A Phase 3 interventional study of Atezolizumab & Bevacizumab and Surgery followed by atezolizumab and bevacizumab in Venous Thrombosis, sponsored by Jia Fan. Active, not recruiting at 23 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-15.
Sponsored by Jia Fan · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
The treatment strategies for HCC with PVTT is still controversial, and differ substantially between the west and the east. According to western guidelines, including those of the EASL, BCLC, and AASLD, PVTT is regarded as a contra-indication to initial surgery or transarterial chemoembolization.
At present, there is still no consensus on the diagnosis and treatment standards of HCC with HVTT/IVCTT. European and American guidelines for liver cancer use The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging as the standard and classify liver cancer with HVTT/IVCTT into the advanced stage. Molecular targeted drugs such as sorafenib and lenvatinib are recommended to the patients in this phase as first-line treatment drugs and methods. In this regard, experts in China and Southeast Asian countries still have different opinions. They believe that surgery, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiotherapy, and combined treatment with multiple treatment methods can achieve more satisfactory results.
HCC with VTT consists of heterogeneous populations with different disease behaviors and prognoses. As a result of recent concept evolution and advances in surgical techniques and perioperative management, emerging evidence shows that selected patients with PVTT may benefit from more aggressive treatment modalities, which are recommended for by Chinese, Japanese, South Korean, and Asia Pacific clinical practice guidelines. A national survey from Japan showed median overall survival with liver resection treatment to be 1.77 years longer than with nonresection therapies, which included TACE, radiotherapy, sorafenib, or conservative treatment (2.87 years vs 1.10 years, respectively; p\<0.001). After propensity-score matching of patient baseline characteristics, median overall survival since diagnosis in the liver resection group was 0.88 years longer than in the non-resection group. In a large-scale, multicentre, propensity-score matched analysis from China, surgery was the best treatment for patients with Cheng's type I and II PVTT with Child-Pugh A and selected B liver function. Median overall survival after liver resection (745 of 1580 patients) was 15.9 months (95% CI 13.3-18.5 months) for Cheng's type I PVTT and 12.5 months (10.7-14.3 months) for Cheng's type II PVTT. Thus, aggressive surgical resection in selected patients with HCC with vascular invasion, as proposed by several tertiary health-care centers in the east, seems to be reasonable.
Currently, there are no dedicated clinical trials to study the value of hepatic resection in this population. Furthermore, cumulative evidence indicates that long-term overall survival after hepatic resection alone remains unsatisfactory because of the high rate of tumor recurrence and correspondingly low rate of disease-free survival. The combination of perioperative therapies may be more efficacious to improve the prognosis in selected population. More high-level evidence of novel multimodality treatment should be generated.
This trial will enroll HCC patients with PVTT CNLC Stage IIIa, who have no prior anti-cancer treatment. Given the poor prognosis and limited treatment options for these patients, this population is considered appropriate for trials of more aggressive and novel therapeutic candidates in the initial treatment setting. The benefit risk profile for hepatic resection combined with perioperative atezo/bev in this patient population is expected to be favorable.
This is a multicenter, open-label, two-arm, randomized study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of surgical resection plus peri-operative atezo/bev compared with continuous systemic atezo/bev in HCC patients with VTT and without EHS.
Initially eligible patients will be enrolled into induction phase, during which they will receive 3 cycles of atezo/bev and 1 cycle of atezo alone as primary systemic therapy. Tumor response assessment using computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will be conducted by the Independent-Review Facility (IRF) according to RECIST v1.1 after cycle 2 and cycle 4.
Only those patients who are assessed as partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) and considered suitable for curative hepatic resection will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following two arms:
Randomization will be performed after the second tumor assessment and stratified according to the following stratification factors:
In Arm A, hepatic resection surgery will be performed 0-2 weeks after the randomization. Surgical approaches will be tailored to the individual patient according to local standards with the goal of achieving R0 resection. The first administration of postoperative atezo/bev treatment is recommended to start within 4-6 weeks after surgery, requiring full recovery from the surgery prior to post-operative atezo/bev treatment, including:
Tumor assessments will be performed in induction phase after cycle 2 and cycle 4 (randomization baseline), and in treatment period at regular intervals (Arm A will receive tumor assessment at the first dose of postoperative treatment (±3 days)and every 9 weeks (±7 days)thereafter. Arm B every 9 weeks (±7 days)thereafter ). Additional scans will be performed as clinically indicated. Following completion or discontinuation of the treatment, information on recurrence or disease progression, survival and subsequent anti-cancer therapies will be collected until death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of ICF or study termination by Sponsor, whichever occurs first. In the absence of disease recurrence or progression, tumor assessments should continue regardless of whether patients start a new anti-cancer therapy, until documented treatment failure events, withdrawal of ICF or study termination. All patients will be followed for survival unless consent is withdrawn.
Patients who withdraw from the study will not be replaced. An IRF will be used to enable centralized, independent reviews of images and other clinical data (e.g., histopathology, tumor markers etc.) used for assessment of HCC response, recurrence and disease progression. IRF reviews will be performed prior to the pre-specified efficacy analyses. IRF membership and procedures will be detailed in an IRF Charter.
774 studies on the registry are indexed under Venous Thrombosis; 124 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 501 is above the median of 131 across 452 interventional studies indexed under Venous Thrombosis.
Browse Venous Thrombosis studies →Jia Fan is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
No prior anti-tumor treatment (including both local-regional and systemic therapies) for HCC
Adequate hematologic and end-organ function, defined by the following laboratory test results, obtained within 14 days prior to initiation of induction treatment unless otherwise specified:
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)≥1.5x109/L (1500/uL) without granulocyte colony stimulating factor support
- Lymphocyte count ≥0.5x109/L (500/uL)
- Platelet count ≥75x109/L (75,000/uL) without transfusion
Serum creatinine (SCr) ≤1.5 x ULN or Creatinine clearance (CCr) ≥ 50mL/min (calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula):
(140-age) x Weight (kg) CCr (ml/min) = --------------------------------- (Female x 0.85) 72 x SCr (mg/dL) (140-age) x Weight (kg) OR CCr (ml/min) = ----------------------------------- (Female x 0.85) 0.818 x SCr (umol/L)
For women of childbearing potential, agreement (by patient) to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or to use contraceptive methods as defined below:
For men: agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use a condom, and agreement to refrain from donating sperm, as defined below:
Patients must meet the following additional criteria for study randomization:
18. Tumor assessed as PR or SD after 4 cycles of atezo/bev treatment as determined by the IRF according to RECIST v1.1 19. Feasibility for curative hepatic resection as assessed by the investigator 20. Physical condition and organ function allowing to undergo appropriate surgical management or atezo/bev treatment according to investigator's judgement.
21. Treatment emerged adverse events during induction phase, if any, should have been recovered to meet the requirements of surgical or atezo/bev treatment according to investigator's judgement.
22. Agreement and ability to comply with the treatment of Arm A or Arm B in the investigator's judgment
Exclusion Criteria:
Untreated or incompletely treated esophageal and/or gastric varices with bleeding or high risk for bleeding
Active or history of autoimmune disease or immune deficiency, including, but not limited to, myasthenia gravis, myositis, autoimmune hepatitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, Wegener granulomatosis, Sjögren syndrome, Guillain-Barré syndrome, or multiple sclerosis, with the following exceptions:
Patients with eczema, psoriasis, lichen simplex chronicus, or vitiligo with dermatologic manifestations only (e.g., patients with psoriatic arthritis are excluded) are eligible for the study provided all of following conditions are met:
Treatment with therapeutic oral or IV antibiotics within 2 weeks prior to Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pregnant or breastfeeding, or intending to become pregnant during the study or within 5 months after the final dose of atezolizumab or within 6 months after the final dose of bevacizumab
Co-infection with HBV and HCV
Any prior treatment for HCC, including systemic therapy (including investigational agents) and locoregional therapy such as TACE
Treatment with systemic immunosuppressive medication (including, but not limited to, corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, thalidomide, and anti-tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α agents) within 2 weeks prior to Day 1 of Cycle 1, or anticipation of need for systemic immunosuppressive medication during study treatment, with the following exceptions:
Inadequately controlled arterial hypertension (defined as systolic blood pressure [BP] > 150 mmHg and/or diastolic BP > 100 mmHg), based on an average of at least three BP readings at two or more sessions
Current or recent (within 10 days prior to Day 1 of Cycle 1) use of full-dose oral or parenteral anticoagulants or thrombolytic agents for therapeutic (as opposed to prophylactic) purpose
Chronic daily treatment with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
hepatic resection with post-operative atezolizumab 1200mg and bevacizumab 15mg/kg, both administered by IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle
Procedure: Surgery followed by atezolizumab and bevacizumab
atezolizumab 1200mg and bevacizumab 15mg/kg, both administered by IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle
Drug: Atezolizumab & Bevacizumab
atezolizumab 1200mg and bevacizumab 15mg/kg
Also known as: Bevacizumab
hepatic resection with post-operative atezolizumab 1200mg and bevacizumab 15mg/kg
Also known as: Atezolizumab, Bevacizumab
TTF
Time-to-treatment failure (TTF) after randomization, defined as the time from randomization to the first documented treatment failure (i.e., local recurrence or progression, EHS, or death from any cause). Tumor response will be determined by the IRF according to RECIST v1.1
Time frame: 24 months
OS
Overall survival (OS) after randomization, defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause
Time frame: 24 months
OS rate
OS rate at 12 months, 18 months and 24 months, defined as the proportion of patients who have not experienced death from any cause at 12, 18 and 24months after randomization, respectively
Time frame: 24 months
TTF
TTF after randomization as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1
Time frame: 24 months
TTF
TTF after randomization as determined by the IRF and the investigator according to HCC mRECIST
Time frame: 24 months
Time to EHS
Time to EHS after randomization, defined as the time from randomization to first appearance of EHS, as determined by the IRF and the investigator
Time frame: 24 months
AE/ADR
Nature, incidence, severity and seriousness of the adverse events/ADR. Adverse events are graded according to the NCI-CTCAE (Version 5.0)
Time frame: 24 months
RFS
Recurrence-free survival (RFS) after randomization (Arm A), defined as the time from randomization to the first documented occurrence of local, regional, or metastatic HCC as determined by the IRF and the investigator, or death from any cause (whichever occurs first)
Time frame: 24 months
TTR
Time-to-Recurrence (TTR) after randomization (Arm A), defined as the time from randomization to the first documented occurrence of local, regional, or metastatic HCC, as determined by the IRF and the investigator
Time frame: 24 months
R0 rate
R0 rate (Arm A), defined as the proportion of patients who accomplish the complete resection of tumor with pathologically confirmed negative margin
Time frame: 24 months
pCR rate
Pathological complete regression (pCR) rate (Arm A), defined as the proportion of patients with no evidence of vital residual tumor cells on the complete resected specimen. pCR status will be analyzed by local pathologists at each site
Time frame: 24 months
ORR
Objective response rate (ORR) during atezo/bev treatment in induction phase before randomization and in Arm B after randomization, defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as determined by the IRF and the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 and HCC mRECIST
Time frame: 24 months
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.