CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04572048Updated Mar 30, 2026

Longitudinal One Year vs Single Day NRP Training.

An interventional study of Single-day NRP Training and longitudinal NRP training in Nurse Training in Neonatal Resuscitation, sponsored by Ahmed Moussa. Terminated at 7 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-30.

Sponsored by Ahmed Moussa · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Why this study was terminated
Difficult recruitment on top of high percentage of loss to follow-up.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
55
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) recommends providers renew their certification every 2 years. However, many Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) in Canada face challenges of significant budget cuts in training and a large number of caregivers to train with a high turnover rate. This situation makes it difficult for managers and nurse educators to ensure up-to-date certification and competence for all clinical staff. In addition, considering that only 0.1% of newborns will require cardiac massage and/or epinephrine, health care professionals' exposure to critical events is low to insure maintenance of expertise. Furthermore, it is shown that there is a significant decrease in knowledge among learners who have undergone specific training after only 3 months. This is worrisome considering that some nurses will not renew their certification if the course is not paid for by the employer, or if they are not released from clinical duties to attend. While keeping in mind the various required components of NRP training: book reading, online exam, performance stations, Integrated Skills Station Assessment (ISSA) and simulations, we would like to assess the educational and financial impact of a new educational strategy developed as to allow more nurses to be retrained thus ensuring maintenance of their neonatal resuscitation expertise.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nurse Training in Neonatal Resuscitation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ahmed Moussa is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Newly recruited ( in the last 3 months) neonatal and delivery room registered nurses from level 2 and 3 perinatal centers

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Registered nurses that have already completed a NRP training in the past.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
55 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Single-day NRP training

    This group will follow the single-day NRP training course that is currently the standard. It usually takes 8 hours to complete this training course and the nurses are released from their clinical duty to attend the training course.

    Other: Single-day NRP Training

  • Experimental
    Longitudinal one year NRP Training

    This group will follow the longitudinal NRP training course. The longitudinal NRP training course will consist of nine 30-minute modules that will be taught every 6-8 weeks over a period of one year. The nurses will attend the different modules of the training course at their work place and during their work shift so they will have to be released from their clinical duty only 30 minutes at a time.

    Other: longitudinal NRP training

Interventions

  • OtherSingle-day NRP Training

    NRP training course completed in one single day of 8 hours

  • Otherlongitudinal NRP training

    NRP training course completed over one year by attending nine 30-minute modules.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Knowledge

    Integrated Skills Stations Assessment Score. The higher the score, the better the performance. Scores range from 0 to 100 %.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Confidence and behavior

    continuing professional development (CPD) reaction questionnaire (REACT). The higher the score, the better the outcome. Scores range from 12 to 82.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Cost-efficiency

    Cost of each educational intervention (each arm).

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

7 sites
  • Cité de la santé de Laval
    Laval, Quebec, Canada
  • University of Montreal Health Center
    Montreal, Quebec H2X 3E4, Canada
  • CHU Sainte-Justine, Dept Neonatology
    Montreal, Quebec H3T 1C5, Canada
  • CHUL
    Québec, Quebec, Canada
  • Université de Sherbrooke
    Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5N4, Canada
  • Jewish General Hospital
    Montreal, Canada
  • Pierre-Legardeur
    Repentigny, Canada
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04572048
Lead sponsor
Ahmed Moussa
Responsible party
Ahmed Moussa (Principal Investigator, St. Justine's Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 1, 2020
Start date
Jan 1, 2021
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2026
Completion
Jan 31, 2026
Last update
Mar 30, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion