CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04549389Updated Feb 12, 2021

The Ideal LiST Session Frequency Protocol for CPPS Treatment

An interventional study of Low intensity shockwave therapy in Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome and Chronic Non-bacterial Prostatitis Type IIIB, sponsored by Institute for the Study of Urological Diseases, Greece. Completed at 1 site in Greece. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-12.

Sponsored by Institute for the Study of Urological Diseases, Greece · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The study will include 50 chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) patients who will be randomised in 2 groups.

Group A (25 patients )will receive 6 LiST sessions with a frequency 1 session / week.

Group B (25 patients) will receive 6 LiST sessions with a frequency 2 sessions / week.

National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index(NHI-CPSI), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-ED) questionnaires will be answered before and at 1 and 3 month follow up visit.

Adverse events will be reported during the treatment and follow up period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome
  • Chronic Non-bacterial Prostatitis Type IIIB
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Participant must 18 to 60 years of age.
  2. Participant has signed and dated the appropriate Informed Consent document.
  3. Participant has had a clinical diagnosis of CP/CPPS defined as symptoms of discomfort or pain in the perineal or pelvic region for at least a three (3) month period within the last six (6) months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant has evidence of facultative Gram negative or enterococcus with a value of ≥ 1000 CFU/ml in mid-stream urine (VB2).
  2. Participant has a history of prostate, bladder or urethral cancer.
  3. Participant has undergone pelvic radiation or systemic chemotherapy.
  4. Participant has undergone intravesical chemotherapy.
  5. Participant has unilateral orchialgia without pelvic symptoms, active urethral stricture or bladder stones, or any other urological condition associated with LUTS, any neurological disease or disorder affecting the bladder.
  6. Participant has undergone prostate surgery or treatment.
  7. Participant with penile or urinary sphincter implants.
  8. Participant has been diagnosed with cancer during the last 5 years, or had any surgery in the pelvis.
  9. Participant has a neurological impairment or psychiatric disorder preventing his understanding of consent and his ability to comply with the protocol.
  10. PSA>3 and age > 40 years
  11. Positive (suspicious for malignancy) digital rectal examination (DRE).
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A

    Patients will receive 6 Low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiST) sessions (1/week) by using Dornier Aries 2 shockwave machine (energy level 7)

    Device: Low intensity shockwave therapy

  • Active comparator
    Group B

    Patients will receive 6 Low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiST) sessions (2/week) by using Dornier Aries 2 shockwave machine (energy level 7)

    Device: Low intensity shockwave therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceLow intensity shockwave therapy

    LiST will be applied in the perineum of the patients by using Dornier Aries 2 shockwave machine (5000shockwaves per session, energy level 7)

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 1.The difference between groups in the change of the pain domain of NIH-CPSI score

    CP/CPPS-related complaints will be assessed by the the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). The questionnaire designed to provide symptom scores for patients with chronic prostatitis. The index provides scores on pain (items 1-4), urinary symptoms (items 5-6), and quality of life (items 7-9).Total score ranges from 0 to 35 (higher values represent worse outcome).The index provides a special pain domain (items 1-4) and the score for this domain ranges from 0 to 21.

    Time frame: from baseline to 12 weeks after final treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. The difference between groups in the change of total NIH-CPSI score (Q1-9)

    CP/CPPS-related complaints will be assessed by the the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). The questionnaire designed to provide symptom scores for patients with chronic prostatitis. The index provides scores on pain (items 1-4), urinary symptoms (items 5-6), and quality of life (items 7-9).Total score ranges from 0 to 35 (higher values represent worse outcome)

    Time frame: Time Frame: baseline, 4 and 12 weeks after final treatment

  2. The difference between groups in the change of urinary symptoms (Q 5-6) and quality of life domains (Q 7-9) of the NIH-CPSI score

    CP/CPPS-related complaints will be assessed by the the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). The questionnaire designed to provide symptom scores for patients with chronic prostatitis. The index provides scores on pain (items 1-4), urinary symptoms (items 5-6), and quality of life (items 7-9).Total score ranges from 0 to 35 (higher values represent worse outcome).The index provides a special urinary symptom domain (items 5-6) and the score for this domain ranges from 0 to 10

    Time frame: from baseline to 4 and 12 weeks after final treatment

  3. The difference between groups in the change of IIEF-ED score

    It will be assessed by International Index of Erectile Function -Erectile Domain (IEF-ED) score. A questionnaire designed to evaluate erectile capabilities. The questionnaire provides a score between 5 and 30.The severity categories are: 1-10 severe ED, 10-16 moderate ED, 17-21 moderate to mild ED, 22-25 mild ED, 26-30 no ED

    Time frame: from baseline to 4 and 12 weeks after final treatment

  4. The difference between groups in the change of IPSS

    They will be assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). A questionnaire designed to provide information on lower urinary tract symptoms and their impact on quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 35. The severity categories are: 1-7 mild, 8-19 moderate, 20-35 severe

    Time frame: from baseline to 4 and 12 weeks after final treatment

  5. The difference between groups in the the Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    It will be assessed by the pain VAS, right after each LIST session. Pain VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity . It is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal (HVAS) or vertical (VVAS) line, usually 10 centimeters (100 mm) in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme. For pain intensity, the scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 \[100-mm scale\]. To avoid clustering of scores around a preferred numeric value, numbers or verbal descriptors at intermediate points are not recommended. The following cut points on the pain VAS have been recommended: no pain (0-4 mm), mild pain (5-44 mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75- 100 mm)

    Time frame: at week 3, 4, 5,

  6. Adverse events rate in all patients

    Potential treatment related adverse events after the first LIST session and during the 3 month follow up period will be reported

    Time frame: 18 weeks

06

Study locations

1 site
  • G.Gennimatas Hospital
    Thessaloniki, 54621, Greece
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04549389
Lead sponsor
Institute for the Study of Urological Diseases, Greece
Responsible party
Dimitrios Hatzichristou (President, Institute for the Study of Urological Diseases Theesaloniki, Greece, Institute for the Study of Urological Diseases, Greece) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 16, 2020
Start date
Mar 2, 2020
Primary completion
Oct 16, 2020
Completion
Jan 15, 2021
Last update
Feb 12, 2021

Study contacts

Dimitrios Hatzichristou, Professor
principal investigator · Institute for the Study of Urological Diseases, Thessaloniki, Greece

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion