CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04577092Updated Oct 6, 2020

Dual Task Training for Balance in Older Adults

An interventional study of Warm-up exercise and Motor-Cognitive exercise in Geriatrics, sponsored by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-06.

Sponsored by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2017, registered Sep 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Dual task training (DTT) have been showed that have satisfying effects on older adults. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of motor-cognitive DTT (mCdtt) and motor-motor DTT (mMdtt) on balance, fear of falling, walking functionality and muscle strength in older adults. The participants were divided into two groups; who received mCdtt (Group 1) and who received mMdtt (Group 2). The intervention program had lasted for 8 weeks.

Read the detailed description

Dual task training (DTT) have been showed that have satisfying effects on older adults. The aim of this study is comparing the effect of motor-cognitive DTT (mCdtt) and motor-motor DTT (mMdtt) on balance, fear of falling, walking functionality and muscle strength in older adults. A total of 50 participants aged 60 and over (mean age: 67.72±7.33 years), having a score ≥ 24 on the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), being in category of walking ability ≥ 4 according to the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), having no problem in visual ability and hearing were included for this study. The participants who received mCdtt (Group 1) counted back from the two-digit number and the participants who received mMdtt (Group 2) held half-filled glasses with 90o flexion elbow with both hand while performing exercises. The intervention program had lasted for 8 weeks. To assess balance, fear of falling, walking functionality and muscle strength of participants, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Hand-held dynamometer were used, respectively.

02

Conditions studied

  • Geriatrics
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa is the lead sponsor of 680 studies on the registry; 207 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • (1) age over 60 years old
  • (2) score ≥ 24 on the Mini-Mental State Exam
  • (3) category of walking ability ≥ 4 according to the Functional Ambulation Category
  • (4) no problem in visual ability and hearing

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) a history of specific balance problems (i.e., diagnosed neurological, musculoskeletal or vestibular disorder)
  • (2) history of cerebrovascular occasion
  • (3) history of hip-knee surgery
  • (4) use of medication(s) such as sedatives and hypnotics, antidepressants and benzodiazepines.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Motor-Cognitive

    In 10-minute warm up period; neck flexion/extension/side flexion/circumflexion (clockwise and counterclockwise), rounding shoulder back and forth, circumflexion of arm back and forth, side flexion of trunk and rising on the fingertips. After warm up period; participants had been asked to count back from the two-digit number while performing; in standing position, straight walk, side walk, abduction/flexion/extension of hip and hip and knee flexion; in sitting position, hip flexion, knee extension, ankle dorsi - plantar flexion. In 10-minute cool down period, stretching of quadriceps femoris muscle, hamstring muscle, achill tendon and cervical muscles were performed.

    Other: Warm-up exercise · Other: Motor-Cognitive exercise · Other: Cool-down exercise

  • Active comparator
    Motor-Motor

    In 10-minute warm up period; neck flexion/extension/side flexion/circumflexion (clockwise and counterclockwise), rounding shoulder back and forth, circumflexion of arm back and forth, side flexion of trunk and rising on the fingertips. After warm up period; participants had been asked to hold with both hand half-filled glasses with 90 degree of flexion elbow and near the trunk while performing; in standing position, straight walk, side walk, abduction/flexion/extension of hip and hip and knee flexion; in sitting position, hip flexion, knee extension, ankle dorsi - plantar flexion. In cool down period, stretching of quadriceps femoris muscle, hamstring muscle, achill tendon and cervical muscles were performed.

    Other: Warm-up exercise · Other: Motor-Motor exercise · Other: Cool-down exercise

Interventions

  • OtherWarm-up exercise

    In 10-minute warm up period; neck flexion/extension/side flexion/circumflexion (clockwise and counterclockwise), rounding shoulder back and forth, circumflexion of arm back and forth, side flexion of trunk and rising on the fingertips.

  • OtherMotor-Cognitive exercise

    After warm up period; participants had been asked to count back from the two-digit number while performing; in standing position, straight walk, side walk, abduction/flexion/extension of hip and hip and knee flexion; in sitting position, hip flexion, knee extension, ankle dorsi - plantar flexion.

  • OtherMotor-Motor exercise

    participants had been asked to hold with both hand half-filled glasses with 90 degree of flexion elbow and near the trunk while performing; in standing position, straight walk, side walk, abduction/flexion/extension of hip and hip and knee flexion; in sitting position, hip flexion, knee extension, ankle dorsi - plantar flexion.

  • OtherCool-down exercise

    In 10-minute cool down period, stretching of quadriceps femoris muscle, hamstring muscle, achill tendon and cervical muscles were performed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Berg Balance Scale (BBS)

    BBS is a widely used, reliable and valid scale, which was developed to measure balance in older adults with functional postures and movements. It consists of 14 items scoring from 0 (unable/unsafe) to 4 (independent/safe). The highest score was 56 and means the best ability of balance. Score of 0-20, 21-40 and 41-56 mean bad, fair and good ability of balance, respectively

    Time frame: baseline (first assessment)

  2. Berg Balance Scale (BBS)

    BBS is a widely used, reliable and valid scale, which was developed to measure balance in older adults with functional postures and movements. It consists of 14 items scoring from 0 (unable/unsafe) to 4 (independent/safe). The highest score was 56 and means the best ability of balance. Score of 0-20, 21-40 and 41-56 mean bad, fair and good ability of balance, respectively

    Time frame: End of the training (8 weeks after)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I)

    FES-I evaluates concerns about falling with 16 items consisting of social and physical activities. Each item can be replied as 1=not all concerned, 2=somewhat concerned 3=fairly concerned and 4=very concerned. Total score is in a range between 16 and 64, a higher score means higher concern about falling.

    Time frame: baseline (first assessment)

  2. Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I)

    FES-I evaluates concerns about falling with 16 items consisting of social and physical activities. Each item can be replied as 1=not all concerned, 2=somewhat concerned 3=fairly concerned and 4=very concerned. Total score is in a range between 16 and 64, a higher score means higher concern about falling.

    Time frame: End of the training (8 weeks after)

  3. Timed Up and Go (TUG)

    (TUG) test is a common, simple and quick test for the function, balance, gait and risk of fall assessment. The TUG was showed to be the most evidence-supported functional measure to evaluate risk of falls in older adults. To perform the test, the participants were asked to seat armchair with back support which was 46 cm above from the floor. The participants were instructed to stand up, walk a distance of 3 meters away from the seat as fast as possible, turn, walk back to seat and sit down. The time passed during this maneuver was recorded as seconds with a chronometer.

    Time frame: baseline (first assessment)

  4. Timed Up and Go (TUG)

    (TUG) test is a common, simple and quick test for the function, balance, gait and risk of fall assessment. The TUG was showed to be the most evidence-supported functional measure to evaluate risk of falls in older adults. To perform the test, the participants were asked to seat armchair with back support which was 46 cm above from the floor. The participants were instructed to stand up, walk a distance of 3 meters away from the seat as fast as possible, turn, walk back to seat and sit down. The time passed during this maneuver was recorded as seconds with a chronometer.

    Time frame: End of the training (8 weeks after)

  5. Muscle Testing (MT)

    MT was performed with Hand-held dynamometer (Lafeyette Instrument®, Lafeyette, IN) to assess power and ability for stability, in this study. Antigravity muscles (m. gluteus maximus, m. quadriceps femoris, m. gastrocnemius and m. tibialis anterior) were assessed while performing maximal volunteer isometric contraction (MVIC) and values were recorded as kg. N-1.

    Time frame: baseline (first assessment)

  6. Muscle Testing (MT)

    MT was performed with Hand-held dynamometer (Lafeyette Instrument®, Lafeyette, IN) to assess power and ability for stability, in this study. Antigravity muscles (m. gluteus maximus, m. quadriceps femoris, m. gastrocnemius and m. tibialis anterior) were assessed while performing maximal volunteer isometric contraction (MVIC) and values were recorded as kg. N-1.

    Time frame: End of the training (8 weeks after)

Other outcomes

  1. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)

    CCI was used to measure the comorbidity status of participants. It investigates existence of 17 comorbidities. The final score indicates disease burden and is a good estimator of mortality.

    Time frame: baseline (first assessment)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Istanbul Aydin University
    Istanbul, 34160, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Akin H, Senel A, Taskiran H, Kaya Mutlu E. Do motor-cognitive and motor-motor dual task training effect differently balance performance in older adults? Eur Geriatr Med. 2021 Apr;12(2):371-378. doi: 10.1007/s41999-020-00434-8. Epub 2021 Jan 3. PubMed 33389715 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 6, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04577092
Lead sponsor
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
Responsible party
Aybike Senel (Research Assistant, Sub-investigator, Physiotherapist, MSc, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 6, 2020
Start date
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 12, 2018
Completion
Mar 18, 2018
Last update
Oct 6, 2020

Study contacts

Hanifegul Taskiran, PT, Prof
study director · Istanbul Aydın University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion