CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04616053Updated Nov 4, 2020

IMPACT Intervention

An interventional study of IMPACT intervention in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, sponsored by Pole de Sante Chambery Nord. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-04.

Sponsored by Pole de Sante Chambery Nord · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2020), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Introduction :

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is increasing in France, especially in deprived districts.

The Itineraires Medico-sociaux Programme d'Accompagnement sur un Territoire (IMPACT) intervention is intended for disadvantaged patients with a chronic disease (not only type 2 diabetes).

The IMPACT intervention offers coordinated and patient-centered care by a multidisciplinary team with an empowerment approach. This personalised intervention lasts 6 months.

This study aims to evaluate the effect of 6 months IMPACT intervention on glycaemic control (glycated haemoglobin - HbA1c) of patients with type 2 diabetes in deprived districts.

Method :

This will be a randomised, controlled, parallel group, multicenter, open-label trial. 140 adults with type 2 diabetes will be randomised in two arms : IMPACT intervention group (n : 70) and usual care group (n : 70). The primary outcome is change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to 6 months. The primary outcome will be analysed using a linear mixed effects model.

Read the detailed description

This will be a randomised, controlled, parallel group, multicenter, open-label trial. Patients will be recruited among patients with type 2 diabetes referred to the IMPACT intervention.

144 patients will be randomised in two arms : IMPACT intervention group (n : 72) and usual care group (n : 72).

IMPACT intervention : a referent is assigned to the patient. A referent is a health worker (nurse, nutritionist, psychologist ...). Patient builds with his referent a free care program. The patient can choose individual consultation (for example : nutrition, tabacology, psychology ...) and/or collective care (for example : patient education, physical activity, relaxation ...). A community health worker can help patients with his health administrative procedures.

Patients will have 3 visits. First visit (inclusion visit) : investigator collects baseline characteristics (sociodemographic data, comorbidity, treatment, diabetes complications, weight, height, body mass index, impedancemetry, HbA1c, lipids, creatinine, albuminuria/creatinuria ratio). Then the patient will be randomised.

Second visit (midpoint visit) : investigator collects weight, BMI, impedancemetry, HbA1c and adverse events Third visit (end point visit) : investigator collects weight, BMI, impedancemetry, HbA1c, lipids and adverse events.

Analysis : The primary outcome is change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to 6 months. The primary outcome will be analysed using a linear mixed effects model. Study groups, districts, time, group-time interaction and district-group interaction will be included as fixed effects. The model will include patients as a random effect. Sub-group analysis will be made with baseline HbA1c, sex, age, Epices score (French precarity score) and diabetes duration. The robustness of the model will be tested by replacing missing data with multiple imputation methods. The same statistical modelling approach will be used for the secondary outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Keywords

  • primary health care
  • patient-centered care
  • poverty areas
  • vulnerable populations
  • Glycated Hemoglobin A
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

9,359 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,318 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 140 is above the median of 80 across 7,525 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Pole de Sante Chambery Nord as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with type 2 diabetes
  • Inclusion HbA1c > 7.5%
  • Live in Hauts de Chambéry, Biollay or Renaudie district
  • Be able to give written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive or psychological disorder that may affect study understanding
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Had IMPACT intervention in the previous 24 months
  • Concurrent participation in another study
  • Concurrent participation in another diabetes educational care program
  • Life expectancy less than 6 months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    IMPACT intervention

    Behavioral: IMPACT intervention

  • No intervention
    Control group

    Usual care

Interventions

  • BehavioralIMPACT intervention

    A referent is assigned to the patient. A referent is a health worker (nurse, nutritionist, psychologist ...). Patient builds with his referent a free care program (without condition or limit). The patient can choose individual consultation (for example : nutrition, tabacology, psychology ...) and/or collective care (for example : patient education, physical activity, relaxation ...). A community health worker can help patient with his health administrative procedures. This intervention lasts 6 months.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. HbA1c

    Change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. HbA1c

    Change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)

    Time frame: From baseline to 3 months

  2. Weight

    Change in weight

    Time frame: At Months 3 and 6 from baseline

  3. Body mass index

    Change in body mass index

    Time frame: At Months 3 and 6 from baseline

  4. Body fat mass (Bioelectrical impedance analysis)

    Change in body fat mass

    Time frame: At Months 3 and 6 from baseline

  5. Body fat percentage (Bioelectrical impedance analysis)

    Change in body fat percentage

    Time frame: At Months 3 and 6 from baseline

  6. Muscle mass (Bioelectrical impedance analysis)

    Change in muscle mass.

    Time frame: At Months 3 and 6 from baseline

  7. Lipids - HDL cholesterol

    Change in HDL cholesterol

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months

  8. Lipids - LDL cholesterol

    Change in LDL cholesterol

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months

  9. Lipids - triglycerides

    Change in triglycerides

    Time frame: From baseline to 6 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tricco AC, Ivers NM, Grimshaw JM, Moher D, Turner L, Galipeau J, Halperin I, Vachon B, Ramsay T, Manns B, Tonelli M, Shojania K. Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012 Jun 16;379(9833):2252-61. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60480-2. Epub 2012 Jun 9. PubMed 22683130 ↗
  • Attridge M, Creamer J, Ramsden M, Cannings-John R, Hawthorne K. Culturally appropriate health education for people in ethnic minority groups with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 4;2014(9):CD006424. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006424.pub3. PubMed 25188210 ↗
  • Captieux M, Pearce G, Parke HL, Epiphaniou E, Wild S, Taylor SJC, Pinnock H. Supported self-management for people with type 2 diabetes: a meta-review of quantitative systematic reviews. BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 14;8(12):e024262. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024262. PubMed 30552277 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 4, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04616053
Lead sponsor
Pole de Sante Chambery Nord
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 4, 2020
Start date
Sep 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 4, 2020

Study contacts

Donatien Talon, Resident
Contact
donatien.talon@gmail.com
+33679230064

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion