CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04652453ACE-ICUUpdated Feb 16, 2024Results posted

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Barriers to Implementation of a Geriatrics Bundle in the ICU

An interventional study of Geriatrics Bundle in Intensive Care Unit Syndrome, sponsored by Yale University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-16.

Sponsored by Yale University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
83
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Despite the known benefits of geriatric care models among hospitalized older adults outside the intensive care unit (ICU), few studies have addressed the needs of older adults in the ICU; for example, sensory impairment, functional decline, and de-prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are rarely addressed in routine ICU practice. This pilot study will evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and barriers to implementation of a geriatrics bundle (occupational therapy, assessment and treatment of hearing impairment, and de-prescribing PIMs) in the ICU.

Read the detailed description

Outcome 4 was updated 11/8/23.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intensive Care Unit Syndrome

Keywords

  • Geriatrics
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Yale University is the lead sponsor of 1,724 studies on the registry; 298 are open to participants now.

Of its 210 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 126 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age > 65 years
  2. Hospitalized in the Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) on the York Street campus of Yale-New Haven Hospital.
  3. Has not opted out of research

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to provide informed consent and no proxy available
  2. Advance directive of "comfort measures only" (CMO) or change to CMO anticipated during this hospital admission
  3. Planned discharge to hospice
  4. Primary language other than English
  5. Tracheostomy with long-term ventilator dependence
  6. Patients with non-family conservators (e.g. a lawyer serving as the conservator for the patient)
  7. Unable to participate in the OT and hearing impairment interventions due to cognitive status (e.g. advanced dementia, anoxic brain injury, vegetative state, etc) or the need for deep sedation (e.g. if treatment of the critical illness requires deep sedation and neuromuscular blockade, such as in severe ARDS [the acute respiratory distress syndrome])
  8. COVID-19 positive
  9. Already receiving OT in the ICU
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
83 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)

    Enrolled participants in the intervention arm will receive all 3 components of the geriatrics bundle: occupational therapy (in addition to physical therapy) upon enrollment in the ICU, a portable amplifying device upon enrollment in the ICU, and a de-prescribing intervention by the ICU pharmacist (in conjunction with the medical team) upon ICU-to-floor transfer.

    Other: Geriatrics Bundle

  • No intervention
    Pre-Intervention Group (Control)

    Participants in the control arm will be enrolled prior to implementation of the geriatrics bundle to gather preliminary data about the secondary outcomes.

Interventions

  • OtherGeriatrics Bundle

    Enrolled participants in the intervention arm will receive all 3 bundle components: occupational therapy (in addition to physical therapy) upon enrollment in the ICU, a portable amplifying device upon enrollment in the ICU, and a de-prescribing intervention by the ICU pharmacist (in conjunction with the medical team) upon ICU-to-floor transfer.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of Bundle Delivery

    Feasibility of bundle delivery will be measured by review of electronic medical record (EMR) documentation of each bundle component and a daily-check in with the patient and team. We will determine the proportion of eligible patients receiving each component as well as delivery of the overall bundle. A feasibility threshold of 70% will be used for the individual bundle components, as well as the combined bundle.

    Time frame: From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days

  2. Acceptability of Bundle Delivery

    Acceptability of the bundle among providers will be assessed with a survey using a 5-point Likert scale (range 1-5, where 5 indicates that participants strongly agree the bundle is completely acceptable for use in its current form and are comfortable using it).

    Time frame: From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days

  3. Barriers and Facilitators to Bundle Implementation

    Barriers and facilitators to bundle implementation will be assessed using qualitative methods. Separate focus groups were conducted with members of each health care discipline. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed. Content analysis was then used to identify barriers and facilitators to bundle implementation.

    Time frame: From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Delirium Assessed Using Chart-based Delirium Identification Instrument for ICU (CHART-DEL-ICU)

    Incident delirium as measured by the Chart-based Delirium Identification Instrument for ICU (CHART-DEL-ICU). The CHART-DEL-ICU is a validated delirium detection tool for use in critically ill older adults. Charts were manually reviewed and assigned a level of confidence in the detection of delirium for the hospitalization: Level of confidence in detection of delirium 1. Definite (85%+) 2. Probable (60-85%) 3. Possible (40-60%) 4. Uncertain (10-40%) 5. No evidence (\< 10%) Delirium present during the hospitalization = "definite, probable, or possible" Delirium not present during the hospitalization = "uncertain or no evidence" Numbers represented here are participants with delirium.

    Time frame: during hospitalization, up to 128 days

  2. Mobility Level - Highest Level

    Data about mobility level during hospitalization will be gathered from the physical therapy and occupational therapy flowsheets. This was scored on a scale of 0-6 with 6 being the highest level of mobility. Presented is the highest score by participants during the hospitalization period.

    Time frame: From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days

  3. Mobility Level - Level at Discharge

    Data about mobility level during hospitalization will be gathered from the physical therapy and occupational therapy flowsheets. This was scored on a scale of 0-6 with 6 being the highest level of mobility. Presented is the participant score at discharge.

    Time frame: From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days

  4. Muscle Strength

    Manual muscle testing via the 6-point MRC system: Strength in each of 12 muscle groups is assessed via a 6-point system, in which a score of 0=no contraction, 1=flicker of a contraction, 2=active movement with gravity eliminated, 3=active movement against gravity, 4=active movement against gravity and resistance, 5= normal power. The highest possible score is 60, which would indicate maximum muscle strength.

    Time frame: From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days

  5. 30-day Functional Outcomes

    Participants will be asked whether they were independently able to complete a series of functional activities, including activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), and mobility activity. Functional activities included seven basic activities of daily living (eating, dressing, bathing, toileting, grooming, getting in and out of a chair, walking around indoors); five instrumental activities of daily living (doing housework, going shopping, preparing a meal, taking medications, managing finances); and three mobility activities (walking a quarter of a mile, climbing stairs, and lifting or carrying heavy objects). A higher count of activities indicates less disability.

    Time frame: 30 days after hospital discharge

  6. Number of Participants With Hospital Readmissions Within 30 Days

    Participants will be asked if they were readmitted to a hospital within 30 days of hospital. The electronic medical record will also be reviewed for readmissions.

    Time frame: 30 days after hospital discharge

  7. Number of Participants That Reported Use and Perceived Benefit of Amplifying Device After Hospital Discharge

    Participants will be asked whether they are still using the portable amplifying device after hospital discharge and whether they perceive benefit from its use. Presented are the qualitative responses summarized as frequencies.

    Time frame: 30 days after hospital discharge

07

Results

Posted Mar 1, 2023

Participant flow

72 participants and 11 providers

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePost-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)Pre-Intervention Group (Control)Providers
Started502211
Completed351511
Not completed1570
Withdrew: Death820
Withdrew: Hospice550
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject200

Outcome measures

PrimaryFeasibility of Bundle Delivery

Feasibility of bundle delivery will be measured by review of electronic medical record (EMR) documentation of each bundle component and a daily-check in with the patient and team. We will determine the proportion of eligible patients receiving each component as well as delivery of the overall bundle. A feasibility threshold of 70% will be used for the individual bundle components, as well as the combined bundle.

Time frame:
From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Feasibility of Bundle Delivery
ParticipantsPost-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)Pre-Intervention Group (Control)
Feasibility of Bundle Delivery50—
PrimaryAcceptability of Bundle Delivery

Acceptability of the bundle among providers will be assessed with a survey using a 5-point Likert scale (range 1-5, where 5 indicates that participants strongly agree the bundle is completely acceptable for use in its current form and are comfortable using it).

Time frame:
From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Acceptability of Bundle Delivery
ParticipantsPost-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)
Strongly agree5
Agree6
PrimaryBarriers and Facilitators to Bundle Implementation

Barriers and facilitators to bundle implementation will be assessed using qualitative methods. Separate focus groups were conducted with members of each health care discipline. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed. Content analysis was then used to identify barriers and facilitators to bundle implementation.

Time frame:
From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
Reported as:
Number · themes
Barriers and Facilitators to Bundle Implementation
themesPost-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)
Occupational Therapy Component: Barriers7
Occupational Therapy Component: Facilitators3
Pharmacy Component: Barriers5
Pharmacy Component: Facilitators6
Hearing Amplifier Component: Barriers3
Hearing Amplifier Component: Facilitators2
SecondaryDelirium Assessed Using Chart-based Delirium Identification Instrument for ICU (CHART-DEL-ICU)

Incident delirium as measured by the Chart-based Delirium Identification Instrument for ICU (CHART-DEL-ICU). The CHART-DEL-ICU is a validated delirium detection tool for use in critically ill older adults. Charts were manually reviewed and assigned a level of confidence in the detection of delirium for the hospitalization: Level of confidence in detection of delirium 1. Definite (85%+) 2. Probable (60-85%) 3. Possible (40-60%) 4. Uncertain (10-40%) 5. No evidence (\< 10%) Delirium present during the hospitalization = "definite, probable, or possible" Delirium not present during the hospitalization = "uncertain or no evidence" Numbers represented here are participants with delirium.

Time frame:
during hospitalization, up to 128 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Delirium Assessed Using Chart-based Delirium Identification Instrument for ICU (CHART-DEL-ICU)
ParticipantsPost-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)Pre-Intervention Group (Control)
Delirium Assessed Using Chart-based Delirium Identification Instrument for ICU (CHART-DEL-ICU)57
SecondaryMobility Level - Highest Level

Data about mobility level during hospitalization will be gathered from the physical therapy and occupational therapy flowsheets. This was scored on a scale of 0-6 with 6 being the highest level of mobility. Presented is the highest score by participants during the hospitalization period.

Time frame:
From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mobility Level - Highest Level
score on a scalePost-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)Pre-Intervention Group (Control)
Mobility Level - Highest Level4.44 ± 1.134.38 ± 1.28
SecondaryMobility Level - Level at Discharge

Data about mobility level during hospitalization will be gathered from the physical therapy and occupational therapy flowsheets. This was scored on a scale of 0-6 with 6 being the highest level of mobility. Presented is the participant score at discharge.

Time frame:
From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mobility Level - Level at Discharge
score on a scalePost-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)Pre-Intervention Group (Control)
Mobility Level - Level at Discharge4.10 ± 1.294.10 ± 1.55
SecondaryMuscle Strength

Manual muscle testing via the 6-point MRC system: Strength in each of 12 muscle groups is assessed via a 6-point system, in which a score of 0=no contraction, 1=flicker of a contraction, 2=active movement with gravity eliminated, 3=active movement against gravity, 4=active movement against gravity and resistance, 5= normal power. The highest possible score is 60, which would indicate maximum muscle strength.

Time frame:
From ICU admission to hospital discharge, up to 30 days
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Muscle Strength
score on a scalePost-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)Pre-Intervention Group (Control)
Muscle Strength50.2 ± 9.049.6 ± 14.0
Secondary30-day Functional Outcomes

Participants will be asked whether they were independently able to complete a series of functional activities, including activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), and mobility activity. Functional activities included seven basic activities of daily living (eating, dressing, bathing, toileting, grooming, getting in and out of a chair, walking around indoors); five instrumental activities of daily living (doing housework, going shopping, preparing a meal, taking medications, managing finances); and three mobility activities (walking a quarter of a mile, climbing stairs, and lifting or carrying heavy objects). A higher count of activities indicates less disability.

Time frame:
30 days after hospital discharge
Reported as:
Median · count of activities
30-day Functional Outcomes
count of activitiesPost-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)Pre-Intervention Group (Control)
30-day Functional Outcomes5 (2 to 12)8 (4 to 12)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Hospital Readmissions Within 30 Days

Participants will be asked if they were readmitted to a hospital within 30 days of hospital. The electronic medical record will also be reviewed for readmissions.

Time frame:
30 days after hospital discharge
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Hospital Readmissions Within 30 Days
ParticipantsPost-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)Pre-Intervention Group (Control)
Number of Participants With Hospital Readmissions Within 30 Days53
SecondaryNumber of Participants That Reported Use and Perceived Benefit of Amplifying Device After Hospital Discharge

Participants will be asked whether they are still using the portable amplifying device after hospital discharge and whether they perceive benefit from its use. Presented are the qualitative responses summarized as frequencies.

Time frame:
30 days after hospital discharge
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Reported Use and Perceived Benefit of Amplifying Device After Hospital Discharge
ParticipantsPost-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)
Indicate Perceived benefits6
Did Not Indicate Perceived benefits1

Adverse events

Collected over up to 30 days after hospital discharge. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)8/50 (16%)0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)
Pre-Intervention Group (Control)2/22 (9.1%)0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)Pre-Intervention Group (Control)ProvidersTotal
Mean79.48 ± 7.1176.91 ± 8.09—78.69 ± 7.46
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)Pre-Intervention Group (Control)ProvidersTotal
Female2312—35
Male2710—37
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)Pre-Intervention Group (Control)ProvidersTotal
White, Non-Hispanic4018—58
White, Hispanic20—2
Black, non-Hispanic63—9
Black, Hispanic00—0
Hispanic, race not reported00—0
Non-Hispanic, race not reported00—0
Asian, non-Hispanic20—2
Unknown race and ethnicity01—1
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)Pre-Intervention Group (Control)ProvidersTotal
United States50221183
Highest level of education completed
Highest level of education completed(Participants)Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)Pre-Intervention Group (Control)ProvidersTotal
Less than high school93—12
High school or equivalent308—38
2- or 4- year degree68—14
Graduate or post-graduate46—10
Medicaid recipient
Medicaid recipient(Participants)Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)Pre-Intervention Group (Control)ProvidersTotal
Count of participants186—24
Marital status
Marital status(Participants)Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)Pre-Intervention Group (Control)ProvidersTotal
Married or living with partner2113—34
Single32—5
Divorced or separated93—12
Widowed164—20
Other11—2
Lives alone
Lives alone(Participants)Post-Intervention Group (Geriatrics Bundle)Pre-Intervention Group (Control)ProvidersTotal
Count of participants164—20

11 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Yale-New Haven Hospital
    New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Apr 7, 2021
  • Informed consent form · Jan 15, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 16, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04652453
Lead sponsor
Yale University
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 3, 2020
Start date
Jan 19, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 22, 2021
Completion
Dec 22, 2021
Results posted
Mar 1, 2023
Last update
Feb 16, 2024

Study contacts

Lauren Ferrante, MD, MHS
principal investigator · Yale University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion