CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04467099Updated Sep 20, 2021

Prevalence of Flexor Hallucis Longus Tears, Associated Os Trigonum Excision, and Return to Play

An observational study in Ankle Impingement and Tendon Tear, sponsored by Forte Sports Medicine and Orthopedics. Status unknown at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 11 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-09-20.

Sponsored by Forte Sports Medicine and Orthopedics · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2021), so the status shown — last known as Enrolling by invitation — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
11 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study's aim is to determine the incidence of flexor hallucis tendon tears associated with os trigonum excision. The study will then compare the length until functional return to play of the patients who had flexor hallucis tendon tears with concomitant os trigonum excision versus those without flexor hallucis tendon tears who underwent os trigonum excision. Lastly, the study will be evaluating the patient complaints and physical exam findings before and after surgery and compare those without flexor hallucis tendon tears to those with flexor hallucis tendon repair.

Read the detailed description

Posterior ankle pain syndrome has many etiologies. Two main causes of this are flexor hallucis tendon tear and os trigonum impingement. The current teaching is that patients with flexor hallucis longus tear complain of posterior medial ankle pain and those with posterior lateral ankle pain have an os trigonum impingement. It is also classically understood that patients with flexor hallucis tendon tears take longer to return to their pre-injury level of function. Our clinical experience refutes these reports and our study looks to further evaluate it.

This study brings back patients who were treated by the study doctor. The patient's preoperative evaluation will be reviewed including clinic notes and imaging. The operative reports for these patients will be reviewed to verify the surgery procedure performed. These patients will be included in the study and we will utilize the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Foot, Ankle, and Lower Limb module that they have completed postoperatively. This measure of patient's functional and subjective satisfaction has already been completed by patients at their regularly scheduled follow up appointments and is available for review.

Prospectively, patients will be asked to return to the clinic for a follow-up evaluation, which includes a standard x-ray. All patients will be consented prior to data collection, minors included in this study will be asked to sign an assent as well. Many factors will be assessed such as; a range of motion test of the ankle utilizing goniometric technique, nerve path and function, stability ankle grading, radiologic findings, and patient-reported outcomes filled out pre and postoperatively.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ankle Impingement
  • Tendon Tear

Keywords

  • flexor hallucis longus
  • os trigonum
  • return to play
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Forte Sports Medicine and Orthopedics is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
11 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Prior patients of the study doctor from August 1996 to June 2017 that underwent os trigonum excision and of the athletic population (recreational to competitive).

Inclusion criteria

  • Os trigonum excision with or without a flexor hallucis longus tear in an athletic population (recreational to competitive)
  • Males and females ages 11-50 at time of surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any other injury that will affect their return to play or recovery process
  • Individuals not actively involved in athletic sport/activity
  • Pregnant women
  • Any other concomitant injuries
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Os Trigonum Excision with Tear

    Participants with flexor hallucis tendon tear

    Other: Foot Exam Follow-Up · Radiation: X-ray · Other: Questionnaire

  • Os Trigonum Excision without Tear

    Participants without flexor hallucis tendon tear

    Other: Foot Exam Follow-Up · Radiation: X-ray · Other: Questionnaire

Interventions

  • OtherFoot Exam Follow-Up

    All participants will have a clinical assessment of their surgery foot by the study doctor.

  • RadiationX-ray

    Standard x-ray of the foot.

  • OtherQuestionnaire

    All participants will complete a questionnaire.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of flexor hallucis longus tears associated with os trigonum excision

    How many participants had a tear.

    Time frame: Less than or equal to 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length until return to play

    Comparing the length until return to play of the patients who had flexor hallucis longus tears with concomitant os trigonum excision versus those without flexor hallucis longus tears who underwent os trigonum excision.

    Time frame: Less than or equal to 30 days

  2. Patient responses to American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Foot and Ankle questionnaire

    The questionnaire responses will be summarized and compared between os trigonum excision with a flexor hallucis longus tear and without a flexor hallucis longus tear groups using two-sample Student t-tests.

    Time frame: preoperative; perioperative; intraoperative; Less than or equal to 30 days

  3. Patient responses to American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Lower Limb questionnaire

    The questionnaire responses will be summarized and compared between os trigonum excision with a flexor hallucis longus tear and without a flexor hallucis longus tear groups using two-sample Student t-tests.

    Time frame: preoperative; perioperative; intraoperative; Less than or equal to 30 days

  4. Change in foot and ankle nerve function

    The comparison includes but is not limited to patient nerve path and function. The findings will be summarized and compared between os trigonum excision with a flexor hallucis longus tear and without a flexor hallucis longus tear groups using chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests.

    Time frame: preoperative; perioperative; intraoperative; Less than or equal to 30 days

  5. Change in foot and ankle areas of pain

    The comparison includes but is not limited to posterior pain, plantarflexion pain, os trigonum resection site pain, and other areas of pain upon visit. The findings will be summarized and compared between trigonum excision with a flexor hallucis longus tear and without a flexor hallucis longus tear groups using chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests.

    Time frame: preoperative; perioperative; intraoperative; Less than or equal to 30 days

  6. Change in foot and ankle range of motion

    The comparison includes but is not limited to patient range of motion (ROM) test in degrees of the ankle by assessing plantarflexion, dorsiflexion, hindfoot angle, and subtalar motion. The findings will be summarized and compared between trigonum excision with a flexor hallucis longus tear and without a flexor hallucis longus tear groups using two-sample Student t-tests.

    Time frame: preoperative; perioperative; intraoperative; Less than or equal to 30 days

  7. Change in foot and ankle stability

    The comparison includes but is not limited to patient range of motion (ROM) test of the ankle by assessing plantarflexion, dorsiflexion, hindfoot angle, and subtalar motion. The findings will be summarized and compared between trigonum excision with a flexor hallucis longus tear and without a flexor hallucis longus tear groups using chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests.

    Time frame: preoperative; perioperative; intraoperative; Less than or equal to 30 days

  8. Change in foot and ankle imaging for x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging

    The comparison includes but is not limited to how many patients have within and group differences in x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Changes to be compared will include but not limited to ankle alignment, os trigonum, the appearance of posterior talus, osteochondral lesions, fractures or dislocations, stress fractures, plantar and posterior heel spurs and arthritic changes in the ankle or hindfoot.

    Time frame: preoperative; perioperative; intraoperative; Less than or equal to 30 days

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Methodist Sports Medicine Carmel
    Carmel, Indiana 46280, United States
  • Methodist Sports Medicine Greenwood
    Greenwood, Indiana 46142, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 20, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04467099
Lead sponsor
Forte Sports Medicine and Orthopedics
Responsible party
David Porter (Orthopedic Surgeon, Forte Sports Medicine and Orthopedics) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 10, 2020
Start date
Mar 2, 2020
Primary completion
Aug 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 20, 2021

Study contacts

David Porter, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Forte Sports Medicine and Orthopedics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion