CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04601623Updated Mar 14, 2022

Ultrasound to Predict the Prognosis of Rotator Cuff Tears

An observational study in Rotator Cuff Tear, sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-14.

Sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To predict the prognosis of large-to-massive RCTs and risk of re-tear by ultrasound elastography.

Read the detailed description

Most symptomatic large-to-massiverotator cuff tears (RCTs) should be operated, but the prognosis and postoperative risk of re-tear depended on the quality of rotator cuff muscles. Preoperative evaluations were usually done by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI was used in recent studies to predict the surgical outcome of large-to-massive RCTs and postoperative re-tear, but the clinical availability was not as good as ultrasound. The investigators hypothesize that ultrasound elastography can predict the prognosis of large-to-massive RCTs and risk of re-tear.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rotator Cuff Tear

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Rotator cuff tears
  • surgery
  • ultrasound
  • elastography
03

In context

Rotator Cuff Injuries

734 studies on the registry are indexed under Rotator Cuff Injuries; 161 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 67 across 162 observational studies indexed under Rotator Cuff Injuries.

Browse Rotator Cuff Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,064 studies on the registry; 235 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The investigator will enroll participants with diagnosis of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears who will receive surgical repairs later, and sonoelastography and MRI are necessary for preoperative evaluation.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients who are diagnosed with rotator cuff tear by an orthopedist.
  2. The large-to-massive rotator cuff tears need to be confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound. The definitions of this diagnosis include a tear over 3 cm or any full-thickness of tears in more than two rotator cuff muscles.
  3. Being willing to cooperated with the arranged examinations before the operation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who are only diagnosed with partial-thickness rotator cuff muscle tears or small- to large- sized full-thickness tears.
  2. Patients who have acromioclavicular arthritis that needs distal clavicle resection.
  3. Patients who had serious glenohumeral arthritis, pseudoparalysis, or any other shoulder trauma history.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherSonoelastography

    This diagnostic test would be executed by a physician who has experiences of using Siemens Acuson S2000 ultrasound system for more than three year. The examination includes two of four rotator cuff muscles, listed as follows, supraspinatus muscle and infraspinatus muscle. Linear transducer (4-9 MHz) would be used for the whole test. The probe would be positioned along the longitudinal axis of the muscle belly. Compressive sonoelastography technique is used for semiquantitative analysis. In order to maintain the quality of images, quality factor needs to be over or equal to 60. The quantitative analysis was performed by shear wave sonoelastography and the region of interest (ROI) would be divided into four quadrants. The physicians will measure the shear wave velocity at the center point of each quadrant.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline finding of sonoelastography

    This diagnostic test would be executed by a physician who has experiences of using Siemens Acuson S2000 ultrasound system for more than three year. The examination includes two of four rotator cuff muscles, listed as follows, supraspinatus muscle and infraspinatus muscle. Linear transducer (4-9 MHz) would be used for the whole test. The probe would be positioned along the longitudinal axis of the muscle belly. Compressive sonoelastography technique is used for semiquantitative analysis. In order to maintain the quality of images, quality factor needs to be over or equal to 60. The quantitative analysis was performed by shear wave sonoelastography and the region of interest (ROI) would be divided into four quadrants. The physicians will measure the shear wave velocity at the center point of each quadrant.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Passive range of motions

    Passive range of motions of internal and external rotation, abduction, extension, and flexion, which are assessed by a goniometer.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  2. Muscle strength

    Muscle strength assessment include the following motions, which are internal and external rotation, abduction, extension, and flexion. They are measured by a manual dynamometer

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  3. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES score)

    Shoulder function is evaluated using American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, which includes one item for pain (VAS) and 10 items for shoulder function. The ASES score ranges from 0 to 100, and the outcome is better when ASES score is higher.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  4. Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC index)

    Shoulder function is evaluated using Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, which includes physical symptoms (10 items), sport/recreation/work function (4 items), lifestyle function (4 items), and emotional function (3 items). The WORC index ranges from 0 to 2100 or can be converted to 0 to 100 scale, and the outcome is better when WORC index is lower.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  5. WHOQOL-BREF (Taiwan version)

    The WHOQOL-BREF (Taiwan version) instrument comprises 28 items, which measure the following broad domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. The WHOQOL-BREF (Taiwan version) is a shorter version of the original instrument that may be more convenient for use in large research studies or clinical trials. The total score WHOQOL-BREF (Taiwan version) can be transformed to a 0-100 scale, and the quality of life is better when the score is higher.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  6. EQ-5D-3L

    The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results into a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

  7. MRI

    MRI was performed on a 1.5T system (Signa Horizon LX, GE Healthcare) equipped with a standard shoulder surface coil. The shoulder MRI protocol was identical for all patients and consisted of axial proton-density-weighted fast spinecho with fat suppression sequence, the sequences was performed above the level o f the acromioclavicular joint down to below the axillary pouch with the following parameters: Coronal oblique proton-density-weighted with and without fat suppression, with axis parallel to the supraspinatus tendon, and sagittal oblique proton-density--weighted with and without fat suppression, with axis perpendicular to the coronal oblique axis, the ast spin-echo sequences were performed with the following parameters: TR msec/TE msec, 2700-4800 /25-40, echo-train length, 6; matrix, 256 × 256; field of view, 180 mm; section thickness, 2.5 mm with 2-mm gap. No IV or intraarticular gadolinium was administered.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
    Kaohsiung, 833, Taiwan
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04601623
Lead sponsor
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Collaborators
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 26, 2020
Start date
Aug 1, 2020
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2021
Completion
Jul 31, 2021
Last update
Mar 14, 2022

Study contacts

Po-Cheng Chen, MD
study chair · Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion