CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04625517Updated Oct 12, 2023Results posted

Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography to Assess Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response (CEDM)

A Phase 4 interventional study of Digital Mammography and Low Osmolar Contrast Material, 300-399 Mg/Ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml in Breast Cancer, sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-12.

Sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · Phase 4, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Why this study was terminated
Low enrollment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2020, registered Nov 2020).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is designed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CEDM) in predicting early neoadjuvant therapy response and pathologic complete response (pCR) compared to mammography.

Patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer with available mammography and ultrasound imaging are eligible for the study.

Eligible patients will be imaged at baseline (before initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy), early (2-4 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy) and late (after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy) timepoints with mammography. CEDM will be done within 2 weeks of the specified timepoint. Additionally, a survey of subject experience with CEDM and other pre-operative imaging will be collected after CEDM is performed.

Read the detailed description

The use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in the treatment of breast cancer patients is increasing beyond the scope of locally advanced disease. Imaging provides important information in assessing response to therapy as a complement to conventional tumor measurements via physical examination. Tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy can also provide prognostic information. The attainment of pCR after completion of neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection is associated with improved disease-free survival. This correlation is especially strong for Triple-receptor negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) positive breast cancer. Studies of neoadjuvant therapy have used a variety of methods for assessing tumor response. Currently, there are no established clinical practice guidelines for how best to assess tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy. Typically, patients undergo conventional breast imaging such as mammography and ultrasonography (US) and physical examination, and dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (DCR-MRI) in selected cases.

Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM) is a novel imaging technique, which allows digital mammography to be used with contrast enhancement to depict cancers that would otherwise be occult on standard unenhanced mammography. CEDM is performed with and without intravenous iodine contrast, using the dual energy subtraction technique. Compared with mammography and US, CEDM improves the sensitivity for breast cancer detection without decreasing specificity. CEDM digital detector has higher spatial resolution than MRI, revealing details that are approximately 10 times better. In contrast to the rapid washout in MRI, enhancement on CEDM in fact persists for at least 10 min after contrast agent infusion. Today CEDM is available commercially for clinical use. It is estimated that over 200,000 CEDM examinations have been performed to date in both research and clinical settings. CEDM costs significantly less compared to MRI. Furthermore, longer time delays between contrast injection and CEDM exposure could result in stronger enhancement and hence better visibility compared to MRI, especially given the much higher spatial resolution of digital mammography. It is unknown whether CEDM can improve the sensitivity of mammography in the early assessment of neoadjuvant therapy response. We hypothesize that CEDM is superior to mammography and ultrasound in assessing early response, and pre-surgical residual cancer after neoadjuvant therapy, and when performed, non-inferior to MRI in assessing the residual disease using the metrics of pCR and residual cancer burden (RCB).

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Keywords

  • mammography
  • contrast enhanced spectral mammography
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 990 studies on the registry; 201 are open to participants now.

Of its 135 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 101 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Ipsilateral intact biopsy-proven breast cancer clinical stage T1-T4 (by imaging)
  • Available mammography and ultrasound imaging of the existing index cancer, with orthogonal measurements
  • Prior history of ipsilateral or contralateral breast cancer, presenting with a new primary or recurrent disease
  • Patients who were determined to be candidates for either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant endocrine therapy by the treating physician
  • Women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry, for the duration of study participation, and for days following completion of study participation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of ipsilateral mastectomy
  • Women who already started neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy
  • Woman who may be pregnant or nursing an infant
  • Prior history of anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reaction to any contrast.
  • Prior allergy to iodine or iodinated contrast.
  • Impaired renal function measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 60 milliliters per minute.
  • Patients with known distant metastasis.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
6 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Breast cancer patients

    Patients with ipsilateral intact biopsy-proven breast cancer

    Procedure: Digital Mammography · Drug: Low Osmolar Contrast Material, 300-399 Mg/Ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml

Interventions

  • ProcedureDigital Mammography

    Digital Mammography enhanced with an iodinated contrast agent

  • DrugLow Osmolar Contrast Material, 300-399 Mg/Ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml

    Injection of low osmolar contrast material during the digital mammography exam

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity of Predicting pCR (Pathologic Complete Response) for CEDM

    Sensitivities in predicting pCR will be calculated for CEDM and measured as AUC

    Time frame: 4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery

  2. Sensitivity of Predicting pCR (Pathologic Complete Response) for Mammography

    Sensitivities in predicting pCR will be calculated for mammography measured as AUC

    Time frame: 4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery

  3. Specificity of Predicting pCR (Pathologic Complete Response) for CEDM

    Specificity of predicting pCR will be calculated for CEDM and measured as AUC

    Time frame: 4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery

  4. Specificity of Predicting pCR (Pathologic Complete Response) for Mammography

    Specificity of predicting pCR will be calculated for mammography and measured as AUC

    Time frame: 4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery

  5. Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Assessing pCR or Non Response

    ROC analysis will be used to assess the diagnostic performance of CEDM. The Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) will be compared. A leave-one-out cross validation algorithm will be used to reduce bias from overfitting.

    Time frame: 4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery

  6. Correlation of Residual Tumor Size With Pathologic Size

    Spearman's rank correlation will be used to measure the association between final pathologic and imaging tumor size

    Time frame: 4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery

07

Results

Posted Oct 12, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBreast Cancer Patients
Started6
Completed3
Not completed3

Outcome measures

PrimarySensitivity of Predicting pCR (Pathologic Complete Response) for CEDM

Sensitivities in predicting pCR will be calculated for CEDM and measured as AUC

Time frame:
4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimarySensitivity of Predicting pCR (Pathologic Complete Response) for Mammography

Sensitivities in predicting pCR will be calculated for mammography measured as AUC

Time frame:
4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimarySpecificity of Predicting pCR (Pathologic Complete Response) for CEDM

Specificity of predicting pCR will be calculated for CEDM and measured as AUC

Time frame:
4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimarySpecificity of Predicting pCR (Pathologic Complete Response) for Mammography

Specificity of predicting pCR will be calculated for mammography and measured as AUC

Time frame:
4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryDiagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Assessing pCR or Non Response

ROC analysis will be used to assess the diagnostic performance of CEDM. The Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) will be compared. A leave-one-out cross validation algorithm will be used to reduce bias from overfitting.

Time frame:
4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryCorrelation of Residual Tumor Size With Pathologic Size

Spearman's rank correlation will be used to measure the association between final pathologic and imaging tumor size

Time frame:
4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over At least 30 minutes after contrast administration. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Breast Cancer Patients0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Breast Cancer Patients
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years6
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Breast Cancer Patients
Female6
Male0
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Breast Cancer Patients
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino6
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Breast Cancer Patients
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American2
White4
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Breast Cancer Patients
United States6
08

Study locations

1 site
  • UT Southwestern Medical Center
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Apr 1, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 12, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04625517
Lead sponsor
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Responsible party
Basak Dogan, MD (Associate Professor, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 12, 2020
Start date
Jan 22, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 15, 2022
Completion
Jun 15, 2022
Results posted
Oct 12, 2023
Last update
Oct 12, 2023

Study contacts

Basak Dogan, MD
principal investigator · UT Southwestern Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion