CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04573569Updated Sep 10, 2022

Neural Correlates of Cognition and Mood

An observational study in Epilepsy, Complex Partial, sponsored by University of Minnesota. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-10.

Sponsored by University of Minnesota · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overall objective of this study is to determine the neural correlates of cognition and mood. This study represents the first preliminary study to begin investigating cognitive and emotional states in patients who have undergone implantation of invasive electrodes for the purpose of seizure localization. In the post-implantation paradigm where patients remain under close supervision with intracranial instrumentation for recording, this study aims to create the platform and preliminary data to inform a larger study for calibrated examination of neural correlates of cognition and mood. As such, this study has the following specific aims:

Aim 1: Establish a portable platform for the assessment of cognitive, behavioral, and emotional tasks with time synchronization to ECoG/SEEG recording platform Aim 2: Quantify the variance in clinical assessments of mood and cognitive function in patients undergoing phase II epilepsy monitoring Aim 3: Assess the relationship between validated surveys/tasks and electrophysiology

Read the detailed description

Study interventions are limited entirely to validated surveys completed on a computer or tablet PC, as outlined above. Patients may elect to have electrodes to be implanted that are not used in standard-of-care at this institution, but are FDA-approved for the same indications. Patients who consent and complete enrollment will be asked to complete cognitive and behavioral tasks on a portable computer or tablet PC while the invasive electrodes remain implanted. Tasks typically require the patient to think or act and then respond by interacting minimally with the portable computer.

The primary outcome for this study includes percentage of completed cognitive or behavioral tasks as a measure of the feasibility of the administration of these tasks. As this is a feasibility study, we are interested in the practical aspects of data acquisition.

Secondary outcomes include the cognitive and behavioral tasks themselves and their relationship with electrophysiology.

02

Conditions studied

  • Epilepsy, Complex Partial
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota is the lead sponsor of 1,184 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 132 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 91 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients undergoing Phase II surgical epilepsy localization

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient is able to consent for themselves and the patient has or is scheduled for surgically implanted electrodes for the purposes of phase II epilepsy surgical evaluation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • BehavioralBehavioral testing

    Patients recruited for this study have already undergone surgical implantation of invasive electrodes for purpose of localizing and characterizing electrographic seizures as part of the second phase of surgical epilepsy evaluation. Patients who consent and complete enrollment will then be asked to complete cognitive and behavioral tasks on a portable computer or tablet PC while the invasive electrodes remain implanted. Tasks typically require the patient to think or act and then respond by interacting minimally with the portable computer. These tasks are performed at the will of each patient during their stay in the intensive care unit while surgical electrodes remain.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of completed cognitive tasks

    The primary outcome for this study includes percentage of completed cognitive or behavioral tasks as a measure of the feasibility of the administration of these tasks. We are interested in the practical aspects of data acquisition. No comparison is made as no baseline data exists ECoG, SEEG recordings, and eye-tracking data are timestamped, this allows the validated surveys and tasks to be linked precisely. These results will establish the response rate to the intervention allowing calculation of the number of events to use in establishing relationships with the underlying physiology.

    Time frame: Up to 1 month (Assessments start after Post-operative day 2)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary outcomes include the cognitive and behavioral tasks themselves and their relationship with electrophysiology of the brain.

    Event-related potential will be calculated using time synchronized ECoG or SEEG recordings. Averaging will be performed across each task for event-related potentials and compared with shuffled data for bootstrapping about the median. Alpha is selected to be 0.05 with the Bonferroni correction with the number of tests. Causal inference will be used to assess the relationship between the various electrodes. Causal metrics including multivariate Granger causality and Transfer Entropy will be used to assess the adjacency matrices. Statistics are performed with shuffled bootstrapping also using the Bonferroni adjustment on the number of channels. The relationship between pupil size, gaze location, task behavior and E-phys measures will be assessed with generalized linear models, generalized canonical correlation analysis, and structured equation models.

    Time frame: Up to 1 month (Assessments start after Post-operative day 2)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04573569
Lead sponsor
University of Minnesota
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 5, 2020
Start date
Mar 28, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2019
Completion
Jun 30, 2019
Last update
Sep 10, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion