CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04463329Updated Jul 21, 2020

Jedi Grip vs. Double Operator Technique for Axillary Brachial Plexus Block

An interventional study of conventional two-operator versus single operator using Jedi grip axillary brachial plexus blockage in Brachial Plexus Block and Ultrasound, Interventional, sponsored by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-21.

Sponsored by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2018, registered Jul 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this prospective randomized controlled observer-blinded study we aimed to compare the efficacy of a single operator technique so called Jedi Grip and conventional technique requiring double operator in ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block.

Read the detailed description

Patients aged between 18 and 65 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to II ) undergoing elective hand, wrist and forearm surgery were prospectively enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to Group C (conventional technique) or group J (Jedi technique). In both groups, axillary plexus blockage was provided by applying 5cc of a mixture of 10 cc 0.5% bupivacaine and 10 cc 2% prilocaine to the ulnar, radial, median and musculocutaneous nerves. Parameters such as performance time and the number of needle passes were recorded during procedure. Subsequently, a blinded observer evaluated and recorded parameters related to the success of blockage. The main outcome variable was performance time and success rate (surgical anesthesia).

02

Conditions studied

  • Brachial Plexus Block
  • Ultrasound, Interventional

Keywords

  • Brachial Plexus Block, Ultrasound-Guided, Jedi Grip, Double operator peripheric nerve block
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent is the lead sponsor of 424 studies on the registry; 105 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • undergoing elective hand, wrist and forearm surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • hepatic or renal failure, serious cardiac or pulmoner disease, local or systemic infection, sepsis, coagulation disorder, neurological, muscular or psychiatric disease, body mass index (BMI) below 18.5 or above 35, drug and substance abuse, pregnancy, refusal of regional anesthesia, history of allergy to local anesthetics, mental-motor retardation (inability to consent or assess the visual analog scale(VAS) pain score), preoperative long-term NSAIDs or opioid use and prior surgery in the axillary regions.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group C

    conventional two-operator axillary brachial plexus blockage

    Procedure: conventional two-operator versus single operator using Jedi grip axillary brachial plexus blockage

  • Active comparator
    Group J

    axillary brachial plexus block with single operator using Jedi grip

    Procedure: conventional two-operator versus single operator using Jedi grip axillary brachial plexus blockage

Interventions

  • Procedureconventional two-operator versus single operator using Jedi grip axillary brachial plexus blockage

    on goup C, operator used the probe and needle with different hands while an assistant controlling the syringe to aspirate or inject local anesthetic. On Group J single operator controlled the probe with one hand while controlling the needle and the syringe on the other hand with the Jedi technique. The needle was held between the index finger and the middle phalanx of the middle finger, and the syringe was held with fingers 4 and 5, with the plunger part to the thumb in the palm.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. block performance time

    the sum of imaging and needling times

    Time frame: during procedure

  2. success rate

    patients percentage with provided successful anesthesia

    Time frame: during operation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Onset time of sensory block

    Sensory blockage was evaluated and graded; from lateral to the forearm, the volar face of the thumb, volar face of the 5th finger and lateral side of the hand back; for musculocutaneous, median, ulnar and radial nerves, respectively. Graduation was according to 3-point scale using a cold test: 0 = no block, 1 = analgesia (patient can feel touch, not cold), and 2 = anesthesia (patient cannot feel touch).

    Time frame: before operation

  2. Onset time of motor block

    Motor blockage was evaluated and graded; with elbow flexion, thumb abduction, thumb opposition, thumb adduction for musculocutaneous, radial, median, ulnar nerves respectively. Motor blockage graduation was also according to a 3-point scale: 0 = no block, 1 = paresis and 2 = paralysis.\[

    Time frame: before operation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ankara City Hospital
    Ankara, 06600, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Pappin D, Christie I. The Jedi Grip: a novel technique for administering local anaesthetic in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2011 Sep;66(9):845. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06845.x. No abstract available. PubMed 21831086 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 21, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04463329
Lead sponsor
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Responsible party
ismail aytaç (Principal Investigator, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 9, 2020
Start date
May 1, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2019
Completion
Feb 28, 2019
Last update
Jul 21, 2020

Study contacts

İsmail Aytac
principal investigator · Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion