CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04578457Updated Oct 5, 2021Results posted

Assessment of Novel Sound Changing Principles in Hearing Instruments to Determine Their Application - 2020_09

An interventional study of Hearing Aid without NR enabled and Hearing Aid with NR(1) in Hearing Loss, sponsored by Sonova AG. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-05.

Sponsored by Sonova AG · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
19
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Participants will perform two different listening tasks: (1) listening to, and repeating back, sentence lists presented in noise, and (2) Subjective rating of effort \& performance following each condition. During this study, continuous, non-invasive physiological measurements (skin conductance, changes in pupil dilation) will be recorded from participants. Using this paradigm we will be assessing the effect of different hearing aid processing algorithms on listening effort. The study takes the form of a one factor (algorithm), within-subjects design.

Each participant performs the Speech perception task with each algorithm (reference, noise reduction I, noise reduction II, noise reduction III), at two individualized signal-to-noise ratios (SRT90 and SRT50). Additionally subjective performance ratings in real-life will be collected.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hearing Loss

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hearing Loss

1,092 studies on the registry are indexed under Hearing Loss; 235 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 19 is below the median of 40 across 764 interventional studies indexed under Hearing Loss.

Browse Hearing Loss studies →

Lead sponsor

Sonova AG is the lead sponsor of 82 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 17 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy outer ear (without previous surgical procedures)
  • Ability to fill in a questionnaire conscientiously
  • Informed Consent as documented by signature
  • Minimum 1 year hearing aid experience
  • Moderate-Severe (N3-N5) hearing loss or Normal Hearing

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to the MD in this study, e.g. known hypersensitivity or allergy to the investigational product
  • Limited mobility and not in the position to attend weekly appointments
  • Inability to produce a reliable hearing test result
  • Massively limited dexterity
  • Known psychological problems
  • Known central hearing disorders
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
19 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Hearing Aid without NR(0) enabled

    Hearing Aid without Noise Reduction (NR 0) enabled serves as reference condition.

    Device: Hearing Aid without NR enabled

  • Experimental
    Hearing Aid with NR (1)

    Hearing Aid with Noise Reduction I (NR) enabled.

    Device: Hearing Aid with NR(1)

  • Experimental
    Hearing Aid with NR(2)

    Hearing Aid with Noise Reduction II (NR) enabled.

    Device: Hearing Aid with NR(2)

  • Experimental
    Hearing Aid with NR(3)

    Hearing Aid with Noise Reduction III (NR) enabled.

    Device: Hearing Aid with NR(3)

Interventions

  • DeviceHearing Aid without NR enabled

    Each participant will be fitted with noise reduction disabled. Disabled means that no sound processing algorithm that removes noise from the speech signal is active.

  • DeviceHearing Aid with NR(1)

    Each participant will be fitted with the noise reduction program on the same hearing aid. The principle of the noise reduction algorithm is to remove noise from a speech signal with the aim of improving the speech intelligibility and comfort.

  • DeviceHearing Aid with NR(2)

    Each participant will be fitted with a second noise reduction program on the same hearing aid. The parameterization of this NR algorithm differs from that in NR(1).

  • DeviceHearing Aid with NR(3)

    Each participant will be fitted with a third noise reduction program on the same hearing aid. The parameterization of this NR algorithm differs from that in NR(1) and NR(2).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Differences in Event-related-skin-conductance

    Skin conductance will be recorded from participants during the performance of the auditory task. Analyses will be carried out on the skin conductance response recorded during a time window following each auditory stimulus. It is planned to analyze event-related skin conductance response amplitudes \& latencies (micro-Siemens \& milliseconds).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Differences in Event-related-pupil-dilation (ERPDs)

    Pupil dilations will be recorded from the participant during the performance of the auditory tasks. Analyses will be carried out relative to the pre-trial baseline (measured one second prior to the onset of the stimulus), in order to account for differences in baseline physiological activity. It is planned to analyze event-related-pupil-dilations. We use the unit: pixels. The size of a pixel in 1mm\^2 is relative to the distance between the eye and the camera. Even though participants heads were placed on a chin rest that was always the same distance from the camera, the distance between the individual eye and the camera can still be different due to differences in participants' anatomies. Thus, pupil dilation are often reported relative to an individuals' baseline, for example as percent change relative to the baseline. Therefore, we use the unit: pixels, as the use of mm\^2 may be inaccurate.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Oldenburg Sentence Test

    Words recalled correctly: words repeated back by participants are logged and the percentage of words recalled correctly calculated.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Sound Quality Ratings

    The sound quality ratings will be assessed with the aid of a Multi-Stimulus Test. The data, serving as secondary outcome measure, are collected in the laboratory. The scale ranges from 0 "very bad" to 6 "very good" in increments of 1. Individual sound quality rating from participants are averaged over 3 different acoustic scenes for each hearing aid program.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  3. Spectro-temporal-modulation Detection Thresholds (STM)

    Stimuli which contain simultaneous frequency and amplitude modulations of a wide-band noise carrier are presented to the participants. The depth of the modulations is systematically varied and the individual modulation detection thresholds are recorded as a broadband decibel (dB) value. For each participant 4 measures were made and averaged to give a mean STM threshold.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Non-verbal Trail Making Test A & B

    The Trail Making Test (TMT) is a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching. It consists of two parts in which the subject is instructed to connect a set of 25 dots as quickly as possible according to a given order. In version A the order is given by increasing digit number (i.e. 1-25) while in version B the order is given by alternating digits and letters (i.e. 1-A-2-B-3-C...). The data, serving as an outcome measure, are time-to-complete the set in seconds.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  2. Digit-Span Test Forward (FW) & Backward (BW)

    The digit-span task is used to measure working memory's number storage capacity. Participants will see a sequence of numerical digits and are tasked to recall the sequence correctly, with increasingly longer sequences being tested in each trial. The participant's span is the longest number of sequential digits that can accurately be remembered, which means that the participant recalls two sequences out of a maximum of three sequences correct. Digit-span tasks can be given forwards or backwards, meaning that once the sequence is presented, the participant is asked to either recall the sentence in normal or reverse order.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  3. Go/No-go Task

    The Go/No-go task measures inhibitory control. Participants are asked to respond to a Go stimulus as fast as possible but not respond to a No-go stimulus. Go stimuli are presented at a rate much higher than the No-go stimuli to elicit prepotent motor activity. The outcome measure of this task is the number of commission errors (i.e. responding to a No-go stimuli) a participant commits as a measure of their ability to stop prepotent motor activity.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  4. Blood Volume Pulse

    Blood volume pulse will be recorded from participants during the performance of the auditory task (non-invasively with a photoplethysmographic (PPG) sensor). Analyses will be carried out on the data recorded during a time window following each auditory stimulus (relative to baseline activity). It is planned to analyze event-related changes in pulse rate and amplitude (beats per minute).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  5. Respiration Data

    Respiration rates will be recorded from participants during the auditory task using a belt placed under the ribcage. This data will only be used to control for changes in breathing patterns which may influence skin conductance measurements.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  6. Skin Temperature Data

    Skin temperature will be recorded from participants during the auditory task using a small thermometer attached to the outside of the little finger (non-dominant hand). This data will only be used to control for changes in temperature which may influence skin conductance measurements.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  7. Acoustic Reflex Thresholds

    Tympanometry will be used to assess the mobility of the eardrum, prior to recording Acoustic Reflex Thresholds (ARTs). Compliance \[ml\], Middle Ear Pressure \[daPa\] and ear canal volume \[ml\] will be recorded and checked that they fall within normal limits. Where this is the case, ARTs will be measured using 0.5, 1 \& 2 kHz stimulus tones ipsi- and contralaterally for each ear. The resulting outcome measure will be the threshold \[dB\] required at each frequency and ear arrangement for a stapedial reflex to be present.

    Time frame: 3 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jul 28, 2021

Participant flow

Hearing Aid Without NR Enabled (0)
Participant flow — Hearing Aid Without NR Enabled (0)
MilestoneRandomized Condition
Started19
Completed17
Not completed2
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2
Hearing Aid With NR (1)
Participant flow — Hearing Aid With NR (1)
MilestoneRandomized Condition
Started19
Completed17
Not completed2
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2
Hearing Aid With NR (2)
Participant flow — Hearing Aid With NR (2)
MilestoneRandomized Condition
Started19
Completed17
Not completed2
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2
Hearing Aid With NR (4)
Participant flow — Hearing Aid With NR (4)
MilestoneRandomized Condition
Started19
Completed17
Not completed2
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2

Outcome measures

PrimaryDifferences in Event-related-skin-conductance

Skin conductance will be recorded from participants during the performance of the auditory task. Analyses will be carried out on the skin conductance response recorded during a time window following each auditory stimulus. It is planned to analyze event-related skin conductance response amplitudes \& latencies (micro-Siemens \& milliseconds).

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · micro Siemens
Differences in Event-related-skin-conductance
micro SiemensHearing Aid Without NR(0) EnabledHearing Aid With NR (1)Hearing Aid With NR(2)Hearing Aid With NR(3)
Differences in Event-related-skin-conductance0.221 (0.176 to 0.267)0.189 (0.150 to 0.227)0.147 (0.099 to 0.195)0.126 (0.099 to 0.153)
PrimaryDifferences in Event-related-pupil-dilation (ERPDs)

Pupil dilations will be recorded from the participant during the performance of the auditory tasks. Analyses will be carried out relative to the pre-trial baseline (measured one second prior to the onset of the stimulus), in order to account for differences in baseline physiological activity. It is planned to analyze event-related-pupil-dilations. We use the unit: pixels. The size of a pixel in 1mm\^2 is relative to the distance between the eye and the camera. Even though participants heads were placed on a chin rest that was always the same distance from the camera, the distance between the individual eye and the camera can still be different due to differences in participants' anatomies. Thus, pupil dilation are often reported relative to an individuals' baseline, for example as percent change relative to the baseline. Therefore, we use the unit: pixels, as the use of mm\^2 may be inaccurate.

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · pixels
Differences in Event-related-pupil-dilation (ERPDs)
pixelsHearing Aid Without NR(0) EnabledHearing Aid With NR (1)Hearing Aid With NR(2)Hearing Aid With NR(3)
Differences in Event-related-pupil-dilation (ERPDs)217.713 (154.747 to 280.689)217.301 (164.876 to 269.726)158.732 (113.199 to 204.265)186.526 (119.151 to 253.900)
SecondaryOldenburg Sentence Test

Words recalled correctly: words repeated back by participants are logged and the percentage of words recalled correctly calculated.

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of correct words
Oldenburg Sentence Test
Percentage of correct wordsHearing Aid Without NR(0) EnabledHearing Aid With NR (1)Hearing Aid With NR(2)Hearing Aid With NR(3)
Oldenburg Sentence Test92.778 ± 3.29688.611 ± 6.70996.157 ± 2.27194.398 ± 4.607
SecondarySound Quality Ratings

The sound quality ratings will be assessed with the aid of a Multi-Stimulus Test. The data, serving as secondary outcome measure, are collected in the laboratory. The scale ranges from 0 "very bad" to 6 "very good" in increments of 1. Individual sound quality rating from participants are averaged over 3 different acoustic scenes for each hearing aid program.

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Sound Quality Ratings
score on a scaleHearing Aid Without NR(0) EnabledHearing Aid With NR (1)Hearing Aid With NR(2)Hearing Aid With NR(3)
Sound Quality Ratings3.275 ± 0.2633.230 ± 0.1073.054 ± 0.2083.157 ± 0.136
SecondarySpectro-temporal-modulation Detection Thresholds (STM)

Stimuli which contain simultaneous frequency and amplitude modulations of a wide-band noise carrier are presented to the participants. The depth of the modulations is systematically varied and the individual modulation detection thresholds are recorded as a broadband decibel (dB) value. For each participant 4 measures were made and averaged to give a mean STM threshold.

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · decibel
Spectro-temporal-modulation Detection Thresholds (STM)
decibelStudy Cohort
Spectro-temporal-modulation Detection Thresholds (STM)-8.181 ± 0.617
Other pre-specifiedNon-verbal Trail Making Test A & B

The Trail Making Test (TMT) is a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching. It consists of two parts in which the subject is instructed to connect a set of 25 dots as quickly as possible according to a given order. In version A the order is given by increasing digit number (i.e. 1-25) while in version B the order is given by alternating digits and letters (i.e. 1-A-2-B-3-C...). The data, serving as an outcome measure, are time-to-complete the set in seconds.

Time frame:
2 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedDigit-Span Test Forward (FW) & Backward (BW)

The digit-span task is used to measure working memory's number storage capacity. Participants will see a sequence of numerical digits and are tasked to recall the sequence correctly, with increasingly longer sequences being tested in each trial. The participant's span is the longest number of sequential digits that can accurately be remembered, which means that the participant recalls two sequences out of a maximum of three sequences correct. Digit-span tasks can be given forwards or backwards, meaning that once the sequence is presented, the participant is asked to either recall the sentence in normal or reverse order.

Time frame:
2 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedGo/No-go Task

The Go/No-go task measures inhibitory control. Participants are asked to respond to a Go stimulus as fast as possible but not respond to a No-go stimulus. Go stimuli are presented at a rate much higher than the No-go stimuli to elicit prepotent motor activity. The outcome measure of this task is the number of commission errors (i.e. responding to a No-go stimuli) a participant commits as a measure of their ability to stop prepotent motor activity.

Time frame:
6 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedBlood Volume Pulse

Blood volume pulse will be recorded from participants during the performance of the auditory task (non-invasively with a photoplethysmographic (PPG) sensor). Analyses will be carried out on the data recorded during a time window following each auditory stimulus (relative to baseline activity). It is planned to analyze event-related changes in pulse rate and amplitude (beats per minute).

Time frame:
6 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedRespiration Data

Respiration rates will be recorded from participants during the auditory task using a belt placed under the ribcage. This data will only be used to control for changes in breathing patterns which may influence skin conductance measurements.

Time frame:
6 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedSkin Temperature Data

Skin temperature will be recorded from participants during the auditory task using a small thermometer attached to the outside of the little finger (non-dominant hand). This data will only be used to control for changes in temperature which may influence skin conductance measurements.

Time frame:
6 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedAcoustic Reflex Thresholds

Tympanometry will be used to assess the mobility of the eardrum, prior to recording Acoustic Reflex Thresholds (ARTs). Compliance \[ml\], Middle Ear Pressure \[daPa\] and ear canal volume \[ml\] will be recorded and checked that they fall within normal limits. Where this is the case, ARTs will be measured using 0.5, 1 \& 2 kHz stimulus tones ipsi- and contralaterally for each ear. The resulting outcome measure will be the threshold \[dB\] required at each frequency and ear arrangement for a stapedial reflex to be present.

Time frame:
3 weeks

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over 7 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Study Cohort0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)1/19 (5.3%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventStudy Cohort
Positive test for COVID-19General disorders1/19

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Study Cohort
Mean74.95 ± 7.42
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Study Cohort
Female4
Male15
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Study Cohort
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Study Cohort
Switzerland19
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Sonova AG
    Stäfa, 8712, Switzerland
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 28, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 5, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04578457
Lead sponsor
Sonova AG
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 8, 2020
Start date
Oct 23, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 2, 2021
Completion
Apr 22, 2021
Results posted
Jul 28, 2021
Last update
Oct 5, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion