CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04626713Updated Nov 17, 2021

An Online Home-based Intervention for Anxiety Regulation

An interventional study of Brain-Computer Interface in Anxiety, sponsored by Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School. Status unknown at 1 site in Singapore. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-17.

Sponsored by Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2021), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 35 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this project is to evaluate the safety and acceptability of our online, home-based, personalized, neuro-technological mindfulness-based intervention in entraining anxiety regulation and ameliorating anxiety in healthy adults. Our technology will deliver a mindfulness-based anxiety regulation intervention through a neuro-/ bio-feedback-based game interface that is driven by an electroencephalography (EEG) algorithm. We hypothesize that the intervention would be safe and acceptable. In exploratory analyses, we further hypothesize that the intervention would help entrain anxiety regulation and ameliorate anxiety in healthy adults. Data will be analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively to inform development of our intervention and future research studies.

Read the detailed description

Anxiety disorders, defined by excess worry, hyperarousal and fear, are amongst the most common class of psychiatric conditions in adults. Large population-based studies on anxiety disorders estimated a lifetime prevalence of 33.7% and a 12-month prevalence between 2.4% and 29.8%. In Singapore, however, studies have only established the prevalence of a limited range or anxiety disorders. In a nationwide, cross-sectional, epidemiological survey, the lifetime prevalence of anxiety disorders, specifically Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, rose from 0.9% and 3.0% respectively in 2010, to 1.6% and 3.6% in 2016. If untreated, anxiety disorders could result in a range of personal and societal costs, such as interpersonal dysfunctions, employment, physical health, social functioning, and frequent primary and acute care visits, resulting in a poor quality of life.

A large proportion of the population experiences subclinical symptoms of anxiety disorders which impede daily functioning and well-being, but most often do not seek professional help or fall below the radar of psychiatric services. Current treatment guidelines recommend pharmacotherapy (i.e. selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs] or venlafaxine) and psychotherapy (i.e. cognitive behavior therapy [CBT]) as first-line treatments for anxiety disorders. Unfortunately, SSRIs are associated with an increased risk of suicide in young adults. Thus, local practices often incorporate more psychological therapies in the treatment of anxiety disorders. However, CBT is labor-intensive and time-consuming - which is incompatible with the demanding lifestyle Singaporeans lead these days. Moreover, therapeutic outcomes are also very much therapist dependent. Due to the fear of stigma that is particularly salient in the local context, individuals with anxiety may be deterred from engaging with therapists. Even if these individuals do receive adequate treatment, existing literature shows that outcomes for recommended treatment modalities are sub-optimal at best, i.e. overall mean remission rate of CBT is 51% while pharmacotherapy is significantly lower. With the low rates of help-seeking behaviors and dismal success rates of existing therapies, novel interventions for anxiety are apposite and vital.

The benefits of mindfulness-based interventions have been extensively researched in anxiety disorders in recent years. Improvements reported across a range of outcomes include enhanced ability to cope with stress, reduced depressive and anxiety symptom severity, as well as improved sleep quality, all of which lead to increased life satisfaction and overall well-being. Not all anxiety regulation strategies are helpful, and mindful emotion regulation presents one promising strategy by cultivating a changing of relationship with one's emotions. Specifically, this strategy facilitates reduced reactivity to emotional stimuli by encouraging one to meet, accept, and detach from one's aversive feelings, thoughts, and ineffective habitual responses. Unfortunately, clinically anxious individuals with no experience in such practices could find it challenging to engage in them as they often require a high degree of individual discipline. Coupled with the fact that sustained practice is crucial to yield the benefits of mindfulness practice, an appealing mode of treatment delivery is necessary. To this end, gamification strategies could be useful: gamification strategies have been shown useful in motivating health-related behaviors through interaction with the immersive interventional programs. Recent preliminary studies have also suggested that neuro-/ biofeedback-based relaxation and mindfulness training is useful for both healthy and anxious individuals.

Accordingly, we have developed an online, home-based, personalized, neuro-technological mindfulness-based intervention and seek to conduct a preliminary study with healthy young adults to evaluate its safety and acceptability. Our technology will deliver a mindfulness-based anxiety regulation intervention through a neuro-/ bio-feedback-based game interface that is driven by an electroencephalography (EEG) algorithm. We hypothesize that the intervention would be safe and acceptable. We further hypothesize that the intervention would help entrain anxiety regulation and ameliorate anxiety in healthy adults.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anxiety

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Biofeedback
  • Intervention
03

In context

Anxiety Disorders

4,868 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,390 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 80 across 4,174 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.

Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School is the lead sponsor of 62 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged between 21 and 35 years old (inclusive).
  • Literate in English.
  • Computer literate and has access to a Windows 10 desktop or laptop
  • Beck Anxiety Inventory II total score ≥ 16

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis (as defined by DSM-5) of: any anxiety disorder induced by medication, substance, or another medical condition; obsessive compulsive disorder; bipolar disorder; any psychotic disorder (lifetime); intellectual disability (i.e. IQ \< 70); autism spectrum disorder; attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder
  • History of substance or drug use disorder (as per DSM-5 criteria) within the last 3 months
  • Neurological disorders or insults (e.g. epilepsy, cerebrovascular accidents)
  • Metal in the cranium, skull defects, or skin lesions on scalp (cuts, abrasions, rash) at proposed electrode sites
  • Gross visual and hearing impairments
  • Irregular heart rhythms or heart problems, severe visual or hearing impairment
  • Prior experience with mindfulness-based therapy (e.g. mindfulness-based stress reduction [MBSR], mindfulness-based cognitive therapy [MBCT])
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Participants will undergo a brief interactive psychoeducation session four times a week for two weeks. For each session, participants will wear a commercially available Electroencephalography (EEG) headset and play a downloaded online game for a total of 30 minutes. Participants can feel free to play the game for more than the instructed frequency during their 2-week intervention participation.

    Device: Brain-Computer Interface

  • No intervention
    Waitlist control

    Participants in Waitlist Control will receive no intervention in the first four weeks of the study. After the Intervention group has completed treatment, participants in the Waitlist Control will then undergo the same intervention as the Intervention group.

Interventions

  • DeviceBrain-Computer Interface

    Brain-computer Interface (BCI) is a direct communication pathway between a human brain and an external device. Electroencephalography (EEG) is the best studied non-invasive interface facilitating such communication. Our technology will deliver a mindfulness-based anxiety regulation intervention through a neuro-/ bio-feedback-based game interface that is driven by an EEG algorithm.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Beck Anxiety Inventory II (BAI-II)

    21-item questionnaire being scored on a scale value of 0 (not at all) to 3 (severely). Higher total scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Intervention group: Changes from baseline anxiety symptoms (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline anxiety symptoms (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).

  2. State-trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)

    4-point Likert scale and consisting of 40 questions measuring two types of anxiety - state and trait anxiety.

    Time frame: Intervention group: Changes from baseline anxiety symptoms (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline anxiety symptoms (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).

  3. Usability questionnaire (System usability questionnaire)

    Participants will rate their agreeableness on 10 statements regarding their satisfaction and ease of use of the training components on a 5-point Likert scale. Participants will also answer three qualitative questions regarding their satisfaction and ease of use.

    Time frame: Intervention group: Week 4 (post-intervention).

  4. IT Anxiety Scale (ITAS)

    7-point Likert scale and consisting of 12 statements measuring participants' anxiety towards information and communication technologies.

    Time frame: Intervention group: Week 4 (post-intervention).

  5. Usability questionnaire (System usability questionnaire)

    Participants will rate their agreeableness on 10 statements regarding their satisfaction and ease of use of the training components on a 5-point Likert scale. Participants will also answer three qualitative questions regarding their satisfaction and ease of use.

    Time frame: Waitlist control group: Week 7 (post-intervention).

  6. IT Anxiety Scale (ITAS)

    7-point Likert scale and consisting of 12 statements measuring participants' anxiety towards information and communication technologies.

    Time frame: Waitlist control group: Week 7 (post-intervention).

  7. Number of Adverse Events/Serious Adverse Events Reported

    The total number and severity rating of all adverse events reported will be collated at the end of the study.

    Time frame: Throughout the intervention period (2 weeks), which are weeks 2 and 3 for the intervention group.

  8. Number of Adverse Events/Serious Adverse Events Reported

    The total number and severity rating of all adverse events reported will be collated at the end of the study.

    Time frame: Throughout the intervention period (2 weeks), which are weeks 5 and 6 for the waitlist control group.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    19-item questionnaire assessing sleep quality over a 1-month time interval.

    Time frame: Intervention group: Changes from baseline sleep quality (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline sleep quality (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).

  2. Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)

    7-item instrument assessing the severity of both nighttime and daytime components of insomnia.

    Time frame: Intervention group: Changes from baseline insomnia symptoms (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).

  3. Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-SF)

    18-item measure used to identify emotional regulation issues in adults.

    Time frame: Intervention group: Changes from baseline emotional regulation (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).

  4. Mindfulness Awareness Attention Scale (MAAS)

    15-item questionnaire assessing individual differences in the frequency of mindful states over time.

    Time frame: Intervention group: Changes from baseline mindfulness (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline mindfulness (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).

  5. Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21)

    21-item questionnaire measures the severity of symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress.

    Time frame: Intervention group: Changes from baseline depression, anxiety and stress (week 1) to post-intervention (week 4) and follow-up (week 7). Waitlist control group: Changes from baseline (week 1) to pre-intervention (week 4) and post-intervention (week 7).

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Duke-NUS Medical School
    Singapore, 169857, Singapore
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 17, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04626713
Lead sponsor
Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School
Collaborators
Nanyang Technological University
Responsible party
Lee Tih Shih (Associate Professor, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 12, 2020
Start date
Jan 5, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 17, 2021

Study contacts

Tih Shih Lee, MD PHD
principal investigator · Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion