CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04646213CALMUpdated Mar 13, 2024Results posted

Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully

An interventional study of Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) Therapy in Mood and Cancer Brain, sponsored by Virginia Commonwealth University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-13.

Sponsored by Virginia Commonwealth University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to pilot test an empirically supported psychotherapeutic intervention, Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM). Researchers hope to better understand the potential benefits of this intervention on brain tumor patients' mood and quality of life. This may lead to improvements in doctor's understanding of how to enhance brain tumor patient's wellbeing and overall functioning.

Read the detailed description

In this study, participants will be asked to do the following things:

  1. Complete \~15-minute online surveys before the program, immediately after the program (4 months), and at follow-up (6 months). . Questions will ask about mood, anxiety, death distress, quality of social relationships, and satisfaction with life.
  2. Meet with an interventionist six times (biweekly) for individual sessions via Zoom, lasting 50-60 minutes each. Sessions will be audio-recorded to ensure all participants receive the same information. Participants will be asked to only use first names.
  3. Complete weekly \~5 minute online surveys after each session on satisfaction with the program.
  4. Complete an exit interview by telephone approximately 1 month after the 6-session intervention. This exit interview will last approximately 15-30 minutes.
02

Conditions studied

  • Mood
  • Cancer Brain
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Virginia Commonwealth University is the lead sponsor of 641 studies on the registry; 82 are open to participants now.

Of its 88 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 62 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • have a confirmed malignant brain cancer diagnosis via histopathology
  • be a minimum of 2 weeks post-surgical resection or biopsy (if applicable)
  • be primarily English speaking
  • be age 18-89
  • obtain >20 on the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS)
  • have current elevated depression or death anxiety symptoms
  • have a reliable internet connection to participate in the Zoom therapy sessions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major communication difficulties as determined by the research team which would prohibit psychotherapeutic interaction
  • inability to meet with interventionist via an electronic device for telehealth intervention sessions
  • inability to provide informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
14 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Therapy

    psychotherapeutic intervention

    Behavioral: Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) Therapy

Interventions

  • BehavioralManaging Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) Therapy

    6 sessions of individualized CALM therapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recruitment for CALM

    Number of potential participants consented and enrolled

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. Completion of CALM Sessions

    Number of participants completing CALM sessions

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Post-session Assessment Completion

    Number of participants completing post-session surveys

    Time frame: 4 months

  4. Follow-up Assessment Completion

    Number of participants that completed a follow-up survey

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Satisfaction With CALM Sessions

    Average rating of CALM session satisfaction score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all satisfied and 5 being very much satisfied. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

  6. Helpfulness of CALM Sessions

    Average rating of CALM session helpfulness score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all helpful and 5 being very much helpful. Higher scores indicate greater helpfulness.

    Time frame: Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

  7. Relevance of CALM

    Average rating of CALM session relevance score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all relevant and 5 being very much relevant. Higher scores indicate greater helpfulness.

    Time frame: Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

  8. Utility of CALM

    Average rating of CALM session utility score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all useful and 5 being very much useful. Higher scores indicate greater helpfulness.

    Time frame: Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

  9. Intervention Satisfaction

    Mean rating of intervention satisfaction score (average score across all participants who completed the CALM intervention - one timepoint). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all satisfied and 5 being very much satisfied. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: 3 month - one timepoint

  10. Number of Participants Likely to Recommend the Program to Others

    Rating of the likelihood of recommending the program to others.

    Time frame: 3 month timepoint

07

Results

Posted Mar 13, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTherapy
Started14
Completed9
Not completed5
Withdrew: Physician decision3
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2

Outcome measures

PrimaryRecruitment for CALM

Number of potential participants consented and enrolled

Time frame:
1 day
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Recruitment for CALM
ParticipantsTherapy
Consented14
Enrolled14
Started intervention12
PrimaryCompletion of CALM Sessions

Number of participants completing CALM sessions

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Completion of CALM Sessions
ParticipantsTherapy
Completion of CALM Sessions9
PrimaryPost-session Assessment Completion

Number of participants completing post-session surveys

Time frame:
4 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Post-session Assessment Completion
ParticipantsTherapy
Post-session Assessment Completion10
PrimaryFollow-up Assessment Completion

Number of participants that completed a follow-up survey

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Follow-up Assessment Completion
ParticipantsTherapy
Follow-up Assessment Completion4
PrimarySatisfaction With CALM Sessions

Average rating of CALM session satisfaction score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all satisfied and 5 being very much satisfied. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

Time frame:
Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Satisfaction With CALM Sessions
units on a scaleTherapy
Satisfaction With CALM Sessions4.6 (3 to 5)
PrimaryHelpfulness of CALM Sessions

Average rating of CALM session helpfulness score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all helpful and 5 being very much helpful. Higher scores indicate greater helpfulness.

Time frame:
Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Helpfulness of CALM Sessions
score on a scaleTherapy
Helpfulness of CALM Sessions4.6 (3 to 5)
PrimaryRelevance of CALM

Average rating of CALM session relevance score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all relevant and 5 being very much relevant. Higher scores indicate greater helpfulness.

Time frame:
Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Relevance of CALM
score on a scaleTherapy
Relevance of CALM4.6 (2 to 5)
PrimaryUtility of CALM

Average rating of CALM session utility score (average score across all participants following each CALM session multiple timepoints). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all useful and 5 being very much useful. Higher scores indicate greater helpfulness.

Time frame:
Following each CALM session, every 2 weeks for 6 sessions: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Utility of CALM
score on a scaleTherapy
Utility of CALM4.5 (3 to 5)
PrimaryIntervention Satisfaction

Mean rating of intervention satisfaction score (average score across all participants who completed the CALM intervention - one timepoint). Rating option is a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being not at all satisfied and 5 being very much satisfied. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

Time frame:
3 month - one timepoint
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Intervention Satisfaction
score on a scaleTherapy
Intervention Satisfaction4.5 (3 to 5)
PrimaryNumber of Participants Likely to Recommend the Program to Others

Rating of the likelihood of recommending the program to others.

Time frame:
3 month timepoint
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Likely to Recommend the Program to Others
ParticipantsTherapy
Will Recommend9
Will not Recommend0

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Therapy0/9 (0%)——

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Therapy
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years9
>=65 years5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Therapy
Female11
Male3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Therapy
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino14
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Therapy
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American1
White13
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Therapy
United States14
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
    Richmond, Virginia 23298, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Loughan AR, Willis KD, Braun SE, Rodin G, Lanoye A, Davies AE, Svikis D, Mazzeo S, Malkin M, Thacker L. Managing cancer and living meaningfully (CALM) in adults with malignant glioma: a proof-of-concept phase IIa trial. J Neurooncol. 2022 May;157(3):447-456. doi: 10.1007/s11060-022-03988-8. Epub 2022 Apr 18. PubMed 35437687 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Nov 19, 2020
  • Informed consent form · Nov 19, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual level data will not be shared other researchers. Access to all data will be limited to study personnel.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 13, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04646213
Lead sponsor
Virginia Commonwealth University
Collaborators
American Cancer Society, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 27, 2020
Start date
Dec 3, 2020
Primary completion
Sep 14, 2021
Completion
Feb 14, 2022
Results posted
Mar 13, 2024
Last update
Mar 13, 2024

Study contacts

Ashlee Loughan, PhD
principal investigator · Virginia Commonwealth University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion