CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04646109Updated Jan 27, 2021Results posted

Ivermectin for Severe COVID-19 Management

A Phase 3 interventional study of Ivermectin in COVID-19, sponsored by Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University. Completed at 4 sites in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-27.

Sponsored by Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2020, registered Nov 2020).
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this multicenter study; it was aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of ivermectin use in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia that have no mutations which alter ivermectin metabolism and cause side effects.

Read the detailed description

Patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia were included in the study. Two groups, the study group and the control group, took part in the study.

Ivermectin 200 mcg/kg/day for five days (9 mg between 36-50 kg, 12 mg between 51-65 kg, 15 mg between 66-79 kg and 200 microgram/kg in > 80 kg) in the form of a solution prepared for enteral use added to the reference treatment protocol -hydroxychloroquine (2x400mg loading dose followed by 2x200mg, po, 5 days) + favipiravir (2x1600mg loading dose followed by 2x600mg maintenance dose, po, total 5 days) + azithromycin (first day 500mg followed by 4 days 250mg/day, po, total 5 days)- of patients included in the study group. Patients in the control group were given only reference treatment with 3 other drugs without ivermectin.

The mutations in 29 pairs of primers in mdr1/abcab1 gene by sequencing analysis using Sanger method, and the haplotypes and mutations of the CYP3A4 gene that cause the function losing were investigated among the patients who meet criteria and who were included in the study group according to randomization. Mutation screening was done when the first dose of the research drug ivermectin was given, ivermectin treatment was not continued in patients with mutations detected as a result of genetic examination and these patients were excluded from the study.

Patients were followed for 5 additional days after treatment. At the end of the treatment and follow-up period (At the end of 10th day), clinical response and changes in oxygenation and laboratory parameters were evaluated.

02

Conditions studied

  • COVID-19

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Ivermectin
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Treatment
03

In context

COVID-19

7,640 studies on the registry are indexed under COVID-19; 488 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 66 is below the median of 100 across 4,099 interventional studies indexed under COVID-19.

Browse COVID-19 studies →

Lead sponsor

Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University is the lead sponsor of 107 studies on the registry; 33 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who were hospitalised with a pre-diagnosis of "severe COVID-19 pneumonia" and thereafter diagnosis of COVID-19 was also confirmed microbiologically with PCR positivity in respiratory tract samples were included into the study. They were randomized to the study and control group, respectively.

Patients with at least one of the criteria below were accepted as patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia;

  1. Presence of tachypnea ≥ 30/minute, SpO2 level \< 90% in room air, PaO2/FiO2 \<300 in oxygen receiving patient
  2. Presence of specific radiological finding for COVID-19 in lung tomography (bilateral lobular, peripherally located, diffuse patchy ground glass opacities)
  3. Mechanical ventilation requirement
  4. Acute organ dysfunction findings; patients with SOFA (sepsis-related organ failure assessment) score >2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with the following characteristics were excluded from the study.

    1. Pediatric patients; \<18 years of old
    2. Patients with chronic liver or kidney disease
    3. Pregnant women
    4. Patients with known ivermectin allergy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
66 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Patients who were hospitalised with a pre-diagnosis of severe COVID-19 pneumonia and thereafter diagnosis of COVID-19 was also confirmed microbiologically with PCR positivity in respiratory tract samples were included into the study. They were randomized to the control and study group, respectively. Hydroxychloroquine, favipiravir and azithromycin (HFA) standard treatment protocol were given to the control group as recommended in the "COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 Infection) Guide" prepared by the Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health.

  • Experimental
    Study Group

    In addition to HFA treatment, ivermectin 200 micrograms/kg/day (9mg between 36-50 kg, 12mg between 51-65 kg, 15mg between 66-79 kg and 200 micrograms/kg in \> 80 kg) in the form of a solution prepared for enteral use was added (HFA+I) to the treatment protocol of the study group's for five days. Blood sample was taken with the first dose of ivermectin and haplotype analysis was performed in ABCB1 and CYP3A4 genes in the whole study group.

    Drug: Ivermectin

Interventions

  • DrugIvermectin

    Ivermectin 5mg/5ml solution was manufactured by NEUTEC™ Pharmaceutical Company-Turkey, under "Good Manufacturing Practices" (GMP) certification conditions.

    Also known as: Hydroxychloroquine, favipiravir and azithromycin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Gender Distribution of the Patients

    The gender of patients (Male/female) in both groups were recorded at the time of inclusion.

    Time frame: At the first day of the study

  2. Age Distribution of the Patients

    The age of the patients (years) in both groups were recorded at the time of inclusion.

    Time frame: At the first day of the study

  3. Percentage of Patients With Accompanying Diseases

    At the beginning of the study, the patients were asked whether there were any of the following accompanying diseases and the percentage of patients with accompanying disease in both groups were recorded: * Diabetes mellitus * Hypertension * Coronary artery disease * Cardiac failure * Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease * Malignancy * Immunodeficiency

    Time frame: At the first day of the study

  4. Percentage of Patients With Baseline Clinical Symptoms

    At the beginning of the study, the patients were asked whether there were any of the following clinical symptoms and the percentage of patients with any of the clinical symptoms in both groups were recorded: * Fever * Cough * Sore throat * Dispnea * Headache * Weakness * Myalgia * Diarrhea * Nausea or vomiting

    Time frame: At the first day of the study

  5. Body Temperature Means of the Patients

    At the beginning of the study, the body temperatures (as degree celcius) of the patients were measured and the mean body temperature values of both groups were recorded.

    Time frame: At the first day of the study

  6. Heart Rate Means of the Patients

    At the beginning of the study, the heart rates (as per minute) of the patients were measured and the mean heart rate values of both groups were recorded.

    Time frame: At the first day of the study

  7. Respiratory Rate Means of the Patients

    At the beginning of the study, the respiratory rates (as per minute) of the patients were measured and the mean respiratory rate values of both groups were recorded.

    Time frame: At the first day of the study

  8. Systolic and Diastolic Pressure Means of the Patients

    At the beginning of the study, the systolic and diastolic pressures (as mmHg) of the patients were measured and the mean systolic and diastolic pressure values of both groups were recorded.

    Time frame: At the first day of the study

  9. Number of Participants With Clinical Response

    The presence of at least two of the following criteria in patients at the end of 5th day were accepted as "clinical response": Extubation in mechanically ventilated patients, respiratory rate \<26/min, SpO2 level in room air \>90%, PaO2/FiO2 \>300 in patients receiving oxygen, presence of at least two of the 2-point reduction criteria in "Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)" score.

    Time frame: From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day)

  10. Changes in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Values

    Baseline SpO2 values of the patients were recorded in both groups. Then, their treatments were started and SpO2 values at the end of the 1st (TD1), 3rd (TD3) and 5th days (TD5) were also recorded. The end of the 5th day was accepted as the primary endpoint. While the change in SpO2 values on the 1st, 3rd and 5th days after the basal value calculated graphically, the change in the SpO2 value at the end of the 5th day (primary endpoint) with the baseline value was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

    Time frame: From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day)

  11. Changes in the Ratio of Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2) to Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (FiO2) (PaO2/FiO2)

    Baseline PaO2/FiO2 ratios of the patients were recorded in both groups. Then, their treatments were started and PaO2/FiO2 ratios at the end of the 1st (TD1), 3rd (TD3) and 5th days (TD5) were also recorded. The end of the 5th day was accepted as the primary endpoint. While the change in PaO2/FiO2 ratios on the 1st, 3rd and 5th days after the basal ratio was calculated graphically, the change in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio at the end of the 5th day (primary endpoint) with the baseline value was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

    Time frame: From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day)

  12. Changes in Serum Lymphocyte Counts

    Baseline Serum Lymphocyte counts (cell/mm\^3) of the patients were recorded in both groups. Then, their treatments were started and Serum Lymphocyte counts at the end of the 1st (TD1), 3rd (TD3) and 5th days (TD5) were also recorded. The end of the 5th day was accepted as the primary endpoint. While the change in Serum Lymphocyte counts on the 1st, 3rd and 5th days after the basal level was calculated graphically, the change in the Serum Lymphocyte count at the end of the 5th day (primary endpoint) with the baseline count was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

    Time frame: From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day)

  13. Changes in the Ratio of Polymorphonuclear Leukocyte Count to Lymphocyte Count (PNL/L)

    Baseline PNL/L ratio of the patients were recorded in both groups. Then, their treatments were started and PNL/L ratios at the end of the 1st (TD1), 3rd (TD3) and 5th days (TD5) were also recorded. The end of the 5th day was accepted as the primary endpoint. While the change in PNL/L ratios on the 1st, 3rd and 5th days after the basal level was calculated graphically, the change in the PNL/L ratio at the end of the 5th day (primary endpoint) with the baseline ratio was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

    Time frame: From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day)

  14. Changes in Serum Ferritin Levels

    Baseline serum ferritin levels (mg/dL) of the patients were recorded in both groups. Then, their treatments were started and serum ferritin levels at the end of the 1st (TD1), 3rd (TD3) and 5th days (TD5) were also recorded. The end of the 5th day was accepted as the primary endpoint. While the change in serum ferritin levels on the 1st, 3rd and 5th days after the basal level was calculated graphically, the change in the serum ferritin level at the end of the 5th day (primary endpoint) with the baseline level was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

    Time frame: From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day)

  15. Changes in Serum D-dimer Levels

    Baseline serum D-dimer levels (mg/L) of the patients were recorded in both groups. Then, their treatments were started and serum D-dimer levels at the end of the 1st (TD1), 3rd (TD3) and 5th days (TD5) were also recorded. The end of the 5th day was accepted as the primary endpoint. While the change in serum D-dimer levels on the 1st, 3rd and 5th days after the basal level was calculated graphically, the change in the serum D-dimer level at the end of the 5th day (primary endpoint) with the baseline level was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

    Time frame: From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day)

  16. Genetic Examination of Haplotypes and Mutations That Cause Function Losing for Ivermectin Metabolism

    A blood sample was taken from the patients included in the study group, after taking or during the first dose of ivermectin. From the blood samples, haplotypes and mutations that cause the function losing were investigated by performing sequence analysis of multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1)/ABCB1 and CYP3A4 genes with Sanger method. In case of detection of mutation, the patient were excluded from the study and if observed, side effects of ivermectin were noted.

    Time frame: At the first day of ivermectin therapy (1st day)

  17. Treatment-Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0

    Adverse effects of ivermectin and drugs other than ivermectin (Hydroxychloroquine, favipiravir, azithromycin) were evaluated in the patients in the study group and and the number of participants were noted. Adverse effects of drugs other than ivermectin (Hydroxychloroquine, favipiravir, azithromycin) were evaluated in the patients in the control group and and the number of participants were noted.

    Time frame: At the first 5 days of study

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Clinical Response

    The presence of at least two of the following criteria in patients on the 10th day were accepted as "clinical response": Respiration rate between 22-24/min, SpO2 level in room air \>95%, absence of oxygen requirement, observation of radiological improvement in control lung tomography and no need for intensive care.

    Time frame: 10 days (5 days ivermectin therapy plus 5 days follow-up)

  2. Mortality

    The number of died patients were evaluated in study and control groups

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 months

  3. Changes in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Values

    In both groups, after the treatment period was completed (first 5 days, primary endpoint), patients were followed up for 5 more days (follow-up period). SpO2 values at the end of 6th (FD1), 8th (FD3) and 10th day (FD5) were also recorded. The end of the 10th day was accepted as the secondary endpoint. While the change in SpO2 values on the 6th, 8th and 10th days was calculated graphically, the change in the SpO2 value at the end of the 10th day (secondary endpoint) with the baseline value was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

    Time frame: From 6th to the end of 10th day

  4. Changes in the Ratio of Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2) to Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (FiO2) (PaO2/FiO2)

    In both groups, after the treatment period was completed (first 5 days, primary endpoint), patients were followed up for 5 more days (follow-up period). PaO2/FiO2 ratios at the end of 6th (FD1), 8th (FD3) and 10th day (FD5) were also recorded. The end of the 10th day was accepted as the secondary endpoint. While the change in PaO2/FiO2 ratios on the 6th, 8th and 10th days was calculated graphically, the change in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio at the end of the 10th day (secondary endpoint) with the baseline ratio was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

    Time frame: From 6th to the end of 10th day

  5. Changes in Serum Lymphocyte Counts

    In both groups, after the treatment period was completed (first 5 days, primary endpoint), patients were followed up for 5 more days (follow-up period). Serum lymphocyte counts (cell/mm\^3) at the end of 6th (FD1), 8th (FD3) and 10th day (FD5) were also recorded. The end of the 10th day was accepted as the secondary endpoint. While the change in serum lymphocyte counts on the 6th, 8th and 10th days was calculated graphically, the change in the serum lymphocyte count at the end of the 10th day (secondary endpoint) with the baseline value was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

    Time frame: From 6th to the end of 10th day

  6. Changes in the Ratio of Polymorphonuclear Leukocyte Count to Lymphocyte Count (PNL/L)

    In both groups, after the treatment period was completed (first 5 days, primary endpoint), patients were followed up for 5 more days (follow-up period). PNL/L ratios at the end of 6th (FD1), 8th (FD3) and 10th day (FD5) were also recorded. The end of the 10th day was accepted as the secondary endpoint. While the change in PNL/L ratios on the 6th, 8th and 10th days was calculated graphically, the change in the PNL/L ratio at the end of the 10th day (secondary endpoint) with the baseline value was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

    Time frame: From 6th to the end of 10th day

  7. Changes in Serum Ferritin Levels

    In both groups, after the treatment period was completed (first 5 days, primary endpoint), patients were followed up for 5 more days (follow-up period). Serum ferritin levels (mg/dL) at the end of 6th (FD1), 8th (FD3) and 10th day (FD5) were also recorded. The end of the 10th day was accepted as the secondary endpoint. While the change in serum ferritin levels on the 6th, 8th and 10th days was calculated graphically, the change in the serum ferritin level at the end of the 10th day (secondary endpoint) with the baseline value was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

    Time frame: From 6th to the end of 10th day

  8. Changes in Serum D-dimer Levels

    In both groups, after the treatment period was completed (first 5 days, primary endpoint), patients were followed up for 5 more days (follow-up period). Serum D-dimer levels (mg/L) at the end of 6th (FD1), 8th (FD3) and 10th day (FD5) were also recorded. The end of the 10th day was accepted as the secondary endpoint. While the change in Serum D-dimer levels on the 6th, 8th and 10th days was calculated graphically, the change in the serum D-dimer level at the end of the 10th day (secondary endpoint) with the baseline value was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

    Time frame: From 6th to the end of 10th day

  9. Rate of COVID-19 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Test Negativity

    At the end of the follow-up period (10th day), patients in the study and control group were investigated by PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 and the negative results were recorded as percentage for both groups.

    Time frame: At the end of 10th day

  10. Treatment-Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0

    Adverse effects of ivermectin and drugs other than ivermectin (Hydroxychloroquine, favipiravir, azithromycin) were evaluated in the patients in the study group and and the number of participants were noted. Adverse effects of drugs other than ivermectin (Hydroxychloroquine, favipiravir, azithromycin) were evaluated in the patients in the control group and and the number of participants were noted.

    Time frame: From the 6th day of study to the 10th day of study

07

Results

Posted Jan 27, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneControl GroupStudy Group
Started3036
Completed3030
Not completed06
Withdrew: Mutation disrupting ivermectin metabolism was found in 6 patients06

Outcome measures

PrimaryGender Distribution of the Patients

The gender of patients (Male/female) in both groups were recorded at the time of inclusion.

Time frame:
At the first day of the study
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Gender Distribution of the Patients
ParticipantsControl GroupStudy Group
Male1921
Female119
PrimaryAge Distribution of the Patients

The age of the patients (years) in both groups were recorded at the time of inclusion.

Time frame:
At the first day of the study
Reported as:
Mean · Years
Age Distribution of the Patients
YearsControl GroupStudy Group
Age Distribution of the Patients66.23 ± 13.3158.17 ± 11.52
PrimaryPercentage of Patients With Accompanying Diseases

At the beginning of the study, the patients were asked whether there were any of the following accompanying diseases and the percentage of patients with accompanying disease in both groups were recorded: * Diabetes mellitus * Hypertension * Coronary artery disease * Cardiac failure * Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease * Malignancy * Immunodeficiency

Time frame:
At the first day of the study
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Patients With Accompanying Diseases
ParticipantsControl GroupStudy Group
Diabetes Mellitus109
Hypertension1215
Coronary artery disease85
Cardiac failure10
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease36
Malignancy10
Immunodeficiency10
PrimaryPercentage of Patients With Baseline Clinical Symptoms

At the beginning of the study, the patients were asked whether there were any of the following clinical symptoms and the percentage of patients with any of the clinical symptoms in both groups were recorded: * Fever * Cough * Sore throat * Dispnea * Headache * Weakness * Myalgia * Diarrhea * Nausea or vomiting

Time frame:
At the first day of the study
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Patients With Baseline Clinical Symptoms
ParticipantsControl GroupStudy Group
Fever1315
Cough1416
Sore throat13
dyspnea1923
Headache25
Weakness1113
Myalgia79
Diarrhea01
Nausea or vomiting01
PrimaryBody Temperature Means of the Patients

At the beginning of the study, the body temperatures (as degree celcius) of the patients were measured and the mean body temperature values of both groups were recorded.

Time frame:
At the first day of the study
Reported as:
Mean · Degree celcius
Body Temperature Means of the Patients
Degree celciusControl GroupStudy Group
Body Temperature Means of the Patients36.8 ± 0.836.9 ± 0.7
PrimaryHeart Rate Means of the Patients

At the beginning of the study, the heart rates (as per minute) of the patients were measured and the mean heart rate values of both groups were recorded.

Time frame:
At the first day of the study
Reported as:
Mean · beats per minute
Heart Rate Means of the Patients
beats per minuteControl GroupStudy Group
Heart Rate Means of the Patients92 ± 1888 ± 12
PrimaryRespiratory Rate Means of the Patients

At the beginning of the study, the respiratory rates (as per minute) of the patients were measured and the mean respiratory rate values of both groups were recorded.

Time frame:
At the first day of the study
Reported as:
Mean · breaths per minute
Respiratory Rate Means of the Patients
breaths per minuteControl GroupStudy Group
Respiratory Rate Means of the Patients24.7 ± 0.724 ± 5
PrimarySystolic and Diastolic Pressure Means of the Patients

At the beginning of the study, the systolic and diastolic pressures (as mmHg) of the patients were measured and the mean systolic and diastolic pressure values of both groups were recorded.

Time frame:
At the first day of the study
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Systolic and Diastolic Pressure Means of the Patients
mmHgControl GroupStudy Group
Systolic pressure124.61 ± 15.37124.39 ± 15.60
Diastolic pressure73.43 ± 8.4775.64 ± 9.79
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Response

The presence of at least two of the following criteria in patients at the end of 5th day were accepted as "clinical response": Extubation in mechanically ventilated patients, respiratory rate \<26/min, SpO2 level in room air \>90%, PaO2/FiO2 \>300 in patients receiving oxygen, presence of at least two of the 2-point reduction criteria in "Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)" score.

Time frame:
From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response
ParticipantsControl GroupStudy Group
Number of Participants With Clinical Response1114
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Study Group · Chi-squared · p = 0.43 (A p\<0.05 value was considered statistically significant)
PrimaryChanges in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Values

Baseline SpO2 values of the patients were recorded in both groups. Then, their treatments were started and SpO2 values at the end of the 1st (TD1), 3rd (TD3) and 5th days (TD5) were also recorded. The end of the 5th day was accepted as the primary endpoint. While the change in SpO2 values on the 1st, 3rd and 5th days after the basal value calculated graphically, the change in the SpO2 value at the end of the 5th day (primary endpoint) with the baseline value was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

Time frame:
From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of peripheral capillary O2
Changes in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Values
percentage of peripheral capillary O2Control GroupStudy Group
Baseline89.67 ± 5.0989.93 ± 6.51
TD190.50 ± 7.4792.85 ± 4.86
TD391.90 ± 4.9793.07 ± 4.12
TD593.00 ± 3.2593.52 ± 4.36
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Study Group · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.14 (A p\<0.05 value was considered statistically significant)
PrimaryChanges in the Ratio of Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2) to Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (FiO2) (PaO2/FiO2)

Baseline PaO2/FiO2 ratios of the patients were recorded in both groups. Then, their treatments were started and PaO2/FiO2 ratios at the end of the 1st (TD1), 3rd (TD3) and 5th days (TD5) were also recorded. The end of the 5th day was accepted as the primary endpoint. While the change in PaO2/FiO2 ratios on the 1st, 3rd and 5th days after the basal ratio was calculated graphically, the change in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio at the end of the 5th day (primary endpoint) with the baseline value was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

Time frame:
From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day)
Reported as:
Mean · Ratio
Changes in the Ratio of Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2) to Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (FiO2) (PaO2/FiO2)
RatioControl GroupStudy Group
Baseline197.44 ± 102.31158.83 ± 88.15
TD1181.83 ± 99.62147.31 ± 74.15
TD3174.77 ± 94.74147.74 ± 83.30
TD5180.13 ± 95.43178.94 ± 98.21
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Study Group · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.68 (A p\<0.05 value was considered statistically significant)
PrimaryChanges in Serum Lymphocyte Counts

Baseline Serum Lymphocyte counts (cell/mm\^3) of the patients were recorded in both groups. Then, their treatments were started and Serum Lymphocyte counts at the end of the 1st (TD1), 3rd (TD3) and 5th days (TD5) were also recorded. The end of the 5th day was accepted as the primary endpoint. While the change in Serum Lymphocyte counts on the 1st, 3rd and 5th days after the basal level was calculated graphically, the change in the Serum Lymphocyte count at the end of the 5th day (primary endpoint) with the baseline count was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

Time frame:
From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day)
Reported as:
Mean · cell/mm^3
Changes in Serum Lymphocyte Counts
cell/mm^3Control GroupStudy Group
Baseline1010 ± 438932 ± 483
TD11034 ± 450928 ± 607
TD3977 ± 5751021 ± 648
TD5968 ± 4771273 ± 822
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Study Group · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.15 (A p\<0.05 value was considered statistically significant)
PrimaryChanges in the Ratio of Polymorphonuclear Leukocyte Count to Lymphocyte Count (PNL/L)

Baseline PNL/L ratio of the patients were recorded in both groups. Then, their treatments were started and PNL/L ratios at the end of the 1st (TD1), 3rd (TD3) and 5th days (TD5) were also recorded. The end of the 5th day was accepted as the primary endpoint. While the change in PNL/L ratios on the 1st, 3rd and 5th days after the basal level was calculated graphically, the change in the PNL/L ratio at the end of the 5th day (primary endpoint) with the baseline ratio was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

Time frame:
From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day)
Reported as:
Mean · Ratio
Changes in the Ratio of Polymorphonuclear Leukocyte Count to Lymphocyte Count (PNL/L)
RatioControl GroupStudy Group
Baseline7.48 ± 6.418.77 ± 8.35
TD17.74 ± 7.4710.82 ± 8.55
TD39.26 ± 7.589.02 ± 13.08
TD59.88 ± 8.457.16 ± 4.97
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Study Group · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.37 (A p\<0.05 value was considered statistically significant)
PrimaryChanges in Serum Ferritin Levels

Baseline serum ferritin levels (mg/dL) of the patients were recorded in both groups. Then, their treatments were started and serum ferritin levels at the end of the 1st (TD1), 3rd (TD3) and 5th days (TD5) were also recorded. The end of the 5th day was accepted as the primary endpoint. While the change in serum ferritin levels on the 1st, 3rd and 5th days after the basal level was calculated graphically, the change in the serum ferritin level at the end of the 5th day (primary endpoint) with the baseline level was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

Time frame:
From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day)
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Changes in Serum Ferritin Levels
mg/dLControl GroupStudy Group
Baseline747.05 ± 800.54682.75 ± 470.08
TD1783.03 ± 827.10834.94 ± 624.12
TD3881.17 ± 779.95875.90 ± 694.52
TD51028.24 ± 777.08875.12 ± 1193.06
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Study Group · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.12 (A p\<0.05 value was considered statistically significant)
PrimaryChanges in Serum D-dimer Levels

Baseline serum D-dimer levels (mg/L) of the patients were recorded in both groups. Then, their treatments were started and serum D-dimer levels at the end of the 1st (TD1), 3rd (TD3) and 5th days (TD5) were also recorded. The end of the 5th day was accepted as the primary endpoint. While the change in serum D-dimer levels on the 1st, 3rd and 5th days after the basal level was calculated graphically, the change in the serum D-dimer level at the end of the 5th day (primary endpoint) with the baseline level was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

Time frame:
From starting to the end of ivermectin therapy (0 to the end of 5th day)
Reported as:
Mean · mg/L
Changes in Serum D-dimer Levels
mg/LControl GroupStudy Group
Baseline1.32 ± 2.041.25 ± 1.71
TD12.80 ± 5.661.40 ± 1.73
TD34.14 ± 9.913.24 ± 11.60
TD53.58 ± 8.275.85 ± 5.28
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Study Group · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.22 (A p\<0.05 value was considered statistically significant)
PrimaryGenetic Examination of Haplotypes and Mutations That Cause Function Losing for Ivermectin Metabolism

A blood sample was taken from the patients included in the study group, after taking or during the first dose of ivermectin. From the blood samples, haplotypes and mutations that cause the function losing were investigated by performing sequence analysis of multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1)/ABCB1 and CYP3A4 genes with Sanger method. In case of detection of mutation, the patient were excluded from the study and if observed, side effects of ivermectin were noted.

Time frame:
At the first day of ivermectin therapy (1st day)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Genetic Examination of Haplotypes and Mutations That Cause Function Losing for Ivermectin Metabolism
ParticipantsControl GroupStudy Group
Mutation positive06
Mutation negative030
PrimaryTreatment-Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0

Adverse effects of ivermectin and drugs other than ivermectin (Hydroxychloroquine, favipiravir, azithromycin) were evaluated in the patients in the study group and and the number of participants were noted. Adverse effects of drugs other than ivermectin (Hydroxychloroquine, favipiravir, azithromycin) were evaluated in the patients in the control group and and the number of participants were noted.

Time frame:
At the first 5 days of study
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Treatment-Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0
ParticipantsControl GroupStudy Group
Nausea and vomiting20
Increase in liver function tests10
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Response

The presence of at least two of the following criteria in patients on the 10th day were accepted as "clinical response": Respiration rate between 22-24/min, SpO2 level in room air \>95%, absence of oxygen requirement, observation of radiological improvement in control lung tomography and no need for intensive care.

Time frame:
10 days (5 days ivermectin therapy plus 5 days follow-up)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response
ParticipantsControl GroupStudy Group
Number of Participants With Clinical Response1622
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Study Group · Chi-squared · p = 0.10 (A p\<0.05 value was considered statistically significant)
SecondaryMortality

The number of died patients were evaluated in study and control groups

Time frame:
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Mortality
ParticipantsControl GroupStudy Group
Mortality96
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Study Group · Chi-squared · p = 0.37 (A p\<0.05 value was considered statistically significant)
SecondaryChanges in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Values

In both groups, after the treatment period was completed (first 5 days, primary endpoint), patients were followed up for 5 more days (follow-up period). SpO2 values at the end of 6th (FD1), 8th (FD3) and 10th day (FD5) were also recorded. The end of the 10th day was accepted as the secondary endpoint. While the change in SpO2 values on the 6th, 8th and 10th days was calculated graphically, the change in the SpO2 value at the end of the 10th day (secondary endpoint) with the baseline value was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

Time frame:
From 6th to the end of 10th day
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of peripheral capillary O2
Changes in Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Values
percentage of peripheral capillary O2Control GroupStudy Group
Baseline89.67 ± 5.0989.93 ± 6.51
FD192.43 ± 2.8694.54 ± 2.21
FD392.91 ± 2.7194.24 ± 2.76
FD593.00 ± 3.9395.35 ± 2.72
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Study Group · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.03 (A p\<0.05 value was considered statistically significant)
SecondaryChanges in the Ratio of Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2) to Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (FiO2) (PaO2/FiO2)

In both groups, after the treatment period was completed (first 5 days, primary endpoint), patients were followed up for 5 more days (follow-up period). PaO2/FiO2 ratios at the end of 6th (FD1), 8th (FD3) and 10th day (FD5) were also recorded. The end of the 10th day was accepted as the secondary endpoint. While the change in PaO2/FiO2 ratios on the 6th, 8th and 10th days was calculated graphically, the change in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio at the end of the 10th day (secondary endpoint) with the baseline ratio was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

Time frame:
From 6th to the end of 10th day
Reported as:
Mean · Ratio
Changes in the Ratio of Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2) to Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (FiO2) (PaO2/FiO2)
RatioControl GroupStudy Group
Baseline197.44 ± 102.31158.83 ± 88.15
FD1204.28 ± 109.51199.83 ± 85.02
FD3211.75 ± 127.62227.43 ± 103.71
FD5220.78 ± 127.26236.33 ± 85.66
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Study Group · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.39 (A p\<0.05 value was considered statistically significant)
SecondaryChanges in Serum Lymphocyte Counts

In both groups, after the treatment period was completed (first 5 days, primary endpoint), patients were followed up for 5 more days (follow-up period). Serum lymphocyte counts (cell/mm\^3) at the end of 6th (FD1), 8th (FD3) and 10th day (FD5) were also recorded. The end of the 10th day was accepted as the secondary endpoint. While the change in serum lymphocyte counts on the 6th, 8th and 10th days was calculated graphically, the change in the serum lymphocyte count at the end of the 10th day (secondary endpoint) with the baseline value was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

Time frame:
From 6th to the end of 10th day
Reported as:
Mean · cell/mm^3
Changes in Serum Lymphocyte Counts
cell/mm^3Control GroupStudy Group
Baseline1010 ± 438932 ± 483
FD1916 ± 4111403 ± 869
FD31086 ± 8801668 ± 819
FD51256 ± 7101698 ± 1438
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Study Group · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.24 (A p\<0.05 value was considered statistically significant)
SecondaryChanges in the Ratio of Polymorphonuclear Leukocyte Count to Lymphocyte Count (PNL/L)

In both groups, after the treatment period was completed (first 5 days, primary endpoint), patients were followed up for 5 more days (follow-up period). PNL/L ratios at the end of 6th (FD1), 8th (FD3) and 10th day (FD5) were also recorded. The end of the 10th day was accepted as the secondary endpoint. While the change in PNL/L ratios on the 6th, 8th and 10th days was calculated graphically, the change in the PNL/L ratio at the end of the 10th day (secondary endpoint) with the baseline value was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

Time frame:
From 6th to the end of 10th day
Reported as:
Mean · Ratio
Changes in the Ratio of Polymorphonuclear Leukocyte Count to Lymphocyte Count (PNL/L)
RatioControl GroupStudy Group
Baseline7.48 ± 6.418.77 ± 8.35
FD110.49 ± 7.106.90 ± 11.84
FD39.66 ± 10.995.81 ± 9.99
FD56.19 ± 4.857.34 ± 8.09
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Study Group · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.56 (A p\<0.05 value was considered statistically significant)
SecondaryChanges in Serum Ferritin Levels

In both groups, after the treatment period was completed (first 5 days, primary endpoint), patients were followed up for 5 more days (follow-up period). Serum ferritin levels (mg/dL) at the end of 6th (FD1), 8th (FD3) and 10th day (FD5) were also recorded. The end of the 10th day was accepted as the secondary endpoint. While the change in serum ferritin levels on the 6th, 8th and 10th days was calculated graphically, the change in the serum ferritin level at the end of the 10th day (secondary endpoint) with the baseline value was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

Time frame:
From 6th to the end of 10th day
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Changes in Serum Ferritin Levels
mg/dLControl GroupStudy Group
Baseline747.05 ± 800.54682.75 ± 470.08
FD11076.88 ± 704.05628.45 ± 580.10
FD31097.57 ± 595.22433.48 ± 641.82
FD51206.90 ± 782.84494.71 ± 349.78
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Study Group · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.005 (A p\<0.05 value was considered statistically significant)
SecondaryChanges in Serum D-dimer Levels

In both groups, after the treatment period was completed (first 5 days, primary endpoint), patients were followed up for 5 more days (follow-up period). Serum D-dimer levels (mg/L) at the end of 6th (FD1), 8th (FD3) and 10th day (FD5) were also recorded. The end of the 10th day was accepted as the secondary endpoint. While the change in Serum D-dimer levels on the 6th, 8th and 10th days was calculated graphically, the change in the serum D-dimer level at the end of the 10th day (secondary endpoint) with the baseline value was compared statistically (the results were given as p value).

Time frame:
From 6th to the end of 10th day
Reported as:
Mean · mg/L
Changes in Serum D-dimer Levels
mg/LControl GroupStudy Group
Baseline1.32 ± 2.041.25 ± 1.71
FD13.45 ± 6.601.37 ± 2.53
FD31.63 ± 1.380.89 ± 2.45
FD51.49 ± 2.280.71 ± 0.96
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Study Group · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.03 (A p\<0.05 value was considered statistically significant)
SecondaryRate of COVID-19 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Test Negativity

At the end of the follow-up period (10th day), patients in the study and control group were investigated by PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 and the negative results were recorded as percentage for both groups.

Time frame:
At the end of 10th day
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Rate of COVID-19 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Test Negativity
ParticipantsControl GroupStudy Group
Rate of COVID-19 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Test Negativity314
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Study Group · Chi-squared · p = 0.01 (A p\<0.05 value was considered statistically significant)
SecondaryTreatment-Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0

Adverse effects of ivermectin and drugs other than ivermectin (Hydroxychloroquine, favipiravir, azithromycin) were evaluated in the patients in the study group and and the number of participants were noted. Adverse effects of drugs other than ivermectin (Hydroxychloroquine, favipiravir, azithromycin) were evaluated in the patients in the control group and and the number of participants were noted.

Time frame:
From the 6th day of study to the 10th day of study
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Treatment-Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0
ParticipantsControl GroupStudy Group
Treatment-Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.000

Adverse events

Collected over From the beginning of the study to the end of the 10th day. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control Group9/30 (30%)0/30 (0%)3/30 (10%)
Study Group6/30 (20%)0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)
Participants With Mutations0/6 (0%)5/6 (83.3%)0/6 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventControl GroupStudy GroupParticipants With Mutations
EncephalopathyNervous system disorders0/300/305/6
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventControl GroupStudy GroupParticipants With Mutations
Nausea and vomitingGastrointestinal disorders2/300/300/6
Increase in liver function testsGastrointestinal disorders1/300/300/6

Baseline characteristics

36 patients were included in the study group. But, 6 patients in the study group were excluded from the study and analysis because ivermectin treatments were terminated due to the detection of a mutation that impairs ivermectin metabolism. As a result, overall number of baseline participants in the study group was 30.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(years)Control GroupStudy GroupTotal
Mean66.23 ± 13.3158.17 ± 11.5262.20 ± 13.00
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Control GroupStudy GroupTotal
Female11920
Male192140
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Control GroupStudy GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported303060
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Control GroupStudy GroupTotal
Turkey303060
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Afyonkarahisar Health Science University
    Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
  • Gulhane Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences
    Ankara, Turkey
  • Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara City Hospital
    Ankara, Turkey
  • Haydarpasa Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital
    İstanbul, Turkey
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, Liu L, Shan H, Lei CL, Hui DSC, Du B, Li LJ, Zeng G, Yuen KY, Chen RC, Tang CL, Wang T, Chen PY, Xiang J, Li SY, Wang JL, Liang ZJ, Peng YX, Wei L, Liu Y, Hu YH, Peng P, Wang JM, Liu JY, Chen Z, Li G, Zheng ZJ, Qiu SQ, Luo J, Ye CJ, Zhu SY, Zhong NS; China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. Epub 2020 Feb 28. PubMed 32109013 ↗
  • Jean SS, Lee PI, Hsueh PR. Treatment options for COVID-19: The reality and challenges. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020 Jun;53(3):436-443. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.03.034. Epub 2020 Apr 4. PubMed 32307245 ↗
  • Croci R, Bottaro E, Chan KW, Watanabe S, Pezzullo M, Mastrangelo E, Nastruzzi C. Liposomal Systems as Nanocarriers for the Antiviral Agent Ivermectin. Int J Biomater. 2016;2016:8043983. doi: 10.1155/2016/8043983. Epub 2016 May 8. PubMed 27242902 ↗
  • Heidary F, Gharebaghi R. Ivermectin: a systematic review from antiviral effects to COVID-19 complementary regimen. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2020 Sep;73(9):593-602. doi: 10.1038/s41429-020-0336-z. Epub 2020 Jun 12. PubMed 32533071 ↗
  • Caly L, Druce JD, Catton MG, Jans DA, Wagstaff KM. The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Antiviral Res. 2020 Jun;178:104787. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104787. Epub 2020 Apr 3. PubMed 32251768 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Apr 5, 2020
  • Informed consent form · Apr 5, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Apr 5, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 27, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04646109
Lead sponsor
Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University
Collaborators
NeuTec Pharma
Responsible party
Nurullah Okumuş (Prof. Dr., Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 27, 2020
Start date
May 11, 2020
Primary completion
Sep 2, 2020
Completion
Sep 2, 2020
Results posted
Jan 27, 2021
Last update
Jan 27, 2021

Study contacts

Nurullah Okumuş, Prof. Dr.
study chair · Afyonkarahisar Health Science University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
Neşe Demirtürk, A. Prof. Dr.
study director · Afyonkarahisar Health Science University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
Rıza A. Çetinkaya, Prof. Dr.
study director · Haydarpasa Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
Rahmet Güner, Prof. Dr.
study director · Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
İsmail Y. Avcı
study director · Gulhane Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion