A Phase 3 interventional study of Carboplatin and Cisplatin in Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Keratinizing Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Nonkeratinizing Carcinoma, sponsored by National Cancer Institute (NCI). Terminated at 325 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-03.
Sponsored by National Cancer Institute (NCI) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
This phase III trial compares the effect of adding nivolumab to the usual chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin with gemcitabine) versus standard chemotherapy alone in treating patients with nasopharyngeal cancer that has come back (recurrent) or spread to other places in the body (metastatic). Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as nivolumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Chemotherapy drugs, such as cisplatin, carboplatin, and gemcitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving nivolumab with the usual chemotherapy may work better than the standard chemotherapy alone in treating patients with nasopharyngeal cancer.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To determine if adding nivolumab to platinum-gemcitabine as first-line treatment improves overall survival (OS) for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare patterns of failure (local-regional relapse and distant metastasis) between treatment arms.
II. To determine if adding nivolumab to platinum-gemcitabine as first-line treatment improves the objective tumor response based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1.
III. To determine if adding nivolumab to platinum-gemcitabine as first-line treatment improves progression free survival (PFS) for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic NPC.
IV. To evaluate the toxicity based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v)5.0.
V. To characterize patient-reported symptomatic toxicities measured by Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO)-CTCAE.
VI. To assess the quality of life (QOL), as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-Core (C)30, between the two arms (primary PRO).
VII. To assess fatigue, as measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), between the two arms (secondary PRO).
VIII. To determine if a subset of patients based on an optimal cutoff point of Programmed Death Receptor Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Combined Positive Score (CPS)/Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) is more likely to benefit in terms of PFS from adding nivolumab to platinum-gemcitabine as first-line treatment.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine if a subset of patients based on an optimal cutoff point of PD-L1 CPS/TPS is more likely to benefit in terms of overall survival (OS) from adding nivolumab to platinum-gemcitabine as first-line treatment.
II. To determine changes in QOL as measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 and in fatigue as measured by MFI-20, between and within arms over time (exploratory PRO).
III. To collect blood and tissue specimens for future translational research.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients receive nivolumab intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes on day 1, gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin IV over 30-60 minutes or carboplatin IV over 30-60 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After 4 weeks, patients then receive nivolumab IV over 30 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 24 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM II: Patients receive gemcitabine and cisplatin or carboplatin as in Arm I.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 4 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually.
816 studies on the registry are indexed under Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma; 282 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 15 is below the median of 84 across 668 interventional studies indexed under Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.
Browse Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma studies →National Cancer Institute (NCI) is the lead sponsor of 3,506 studies on the registry; 334 are open to participants now.
Of its 402 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 365 (91%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
For patients with evidence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, the HBV viral load must be undetectable, and patients must be receiving anti-viral therapy at enrollment. Patients must agree to continue anti-viral therapy throughout the study period as directed by their treating physicians
Patients with a history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection must have been treated and cured. For patients with HCV infection who are currently on treatment they are eligible if they have an undetectable HCV viral load
For women of childbearing potential (WOCBP), negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 14 days prior to registration. For WOCBP randomized to Arm 1, an additional negative serum or urine pregnancy is required within 24 hours prior to starting nivolumab treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who have received neoadjuvant (induction) and/or adjuvant chemotherapy for primary NPC with chemotherapy (any drug regimens including those containing platinum and/or gemcitabine) at or within 6 months prior to registration are excluded (counting from the last day of the chemotherapy for the primary NPC, prior to enrolling into the current study). The following subgroups of patients are NOT excluded:
Severe, active co-morbidity defined as follows:
Known history of grade 3-4 allergic reaction and/or hepatic toxicity to cisplatin, carboplatin, or gemcitabine
Patients receive nivolumab IV over 30 minutes on day 1, gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin IV over 30-60 minutes or carboplatin IV over 30-60 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After 4 weeks, patients then receive nivolumab IV over 30 minutes on day 1. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 24 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Drug: Carboplatin · Drug: Cisplatin · Drug: Gemcitabine · Biological: Nivolumab · Other: Questionnaire Administration
Patients receive gemcitabine and cisplatin or carboplatin as in Arm I.
Drug: Carboplatin · Drug: Cisplatin · Drug: Gemcitabine · Other: Questionnaire Administration
Given IV
Also known as: Blastocarb, Carboplat, Carboplatin Hexal, Carboplatino, Carboplatinum, Carbosin, Carbosol, Carbotec, CBDCA, Displata, Ercar, JM-8, JM8, Nealorin, Novoplatinum, Paraplatin, Paraplatin AQ, Paraplatine, Platinwas, Ribocarbo
Given IV
Also known as: Abiplatin, Blastolem, Briplatin, CDDP, Cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum, Cis-diamminedichloridoplatinum, Cis-diamminedichloro Platinum (II), Cis-diamminedichloroplatinum, Cis-dichloroammine Platinum (II), Cis-platinous Diamine Dichloride, Cis-platinum, Cis-platinum II, Cis-platinum II Diamine Dichloride, Cismaplat, Cisplatina, Cisplatinum, Cisplatyl, Citoplatino, Citosin, Cysplatyna, DDP, Lederplatin, Metaplatin, Neoplatin, Peyrone's Chloride, Peyrone's Salt, Placis, Plastistil, Platamine, Platiblastin, Platiblastin-S, Platinex, Platinol, Platinol- AQ, Platinol-AQ, Platinol-AQ VHA Plus, Platinoxan, Platinum, Platinum Diamminodichloride, Platiran, Platistin, Platosin
Given IV
Also known as: dFdC, dFdCyd, Difluorodeoxycytidine
Given IV
Also known as: ABP 206, BMS-936558, CMAB819, MDX-1106, NIVO, Nivolumab Biosimilar ABP 206, Nivolumab Biosimilar CMAB819, ONO-4538, Opdivo
Ancillary studies
Overall Survival (OS)
Failure is death from any cause. Survival rates were to be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and arms were to be compared using a log-rank test. Analysis was to occur after 200 deaths have been reported. Given the small number of participants due to early study closure, only the number of patients last reported to be alive at time of study termination is reported.
Time frame: Baseline to the date of death or last follow-up. Maximum follow-up time was 2.3 years.
Locoregional Failure
Locoregional failure is defined as first evidence of local or regional progression, death due to study cancer without documented progression, or death due to unknown causes without documented progression; distant metastasis and deaths from other causes were considered competing risks. Progressive disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance or recurrence of any locoregional lesions is also considered progression. Failure rates were to be estimated using the cumulative incidence method and arms were to be compared using the cause-specific log-rank test. Analysis was to occur after 200 deaths. Given the small number of participants due to early study closure, only the number of patients with locoregional failure is reported.
Time frame: Baseline to the date of failure or last known follow-up. Maximum follow-up time was 2.3 years.
Distant Metastases
Distant failure is defined as first evidence of distant metastasis; locoregional failure and all deaths were to be considered competing risks. Distant failure rates were to be estimated using the cumulative incidence method and arms were to be compared using the cause-specific log-rank test. Analysis was to occur after 200 deaths. Given the small number of participants due to early study closure, only the number of patients with distant failure is reported.
Time frame: Randomization to the date of failure or last known follow-up. Maximum follow-up time was 2.3 years.
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Failure is defined as local, regional, or distant disease progression, or death from any cause. Progressive disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance or recurrence of any lesions is also considered progression. Failure rates were to be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and arms were to be compared using the log-rank test. Analysis was to occur after 200 deaths. Given the small number of participants due to early study closure, only the number of patients alive without progression is reported.
Time frame: Baseline to the date of failure or last known follow-up. Maximum follow-up time was 2.3 years.
Number of Participants With Complete or Partial Response (Objective Response Rate) Through the End of Cycle 6 Determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1
CT/MRI of nasopharynx and neck or chest CT at baseline and through the end of cycle 6 are compared to determine tumor response. Per RECIST 1.1: * Complete response: * Disappearance of all lesions and pathologic lymph nodes * Partial response: * 30% decrease sum of the longest diameters * No new lesions * No progression of non-target lesions
Time frame: Baseline through end of cycle 6 (each cycle is 21 days)
Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs)
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5 grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. Counts of participants with any grade 3 or higher adverse event are reported. Adverse events of any attribution are included.
Time frame: Baseline to the date of last follow-up. Maximum follow-up time was 2.3 years.
Number of Participants With Patient Reported Outcomes-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) Severity Score ≥ 3 (or Present) at Baseline
PRO-CTCAE is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement system developed to evaluate symptomatic toxicity in patients on cancer clinical trials. This study collects PRO-CTCAE data on sixteen symptomatic adverse events (AEs), asking about experience over the last seven days. Worst severity of the given symptom was collected for 14 items (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, and 4=very severe). Any presence of the symptom was collected for 2 items (present/absent). For each symptom, the row label indicates whether severity score ≥ 3 or presence is reported.
Time frame: Baseline
Number of Participants With Patient Reported Outcomes-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) Severity Score ≥ 3 (or Present) at Cycle 6
PRO-CTCAE is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement system developed to evaluate symptomatic toxicity in patients on cancer clinical trials. This study collects PRO-CTCAE data on sixteen symptomatic adverse events (AEs), asking about experience over the last seven days. Worst severity of the given symptom was collected for 14 items (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, and 4=very severe). Any presence of the symptom was collected for 2 items (present/absent). For each symptom, the row label indicates whether severity score ≥ 3 or presence is reported.
Time frame: End of cycle 6 (each cycle is 21 days for the first six cycles)
Global Heath Status (GHS) Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Global Health Status is calculated from two questions on the EORTC QLQ-C30. The question responses range from 1 "very poor" to 7 "excellent" such that a higher response indicates better quality of life (QOL). The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time frame: End of cycle 6 (each cycle is 21 days)
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI)-20 Total Score
The MFI-20 is a 20-item self-report instrument measuring fatigue with the total score ranging from 20 to 100 and a higher score indicating more fatigue.
Time frame: End of cycle 6 (each cycle is 21 days)
Progression-free Survival by Programmed Death Receptor Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Combined Positive Score (CPS) and Tumor Proportion Score (TPS)
This study hypothesizes that the use of PD-L1 expression based on the TPS or CPS may be useful in identifying those patients who are more likely to benefit from treatment with PD-1 inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy. This study will explore a range of CPS and TPS scores.
Time frame: Baseline to the date of failure or last known follow-up. Maximum follow-up time was 2.3 years.
Overall Survival by PD-L1 CPS and TPS
This study hypothesizes that the use of PD-L1 expression based on the TPS or CPS may be useful in identifying those patients who are more likely to benefit from treatment with PD-1 inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy. This study will explore a range of CPS and TPS scores.
Time frame: Baseline to the date of failure or last known follow-up. Maximum follow-up time was 2.3 years.
Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Global Heath Status (GHS) Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Global Health Status is calculated from two questions on the EORTC QLQ-C30. The question responses range from 1 "very poor" to 7 "excellent" such that a higher response indicates better quality of life (QOL). The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Change is calculated as later value minus baseline value such that a positive change indicates improvement
Time frame: Baseline and end of cycle 6 (each cycle is 21 days)
Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI)-20 Total Score
The MFI-20 is a 20-item self-report instrument measuring fatigue with the total score ranging from 20 to 100 and a higher score indicating more fatigue. Change is calculated as later value minus baseline value such that a negative change indicates decreased fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline and end of cycle 6 (each cycle is 21 days)
Translational Research Studies
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up, assessed up to 8 years
| Milestone | Arm I (Nivolumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Arm II (Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 11 | 4 |
| Started protocol treatment | 11 | 4 |
| Completed | 11 | 4 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
Failure is death from any cause. Survival rates were to be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and arms were to be compared using a log-rank test. Analysis was to occur after 200 deaths have been reported. Given the small number of participants due to early study closure, only the number of patients last reported to be alive at time of study termination is reported.
| Participants | Arm I (Nivolumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Arm II (Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival (OS) | 8 | 4 |
Locoregional failure is defined as first evidence of local or regional progression, death due to study cancer without documented progression, or death due to unknown causes without documented progression; distant metastasis and deaths from other causes were considered competing risks. Progressive disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance or recurrence of any locoregional lesions is also considered progression. Failure rates were to be estimated using the cumulative incidence method and arms were to be compared using the cause-specific log-rank test. Analysis was to occur after 200 deaths. Given the small number of participants due to early study closure, only the number of patients with locoregional failure is reported.
| Participants | Arm I (Nivolumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Arm II (Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) |
|---|---|---|
| Locoregional Failure | 6 | 0 |
Distant failure is defined as first evidence of distant metastasis; locoregional failure and all deaths were to be considered competing risks. Distant failure rates were to be estimated using the cumulative incidence method and arms were to be compared using the cause-specific log-rank test. Analysis was to occur after 200 deaths. Given the small number of participants due to early study closure, only the number of patients with distant failure is reported.
| Participants | Arm I (Nivolumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Arm II (Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) |
|---|---|---|
| Distant Metastases | 2 | 1 |
Failure is defined as local, regional, or distant disease progression, or death from any cause. Progressive disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance or recurrence of any lesions is also considered progression. Failure rates were to be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and arms were to be compared using the log-rank test. Analysis was to occur after 200 deaths. Given the small number of participants due to early study closure, only the number of patients alive without progression is reported.
| Participants | Arm I (Nivolumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Arm II (Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) |
|---|---|---|
| Progression-free Survival (PFS) | 3 | 3 |
CT/MRI of nasopharynx and neck or chest CT at baseline and through the end of cycle 6 are compared to determine tumor response. Per RECIST 1.1: * Complete response: * Disappearance of all lesions and pathologic lymph nodes * Partial response: * 30% decrease sum of the longest diameters * No new lesions * No progression of non-target lesions
| Participants | Arm I (Nivolumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Arm II (Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Complete or Partial Response (Objective Response Rate) Through the End of Cycle 6 Determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 | 4 | 0 |
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5 grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. Counts of participants with any grade 3 or higher adverse event are reported. Adverse events of any attribution are included.
| Participants | Arm I (Nivolumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Arm II (Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) | 10 | 2 |
PRO-CTCAE is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement system developed to evaluate symptomatic toxicity in patients on cancer clinical trials. This study collects PRO-CTCAE data on sixteen symptomatic adverse events (AEs), asking about experience over the last seven days. Worst severity of the given symptom was collected for 14 items (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, and 4=very severe). Any presence of the symptom was collected for 2 items (present/absent). For each symptom, the row label indicates whether severity score ≥ 3 or presence is reported.
| Participants | Arm I (Nivolumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Arm II (Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) |
|---|---|---|
| Dry mouth (severity grade 3+) | 1 | 1 |
| Difficulty swallowing (severity grade 3+) | 1 | 0 |
| Voice quality changes (presence) | 2 | 0 |
| Mouth/throat sore (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 0 |
| Taste changes (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 0 |
| Abdominal pain (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 0 |
| Heart palpitations (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 1 |
| Rash (presence) | 1 | 0 |
| Itching (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 0 |
| Numbness & tingling (severity grade 3+ | 0 | 0 |
| Blurred vision (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 0 |
| Ringing in ears (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 0 |
| Concentration (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 0 |
| Memory (severity grade 3+) | 1 | 0 |
| Headache (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 0 |
| Sad (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 0 |
PRO-CTCAE is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement system developed to evaluate symptomatic toxicity in patients on cancer clinical trials. This study collects PRO-CTCAE data on sixteen symptomatic adverse events (AEs), asking about experience over the last seven days. Worst severity of the given symptom was collected for 14 items (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, and 4=very severe). Any presence of the symptom was collected for 2 items (present/absent). For each symptom, the row label indicates whether severity score ≥ 3 or presence is reported.
| Participants | Arm I (Nivolumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Arm II (Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) |
|---|---|---|
| Dry mouth (severity grade 3+) | 1 | 0 |
| Difficulty swallowing (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 0 |
| Voice quality changes (presence) | 1 | 0 |
| Mouth/throat sore (severity grade 3+) | 1 | 0 |
| Taste changes (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 0 |
| Abdominal pain (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 0 |
| Heart palpitations (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 0 |
| Rash (presence) | 1 | 0 |
| Itching (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 0 |
| Numbness & tingling (severity grade 3+ | 0 | 0 |
| Blurred vision (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 0 |
| Ringing in ears (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 0 |
| Concentration (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 0 |
| Memory (severity grade 3+) | 1 | 0 |
| Headache (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 0 |
| Sad (severity grade 3+) | 0 | 0 |
Global Health Status is calculated from two questions on the EORTC QLQ-C30. The question responses range from 1 "very poor" to 7 "excellent" such that a higher response indicates better quality of life (QOL). The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
| score on a scale | Arm I (Nivolumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Arm II (Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) |
|---|---|---|
| Global Heath Status (GHS) Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) | 63.9 ± 9.6 | 75.0 ± 4.8 |
The MFI-20 is a 20-item self-report instrument measuring fatigue with the total score ranging from 20 to 100 and a higher score indicating more fatigue.
| score on a scale | Arm I (Nivolumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Arm II (Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) |
|---|---|---|
| Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI)-20 Total Score | 61.6 ± 4.4 | 72.7 ± 7.8 |
This study hypothesizes that the use of PD-L1 expression based on the TPS or CPS may be useful in identifying those patients who are more likely to benefit from treatment with PD-1 inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy. This study will explore a range of CPS and TPS scores.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
This study hypothesizes that the use of PD-L1 expression based on the TPS or CPS may be useful in identifying those patients who are more likely to benefit from treatment with PD-1 inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy. This study will explore a range of CPS and TPS scores.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Global Health Status is calculated from two questions on the EORTC QLQ-C30. The question responses range from 1 "very poor" to 7 "excellent" such that a higher response indicates better quality of life (QOL). The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Change is calculated as later value minus baseline value such that a positive change indicates improvement
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
The MFI-20 is a 20-item self-report instrument measuring fatigue with the total score ranging from 20 to 100 and a higher score indicating more fatigue. Change is calculated as later value minus baseline value such that a negative change indicates decreased fatigue.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Collected over Baseline to the date of failure or last known follow-up. Maximum follow-up time was 2.3 years.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm I (Nivolumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | 3/11 (27.3%) | 10/11 (90.9%) | 11/11 (100%) |
| Arm II (Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | 0/4 (0%) | 2/4 (50%) | 4/4 (100%) |
| Event | Arm I (Nivolumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Arm II (Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) |
|---|---|---|
| Neutrophil count decreasedInvestigations | 6/11 | 2/4 |
| AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 5/11 | 0/4 |
| Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations | 1/11 | 1/4 |
| White blood cell decreasedInvestigations | 1/11 | 1/4 |
| DysphagiaGastrointestinal disorders | 2/11 | 0/4 |
| Mucositis oralGastrointestinal disorders | 1/11 | 0/4 |
| Alkaline phosphatase increasedInvestigations | 1/11 | 0/4 |
| Platelet count decreasedInvestigations | 1/11 | 0/4 |
| DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 1/11 | 0/4 |
| HyponatremiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 1/11 | 0/4 |
| Event | Arm I (Nivolumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Arm II (Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) |
|---|---|---|
| ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders | 6/11 | 3/4 |
| DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders | 1/11 | 3/4 |
| Mucositis oralGastrointestinal disorders | 2/11 | 3/4 |
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 5/11 | 3/4 |
| FatigueGeneral disorders | 7/11 | 3/4 |
| Neutrophil count decreasedInvestigations | 7/11 | 3/4 |
| AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 5/11 | 2/4 |
| Blood and lymphatic system disorders - OtherBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 1/11 | 2/4 |
| DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders | 0/11 | 2/4 |
| VomitingGastrointestinal disorders | 2/11 | 2/4 |
Randomized participants
| Age, Customized(Participants) | Arm I (Nivolumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Arm II (Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| ≤ 49 years | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| 50 - 59 years | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 60 - 69 years | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| ≥ 70 years | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Arm I (Nivolumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Arm II (Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Male | 10 | 1 | 11 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Arm I (Nivolumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Arm II (Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 10 | 3 | 13 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Arm I (Nivolumab, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Arm II (Gemcitabine, Cisplatin / Carboplatin) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 8 | 3 | 11 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| White | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Showing the first 100 of 325 sites across 4 countries.
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Yes — NCI is committed to sharing data in accordance with NIH policy. For more details on how clinical trial data is shared, access the link to the NIH data sharing policy page.
This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)