CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04635397Allo MonitorUpdated May 26, 2026

Immunomonitoring After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

An observational study in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-26.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
61
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative option for many hematologic malignancies, in particular acute leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes.

At the center of these reactions are the donor's T and NK cells. Several studies have highlighted the impact of T cells reconstitution on post-transplant infection rates, relapse and GvHD.

Most of the post-allogeneic immune reconstitution studies available to us today include young patients (\<60 years of age) who have had genoidentic or phenoidentic 10/10 allografts and mostly only study the phenotype of a limited number of immune cells. While it is important to know the absolute number reconstitution kinetics of the different categories of immune cells, it is essential to also be able to assess the function of the different cells. Knowledge of the restoration of T function at key dates after allogeneic stem cell transplantation would make it possible to adapt post allogeneic immunomodulation (immunosuppressive treatment and injections of donor lymphocytes) and anti-infectious prophylaxis for patients. The measurement of cytokine profiles after nonspecific stimulation of T and NK lymphocytes recently made available to the immunology laboratory of the CHU de Nice allows a routine assessment of T lymphocyte function (Th1, Th2 Th 17 and T regulatory) and NK by measurement of the secretion of different cytokines after stimulation of the patient's lymphocytes with different antigens (anti-CD3 and anti-TLR7).

The cytokine profile during immune reconstitution in hematopoietic cell transplants has never been evaluated; we will analyze it with regard to clinical data: relapse, infections and GVHD.

Read the detailed description

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative option for many hematologic malignancies, in particular acute leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes.

The success of the allogeneic transplant is based on the Graft versus Leukemia (GvL) effect which corresponds to the elimination of tumor cells by the donor's immune system from the recipient's body. Conversely, graft versus host disease (GvHD) is an immune response of the donor versus the host due to major and / or minor histocompatibility differences resulting in multi-organ damage and being the main cause of transplant-related mortality. The main causes of death in allogeneic patients are infections, relapse of the initial disease and GvHD. The relapse linked to an ineffectiveness of the anti-tumor response of the donor's immune system is responsible for 40% of transplant failures. GvHD is present in 40 to 70% of transplants. In both cases, therapeutic options are available in order to modulate the immune response.

In fact, in the event of a relapse of the disease, reinjections of donor lymphocytes make it possible to trigger a GvL effect and cure. For patients with GvHD, on the other hand, treatment is based on increased immunosuppression.

At the center of these reactions are the donor's T and NK cells. Several studies have highlighted the impact of T immune reconstitution on post-transplant infection rates, relapse and GvHD.

Infections and relapses may be linked to insufficient antiviral or anti-tumor responses of the graft (Th1 pathway deficiency) while GvHD is linked to an excessive response of the graft against the host cells (Immune imbalance associating a excess of Th1, Th2 and Th17 responses).

However, there is currently no routine test to predict the kinetics and quality of immune reconstitution in allogeneic patients.

Most of the post-allogeneic immune reconstitution studies available to us today include young patients (\<60 years of age) who have had genoidentic or phenoidentic 10/10 allografts and mostly only study the phenotype of a limited number of immune cells. While it is important to know the absolute number reconstitution kinetics of the different categories of immune cells, it is essential to also be able to assess the function of the different cells.

The evaluation of lymphocyte function is mainly based on the measurement of their ability to secrete different cytokines. This measure currently requires complex procedures exclusively reserved for research. Knowledge of the restoration of T function at key dates after allogeneic stem cell transplantation would make it possible to adapt post allogeneic immunomodulation (immunosuppressive treatment and injections of donor lymphocytes) and anti-infectious prophylaxis for patients. The measurement of cytokine profiles after nonspecific stimulation of T and NK lymphocytes recently made available to the immunology laboratory of the CHU de Nice allows a routine assessment of T lymphocyte function (Th1, Th2 Th 17 and T regulatory) and NK by measurement of the secretion of different cytokines after stimulation of the patient's lymphocytes with different antigens (anti-CD3 and anti-TLR7).

The immunology laboratory of the Nice University Hospital recently demonstrated in a cohort of patients with a kidney transplant that the level of secretion of INF-γ (Th1 pathway) by T lymphocytes after non-specific stimulation was correlated with the risk of rejection and inversely correlated with the risk of infectious complications. In addition, in a cohort of patients with an autoimmune disease (Extra-Membranous Glomerulonephritis), the level of secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines from the Th17 pathway (IL6, IL17, etc.) was correlated with the risk of thrombo-complications. embolic and relapse.

The cytokine profile during immune reconstitution in hematopoietic cell transplants has never been evaluated; we will analyze it with regard to clinical data: relapse, infections and GVHD.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice is the lead sponsor of 709 studies on the registry; 176 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients receiving an allogeneic stem cell transplantation for an hematological malignancy

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient over 18 years old
  • Suffering from a malignant hemopathy
  • Allogeneic bone marrow or hematopoietic stem cells
  • Identical geno-, pheno- and haplo donors
  • Informed consent signed by the patient or the person of trust in case of impossibility (deferred consent of the patient when his condition allows it)
  • Affiliated with a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a clinical or biological contraindication to performing an allogeneic transplant
  • Patient with progressive solid cancer or in remission for less than 3 years
  • HIV-positive patients
  • Patients with chronic active hepatitis B or C
  • Allogeneic cord blood transplant
  • Allograft with sequential conditioning
  • Post-allograft preemptive treatment other than injections of donor lymphocytes Withdrawal of informed consent
  • Inability to undergo medical monitoring of the study for geographical, social or psychological reasons

Non-inclusion criteria:

  • Minor patient
  • Pregnant woman
  • Patient with congenital or previously acquired immune deficiency
  • Patient on prior immunosuppressive treatment
  • Patient under guardianship or guardianship or placed in detention
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
61 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of T and NK lymphocyte reconstitution in post allogeneic transplant

    measuring cytokine profiles (Th1, Th2 or Th17) after non-specific stimulation of T and NK lymphocytes

    Time frame: on day 2 post transplant,

  2. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of T and NK lymphocyte reconstitution in post allogeneic transplant

    measuring cytokine profiles (Th1, Th2 or Th17) after non-specific stimulation of T and NK lymphocytes

    Time frame: 90 days post transplant,

  3. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of T and NK lymphocyte reconstitution in post allogeneic transplant by measuring cytokine profiles (Th1, Th2 or Th17) after non-specific stimulation of T and NK lymphocytes

    measuring cytokine profiles (Th1, Th2 or Th17) after non-specific stimulation of T and NK lymphocytes

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of T and NK lymphocyte reconstitution in post allogeneic transplant

    measuring cytokine profiles (Th1, Th2 or Th17) after non-specific stimulation of T and NK lymphocytes

    Time frame: one year after allogeneic transplantation

  5. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of T and NK lymphocyte reconstitution in post allogeneic transplant

    measuring cytokine profiles (Th1, Th2 or Th17) after non-specific stimulation of T and NK lymphocytes

    Time frame: in the event of a proven relapse or occurrence of acute grade 2 or more GVHD

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overal

    Time frame: at Day 90 post allograft

  2. relapse-free survival

    Time frame: at Day 90 post allograft

  3. Overall

    Time frame: Month 6 post allograft,

  4. relapse-free survival

    Time frame: Month 6 post allograft,

  5. Overall

    Time frame: Month 12 post allograft

  6. relapse-free survival

    Time frame: Month 12 post allograft

  7. Incidence of acute GvH

    Time frame: Day 90 post allograft

  8. Incidence of acute GvH

    Time frame: Month 6 post allograft

  9. Incidence of chronic GvH

    Time frame: at Day 90, Month 6 and Month 12 post transplant

  10. Incidence of relapses

    Time frame: at Day 90, Month 6 and Month12 post transplant

  11. Incidence of infectious events

    Time frame: Day 90, Month 6 and Month 12 post transplant

  12. Quantification of T, B and NK lymphocyte populations by flow cytometry already performed as part of the management of allogeneic patients

    Time frame: during the study

  13. Study the correlation between the measurement of cytokine profiles (Th1, Th2 or Th17) after nonspecific stimulation of T and NK lymphocytes

    Time frame: on day 2 post transplant, 90 days post transplant, 6 months and one year post allogeneic transplant and in the event of proven relapse. or occurrence of acute grade 2 or greater GVHD and other secondary endpoints

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHU de Nice
    Nice, CHU de NICE 06003, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04635397
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 19, 2020
Start date
Feb 3, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 13, 2024
Completion
Sep 13, 2024
Last update
May 26, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion