be asked whether they were independently able to complete a series of functional activities, including activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), and mobility activity. Functional activities included seven basic activities of daily living (eating, dressing, bathing, toileting, grooming, getting in and out of a chair, walking around indoors); five instrumental activities of daily living (doing housework, going shopping, preparing a meal, taking medications, managing finances); and three mobility activities (walking a quarter of a mile, climbing stairs, and lifting or carrying heavy objects). A higher count of activities indicates less disability.
Time frame: 30 days after hospital discharge
Number of Participants With Hospital Readmissions Within 30 Days
Participants will be asked if they were readmitted to a hospital within 30 days of hospital. The electronic medical record will also be reviewed for readmissions.
Time frame: 30 days after hospital discharge
Number of Participants That Reported Use and Perceived Benefit of Amplifying Device After Hospital Discharge
Participants will be asked whether they are still using the portable amplifying device after hospital discharge and whether they perceive benefit from its use. Presented are the qualitative responses summarized as frequencies.
Time frame: 30 days after hospital discharge
72 participants and 11 providers
| Milestone | Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) | Pre-Intervention Group (Control) | Providers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 50 | 22 | 11 |
| Completed | 35 | 15 | 11 |
| Not completed | 15 | 7 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Death | 8 | 2 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Hospice | 5 | 5 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Feasibility of bundle delivery will be measured by review of electronic medical record (EMR) documentation of each bundle component and a daily-check in with the patient and team. We will determine the proportion of eligible patients receiving each component as well as delivery of the overall bundle. A feasibility threshold of 70% will be used for the individual bundle components, as well as the combined bundle.
| Participants | Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) | Pre-Intervention Group (Control) |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility of Bundle Delivery | 50 | — |
Acceptability of the bundle among providers will be assessed with a survey using a 5-point Likert scale (range 1-5, where 5 indicates that participants strongly agree the bundle is completely acceptable for use in its current form and are comfortable using it).
| Participants | Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) |
|---|---|
| Strongly agree | 5 |
| Agree | 6 |
Barriers and facilitators to bundle implementation will be assessed using qualitative methods. Separate focus groups were conducted with members of each health care discipline. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed. Content analysis was then used to identify barriers and facilitators to bundle implementation.
| themes | Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) |
|---|---|
| Occupational Therapy Component: Barriers | 7 |
| Occupational Therapy Component: Facilitators | 3 |
| Pharmacy Component: Barriers | 5 |
| Pharmacy Component: Facilitators | 6 |
| Hearing Amplifier Component: Barriers | 3 |
| Hearing Amplifier Component: Facilitators | 2 |
Incident delirium as measured by the Chart-based Delirium Identification Instrument for ICU (CHART-DEL-ICU). The CHART-DEL-ICU is a validated delirium detection tool for use in critically ill older adults. Charts were manually reviewed and assigned a level of confidence in the detection of delirium for the hospitalization: Level of confidence in detection of delirium 1. Definite (85%+) 2. Probable (60-85%) 3. Possible (40-60%) 4. Uncertain (10-40%) 5. No evidence (\< 10%) Delirium present during the hospitalization = "definite, probable, or possible" Delirium not present during the hospitalization = "uncertain or no evidence" Numbers represented here are participants with delirium.
| Participants | Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) | Pre-Intervention Group (Control) |
|---|---|---|
| Delirium Assessed Using Chart-based Delirium Identification Instrument for ICU (CHART-DEL-ICU) | 5 | 7 |
Data about mobility level during hospitalization will be gathered from the physical therapy and occupational therapy flowsheets. This was scored on a scale of 0-6 with 6 being the highest level of mobility. Presented is the highest score by participants during the hospitalization period.
| score on a scale | Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) | Pre-Intervention Group (Control) |
|---|---|---|
| Mobility Level - Highest Level | 4.44 ± 1.13 | 4.38 ± 1.28 |
Data about mobility level during hospitalization will be gathered from the physical therapy and occupational therapy flowsheets. This was scored on a scale of 0-6 with 6 being the highest level of mobility. Presented is the participant score at discharge.
| score on a scale | Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) | Pre-Intervention Group (Control) |
|---|---|---|
| Mobility Level - Level at Discharge | 4.10 ± 1.29 | 4.10 ± 1.55 |
Manual muscle testing via the 6-point MRC system: Strength in each of 12 muscle groups is assessed via a 6-point system, in which a score of 0=no contraction, 1=flicker of a contraction, 2=active movement with gravity eliminated, 3=active movement against gravity, 4=active movement against gravity and resistance, 5= normal power. The highest possible score is 60, which would indicate maximum muscle strength.
| score on a scale | Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) | Pre-Intervention Group (Control) |
|---|---|---|
| Muscle Strength | 50.2 ± 9.0 | 49.6 ± 14.0 |
Participants will be asked whether they were independently able to complete a series of functional activities, including activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), and mobility activity. Functional activities included seven basic activities of daily living (eating, dressing, bathing, toileting, grooming, getting in and out of a chair, walking around indoors); five instrumental activities of daily living (doing housework, going shopping, preparing a meal, taking medications, managing finances); and three mobility activities (walking a quarter of a mile, climbing stairs, and lifting or carrying heavy objects). A higher count of activities indicates less disability.
| count of activities | Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) | Pre-Intervention Group (Control) |
|---|---|---|
| 30-day Functional Outcomes | 5 (2 to 12) | 8 (4 to 12) |
Participants will be asked if they were readmitted to a hospital within 30 days of hospital. The electronic medical record will also be reviewed for readmissions.
| Participants | Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) | Pre-Intervention Group (Control) |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Hospital Readmissions Within 30 Days | 5 | 3 |
Participants will be asked whether they are still using the portable amplifying device after hospital discharge and whether they perceive benefit from its use. Presented are the qualitative responses summarized as frequencies.
| Participants | Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) |
|---|---|
| Indicate Perceived benefits | 6 |
| Did Not Indicate Perceived benefits | 1 |
Collected over up to 30 days after hospital discharge. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) | 8/50 (16%) | 0/50 (0%) | 0/50 (0%) |
| Pre-Intervention Group (Control) | 2/22 (9.1%) | 0/22 (0%) | 0/22 (0%) |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) | Pre-Intervention Group (Control) | Providers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 79.48 ± 7.11 | 76.91 ± 8.09 | — | 78.69 ± 7.46 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) | Pre-Intervention Group (Control) | Providers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 23 | 12 | — | 35 |
| Male | 27 | 10 | — | 37 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants) | Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) | Pre-Intervention Group (Control) | Providers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White, Non-Hispanic | 40 | 18 | — | 58 |
| White, Hispanic | 2 | 0 | — | 2 |
| Black, non-Hispanic | 6 | 3 | — | 9 |
| Black, Hispanic | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Hispanic, race not reported | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Non-Hispanic, race not reported | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| Asian, non-Hispanic | 2 | 0 | — | 2 |
| Unknown race and ethnicity | 0 | 1 | — | 1 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) | Pre-Intervention Group (Control) | Providers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 50 | 22 | 11 | 83 |
| Highest level of education completed(Participants) | Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) | Pre-Intervention Group (Control) | Providers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less than high school | 9 | 3 | — | 12 |
| High school or equivalent | 30 | 8 | — | 38 |
| 2- or 4- year degree | 6 | 8 | — | 14 |
| Graduate or post-graduate | 4 | 6 | — | 10 |
| Medicaid recipient(Participants) | Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) | Pre-Intervention Group (Control) | Providers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | 18 | 6 | — | 24 |
| Marital status(Participants) | Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) | Pre-Intervention Group (Control) | Providers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Married or living with partner | 21 | 13 | — | 34 |
| Single | 3 | 2 | — | 5 |
| Divorced or separated | 9 | 3 | — | 12 |
| Widowed | 16 | 4 | — | 20 |
| Other | 1 | 1 | — | 2 |
| Lives alone(Participants) | Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle) | Pre-Intervention Group (Control) | Providers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | 16 | 4 | — | 20 |
11 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Yale University