CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04630002Updated Aug 29, 2024Results posted

Drug-drug Interaction (DDI) Study of GSK3640254 With Darunavir/Ritonavir (DRV/RTV) and Etravirine (ETR)

A Phase 1 interventional study of GSK3640254 and Darunavir/Ritonavir (DRV/RTV) in HIV Infections, sponsored by ViiV Healthcare. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-29.

Sponsored by ViiV Healthcare · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an open-label, single-sequence, multiple-dose, 3 cohort study to investigate the effects of DRV/RTV and/or ETR on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of GSK3640254 and the effects of GSK3640254 on the PK of DRV/RTV and/or ETR. This study will aid in understanding these interactions and resulting changes in exposure (if any) when given in combination with GSK3640254.

02

Conditions studied

  • HIV Infections

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Darunavir
  • Ritonavir
  • Etravirine
  • GSK3640254
  • Pharmacokinetics
03

In context

HIV Infections

4,258 studies on the registry are indexed under HIV Infections; 240 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 54 is below the median of 83 across 3,251 interventional studies indexed under HIV Infections.

Browse HIV Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

ViiV Healthcare is the lead sponsor of 261 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Of its 66 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 50 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant must be 18 to 50 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent.
  • Participants who are overtly healthy as determined by investigator or medically qualified designee based on a medical evaluation including medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and cardiac monitoring (history and screening ECG).
  • Body weight more than or equal to (>=)50.0 kilograms (kg) (110 pounds [lbs]) for men and >=45.0 kg (99 lbs) for women and body mass index within the range 18.5 to 31.0 kilograms per square meter (kg/m\^2) (inclusive).
  • Male or female participants:

    1. Male participants should not engage in intercourse while confined in the study site. There is no need for an extended period of double barrier use or prolonged abstinence after study discharge.
    2. Female participants:

    (i) A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and at least one of the following conditions applies: Is not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) OR Is a WOCBP and using a non-hormonal contraceptive method that is highly effective, with a failure rate of less than (\<)1 percent (%) for 28 days before intervention, during the intervention period, and for at least 28 days after the last dose of study intervention. The investigator should evaluate the effectiveness of the contraceptive method in relationship to the first dose of study intervention.

(ii) A WOCBP must have a negative highly sensitive serum or urine pregnancy test at screening and check-in (Day -1).

  • Capable of giving signed informed consent, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the Informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Participants with current or chronic history of liver disease or known hepatic or biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones).
  • A pre-existing condition interfering with normal Gastrointestinal (GI) anatomy or motility (for example [e.g.], gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastric ulcers, gastritis) or hepatic and/or renal function that could interfere with the absorption, metabolism, and/or excretion of the study intervention or render the participant unable to take oral study intervention.
  • Prior cholecystectomy surgery (prior appendectomy is acceptable).
  • Clinically significant illness, including viral syndromes within 3 weeks of dosing.
  • A participant with known or suspected active Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection or contact with an individual with known COVID-19, within 14 days of study enrollment (World Health Organization [WHO] definitions).
  • Any history of significant underlying psychiatric disorder, including, but not limited to, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder with or without psychotic symptoms, other psychotic disorders, or schizotypal (personality) disorder.
  • Any history of major depressive disorder with or without suicidal features, or anxiety disorders that required medical intervention (pharmacologic or not) such as hospitalization or other inpatient treatment and/or chronic (more than [>]6 months) outpatient treatment. Participants with other conditions such as adjustment disorder or dysthymia that have required shorter term medical therapy (\<6 months) without inpatient treatment and are currently well-controlled clinically or resolved may be considered for entry after discussion and agreement with the ViiV Healthcare/GlaxoSmithKline (VH/GSK) medical monitor.
  • Any pre-existing physical or other psychiatric condition (including alcohol or drug abuse), which, in the opinion of the investigator (with or without psychiatric evaluation), could interfere with the participant's ability to comply with the dosing schedule and protocol evaluations or which might compromise the safety of the participant.
  • Medical history of cardiac arrhythmias, prior myocardial infarction in the past 3 months, or cardiac disease or a family or personal history of long QT syndrome.
  • Presence of hepatitis B surface antigen at screening or within 3 months prior to starting study intervention.
  • Positive hepatitis C antibody test result at screening or within 3 months prior to starting study intervention.
  • Positive Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 and -2 antigen/antibody immunoassay at screening.
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN). A single repeat of ALT is allowed within a single screening period to determine eligibility.
  • Bilirubin >1.5 times ULN (isolated bilirubin >1.5 times ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin \<35%). A single repeat of any laboratory abnormality is allowed within a single screening period to determine eligibility.
  • Any acute laboratory abnormality at screening which, in the opinion of the investigator, should preclude participation in the study of an investigational compound.
  • Any Grade 2 to 4 laboratory abnormality at screening, with the exception of creatine phosphokinase (CPK), lipid abnormalities (e.g., total cholesterol, triglycerides), and ALT (described above), will exclude a participant from the study unless the investigator can provide a compelling explanation for the laboratory result(s) and has the assent of the sponsor. A single repeat of any laboratory abnormality is allowed within a single screening period to determine eligibility.
  • Urine drug screen positive (showing presence of): amphetamines, barbiturates, cannabinoids, cocaine, or phencyclidine, or non-prescribed opiates, oxycodone, benzodiazepines, methadone, Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), methamphetamines, or tricyclic antidepressants at screening or before the first dose of study intervention.
  • Unable to refrain from the use of prescription or nonprescription drugs including vitamins, herbal and dietary supplements (including Saint [St] John's wort) within 7 days (or 14 days if the drug is a potential enzyme inducer) or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the first dose of study intervention and for the duration of the study.
  • Treatment with any vaccine within 30 days prior to receiving study intervention.
  • Unwillingness to abstain from excessive consumption of any food or drink containing grapefruit and grapefruit juice, Seville oranges, blood oranges, or pomelos or their fruit juices within 7 days prior to the first dose of study intervention(s) until the end of the study.
  • Participation in another concurrent clinical study or prior clinical study (with the exception of imaging trials) prior to the first dosing day in the current study: 30 days, 5 half-lives, or twice the duration of the biological effect of the study intervention (whichever is longer).
  • Prior exposure to GSK3640254 or prior intolerance to DRV/RTV or ETR in this or another clinical study.
  • Prior intolerance to any other study medications: DRV/RTV or ETR.
  • Where participation in the study would result in donation of blood or blood products in excess of 500 milliliters (mL) within 56 days.
  • Any positive (abnormal) response confirmed by the investigator on a screening clinician- or qualified designee-administered Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).
  • Systolic blood pressure \<100 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg). Up to 2 repeats are allowed for confirmation.
  • Any significant arrhythmia or ECG finding (e.g., prior myocardial infarction in the past 3 months, symptomatic bradycardia, non-sustained or sustained atrial arrhythmias, non-sustained or sustained ventricular tachycardia, any degree of atrioventricular block, or conduction abnormality) which, in the opinion of the investigator or VH/GSK medical monitor, will interfere with the safety for the individual participant.
  • Exclusion criteria for screening ECG (a single repeat is allowed for eligibility determination):

    1. Heart rate: \<50 or >100 beats per minute (bpm).
    2. PR interval >200 milliseconds (ms).
    3. Corrected QT interval (QTc) >450 ms.
  • History of regular alcohol consumption within 6 months of the study, defined as an average weekly intake of >14 units. One unit is equivalent to 8 grams (g) of alcohol: a half-pint (approximately 240 mL) of beer, 1 glass (125 mL) of wine, or 1 (25 mL) measure of spirits.
  • Unable to refrain from tobacco or nicotine-containing products within 3 months prior to screening.
  • History of sensitivity to any of the study medications, or components thereof, or a history of drug or other allergy that, in the opinion of the investigator or medical monitor, contraindicates their participation.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
54 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cohort 1: GSK3640254 then DRV/RTV then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTV

    Cohort 1 will include 3 periods. In Period 1 GSK3640254 will be administered (Treatment A). In Period 2 DRV/RTV will be administered (Treatment B). In Period 3 GSK3640254 (Treatment A) and DRV/RTV (Treatment B) will be administered.

    Drug: GSK3640254 · Drug: Darunavir/Ritonavir (DRV/RTV)

  • Experimental
    Cohort 2: GSK3640254 then ETR then GSK3640254 + ETR

    Cohort 2 will include 3 periods. In Period 1 GSK3640254 will be given (Treatment A). In Period 2 ETR will be given (Treatment C). In Period 3 GSK3640254 (Treatment A) and ETR (Treatment C) will be administered.

    Drug: GSK3640254 · Drug: Etravirine (ETR)

  • Experimental
    Cohort 3: GSK3640254 then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTV + ETR

    Cohort 3 will include 2 periods. In Period 1 GSK3640254 will be administered (Treatment A). In Period 2 GSK3640254 (Treatment A), DRV/RTV (Treatment B), and ETR (Treatment C) will be administered.

    Drug: GSK3640254 · Drug: Darunavir/Ritonavir (DRV/RTV) · Drug: Etravirine (ETR)

Interventions

  • DrugGSK3640254

    GSK3640254 will be available as oral tablets.

  • DrugDarunavir/Ritonavir (DRV/RTV)

    DRV/RTV will be available as oral tablets.

  • DrugEtravirine (ETR)

    ETR will be available as oral tablets.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the End of the Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUC[0-tau]) of GSK3640254

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 3

  2. Cohort 1: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of GSK3640254

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 3

  3. Cohort 1: AUC(0-tau) of DRV

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3

  4. Cohort 1: Cmax of DRV

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3

  5. Cohort 1: AUC(0-tau) of RTV

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3

  6. Cohort 1: Cmax of RTV

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3

  7. Cohort 2: AUC(0-tau) of GSK3640254

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 3

  8. Cohort 2: Cmax of GSK3640254

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 3

  9. Cohort 2: AUC(0-tau) of ETR

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3

  10. Cohort 2: Cmax of ETR

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3

  11. Cohort 3: AUC(0-tau) of GSK3640254

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 2

  12. Cohort 3: Cmax of GSK3640254

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 2

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cohort 1: Plasma Concentration at the End of the Dosing Interval (Ctau) of DRV

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3

  2. Cohort 1: Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of DRV

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3

  3. Cohort 1: Ctau of RTV

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3

  4. Cohort 1: Tmax of RTV

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3

  5. Cohort 1: Ctau of GSK3640254

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 3

  6. Cohort 1: Tmax of GSK3640254

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 3

  7. Cohort 2: Ctau of ETR

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3

  8. Cohort 2: Tmax of ETR

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3

  9. Cohort 2: Ctau of GSK3640254

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 3

  10. Cohort 2: Tmax of GSK3640254

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

    Time frame: Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 3

  11. Cohort 1: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or other situations as per medical or scientific judgment. Adverse events which were not Serious were considered as Non-Serious adverse events.

    Time frame: Up to Day 35

  12. Cohort 2: Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or other situations as per medical or scientific judgment. Adverse events which were not Serious were considered as Non-Serious adverse events.

    Time frame: Up to Day 36

  13. Cohort 3: Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or other situations as per medical or scientific judgment. Adverse events which were not Serious were considered as Non-Serious adverse events.

    Time frame: Up to Day 26

  14. Cohort 1: Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuations and Deaths

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Number of participants with AEs leading to discontinuations and deaths were reported.

    Time frame: Up to Day 35

  15. Cohort 2: Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuations and Deaths

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Number of participants with AEs leading to discontinuations and deaths were reported.

    Time frame: Up to Day 36

  16. Cohort 3: Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuations and Deaths

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Number of participants with AEs leading to discontinuations and deaths were reported.

    Time frame: Up to Day 26

  17. Cohort 1: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Hematology Parameters

    Blood samples were collected for analysis of hematology parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) grading table Version 2.1. For Hemoglobin Low, Grade 3: 7.0 to \<9.0 Grams per deciliter (g/dL) (males) and 6.5 to \<8.5 g/dL (females),Grade 4: \<7.0 g/dL (males) and \<6.5 g/dL (females); Leukocytes Low, Grade 3: 1000 to 1499 cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm\^3),Grade 4: \<1000 cells/mm\^3; Lymphocytes Low, Grade 3: 350 to \<500 cells per liter (cells/L),Grade 4: \<350 cells/L; Neutrophils Low, Grade 3: 400 to 599 cells/mm\^3, Grade 4: \<400 cells/mm\^3; Platelets Low, Grade 3: 25,000 to \<50,000 cells/mm\^3, Grade 4: \<25,000 cells/mm\^3. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 35

  18. Cohort 2: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Hematology Parameters

    Blood samples were collected for analysis of hematology parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Hemoglobin Low, Grade 3: 7.0 to \<9.0 g/dL (males) and 6.5 to \<8.5 g/dL (females),Grade 4: \<7.0 g/dL (males) and \<6.5 g/dL (females); Leukocytes Low, Grade 3: 1000 to 1499 cells/mm\^3,Grade 4: \<1000 cells/mm\^3; Lymphocytes Low, Grade 3: 350 to \<500 cells/L,Grade 4: \<350 cells/L; Neutrophils Low, Grade 3: 400 to 599 cells/mm\^3, Grade 4: \<400 cells/mm\^3; Platelets Low, Grade 3: 25,000 to \<50,000 cells/mm\^3, Grade 4: \<25,000 cells/mm\^3. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 36

  19. Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Hematology Parameters

    Blood samples were collected for analysis of hematology parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Hemoglobin Low, Grade 3: 7.0 to \<9.0 g/dL (males) and 6.5 to \<8.5 g/dL (females),Grade 4: \<7.0 g/dL (males) and \<6.5 g/dL (females); Leukocytes Low, Grade 3: 1000 to 1499 cells/mm\^3,Grade 4: \<1000 cells/mm\^3; Lymphocytes Low, Grade 3: 350 to \<500 cells/L,Grade 4: \<350 cells/L; Neutrophils Low, Grade 3: 400 to 599 cells/mm\^3, Grade 4: \<400 cells/mm\^3; Platelets Low, Grade 3: 25,000 to \<50,000 cells/mm\^3, Grade 4: \<25,000 cells/mm\^3. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 26

  20. Cohort 1: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Bilirubin and Direct Bilirubin

    Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Alanine Aminotransferase High; Grade 3: 5.0 to \<10.0 times (×) Upper Limit Normal (ULN), Grade 4: \>=10.0 × ULN; Albumin Low, Grade 3: \<2.0 grams per deciliter (g/dL), Grade 4: Not Applicable; Alkaline Phosphatase High, Grade 3: 5.0 to \<10.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=10.0 × ULN; Amylase High, Grade 3: 3.0 to \<5.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=5.0 × ULN; Aspartate Aminotransferase High, Grade 3: 5.0 to \<10.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=10.0 × ULN; Bilirubin High, Grade 3: 2.6 to\<5.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=5.0 × ULN and Direct Bilirubin High, Grade 3: \>ULN with other signs and symptoms of hepatotoxicity, Grade 4: \>ULN with life-threatening consequences. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 35

  21. Cohort 1: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Calcium, Creatine Kinase, Creatinine, Phosphate, Potassium and Sodium

    Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Calcium High, Grade 3: 12.5 to \<13.5 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL), Grade 4: \>=13.5 mg/dL; Calcium Low, Grade 3: 6.1 to \<7.0 mg/dL, Grade 4: \<6.1 mg/dL; Creatine Kinase High, Grade 3: 10 to \<20 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=20 × ULN; Creatinine High, Grade 3: \>1.8 to \<3.5 ULN, Grade 4: \>=3.5 × ULN; Phosphate Low, Grade 3: 1.0 to \<1.4 mg/dL, Grade 4: \<1.0 mg/dL; Potassium High, Grade 3: 6.5 to \<7.0 Milliequivalents per liter (mEq/L),Grade 4: \>=7.0 mEq/L; Potassium Low, Grade 3: 2.0 to \<2.5 mEq/L, Grade 4: \<2.00 mEq/L; Sodium High, Grade 3: 154 to \<160 mEq/L, Grade 4:\>=160 mEq/L; Sodium Low, Grade 3: 121 to \<125 mEq/L, Grade 4:\<=120 mEq/L. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 35

  22. Cohort 1: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Glucose, Triglycerides, Lipase, Urate and Cholesterol

    Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Glucose High, Grade 3: \>250 to 500 mg/dL, Grade 4: \>=500 mg/dL, Glucose Low, Grade 3: 30 to\<40 mg/dL, Grade 4:\<30 mg/dL; Triglycerides High, Grade 3: \>500 to \<1.000 mg/dL, Grade 4:\>1000 mg/dL; Lipase High, Grade 3: 3.0 to \<5.0×ULN, Grade 4:\>=5.0×ULN; Urate High, Grade 3: 12.0 to \<15.0 mEq/L, Grade 4:\>=15.0 mEq/L; Cholesterol High, Grade 3: \>=300 mg/dL, Grade 4: Not Applicable. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 35

  23. Cohort 2: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Bilirubin and Direct Bilirubin

    Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Alanine Aminotransferase High; Grade 3: 5.0 to \<10.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=10.0 × ULN; Albumin Low, Grade 3: \<2.0 g/dL, Grade 4: Not Applicable; Alkaline Phosphatase High, Grade 3: 5.0 to \<10.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=10.0 × ULN; Amylase High, Grade 3: 3.0 to \<5.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=5.0 × ULN; Aspartate Aminotransferase High, Grade 3: 5.0 to \<10.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=10.0 × ULN; Bilirubin High, Grade 3: 2.6 to\<5.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=5.0 × ULN and Direct Bilirubin High, Grade 3: \>ULN with other signs and symptoms of hepatotoxicity, Grade 4: \>ULN with life-threatening consequences. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 36

  24. Cohort 2: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Calcium, Creatine Kinase, Creatinine, Phosphate, Potassium and Sodium

    Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Calcium High, Grade 3: 12.5 to \<13.5 mg/dL, Grade 4: \>=13.5 mg/dL; Calcium Low, Grade 3: 6.1 to \<7.0 mg/dL, Grade 4: \<6.1 mg/dL; Creatine Kinase High, Grade 3: 10 to \<20 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=20 × ULN; Creatinine High, Grade 3: \>1.8 to \<3.5 ULN, Grade 4: \>=3.5 × ULN; Phosphate Low, Grade 3: 1.0 to \<1.4 mg/dL, Grade 4: \<1.0 mg/dL; Potassium High, Grade 3: 6.5 to \<7.0 mEq/L,Grade 4: \>=7.0 mEq/L; Potassium Low, Grade 3: 2.0 to \<2.5 mEq/L, Grade 4: \<2.00 mEq/L; Sodium High, Grade 3: 154 to \<160 mEq/L, Grade 4:\>=160 mEq/L; Sodium Low, Grade 3: 121 to \<125 mEq/L, Grade 4:\<=120 mEq/L. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 36

  25. Cohort 2: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Glucose, Triglycerides, Lipase, Urate and Cholesterol

    Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Glucose High, Grade 3: \>250 to 500 mg/dL, Grade 4: \>=500 mg/dL, Glucose Low, Grade 3: 30 to\<40 mg/dL, Grade 4:\<30 mg/dL; Triglycerides High, Grade 3: \>500 to \<1.000 mg/dL, Grade 4:\>1000 mg/dL; Lipase High, Grade 3: 3.0 to \<5.0×ULN, Grade 4:\>=5.0×ULN; Urate High, Grade 3: 12.0 to \<15.0 mEq/L, Grade 4:\>=15.0 mEq/L; Cholesterol High, Grade 3: \>=300 mg/dL, Grade 4: Not Applicable. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 36

  26. Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Bilirubin and Direct Bilirubin

    Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Alanine Aminotransferase High; Grade 3: 5.0 to \<10.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=10.0 × ULN; Albumin Low, Grade 3: \<2.0 g/dL, Grade 4: Not Applicable; Alkaline Phosphatase High, Grade 3: 5.0 to \<10.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=10.0 × ULN; Amylase High, Grade 3: 3.0 to \<5.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=5.0 × ULN; Aspartate Aminotransferase High, Grade 3: 5.0 to \<10.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=10.0 × ULN; Bilirubin High, Grade 3: 2.6 to\<5.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=5.0 × ULN and Direct Bilirubin High, Grade 3: \>ULN with other signs and symptoms of hepatotoxicity, Grade 4: \>ULN with life-threatening consequences. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 26

  27. Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Calcium, Creatine Kinase, Creatinine, Phosphate, Potassium and Sodium

    Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Calcium High, Grade 3: 12.5 to \<13.5 mg/dL, Grade 4: \>=13.5 mg/dL; Calcium Low, Grade 3: 6.1 to \<7.0 mg/dL, Grade 4: \<6.1 mg/dL; Creatine Kinase High, Grade 3: 10 to \<20 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=20 × ULN; Creatinine High, Grade 3: \>1.8 to \<3.5 ULN, Grade 4: \>=3.5 × ULN; Phosphate Low, Grade 3: 1.0 to \<1.4 mg/dL, Grade 4: \<1.0 mg/dL; Potassium High, Grade 3: 6.5 to \<7.0 mEq/L,Grade 4: \>=7.0 mEq/L; Potassium Low, Grade 3: 2.0 to \<2.5 mEq/L, Grade 4: \<2.00 mEq/L; Sodium High, Grade 3: 154 to \<160 mEq/L, Grade 4:\>=160 mEq/L; Sodium Low, Grade 3: 121 to \<125 mEq/L, Grade 4:\<=120 mEq/L. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 26

  28. Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Glucose, Triglycerides, Lipase, Urate and Cholesterol

    Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Glucose High, Grade 3: \>250 to 500 mg/dL, Grade 4: \>=500 mg/dL, Glucose Low, Grade 3: 30 to\<40 mg/dL, Grade 4:\<30 mg/dL; Triglycerides High, Grade 3: \>500 to \<1.000 mg/dL, Grade 4:\>1000 mg/dL; Lipase High, Grade 3: 3.0 to \<5.0×ULN, Grade 4:\>=5.0×ULN; Urate High, Grade 3: 12.0 to \<15.0 mEq/L, Grade 4:\>=15.0 mEq/L; Cholesterol High, Grade 3: \>=300 mg/dL, Grade 4: Not Applicable. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 26

  29. Cohort 1: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Urinalysis Parameters

    Urine samples were collected for urinalysis parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Erythrocytes High, Grade 3: Gross, with or without clots OR with Red Blood Cells (RBC) casts OR intervention indicated, Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; Glucose High, Grade 3: \>2+ (proportionate concentration by dipstick test) or \>500 mg, Grade 4: \>500 mg; Protein High, Grade 3: 3+ (proportionate concentration by dipstick test) or higher, Grade 4: Not Applicable. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 35

  30. Cohort 2: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Urinalysis Parameters

    Urine samples were collected for urinalysis parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Erythrocytes High, Grade 3: Gross, with or without clots OR with RBC casts OR intervention indicated, Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; Glucose High, Grade 3: \>2+ (proportionate concentration by dipstick test) or \>500 mg, Grade 4: \>500 mg; Protein High, Grade 3: 3+ (proportionate concentration by dipstick test) or higher, Grade 4: Not Applicable. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 36

  31. Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Urinalysis Parameters

    Urine samples were collected for urinalysis parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Erythrocytes High, Grade 3: Gross, with or without clots OR with RBC casts OR intervention indicated, Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; Glucose High, Grade 3: \>2+ (proportionate concentration by dipstick test) or \>500 mg, Grade 4: \>500 mg; Protein High, Grade 3: 3+ (proportionate concentration by dipstick test) or higher, Grade 4: Not Applicable. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 26

  32. Cohort 1: Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria

    Vital signs including systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and pulse rate were measured in a supine position after atleast 5 minutes of rest. The PCI ranges for vitals were as follows; for SBP \<85 or \>140 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), for DBP \<45 or \>90 mmHg, for pulse rate \<40 or \>100 beats per minute. The number of participants with vital signs of PCI were presented.

    Time frame: Up to Day 35

  33. Cohort 2: Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values of PCI Criteria

    Vital signs including SBP, DBP and pulse rate were measured in a supine position after atleast 5 minutes of rest. The PCI ranges for vitals were as follows; for SBP \<85 or \>140 mmHg, for DBP \<45 or \>90 mmHg, for pulse rate \<40 or \>100 beats per minute. The number of participants with vital signs of PCI were presented.

    Time frame: Up to Day 36

  34. Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values of PCI Criteria

    Vital signs including SBP, DBP and pulse rate were measured in a supine position after atleast 5 minutes of rest. The PCI ranges for vitals were as follows; for SBP \<85 or \>140 mmHg, for DBP \<45 or \>90 mmHg, for pulse rate \<40 or \>100 beats per minute. The number of participants with vital signs of PCI were presented.

    Time frame: Up to Day 26

  35. Cohort 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

    A 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position using an automated ECG machine. Clinically significant abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition. Data for number of participants with clinically significant abnormal ECG findings were reported. Data has been presented for the participants with respect to the actual treatment received in respective treatment periods.

    Time frame: Day 1 (2,4,6 Hours), Day 7 and Day 11 in Treatment Period 1; Day 12 (2,4,6 Hours), Day 21 in Treatment Period 2; Day 22 (2,4,6 Hours), Day 26 and Day 35 in Treatment Period 3

  36. Cohort 2: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal ECG Findings

    A 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position using an automated ECG machine. Clinically significant abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition. Data for number of participants with clinically significant abnormal ECG findings were reported. Data has been presented for the participants with respect to the actual treatment received in respective treatment periods.

    Time frame: Day 1 (2,4,6 Hours), Day 7 and Day 11 in Treatment Period 1; Day 12 (2,4,6 Hours), Day 21 in Treatment Period 2; Day 22 (2,4,6 Hours), Day 26 and Day 36 in Treatment Period 3

  37. Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal ECG Findings

    A 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position using an automated ECG machine. Clinically significant abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition. Data for number of participants with clinically significant abnormal ECG findings were reported. Data has been presented for the participants with respect to the actual treatment received in respective treatment periods.

    Time frame: Day 1 (2,4,6 Hours) in Treatment Period 1; Day 8 (2,4,6 Hours), Day 9 (2,4,6 Hours), Day 26 in Treatment Period 2

07

Results

Posted Aug 21, 2023

Participant flow

This study was conducted at a single center in the United States.

Cohort 1:Treatment Period 1(Days 1 to 7)
Participant flow — Cohort 1:Treatment Period 1(Days 1 to 7)
MilestoneCohort 1: GSK3640254 Then DRV/RTV Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTVCohort 2: GSK3640254 Then ETR Then GSK3640254 + ETRCohort 3: GSK3640254 Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTV + ETR
Started1900
Completed1900
Not completed000
Cohort 1:Washout Period (Days 8 to 11)
Participant flow — Cohort 1:Washout Period (Days 8 to 11)
MilestoneCohort 1: GSK3640254 Then DRV/RTV Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTVCohort 2: GSK3640254 Then ETR Then GSK3640254 + ETRCohort 3: GSK3640254 Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTV + ETR
Started1900
Completed1900
Not completed000
Cohort1:Treatment Period2(Days 12 to 21)
Participant flow — Cohort1:Treatment Period2(Days 12 to 21)
MilestoneCohort 1: GSK3640254 Then DRV/RTV Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTVCohort 2: GSK3640254 Then ETR Then GSK3640254 + ETRCohort 3: GSK3640254 Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTV + ETR
Started1900
Completed1700
Not completed200
Withdrew: Physician decision200
Cohort1:Treatment Period3(Days 22 to 31)
Participant flow — Cohort1:Treatment Period3(Days 22 to 31)
MilestoneCohort 1: GSK3640254 Then DRV/RTV Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTVCohort 2: GSK3640254 Then ETR Then GSK3640254 + ETRCohort 3: GSK3640254 Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTV + ETR
Started1700
Completed1500
Not completed200
Withdrew: Physician decision100
Withdrew: Adverse event100
Cohort 2:Treatment Period 1(Days 1 to 7)
Participant flow — Cohort 2:Treatment Period 1(Days 1 to 7)
MilestoneCohort 1: GSK3640254 Then DRV/RTV Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTVCohort 2: GSK3640254 Then ETR Then GSK3640254 + ETRCohort 3: GSK3640254 Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTV + ETR
Started0190
Completed0190
Not completed000
Cohort 2: Washout Period (Days 8 to 11)
Participant flow — Cohort 2: Washout Period (Days 8 to 11)
MilestoneCohort 1: GSK3640254 Then DRV/RTV Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTVCohort 2: GSK3640254 Then ETR Then GSK3640254 + ETRCohort 3: GSK3640254 Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTV + ETR
Started0190
Completed0190
Not completed000
Cohort2:Treatment Period2(Days 12 to 21)
Participant flow — Cohort2:Treatment Period2(Days 12 to 21)
MilestoneCohort 1: GSK3640254 Then DRV/RTV Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTVCohort 2: GSK3640254 Then ETR Then GSK3640254 + ETRCohort 3: GSK3640254 Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTV + ETR
Started0190
Completed0170
Not completed020
Withdrew: Physician decision020
Cohort2:Treatment Period3(Days 22 to 31)
Participant flow — Cohort2:Treatment Period3(Days 22 to 31)
MilestoneCohort 1: GSK3640254 Then DRV/RTV Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTVCohort 2: GSK3640254 Then ETR Then GSK3640254 + ETRCohort 3: GSK3640254 Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTV + ETR
Started0170
Completed0140
Not completed030
Withdrew: Physician decision020
Withdrew: Adverse event010
Cohort 3:Treatment Period 1(Days 1 to 7)
Participant flow — Cohort 3:Treatment Period 1(Days 1 to 7)
MilestoneCohort 1: GSK3640254 Then DRV/RTV Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTVCohort 2: GSK3640254 Then ETR Then GSK3640254 + ETRCohort 3: GSK3640254 Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTV + ETR
Started0016
Completed0016
Not completed000
Cohort 3:Treatment Period2(Days 8 to 21)
Participant flow — Cohort 3:Treatment Period2(Days 8 to 21)
MilestoneCohort 1: GSK3640254 Then DRV/RTV Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTVCohort 2: GSK3640254 Then ETR Then GSK3640254 + ETRCohort 3: GSK3640254 Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTV + ETR
Started0016
Completed0014
Not completed002
Withdrew: Physician decision001
Withdrew: Adverse event001

Outcome measures

PrimaryCohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the End of the Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUC[0-tau]) of GSK3640254

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 3
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Hours*micrograms per milliliter
Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the End of the Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUC[0-tau]) of GSK3640254
Hours*micrograms per milliliterCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the End of the Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUC[0-tau]) of GSK364025427.03 ± 33.730.70 ± 33.6
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg vs Cohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg · Ratio of geometric least square means: 1.137 · 90% CI 0.9990 to 1.293A linear mixed-effects model with period as a fixed effect, participant as a random effect, and measurements within participant as repeated measures was performed on the log-transformed parameter AUC(0-tau).
PrimaryCohort 1: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of GSK3640254

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 3
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Micrograms per milliliter
Cohort 1: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of GSK3640254
Micrograms per milliliterCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
Cohort 1: Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of GSK36402541.752 ± 39.11.863 ± 41.0
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg vs Cohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg · Ratio of geometric least square means: 1.068 · 90% CI 0.9185 to 1.242A linear mixed-effects model with period as a fixed effect, participant as a random effect, and measurements within participant as repeated measures was performed on the log-transformed parameter Cmax.
PrimaryCohort 1: AUC(0-tau) of DRV

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Hours*micrograms per milliliter
Cohort 1: AUC(0-tau) of DRV
Hours*micrograms per milliliterCohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
Cohort 1: AUC(0-tau) of DRV57.47 ± 25.753.37 ± 22.1
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mg vs Cohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg · Ratio of geometric least square means: 0.9891 · 90% CI 0.9313 to 1.051A linear mixed-effects model with period as a fixed effect, participant as a random effect, and measurements within participant as repeated measures was performed on the log-transformed parameter AUC(0-tau).
PrimaryCohort 1: Cmax of DRV

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Micrograms per milliliter
Cohort 1: Cmax of DRV
Micrograms per milliliterCohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
Cohort 1: Cmax of DRV7.037 ± 24.47.268 ± 21.7
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mg vs Cohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg · Ratio of geometric least square means: 1.050 · 90% CI 0.9816 to 1.122A linear mixed-effects model with period as a fixed effect, participant as a random effect, and measurements within participant as repeated measures was performed on the log-transformed parameter Cmax.
PrimaryCohort 1: AUC(0-tau) of RTV

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Hours* micrograms per milliliter
Cohort 1: AUC(0-tau) of RTV
Hours* micrograms per milliliterCohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
Cohort 1: AUC(0-tau) of RTV7.303 ± 48.77.790 ± 45.9
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mg vs Cohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg · Ratio of geometric least square means: 1.102 · 90% CI 1.025 to 1.185A linear mixed-effects model with period as a fixed effect, participant as a random effect, and measurements within participant as repeated measures was performed on the log-transformed parameter AUC(0-tau).
PrimaryCohort 1: Cmax of RTV

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Micrograms per milliliter
Cohort 1: Cmax of RTV
Micrograms per milliliterCohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
Cohort 1: Cmax of RTV1.178 ± 43.11.306 ± 36.6
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mg vs Cohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg · Ratio of geometric least square means: 1.120 · 90% CI 0.9947 to 1.260A linear mixed-effects model with period as a fixed effect, participant as a random effect, and measurements within participant as repeated measures was performed on the log-transformed parameter Cmax.
PrimaryCohort 2: AUC(0-tau) of GSK3640254

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 3
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Hours*micrograms per milliliter
Cohort 2: AUC(0-tau) of GSK3640254
Hours*micrograms per milliliterCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg
Cohort 2: AUC(0-tau) of GSK364025427.86 ± 27.814.73 ± 26.5
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg vs Cohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg · Ratio of geometric least square means: 0.5299 · 90% CI 0.4801 to 0.5848A linear mixed-effects model with period as a fixed effect, participant as a random effect, and measurements within participant as repeated measures was performed on the log-transformed parameter AUC(0-tau).
PrimaryCohort 2: Cmax of GSK3640254

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 3
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Micrograms per milliliter
Cohort 2: Cmax of GSK3640254
Micrograms per milliliterCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg
Cohort 2: Cmax of GSK36402541.889 ± 38.21.136 ± 28.5
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg vs Cohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg · Ratio of geometric least square means: 0.6001 · 90% CI 0.5271 to 0.6833A linear mixed-effects model with period as a fixed effect, participant as a random effect, and measurements within participant as repeated measures was performed on the log-transformed parameter Cmax.
PrimaryCohort 2: AUC(0-tau) of ETR

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Hours*micrograms per milliliter
Cohort 2: AUC(0-tau) of ETR
Hours*micrograms per milliliterCohort 2: ETR 200 mgCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg
Cohort 2: AUC(0-tau) of ETR8.340 ± 36.09.791 ± 32.8
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort 2: ETR 200 mg vs Cohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg · Ratio of geometric least square means: 1.144 · 90% CI 1.082 to 1.210A linear mixed-effects model with period as a fixed effect, participant as a random effect, and measurements within participant as repeated measures was performed on the log-transformed parameter AUC(0-tau).
PrimaryCohort 2: Cmax of ETR

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Micrograms per milliliter
Cohort 2: Cmax of ETR
Micrograms per milliliterCohort 2: ETR 200 mgCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg
Cohort 2: Cmax of ETR0.9749 ± 35.11.102 ± 33.0
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort 2: ETR 200 mg vs Cohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg · Ratio of geometric least square means: 1.104 · 90% CI 1.026 to 1.187A linear mixed-effects model with period as a fixed effect, participant as a random effect, and measurements within participant as repeated measures was performed on the log-transformed parameter Cmax.
PrimaryCohort 3: AUC(0-tau) of GSK3640254

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 2
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Hours*micrograms per milliliter
Cohort 3: AUC(0-tau) of GSK3640254
Hours*micrograms per milliliterCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mg+ DRV/RTV 600/100 mg+ ETR 200 mg
Cohort 3: AUC(0-tau) of GSK364025424.99 ± 34.722.78 ± 34.3
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mg vs Cohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mg+ DRV/RTV 600/100 mg+ ETR 200 mg · Ratio of geometric least square means: 0.9435 · 90% CI 0.8147 to 1.093A linear mixed-effects model with period as a fixed effect, participant as a random effect, and measurements within participant as repeated measures was performed on the log-transformed parameter AUC(0-tau).
PrimaryCohort 3: Cmax of GSK3640254

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 2
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Micrograms per milliliter
Cohort 3: Cmax of GSK3640254
Micrograms per milliliterCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mg+ DRV/RTV 600/100 mg+ ETR 200 mg
Cohort 3: Cmax of GSK36402541.578 ± 34.81.383 ± 32.5
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mg vs Cohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mg+ DRV/RTV 600/100 mg+ ETR 200 mg · Ratio of geometric least square means: 0.8928 · 90% CI 0.7467 to 1.068A linear mixed-effects model with period as a fixed effect, participant as a random effect, and measurements within participant as repeated measures was performed on the log-transformed parameter Cmax.
SecondaryCohort 1: Plasma Concentration at the End of the Dosing Interval (Ctau) of DRV

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Micrograms per milliliter
Cohort 1: Plasma Concentration at the End of the Dosing Interval (Ctau) of DRV
Micrograms per milliliterCohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
Cohort 1: Plasma Concentration at the End of the Dosing Interval (Ctau) of DRV2.957 ± 37.02.637 ± 36.5
SecondaryCohort 1: Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of DRV

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3
Reported as:
Median · Hours
Cohort 1: Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of DRV
HoursCohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
Cohort 1: Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of DRV3.000 (1.50 to 4.00)3.000 (1.57 to 4.00)
SecondaryCohort 1: Ctau of RTV

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Micrograms per milliliter
Cohort 1: Ctau of RTV
Micrograms per milliliterCohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
Cohort 1: Ctau of RTV0.3194 ± 77.40.3314 ± 91.1
SecondaryCohort 1: Tmax of RTV

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3
Reported as:
Median · Hours
Cohort 1: Tmax of RTV
HoursCohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
Cohort 1: Tmax of RTV4.000 (2.00 to 6.00)4.000 (2.00 to 4.00)
SecondaryCohort 1: Ctau of GSK3640254

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 3
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Micrograms per milliliter
Cohort 1: Ctau of GSK3640254
Micrograms per milliliterCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
Cohort 1: Ctau of GSK36402540.8152 ± 34.50.9530 ± 35.2
SecondaryCohort 1: Tmax of GSK3640254

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 3
Reported as:
Median · Hours
Cohort 1: Tmax of GSK3640254
HoursCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
Cohort 1: Tmax of GSK36402544.000 (1.50 to 8.00)4.000 (1.50 to 11.93)
SecondaryCohort 2: Ctau of ETR

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Micrograms per milliliter
Cohort 2: Ctau of ETR
Micrograms per milliliterCohort 2: ETR 200 mgCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg
Cohort 2: Ctau of ETR0.4705 ± 37.80.5837 ± 33.1
SecondaryCohort 2: Tmax of ETR

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 2 and 3
Reported as:
Median · Hours
Cohort 2: Tmax of ETR
HoursCohort 2: ETR 200 mgCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg
Cohort 2: Tmax of ETR3.500 (2.00 to 6.00)4.000 (2.00 to 8.00)
SecondaryCohort 2: Ctau of GSK3640254

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 3
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Micrograms per milliliter
Cohort 2: Ctau of GSK3640254
Micrograms per milliliterCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg
Cohort 2: Ctau of GSK36402540.7706 ± 36.30.3901 ± 50.2
SecondaryCohort 2: Tmax of GSK3640254

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.

Time frame:
Pre-dose and 0.5 Hours, 1 Hour, 1.5 Hours, 2 Hours, 3 Hours, 4 Hours, 6 Hours, 8 Hours, 12 Hours, 16 Hours, 24 Hours post-dose in Treatment Periods 1 and 3
Reported as:
Median · Hours
Cohort 2: Tmax of GSK3640254
HoursCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg
Cohort 2: Tmax of GSK36402544.000 (2.00 to 8.00)3.000 (2.00 to 6.00)
SecondaryCohort 1: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or other situations as per medical or scientific judgment. Adverse events which were not Serious were considered as Non-Serious adverse events.

Time frame:
Up to Day 35
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 1: Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs)
ParticipantsCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
SAE000
non-SAE645
SecondaryCohort 2: Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or other situations as per medical or scientific judgment. Adverse events which were not Serious were considered as Non-Serious adverse events.

Time frame:
Up to Day 36
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 2: Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs
ParticipantsCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 2: ETR 200 mgCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg
SAE000
non-SAE347
SecondaryCohort 3: Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or other situations as per medical or scientific judgment. Adverse events which were not Serious were considered as Non-Serious adverse events.

Time frame:
Up to Day 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 3: Number of Participants With SAEs and Non-SAEs
ParticipantsCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mg+ DRV/RTV 600/100 mg+ ETR 200 mg
SAE00
non-SAE18
SecondaryCohort 1: Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuations and Deaths

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Number of participants with AEs leading to discontinuations and deaths were reported.

Time frame:
Up to Day 35
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 1: Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuations and Deaths
ParticipantsCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
AEs leading to discontinuations010
AES leading to deaths000
SecondaryCohort 2: Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuations and Deaths

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Number of participants with AEs leading to discontinuations and deaths were reported.

Time frame:
Up to Day 36
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 2: Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuations and Deaths
ParticipantsCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 2: ETR 200 mgCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg
AEs leading to discontinuations001
AES leading to deaths000
SecondaryCohort 3: Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuations and Deaths

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Number of participants with AEs leading to discontinuations and deaths were reported.

Time frame:
Up to Day 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 3: Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuations and Deaths
ParticipantsCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mg+ DRV/RTV 600/100 mg+ ETR 200 mg
AEs leading to discontinuations01
AES leading to deaths00
SecondaryCohort 1: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Hematology Parameters

Blood samples were collected for analysis of hematology parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) grading table Version 2.1. For Hemoglobin Low, Grade 3: 7.0 to \<9.0 Grams per deciliter (g/dL) (males) and 6.5 to \<8.5 g/dL (females),Grade 4: \<7.0 g/dL (males) and \<6.5 g/dL (females); Leukocytes Low, Grade 3: 1000 to 1499 cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm\^3),Grade 4: \<1000 cells/mm\^3; Lymphocytes Low, Grade 3: 350 to \<500 cells per liter (cells/L),Grade 4: \<350 cells/L; Neutrophils Low, Grade 3: 400 to 599 cells/mm\^3, Grade 4: \<400 cells/mm\^3; Platelets Low, Grade 3: 25,000 to \<50,000 cells/mm\^3, Grade 4: \<25,000 cells/mm\^3. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

Time frame:
Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 35
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 1: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Hematology Parameters
ParticipantsCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
Hemoglobin, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Hemoglobin, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Leukocytes, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Leukocytes, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Lymphocytes, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Lymphocytes, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Neutrophils, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Neutrophils, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Platelets, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Platelets, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
SecondaryCohort 2: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Hematology Parameters

Blood samples were collected for analysis of hematology parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Hemoglobin Low, Grade 3: 7.0 to \<9.0 g/dL (males) and 6.5 to \<8.5 g/dL (females),Grade 4: \<7.0 g/dL (males) and \<6.5 g/dL (females); Leukocytes Low, Grade 3: 1000 to 1499 cells/mm\^3,Grade 4: \<1000 cells/mm\^3; Lymphocytes Low, Grade 3: 350 to \<500 cells/L,Grade 4: \<350 cells/L; Neutrophils Low, Grade 3: 400 to 599 cells/mm\^3, Grade 4: \<400 cells/mm\^3; Platelets Low, Grade 3: 25,000 to \<50,000 cells/mm\^3, Grade 4: \<25,000 cells/mm\^3. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

Time frame:
Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 36
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 2: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Hematology Parameters
ParticipantsCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 2: ETR 200 mgCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg
Hemoglobin, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Hemoglobin, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Leukocytes, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Leukocytes, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Lymphocytes, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Lymphocytes, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Neutrophils, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Neutrophils, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Platelets, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Platelets, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
SecondaryCohort 3: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Hematology Parameters

Blood samples were collected for analysis of hematology parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Hemoglobin Low, Grade 3: 7.0 to \<9.0 g/dL (males) and 6.5 to \<8.5 g/dL (females),Grade 4: \<7.0 g/dL (males) and \<6.5 g/dL (females); Leukocytes Low, Grade 3: 1000 to 1499 cells/mm\^3,Grade 4: \<1000 cells/mm\^3; Lymphocytes Low, Grade 3: 350 to \<500 cells/L,Grade 4: \<350 cells/L; Neutrophils Low, Grade 3: 400 to 599 cells/mm\^3, Grade 4: \<400 cells/mm\^3; Platelets Low, Grade 3: 25,000 to \<50,000 cells/mm\^3, Grade 4: \<25,000 cells/mm\^3. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

Time frame:
Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Hematology Parameters
ParticipantsCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mg+ DRV/RTV 600/100 mg+ ETR 200 mg
Hemoglobin, Low, Increase to Grade 300
Hemoglobin, Low, Increase to Grade 400
Leukocytes, Low, Increase to Grade 300
Leukocytes, Low, Increase to Grade 400
Lymphocytes, Low, Increase to Grade 300
Lymphocytes, Low, Increase to Grade 400
Neutrophils, Low, Increase to Grade 300
Neutrophils, Low, Increase to Grade 400
Platelets, Low, Increase to Grade 300
Platelets, Low, Increase to Grade 400
SecondaryCohort 1: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Bilirubin and Direct Bilirubin

Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Alanine Aminotransferase High; Grade 3: 5.0 to \<10.0 times (×) Upper Limit Normal (ULN), Grade 4: \>=10.0 × ULN; Albumin Low, Grade 3: \<2.0 grams per deciliter (g/dL), Grade 4: Not Applicable; Alkaline Phosphatase High, Grade 3: 5.0 to \<10.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=10.0 × ULN; Amylase High, Grade 3: 3.0 to \<5.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=5.0 × ULN; Aspartate Aminotransferase High, Grade 3: 5.0 to \<10.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=10.0 × ULN; Bilirubin High, Grade 3: 2.6 to\<5.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=5.0 × ULN and Direct Bilirubin High, Grade 3: \>ULN with other signs and symptoms of hepatotoxicity, Grade 4: \>ULN with life-threatening consequences. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

Time frame:
Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 35
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 1: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Bilirubin and Direct Bilirubin
ParticipantsCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
Alanine Aminotransferase, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Alanine Aminotransferase, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Albumin, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Albumin, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Alkaline Phosphatase, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Alkaline Phosphatase, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Amylase, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Amylase, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Aspartate Aminotransferase, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Aspartate Aminotransferase, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Bilirubin, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Bilirubin, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Direct Bilirubin, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Direct Bilirubin, High, Increase to Grade 4000
SecondaryCohort 1: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Calcium, Creatine Kinase, Creatinine, Phosphate, Potassium and Sodium

Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Calcium High, Grade 3: 12.5 to \<13.5 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL), Grade 4: \>=13.5 mg/dL; Calcium Low, Grade 3: 6.1 to \<7.0 mg/dL, Grade 4: \<6.1 mg/dL; Creatine Kinase High, Grade 3: 10 to \<20 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=20 × ULN; Creatinine High, Grade 3: \>1.8 to \<3.5 ULN, Grade 4: \>=3.5 × ULN; Phosphate Low, Grade 3: 1.0 to \<1.4 mg/dL, Grade 4: \<1.0 mg/dL; Potassium High, Grade 3: 6.5 to \<7.0 Milliequivalents per liter (mEq/L),Grade 4: \>=7.0 mEq/L; Potassium Low, Grade 3: 2.0 to \<2.5 mEq/L, Grade 4: \<2.00 mEq/L; Sodium High, Grade 3: 154 to \<160 mEq/L, Grade 4:\>=160 mEq/L; Sodium Low, Grade 3: 121 to \<125 mEq/L, Grade 4:\<=120 mEq/L. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

Time frame:
Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 35
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 1: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Calcium, Creatine Kinase, Creatinine, Phosphate, Potassium and Sodium
ParticipantsCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
Calcium, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Calcium, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Calcium, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Calcium, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Creatine Kinase, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Creatine Kinase, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Creatinine, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Creatinine, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Phosphate, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Phosphate, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Potassium, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Potassium, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Potassium, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Potassium, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Sodium, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Sodium, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Sodium, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Sodium, High, Increase to Grade 4000
SecondaryCohort 1: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Glucose, Triglycerides, Lipase, Urate and Cholesterol

Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Glucose High, Grade 3: \>250 to 500 mg/dL, Grade 4: \>=500 mg/dL, Glucose Low, Grade 3: 30 to\<40 mg/dL, Grade 4:\<30 mg/dL; Triglycerides High, Grade 3: \>500 to \<1.000 mg/dL, Grade 4:\>1000 mg/dL; Lipase High, Grade 3: 3.0 to \<5.0×ULN, Grade 4:\>=5.0×ULN; Urate High, Grade 3: 12.0 to \<15.0 mEq/L, Grade 4:\>=15.0 mEq/L; Cholesterol High, Grade 3: \>=300 mg/dL, Grade 4: Not Applicable. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

Time frame:
Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 35
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 1: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Glucose, Triglycerides, Lipase, Urate and Cholesterol
ParticipantsCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
Glucose, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Glucose, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Glucose, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Glucose, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Triglycerides, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Triglycerides, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Lipase, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Lipase, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Urate, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Urate, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Cholesterol, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Cholesterol, High, Increase to Grade 4000
SecondaryCohort 2: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Bilirubin and Direct Bilirubin

Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Alanine Aminotransferase High; Grade 3: 5.0 to \<10.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=10.0 × ULN; Albumin Low, Grade 3: \<2.0 g/dL, Grade 4: Not Applicable; Alkaline Phosphatase High, Grade 3: 5.0 to \<10.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=10.0 × ULN; Amylase High, Grade 3: 3.0 to \<5.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=5.0 × ULN; Aspartate Aminotransferase High, Grade 3: 5.0 to \<10.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=10.0 × ULN; Bilirubin High, Grade 3: 2.6 to\<5.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=5.0 × ULN and Direct Bilirubin High, Grade 3: \>ULN with other signs and symptoms of hepatotoxicity, Grade 4: \>ULN with life-threatening consequences. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

Time frame:
Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 36
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 2: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Bilirubin and Direct Bilirubin
ParticipantsCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 2: ETR 200 mgCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg
Alanine Aminotransferase, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Alanine Aminotransferase, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Albumin, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Albumin, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Alkaline Phosphatase, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Alkaline Phosphatase, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Amylase, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Amylase, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Aspartate Aminotransferase, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Aspartate Aminotransferase, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Bilirubin, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Bilirubin, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Direct Bilirubin, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Direct Bilirubin, High, Increase to Grade 4000
SecondaryCohort 2: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Calcium, Creatine Kinase, Creatinine, Phosphate, Potassium and Sodium

Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Calcium High, Grade 3: 12.5 to \<13.5 mg/dL, Grade 4: \>=13.5 mg/dL; Calcium Low, Grade 3: 6.1 to \<7.0 mg/dL, Grade 4: \<6.1 mg/dL; Creatine Kinase High, Grade 3: 10 to \<20 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=20 × ULN; Creatinine High, Grade 3: \>1.8 to \<3.5 ULN, Grade 4: \>=3.5 × ULN; Phosphate Low, Grade 3: 1.0 to \<1.4 mg/dL, Grade 4: \<1.0 mg/dL; Potassium High, Grade 3: 6.5 to \<7.0 mEq/L,Grade 4: \>=7.0 mEq/L; Potassium Low, Grade 3: 2.0 to \<2.5 mEq/L, Grade 4: \<2.00 mEq/L; Sodium High, Grade 3: 154 to \<160 mEq/L, Grade 4:\>=160 mEq/L; Sodium Low, Grade 3: 121 to \<125 mEq/L, Grade 4:\<=120 mEq/L. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

Time frame:
Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 36
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 2: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Calcium, Creatine Kinase, Creatinine, Phosphate, Potassium and Sodium
ParticipantsCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 2: ETR 200 mgCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg
Calcium, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Calcium, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Calcium, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Calcium, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Creatine Kinase, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Creatine Kinase, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Creatinine, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Creatinine, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Phosphate, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Phosphate, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Potassium, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Potassium, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Potassium, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Potassium, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Sodium, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Sodium, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Sodium, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Sodium, High, Increase to Grade 4000
SecondaryCohort 2: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Glucose, Triglycerides, Lipase, Urate and Cholesterol

Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Glucose High, Grade 3: \>250 to 500 mg/dL, Grade 4: \>=500 mg/dL, Glucose Low, Grade 3: 30 to\<40 mg/dL, Grade 4:\<30 mg/dL; Triglycerides High, Grade 3: \>500 to \<1.000 mg/dL, Grade 4:\>1000 mg/dL; Lipase High, Grade 3: 3.0 to \<5.0×ULN, Grade 4:\>=5.0×ULN; Urate High, Grade 3: 12.0 to \<15.0 mEq/L, Grade 4:\>=15.0 mEq/L; Cholesterol High, Grade 3: \>=300 mg/dL, Grade 4: Not Applicable. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

Time frame:
Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 36
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 2: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Glucose, Triglycerides, Lipase, Urate and Cholesterol
ParticipantsCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 2: ETR 200 mgCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg
Glucose, Low, Increase to Grade 3000
Glucose, Low, Increase to Grade 4000
Glucose, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Glucose, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Triglycerides, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Triglycerides, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Lipase, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Lipase, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Urate, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Urate, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Cholesterol, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Cholesterol, High, Increase to Grade 4000
SecondaryCohort 3: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Bilirubin and Direct Bilirubin

Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Alanine Aminotransferase High; Grade 3: 5.0 to \<10.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=10.0 × ULN; Albumin Low, Grade 3: \<2.0 g/dL, Grade 4: Not Applicable; Alkaline Phosphatase High, Grade 3: 5.0 to \<10.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=10.0 × ULN; Amylase High, Grade 3: 3.0 to \<5.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=5.0 × ULN; Aspartate Aminotransferase High, Grade 3: 5.0 to \<10.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=10.0 × ULN; Bilirubin High, Grade 3: 2.6 to\<5.0 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=5.0 × ULN and Direct Bilirubin High, Grade 3: \>ULN with other signs and symptoms of hepatotoxicity, Grade 4: \>ULN with life-threatening consequences. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

Time frame:
Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Alanine Aminotransferase, Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Bilirubin and Direct Bilirubin
ParticipantsCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mg+ DRV/RTV 600/100 mg+ ETR 200 mg
Alanine Aminotransferase, High, Increase to Grade 300
Alanine Aminotransferase, High, Increase to Grade 400
Albumin, Low, Increase to Grade 300
Albumin, Low, Increase to Grade 400
Alkaline Phosphatase, High, Increase to Grade 300
Alkaline Phosphatase, High, Increase to Grade 400
Amylase, High, Increase to Grade 300
Amylase, High, Increase to Grade 400
Aspartate Aminotransferase, High, Increase to Grade 300
Aspartate Aminotransferase, High, Increase to Grade 400
Bilirubin, High, Increase to Grade 300
Bilirubin, High, Increase to Grade 400
Direct Bilirubin, High, Increase to Grade 300
Direct Bilirubin, High, Increase to Grade 400
SecondaryCohort 3: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Calcium, Creatine Kinase, Creatinine, Phosphate, Potassium and Sodium

Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Calcium High, Grade 3: 12.5 to \<13.5 mg/dL, Grade 4: \>=13.5 mg/dL; Calcium Low, Grade 3: 6.1 to \<7.0 mg/dL, Grade 4: \<6.1 mg/dL; Creatine Kinase High, Grade 3: 10 to \<20 × ULN, Grade 4: \>=20 × ULN; Creatinine High, Grade 3: \>1.8 to \<3.5 ULN, Grade 4: \>=3.5 × ULN; Phosphate Low, Grade 3: 1.0 to \<1.4 mg/dL, Grade 4: \<1.0 mg/dL; Potassium High, Grade 3: 6.5 to \<7.0 mEq/L,Grade 4: \>=7.0 mEq/L; Potassium Low, Grade 3: 2.0 to \<2.5 mEq/L, Grade 4: \<2.00 mEq/L; Sodium High, Grade 3: 154 to \<160 mEq/L, Grade 4:\>=160 mEq/L; Sodium Low, Grade 3: 121 to \<125 mEq/L, Grade 4:\<=120 mEq/L. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

Time frame:
Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Calcium, Creatine Kinase, Creatinine, Phosphate, Potassium and Sodium
ParticipantsCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mg+ DRV/RTV 600/100 mg+ ETR 200 mg
Calcium, Low, Increase to Grade 300
Calcium, Low, Increase to Grade 400
Calcium, High, Increase to Grade 300
Calcium, High, Increase to Grade 400
Creatine Kinase, High, Increase to Grade 300
Creatine Kinase, High, Increase to Grade 400
Creatinine, High, Increase to Grade 300
Creatinine, High, Increase to Grade 400
Phosphate, Low, Increase to Grade 300
Phosphate, Low, Increase to Grade 400
Potassium, Low, Increase to Grade 300
Potassium, Low, Increase to Grade 400
Potassium, High, Increase to Grade 300
Potassium, High, Increase to Grade 400
Sodium, Low, Increase to Grade 300
Sodium, Low, Increase to Grade 400
Sodium, High, Increase to Grade 300
Sodium, High, Increase to Grade 400
SecondaryCohort 3: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Glucose, Triglycerides, Lipase, Urate and Cholesterol

Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Glucose High, Grade 3: \>250 to 500 mg/dL, Grade 4: \>=500 mg/dL, Glucose Low, Grade 3: 30 to\<40 mg/dL, Grade 4:\<30 mg/dL; Triglycerides High, Grade 3: \>500 to \<1.000 mg/dL, Grade 4:\>1000 mg/dL; Lipase High, Grade 3: 3.0 to \<5.0×ULN, Grade 4:\>=5.0×ULN; Urate High, Grade 3: 12.0 to \<15.0 mEq/L, Grade 4:\>=15.0 mEq/L; Cholesterol High, Grade 3: \>=300 mg/dL, Grade 4: Not Applicable. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

Time frame:
Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Glucose, Triglycerides, Lipase, Urate and Cholesterol
ParticipantsCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mg+ DRV/RTV 600/100 mg+ ETR 200 mg
Glucose, Low, Increase to Grade 300
Glucose, Low, Increase to Grade 400
Glucose, High, Increase to Grade 300
Glucose, High, Increase to Grade 400
Triglycerides, High, Increase to Grade 300
Triglycerides, High, Increase to Grade 400
Lipase, High, Increase to Grade 300
Lipase, High, Increase to Grade 400
Urate, High, Increase to Grade 300
Urate, High, Increase to Grade 400
Cholesterol, High, Increase to Grade 300
Cholesterol, High, Increase to Grade 400
SecondaryCohort 1: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Urinalysis Parameters

Urine samples were collected for urinalysis parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Erythrocytes High, Grade 3: Gross, with or without clots OR with Red Blood Cells (RBC) casts OR intervention indicated, Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; Glucose High, Grade 3: \>2+ (proportionate concentration by dipstick test) or \>500 mg, Grade 4: \>500 mg; Protein High, Grade 3: 3+ (proportionate concentration by dipstick test) or higher, Grade 4: Not Applicable. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

Time frame:
Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 35
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 1: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Urinalysis Parameters
ParticipantsCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
Erythrocytes, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Erythrocytes, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Glucose, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Glucose, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Protein, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Protein, High, Increase to Grade 4000
SecondaryCohort 2: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Urinalysis Parameters

Urine samples were collected for urinalysis parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Erythrocytes High, Grade 3: Gross, with or without clots OR with RBC casts OR intervention indicated, Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; Glucose High, Grade 3: \>2+ (proportionate concentration by dipstick test) or \>500 mg, Grade 4: \>500 mg; Protein High, Grade 3: 3+ (proportionate concentration by dipstick test) or higher, Grade 4: Not Applicable. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

Time frame:
Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 36
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 2: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Urinalysis Parameters
ParticipantsCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 2: ETR 200 mgCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg
Erythrocytes, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Erythrocytes, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Glucose, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Glucose, High, Increase to Grade 4000
Protein, High, Increase to Grade 3000
Protein, High, Increase to Grade 4000
SecondaryCohort 3: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Urinalysis Parameters

Urine samples were collected for urinalysis parameters. Laboratory abnormalities were graded according to DAIDS grading table Version 2.1. For Erythrocytes High, Grade 3: Gross, with or without clots OR with RBC casts OR intervention indicated, Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; Glucose High, Grade 3: \>2+ (proportionate concentration by dipstick test) or \>500 mg, Grade 4: \>500 mg; Protein High, Grade 3: 3+ (proportionate concentration by dipstick test) or higher, Grade 4: Not Applicable. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in DAIDS grade relative to Baseline grade.

Time frame:
Baseline (Pre-dose, Day-1) and up to Day 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Grade Increase Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline in Urinalysis Parameters
ParticipantsCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mg+ DRV/RTV 600/100 mg+ ETR 200 mg
Erythrocytes, High, Increase to Grade 300
Erythrocytes, High, Increase to Grade 400
Glucose, High, Increase to Grade 300
Glucose, High, Increase to Grade 400
Protein, High, Increase to Grade 300
Protein, High, Increase to Grade 400
SecondaryCohort 1: Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria

Vital signs including systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and pulse rate were measured in a supine position after atleast 5 minutes of rest. The PCI ranges for vitals were as follows; for SBP \<85 or \>140 millimeters of mercury (mmHg), for DBP \<45 or \>90 mmHg, for pulse rate \<40 or \>100 beats per minute. The number of participants with vital signs of PCI were presented.

Time frame:
Up to Day 35
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 1: Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria
ParticipantsCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
SBP020
DBP000
Pulse rate000
SecondaryCohort 2: Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values of PCI Criteria

Vital signs including SBP, DBP and pulse rate were measured in a supine position after atleast 5 minutes of rest. The PCI ranges for vitals were as follows; for SBP \<85 or \>140 mmHg, for DBP \<45 or \>90 mmHg, for pulse rate \<40 or \>100 beats per minute. The number of participants with vital signs of PCI were presented.

Time frame:
Up to Day 36
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 2: Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values of PCI Criteria
ParticipantsCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 2: ETR 200 mgCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg
SBP000
DBP001
Pulse rate000
SecondaryCohort 3: Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values of PCI Criteria

Vital signs including SBP, DBP and pulse rate were measured in a supine position after atleast 5 minutes of rest. The PCI ranges for vitals were as follows; for SBP \<85 or \>140 mmHg, for DBP \<45 or \>90 mmHg, for pulse rate \<40 or \>100 beats per minute. The number of participants with vital signs of PCI were presented.

Time frame:
Up to Day 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values of PCI Criteria
ParticipantsCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mg+ DRV/RTV 600/100 mg+ ETR 200 mg
SBP10
DBP00
Pulse rate00
SecondaryCohort 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

A 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position using an automated ECG machine. Clinically significant abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition. Data for number of participants with clinically significant abnormal ECG findings were reported. Data has been presented for the participants with respect to the actual treatment received in respective treatment periods.

Time frame:
Day 1 (2,4,6 Hours), Day 7 and Day 11 in Treatment Period 1; Day 12 (2,4,6 Hours), Day 21 in Treatment Period 2; Day 22 (2,4,6 Hours), Day 26 and Day 35 in Treatment Period 3
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
ParticipantsCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg
2 Hours, Day 10——
4 Hours, Day 10——
6 Hours; Day 10——
Day 70——
Day 110——
2 Hours, Day 12—0—
4 Hours, Day 12—0—
6 Hours; Day 12—0—
Day 21—0—
2 Hours; Day 22——0
4 Hours; Day 22——0
6 Hours; Day 22——0
Day 26——0
Day 35——0
SecondaryCohort 2: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal ECG Findings

A 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position using an automated ECG machine. Clinically significant abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition. Data for number of participants with clinically significant abnormal ECG findings were reported. Data has been presented for the participants with respect to the actual treatment received in respective treatment periods.

Time frame:
Day 1 (2,4,6 Hours), Day 7 and Day 11 in Treatment Period 1; Day 12 (2,4,6 Hours), Day 21 in Treatment Period 2; Day 22 (2,4,6 Hours), Day 26 and Day 36 in Treatment Period 3
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 2: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal ECG Findings
ParticipantsCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 2: ETR 200 mgCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg
2 Hours, Day 10——
4 Hours, Day 10——
6 Hours; Day 10——
Day 70——
Day 110——
2 Hours, Day 12—0—
4 Hours, Day 12—0—
6 Hours; Day 12—0—
Day 21—0—
2 Hours; Day 22——0
4 Hours; Day 22——0
6 Hours; Day 22——0
Day 26——0
Day 36——0
SecondaryCohort 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal ECG Findings

A 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a supine position using an automated ECG machine. Clinically significant abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition. Data for number of participants with clinically significant abnormal ECG findings were reported. Data has been presented for the participants with respect to the actual treatment received in respective treatment periods.

Time frame:
Day 1 (2,4,6 Hours) in Treatment Period 1; Day 8 (2,4,6 Hours), Day 9 (2,4,6 Hours), Day 26 in Treatment Period 2
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal ECG Findings
ParticipantsCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mg+ DRV/RTV 600/100 mg+ ETR 200 mg
2 Hours, Day 10—
4 Hours, Day 10—
6 Hours, Day 10—
2 Hours, Day 8—0
4 Hours, Day 8—0
6 Hours, Day 8—0
2 Hours; Day 9—0
4 Hours; Day 9—0
6 Hours; Day 9—0
Day 26—0

Adverse events

Collected over All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAE) and non-serious adverse events (non-SAE) were collected up to Day 35 during Cohort 1; up to Day 36 during Cohort 2; up to Day 26 during Cohort 3. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)6/19 (31.6%)
Cohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mg0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)4/16 (25%)
Cohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mg0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)5/15 (33.3%)
Cohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)3/19 (15.8%)
Cohort 2: ETR 200 mg0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)4/16 (25%)
Cohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mg0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)7/16 (43.8%)
Cohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mg0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)1/16 (6.3%)
Cohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mg+ DRV/RTV 600/100 mg+ ETR 200 mg0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)8/15 (53.3%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 33
Most frequent other events
EventCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 1: DRV/RTV 600/100 mgCohort 1: GSK3640254 200 mg + DRV/RTV 600/100 mgCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 2: ETR 200 mgCohort 2: GSK3640254 200 mg + ETR 200 mgCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mgCohort 3: GSK3640254 200 mg+ DRV/RTV 600/100 mg+ ETR 200 mg
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/190/163/152/191/161/160/161/15
Rash maculo-papularSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/190/160/150/190/160/160/163/15
Scleral hyperaemiaEye disorders1/191/160/150/190/160/160/163/15
HeadacheNervous system disorders0/191/161/150/190/163/160/162/15
ToothacheGastrointestinal disorders0/190/160/150/190/162/160/160/15
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders1/190/161/150/190/160/160/160/15
FlatulenceGastrointestinal disorders0/190/161/150/190/160/160/160/15
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/190/161/151/190/160/160/160/15
DizzinessNervous system disorders0/190/161/150/190/160/160/160/15
Periorbital oedemaEye disorders0/190/160/150/190/160/160/161/15

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics were reported for Safety Population.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Cohort 1: GSK3640254 Then DRV/RTV Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTVCohort 2: GSK3640254 Then ETR Then GSK3640254 + ETRCohort 3: GSK3640254 Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTV + ETRTotal
Mean34.3 ± 5.9831.2 ± 6.1832.0 ± 9.2132.5 ± 7.14
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cohort 1: GSK3640254 Then DRV/RTV Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTVCohort 2: GSK3640254 Then ETR Then GSK3640254 + ETRCohort 3: GSK3640254 Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTV + ETRTotal
Female54211
Male14151443
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Cohort 1: GSK3640254 Then DRV/RTV Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTVCohort 2: GSK3640254 Then ETR Then GSK3640254 + ETRCohort 3: GSK3640254 Then GSK3640254 + DRV/RTV + ETRTotal
ASIAN-CENTRAL/SOUTH ASIAN HERITAGE (H)0101
ASIAN-JAPANESE H/EAST ASIAN H/SOUTH EAST ASIAN H0101
BLACK (BLA) OR AFRICAN AMERICAN (AFR AME)108624
WHITE-ARABIC NORTH AFR WHITE H1214
WHITE-CAUCASIAN EUROPEAN WHITE H77923
AME INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE &BLA OR AFR AMR &WHITE1001
08

Study locations

1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Austin, Texas 78744, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Zhang Y, Joshi S, Yazdani P, Zhan J, Wen B, Bainbridge V, Ballesteros-Perez A, Gartland M, Lataillade M. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of the maturation inhibitor GSK3640254 coadministered with darunavir/ritonavir and/or etravirine in healthy adults. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Jan;90(1):274-285. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15893. Epub 2023 Sep 20. PubMed 37621050 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Sep 29, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Oct 15, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — ViiV will assess requests from qualified researchers for anonymized individual patient-level data (IPD) and related study documents. Data sharing is subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. For further information, refer to https://www.viiv-studyregister.com/documents/About_ViiV_Patient_Level_Data_Sharing_Final_25Sep2023.pdf

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04630002
Lead sponsor
ViiV Healthcare
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 16, 2020
Start date
Oct 28, 2020
Primary completion
Oct 2, 2021
Completion
Oct 2, 2021
Results posted
Aug 21, 2023
Last update
Aug 29, 2024

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · ViiV Healthcare

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion