CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04472000VitCUpdated Jun 14, 2024

Can Vitamin C Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Shoulder Stiffness?

A Phase 4 interventional study of Vitamin C and Placebo in Shoulder Stiffness, sponsored by Lindenhofgruppe AG. Terminated at 2 sites in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-14.

Sponsored by Lindenhofgruppe AG · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
The study had to be stopped due to difficulties in recruiting patients.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
46
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Postoperative shoulder stiffness is a common complication after shoulder surgery (incidence 10-15%). The symptoms consist primarily in a painful impairment of the mobility of the glenohumeral joint, usually after initially good course. Cause and origin are not clear.

Vitamin C is known as an inactivator of free radicals and plays a key role in building collagen tissue. Vitamin C thus has a modulating role in inflammatory reactions. Injured and ill people have been shown to have significantly increased vitamin C needs, which underlines this role. Evidence was also found that vitamin C has a positive influence on similar diseases such as the complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS, Morbus Sudeck) on the wrist and postoperative arthrofibrosis on the knee joint.

The Investigators want to investigate whether vitamin C intake can positively influence the incidence and / or severity of postoperative shoulder stiffness after shoulder surgery.

The primary objective of this study is to investigate the effect of vitamin C on the external rotational ability of the operated shoulder in the glenohumeral joint compared to the opposite side at 12 weeks post surgery.

Secondary objectives of this study are to investigate other shoulder mobility tests, patient-reported outcomes (level of pain, ability/return to work, smoking habits), patient-reported questionnaires (Constant Score, Oxford shoulder score, DASH score) and the incidence of a frozen shoulder at 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post surgery.

Total duration of study: 2.5 years.

Read the detailed description

Participants will be randomly allocated to the two treatment arms, vitamin C or placebo, in a 1:1 ratio Study participants in the verum group receive one capsule of Burgerstein Vitamin C retard 500mg b.i.d. with treatment starting in the evening on the day of the operation for a total of 50 days.

The placebo group receives one placebo capsule b.i.d. with treatment starting in the evening on the day of the operation for a total of 50 days. Vitamin C will be administered orally. Burgerstein Vitamin C Retard Capsules 500 mg (Pharmacode: 6739189) will be used for this study. Active substance: Ascorbic acid (Vitamin C, E 300).

Since a known drug should be tested for a new indication, the exclusion of a bias by a placebo effect, the administration of a placebo to the control group is necessary. To exclude a detection bias and a performance bias, the study is performed double-blind. A randomization protects against a selection bias.

The determination of the sample size is based on the following considerations. The primary endpoint is not expected to be normally distributed. Therefore the sample size determination is based on a Mann-Whitney test for the comparison of the two groups (placebo and treatment) assuming a logistic distribution. Based on a few data of comparable measurements the Investigators think that the standard deviation of the primary endpoint is 10(=SD) in each group. The treatment effect is expected to be Delta=10, a medically reasonable effect.

To achieve a power of at least 80% for the 4 tested comparisons in the final analysis of the primary endpoint, a minimal sample size of 42 in each of the 4 patient groups (strata) is required. In expectation of a drop-out rate of 20%, the target sample size will be 50 patients in each stratum and 200 patients in total, with 100 in the placebo group and 100 in the treatment group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Shoulder Stiffness

Keywords

  • Vitamin C
  • pain
  • mobility
  • rotation
  • glenohumeral joint
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Informed Consent as documented by signature
  • 18 years or older at the time of informed consent signature
  • Complication-free rotator cuff* or shoulder arthroscopy** with or without resection of the acromioclavicular joint at the orthopedics Sonnenhof. The rotator cuff operations are basically open or in mini-open technique, usually with additional tenotomy / tenodesis of the long biceps tendon.

    * rotator cuff surgery can include tenotomy/tenodesis of long biceps tendon, intra-articular debridement with or without resection of the coracoacromial ligament and/or acromioplasty, biopsies, diagnostic arthroscopy

    ** Arthroscopic procedures include subacromial debridement (including partial resection of the coracoacromial ligament \& acromioplasty), diagnostic arthroscopy, tenotomy of the long biceps tendon, intra-articular debridement, resection of calcium depots for treatment of tendinitis calcarea, biopsies, stabilizations (only without postoperative immobilization)

  • Sufficient knowledge of German to understand the patient information and informed consent, follow instructions by study personnel, and complete patient questionnaires \& diary

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to ascorbic acid or one of the excipients, e.g. known hypersensitivity or allergy to the investigational product
  • Planned single or multiple intake of vitamin supplements during the study period, which results in an additional daily intake of > 50 mg ascorbic acid
  • Known pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Known or suspected non-compliance, for example drug or alcohol abuse
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to psychological disorders, dementia, etc.
  • Participation in another interventional study within the 30 days preceding and during the present study
  • Previous enrollment into the current study
  • Enrollment of the investigator, his / her family members, employees and other dependent persons
  • Current or previous frozen shoulder (no matter on which side)
  • Pre-surgery on the affected shoulder joint (preoperative procedures include all procedures examined in this study, including all other procedures involving the glenohumeral joint and / or acromioclavicular joint. In addition, all interventions, which as a result, negatively influence the mobility of the shoulder with great likelihood up to the current time)
  • Known current unstable medical problem on the not-affected shoulder joint according to the judgment of the investigator
  • Taking a cortisone preparation or an immunomodulatory drug (for example methotrexate or similar)
  • Alcoholism (defined as intake of more than 12g (women) or 24g (men) alcohol per day)
  • Regular hemodialysis
  • Known diabetes mellitus
  • Known Addison's disease
  • Known not correctly adjusted thyroid metabolism
  • Known Parkinson's disease and similar CNS disorders (Diffuse Lewy Body Disease, Corticobasal Degeneration, Multisystem Atrophy, Progressive Supranuclear Paralysis, Essential Tumor, Huntington's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis)
  • Known diseases / injuries of the peripheral nerves (Isaac's Syndrome, Stiff-Person Syndrome, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy, Hereditary Neuropathies, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Hereditary Motor Neuropathies Prone to Pressure Paralysis, Motor Neurone Diseases, Myasthenia Gravis, Spinal Muscular Atrophies, Thoracic Outlet Syndromes)
  • Known infection in the shoulder joint to be operated
  • Known Hyperlipidemia
  • Known Uremia
  • Known Thalassemia
  • Known iron storage diseases
  • Known Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency
  • Planned further operation of any kind within the next 50 days after shoulder surgery
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
46 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Vitamin C

    Patients who are assigned to the experimental treatment group will be given extended release capsules with 500 mg of ascorbic acid orally two times daily, packed in PET/PP-bottles identical as used for the licenced product.

    Drug: Vitamin C

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    The control intervention of this study consists of treatment with no active substance (placebo) but in the same schedule as the experimental treatment (verum).

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugVitamin C

    Study participants in the verum group receive one capsule of Burgerstein Vitamin C retard 500mg b.i.d. with treatment starting in the evening on the day of the operation for a total of 50 days.

  • DrugPlacebo

    The placebo group receives one placebo capsule b.i.d. with treatment starting in the evening on the day of the operation for a total of 50 days.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference between the external glenohumeral joint rotations of the operated shoulder and the opposite shoulder

    The primary endpoint of this study is the difference between the external glenohumeral joint rotations of the operated shoulder and the opposite shoulder ("Delta ∆"). The external glenohumeral joint rotation was chosen as primary measure for shoulder performance because this is the component of movement in the shoulder joint, which is the first and most severely impaired in postoperative shoulder stiffness and which normalizes as the last after the symptomatology subsides. Delta ∆ was chosen as an outcome measure, since the standard deviation of the external rotation capability in the population is very high. The external glenohumeral joint rotation of both shoulders is measured using a smartphone with the App "GetMyROM".

    Time frame: 12 weeks post surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Delta ∆ of the external glenohumeral joint rotation

    The external glenohumeral joint rotation of both shoulders is measured using a smartphone with the App "GetMyROM"

    Time frame: after 6, 26, and 52 weeks post surgery

  2. Delta ∆ of abduction

    - Abduction will be assessed using the GetMyROM-App. Abduction will be done passively with the glenohumeral joint fixed.

    Time frame: after 6, 26, and 52 weeks post surgery

  3. Delta ∆ of internal rotation

    -Internal rotation will be assessed using typical landmarks in clinical practice (Trochanter major, Gluteus maximus/Buttocks, Belt, lumbar spine, thoracolumbar junction, breast spine, interscapular)

    Time frame: after 6, 26, and 52 weeks post surgery

  4. Delta ∆ of flexion

    -Flexion will be assessed using the GetMyROM-App. Flexion will be done passively with the glenohumeral joint fixed.

    Time frame: after 6, 26, and 52 weeks post surgery

  5. Level of pain

    Secondary endpoints include the Level of pain of the operated shoulder preoperatively and level of pain (at rest and in motion) will be assessed using the VAS pain scale

    Time frame: daily during the first 50 days post surgery, and at 12, 26, and 52 weeks post surgery as a criterion for the occurrence of postoperative frozen shoulder

  6. Work ability

    Secondary endpoints include work ability (back-to-work ratio) post surgery. The (partial) ability to work is requested.

    Time frame: 6, 26, and 52 weeks post surgery

  7. Oxford shoulder score

    Secondary endpoints include the Oxford shoulder score as a measure of the pain and the utilizability of the shoulder as well as the patient satisfaction. Will be recorded by the patient getting a questionnaire, which he or she fills out in the waiting room before the appointment with the doctor. The practical part of the Constant score is subsequently filled in by the doctor during the clinical follow-up examination.

    Time frame: preoperatively and after 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks

  8. Constant Score

    Secondary endpoints include the Constant Score as a measure of everyday utilizability of the shoulder and patient satisfaction. Will be recorded by the patient getting a questionnaire, which he or she fills out in the waiting room before the appointment with the doctor. The practical part of the Constant score is subsequently filled in by the doctor during the clinical follow-up examination. The Force measurement in the Constant score is performed with the following device: IsoForceControl®EVO2 - Dynamometer 10-400N.

    Time frame: preoperatively and depending on the procedure after 6 and 12 weeks (strata 3 & 4), and after 26 and 52 weeks (all strata)

  9. DASH score

    Secondary endpoints include the DASH score as a measure of the pain and the utilizability of the shoulder as well as the patient satisfaction. Will be recorded by the patient getting a questionnaire, which he or she fills out in the waiting room before the appointment with the doctor. The practical part of the Constant score is subsequently filled in by the doctor during the clinical follow-up examination.

    Time frame: preoperatively and after 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks

  10. Smoking habits

    Secondary endpoints include the influence of smoking habits on the outcome and possibly on the effect of the study drug. The (current) smoking habits are documented.

    Time frame: end of the study, up to 2.5 years

  11. Frozen shoulder

    Secondary endpoints include the incidence of frozen shoulder. There is no standard definition for frozen shoulder in the literature. The diagnosis is made clinically. The frozen shoulder in this study is defined as a further decrease in external rotation of the glenohumeral joint in the postoperative period.

    Time frame: end of the study, up to 2.5 years

06

Study locations

2 sites
  • Spital Aaberg
    Aarberg, Bern 3270, Switzerland
  • Orthopädie Sonnenhof
    Bern, Switzerland
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Cho CH, Song KS, Kim BS, Kim DH, Lho YM. Biological Aspect of Pathophysiology for Frozen Shoulder. Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 24;2018:7274517. doi: 10.1155/2018/7274517. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29992159 ↗
  • Wong CK, Levine WN, Deo K, Kesting RS, Mercer EA, Schram GA, Strang BL. Natural history of frozen shoulder: fact or fiction? A systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2017 Mar;103(1):40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jun 21. PubMed 27641499 ↗
  • Kim DH, Kim YS, Kim BS, Sung DH, Song KS, Cho CH. Is frozen shoulder completely resolved at 2 years after the onset of disease? J Orthop Sci. 2020 Mar;25(2):224-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Apr 2. PubMed 30952550 ↗
  • Aim F, Klouche S, Frison A, Bauer T, Hardy P. Efficacy of vitamin C in preventing complex regional pain syndrome after wrist fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 May;103(3):465-470. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.12.021. Epub 2017 Mar 4. PubMed 28274883 ↗
  • Kim JH, Kim YC, Nahm FS, Lee PB. The Therapeutic Effect of Vitamin C in an Animal Model of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Produced by Prolonged Hindpaw Ischemia-Reperfusion in Rats. Int J Med Sci. 2017 Jan 15;14(1):97-101. doi: 10.7150/ijms.17681. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28138314 ↗
  • Chen S, Roffey DM, Dion CA, Arab A, Wai EK. Effect of Perioperative Vitamin C Supplementation on Postoperative Pain and the Incidence of Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin J Pain. 2016 Feb;32(2):179-85. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000218. PubMed 25654537 ↗
  • Fukushima R, Yamazaki E. Vitamin C requirement in surgical patients. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2010 Nov;13(6):669-76. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32833e05bc. PubMed 20689415 ↗
  • Behrend H, Lengnick H, Zdravkovic V, Ladurner A, Rudin D, Erschbamer M, Joerger M, Kuster M. Vitamin C demand is increased after total knee arthroplasty: a double-blind placebo-controlled-randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1182-1188. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5030-3. Epub 2018 Jun 28. PubMed 29955932 ↗
  • Giladi AM, Dossett LA, Fleming SB, Abumrad NN, Cotton BA. High-dose antioxidant administration is associated with a reduction in post-injury complications in critically ill trauma patients. Injury. 2011 Jan;42(1):78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.01.104. Epub 2010 Feb 10. PubMed 20149369 ↗
  • Rizzo JA, Rowan MP, Driscoll IR, Chung KK, Friedman BC. Vitamin C in Burn Resuscitation. Crit Care Clin. 2016 Oct;32(4):539-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Aug 2. PubMed 27600125 ↗
  • Kleszczewski T, Modzelewska B, Lisowska A, Buzun L, Kleszczewska E. Levels of vitamin C In the blood plasma patients treated with coronary artery bypass grafting increases significantly after surgery. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017 Jan;85:527-530. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.11.060. Epub 2016 Nov 24. PubMed 27890433 ↗
  • Lee GW, Yang HS, Yeom JS, Ahn MW. The Efficacy of Vitamin C on Postoperative Outcomes after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Clin Orthop Surg. 2017 Sep;9(3):317-324. doi: 10.4055/cios.2017.9.3.317. Epub 2017 Aug 4. PubMed 28861199 ↗
  • Zollinger PE, Tuinebreijer WE, Breederveld RS, Kreis RW. Can vitamin C prevent complex regional pain syndrome in patients with wrist fractures? A randomized, controlled, multicenter dose-response study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jul;89(7):1424-31. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01147. PubMed 17606778 ↗
  • Zollinger PE, Tuinebreijer WE, Kreis RW, Breederveld RS. Effect of vitamin C on frequency of reflex sympathetic dystrophy in wrist fractures: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999 Dec 11;354(9195):2025-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03059-7. PubMed 10636366 ↗
  • Traxer O, Huet B, Poindexter J, Pak CY, Pearle MS. Effect of ascorbic acid consumption on urinary stone risk factors. J Urol. 2003 Aug;170(2 Pt 1):397-401. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000076001.21606.53. PubMed 12853784 ↗
  • Thomas LD, Elinder CG, Tiselius HG, Wolk A, Akesson A. Ascorbic acid supplements and kidney stone incidence among men: a prospective study. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Mar 11;173(5):386-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2296. No abstract available. PubMed 23381591 ↗
  • Prier M, Carr AC, Baillie N. No Reported Renal Stones with Intravenous Vitamin C Administration: A Prospective Case Series Study. Antioxidants (Basel). 2018 May 21;7(5):68. doi: 10.3390/antiox7050068. PubMed 29883396 ↗
  • Mitch WE, Johnson MW, Kirshenbaum JM, Lopez RE. Effect of large oral doses of ascorbic acid on uric acid excretion by normal subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981 Mar;29(3):318-21. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1981.42. PubMed 7471601 ↗
  • Auer BL, Auer D, Rodgers AL. The effect of ascorbic acid ingestion on the biochemical and physicochemical risk factors associated with calcium oxalate kidney stone formation. Clin Chem Lab Med. 1998 Mar;36(3):143-7. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.1998.027. PubMed 9589801 ↗
  • Levine M, Conry-Cantilena C, Wang Y, Welch RW, Washko PW, Dhariwal KR, Park JB, Lazarev A, Graumlich JF, King J, Cantilena LR. Vitamin C pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers: evidence for a recommended dietary allowance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 16;93(8):3704-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.8.3704. PubMed 8623000 ↗
  • Padayatty SJ, Levine M. Vitamin C: the known and the unknown and Goldilocks. Oral Dis. 2016 Sep;22(6):463-93. doi: 10.1111/odi.12446. Epub 2016 Apr 14. PubMed 26808119 ↗
  • Zhang M, Jativa DF. Vitamin C supplementation in the critically ill: A systematic review and meta-analysis. SAGE Open Med. 2018 Oct 19;6:2050312118807615. doi: 10.1177/2050312118807615. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30364374 ↗
  • Gerster H. No contribution of ascorbic acid to renal calcium oxalate stones. Ann Nutr Metab. 1997;41(5):269-82. doi: 10.1159/000177954. PubMed 9429689 ↗
  • Zuckerman JD, Rokito A. Frozen shoulder: a consensus definition. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Mar;20(2):322-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.008. Epub 2010 Nov 4. PubMed 21051244 ↗
  • Mejia-Hernandez K, Chang A, Eardley-Harris N, Jaarsma R, Gill TK, McLean JM. Smartphone applications for the evaluation of pathologic shoulder range of motion and shoulder scores-a comparative study. JSES Open Access. 2018 Mar 13;2(1):109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jses.2017.10.001. eCollection 2018 Mar. PubMed 30675577 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04472000
Lead sponsor
Lindenhofgruppe AG
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 15, 2020
Start date
Apr 27, 2021
Primary completion
May 16, 2023
Completion
Apr 21, 2024
Last update
Jun 14, 2024

Study contacts

Janine Antonov, Dr.
study chair · Campus SLB, Lindenhof AG

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion