CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT04482673VitD-COVID19Updated Feb 24, 2023

Vitamin D Supplementation in the Prevention and Mitigation of COVID-19 Infection

A Phase 4 interventional study of Daily Vitamin D3 and Daily placebo in COVID-19, Vitamin D Deficiency and Respiratory Viral Infection, sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-24.

Sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
95
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how useful vitamin D supplementation is in reducing the severity of COVID-19 symptoms and the body's inflammatory and infection-fighting response to COVID-19. Individuals ≥50 years of age and older who are tested for COVID-19 and negative will be randomized (like flipping a coin) to either daily high dose vitamin D supplementation (6000 IU vitamin D3/day) vs. standard of care. Those individuals ≥50 years of age or older who test positive for COVID-19 at baseline will be randomized to bolus vitamin D (20,000 IU/day for 3 days) followed by high dose (6000 IU vitamin D/day) vs. standard of care for 12 months. All participants will receive a multivitamin containing vitamin D.

Read the detailed description

Vitamin D (vitD) deficiency is more prevalent among African Americans and Latinx and in the elderly who have low exposure to sunlight. African Americans and nursing home residents who contract SARS-CoV-2, the novel virus that first appeared in Wuhan, China, and who develop the disease designated COVID-19 experience a much worse clinical outcome than other groups. Some have speculated that low vitD status could exacerbate COVID-19 infection, especially if the viral infection reaches the lower respiratory tract.

Sufficient vitD may help to improve the pulmonary immune response to the virus, reduce the dangerous cytokine storm, and lessen surfactant dysregulation, potentially preventing or ameliorating the acute syndrome. To maximize the benefits of vitD on host response to SARS-CoV-2, prophylactic supplementation to ensure sufficiency before COVID-19 would be the preferable public health option. Yet, vitD supplementation during acute infection may also improve overall clinical outcome in some infected patients. It is a relatively inexpensive therapy that has a large safety profile when given in doses of 4000-6000 international units/day to adults.

To date, there is no effective cure or preventive vaccine for COVID-19. Given the risk of disease and death, any intervention that reduces the morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 would be of immense value. We hypothesize that achieving and sustaining vitD sufficiency through dietary supplementation will result in improved immune function and a decrease in COVID-19 incidence and symptomatology. Importantly, this objective will address the significant health disparity of vitD deficiency among black, Latina and the elderly. We further hypothesize that those individuals with a circulating 25(OH)D of ≥40 ng/mL will have less severe COVID-19 symptoms, particularly among higher risk populations. We will compare the effectiveness of higher dose vitD vs. standard of care dosing.To test these hypotheses, we propose the following Aims:

  1. Focusing on prevention, this Aim will test whether achieving vitD sufficiency (as defined by total circulating 25(OH)D ≥40-60 ng/mL) in individuals at risk for deficiency will improve clinical outcomes in those who subsequently develop COVID-19.
  2. Focusing on vitD as mitigation therapy, this Aim will evaluate the effectiveness of bolus dosing followed by daily vitD supplementation in achieving the target 25(OH)D range of ≥40-60 ng/mL in those individuals testing positive for COVID-19 at MUSC/affiliated hospital facilities, but do not require admission to a hospital (outpatient) and will examine whether achieving this target range is associated with less severe COVID-19 and differences in inflammatory cytokine profiles.

In the prevention arm of this project (Aim 1), individuals at higher risk ≥50 years of age who test negative for COVID-19 at MUSC/its affiliate hospitals, and agree to daily vitD supplementation for a 12-month period, with vitD status measured monthly will be randomized to placebo or prescribed vitD (6000 IU/day) to achieve a total circulating 25(OH) concentration of ≥40-60 ng/mL. We will compare study groups regarding subsequent infection with COVID-19, severity of symptoms, need and duration of hospitalization (LOS), admission to the ICU, need for ventilatory support, and mortality, along with return to baseline activities and/or work, as a function of age, BMI, and other recognized COVID-19 risk factors. In the mitigation arm of this project (Aim 2), non-hospitalized individuals ≥50 years of age who test COVID-19 positive will be randomized to placebo or a bolus of oral vitD (20,000 IU X 3 days) followed by 6000 IU vitD/day, and we will compare study groups on measures of disease severity as in Aim 1. All participants in both Aims 1 and 2 will receive a daily multivitamin (MVI) containing 800 IU VitD for the 12-month period.

Following the completion of these Aims, we will be able to answer the following questions:

  1. Are individuals with vitD deficiency more likely to be diagnosed with COVID-19 infection?
  2. Does being vitD replete make a person more likely to have asymptomatic COVID-19?
  3. Does vitD sufficiency status account for why African Americans, Latina, and the elderly more likely to experience complications related to COVID-19?
  4. Is vitD deficiency in COVID-19 positive outpatients associated with increased severity of symptoms and differences in inflammatory cytokine profiles that is mitigated by bolus and then sustained vitD supplementation?

The long-term impact of these studies will influence public policy regarding more widespread vitD supplementation is a means of reducing the severity of COVID-19. Given its low cost and the ease with which widespread supplementation could be instituted, oral vitD supplementation may represent a rapid and inexpensive means by which to reduce both the COVID-19 incidence and severity.

02

Conditions studied

  • COVID-19
  • Vitamin D Deficiency
  • Respiratory Viral Infection

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Vitamin D Deficiency
  • Respiratory Viral Infection
03

In context

Infections

6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 95 is below the median of 120 across 4,200 interventional studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of South Carolina is the lead sponsor of 852 studies on the registry; 165 are open to participants now.

Of its 128 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 101 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Entry Criteria:

---Adults aged 50 years of age or older who presents to MUSC or its affiliate hospitals (or associated testing centers) for COVID-19 testing during the recruitment period is eligible for participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hospitalization at the time of study recruitment.
  • Any individual less than 50 years of age. The reason that the participants ≥50 years are being excluded from this study is because those who are ≥50 years have a higher risk of being symptomatic with COVID-19 and have the potential for the greatest benefit. The disease appears to manifest differently in children and its occurrence is quite rare.
  • Only those patients tested for COVID-19 initially will be eligible to participate; therefore, anyone wanting to participate in the trial must have had a COVID-19 test prior to enrollment/participation in the study.
  • Any individual who is not capable of making independent decisions and who is considered cognitively impaired.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
95 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    COVID-19 Negative Active Treatment

    Participants will be randomized to vitamin D3 (6000 IU) per day for 12 months. All participants will receive a multivitamin containing 800 IU vitamin D3/day.

    Drug: Daily Vitamin D3

  • Placebo comparator
    COVID-19 Negative Placebo

    Participants in this arm would receive placebo for 12 months. All participants will receive a multivitamin containing 800 IU vitamin D3/day.

    Drug: Daily placebo

  • Experimental
    COVID-19 Positive Active Treatment

    Participants will be randomized to vitamin D3 as a bolus (20,000 IU) per day for 3 days followed by high dose vitamin D (6000 IU) per dayfor 12 months. All participants will receive a multivitamin containing 800 IU vitamin D3/day.

    Drug: Daily Vitamin D3 · Drug: Bolus vitamin D3

  • Placebo comparator
    COVID-19 Positive Placebo

    Participants in this arm would receive placebo as a bolus followed by daily placebo for 12 months. All participants will receive a multivitamin containing 800 IU vitamin D3/day.

    Drug: Daily placebo · Drug: Bolus placebo

Interventions

  • DrugDaily Vitamin D3

    6000 IU vitamin D3 daily

    Also known as: Daily cholecalciferol

  • DrugDaily placebo

    Placebo daily

  • DrugBolus vitamin D3

    Bolus 20,000 IU vitamin D3 daily for 3 days

    Also known as: Bolus cholecalciferol

  • DrugBolus placebo

    Bolus placebo daily for 3 days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in total circulating 25(OH)D concentration

    metabolite of vitamin D

    Time frame: monthly in COVID-19 negative participants through study completion for 1 year

  2. Change in total circulating 25(OH)D concentration in COVID-19 positives

    metabolite of vitamin D

    Time frame: baseline, 2 and 4 weeks, then months 3, 6, 9 and 12 in COVID-19 positive participants

  3. Change in SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers

    The presence or absent of SARS-CoV-2 antibody will be measured at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.

    Time frame: every 3 months up to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in inflammatory cytokine concentration (10 cytokine panel Elisa: Interferon (INF)-gamma, Interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-13, Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-alpha

    At baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, inflammatory cytokines will be measured in participant plasma samples. Cytokines to be measured are Interferon-gamma (IFN-g), Interleukin-1beta (IL-1B), IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, and Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNFa). Values of these cytokines at baseline will compared to those at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

    Time frame: baseline and every 3 months up to 12 months

  2. Respiratory symptoms

    COVID-19 positive participants or if COVID-19 negatives develop respiratory symptoms will complete this respiratory survey daily for 2 weeks

    Time frame: daily for 2 weeks

  3. Signs and symptoms of rhino/sinusitis

    Inventory of signs and symptoms of rhino/sinusitis. These signs include sneezing, running nose, cough, dizziness, fatigue, and sense of smell. Each sign is rated on a scale of 0 to 5, with 0 indicating not problem, for instance 1 indicating mild problem, 4 indicating severe problem and 5 indicating problem as bad as it can be.

    Time frame: Baseline then 3, 6, 9 and 12 months in negatives and daily for 2 weeks in positives

  4. NCI Dietary Intake

    Dietary intake assessment

    Time frame: baseline then at 6 and 12 months

  5. Charlson Comorbidity survey

    Survey of participant health problems

    Time frame: baseline then at 6 and 12 months

  6. Paffenberger Physical Activity Assessment

    Assessment of physical activity of each participant

    Time frame: Baseline then at 6 and 12 months

  7. Perceived stress

    Each participant will complete the Perceived Stress Scale Questionnaire (PSS) to assess their perceived stress. Assessments are base on a scale of 0 to 4, with 0 indicating "never" and 4 indicating "very often"

    Time frame: monthly for 1 year

  8. Pandemic stress

    Each participant will complete the and Pandemic Stress Index Questionnaire (PSI) to assess their perceived stress cause by the pandemic. Assessments are base on a scale of 0 to 6, with 0 indicating "not at all" and 5 indicating "extremely," and 6 indicating "decline to answer."

    Time frame: monthly for 1 year

  9. NEO-Personality Inventory

    Personality characteristics of each participant

    Time frame: baseline visit

  10. GrassrootsHealth Monthly Health assessment

    A health assessment will be completed by each participant monthly for 1year. This health. This is for information on health status only and not for comparative assessment.

    Time frame: baseline, 6, and 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04482673
Lead sponsor
Medical University of South Carolina
Collaborators
Grassroots Health Nutrition Institute, ZRT Laboratory
Responsible party
Carol L. Wagner, MD (Principal Investigator, Medical University of South Carolina) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 22, 2020
Start date
Jul 31, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2022
Completion
Dec 31, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 24, 2023

Study contacts

Carol L Wagner, MD
principal investigator · Medical University of South Carolina

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion