ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04456478ACIDOFIVUpdated Jan 13, 2025

Impact of PH Values of the Embryo Culture Medium on Success of in Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

An interventional study of pH at 7.38 ± 0.02 and pH at 7.22 ± 0.02 in Embryo Growth Disorder, Humans and Pregnancy, sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse. Completed at 3 sites in France. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-13.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
429
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to compare, through a multicentric randomized trial, the impact of two pH values in the embryo culture medium on the clinical results of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) process and especially the impact on live birth delivery rate.

Read the detailed description

Despite progress in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), the livebirth rate per oocyte retrieval during In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) remain relatively low (15 à 25%). This is in part due to the sensitivity of the preimplantation embryo to its environment. Indeed, there is growing evidence that culture conditions during IVF are critical not only for the development of pre- and post-implantation embryo, but also for long-term health effects; and numerous animal data suggest the importance of pH control in the IVF culture medium. Maintaining the intercellular pH (pHi) is one of the vital roles of embryo homeostasis since pHi regulates many cellular processes. Indeed, variations in pHi can affect embryonic development. Although the embryo has biochemical systems to regulate its pHi, these systems can be overtaken. Under the conditions of IVF embryo culture, the extracellular pH (pHe) in a culture medium is the result of a balance between CO2 concentration in the incubator and bicarbonate concentration in the culture medium (determined by the medium manufacturer). The recommendations of the manufacturers of embryo culture media are to maintain a pHe slightly higher (generally between 7.2 and 7.4) than the pHi (estimated between 7.1 to 7.2) to compensate for the acidification due to cell metabolism. However, as the pH scale is logarithmic, a pHe variation of 7.2 to 7.4 corresponds to a decrease in the concentration of H+ ions by a factor of 1.6 in the medium. Actually, there is no clinical data to know what is the ideal pH to apply to a culture medium during IVF.

This is a clinical study comparing two pH values in the culture medium of embryos obtained by IVF, randomized, multicentric (3 centers), patient-blinded, in groups parallel to the ratio 1: 1. IVF-ICSI will be performed according to the usual procedure and the day of the oocyte puncture, the embryologist will proceed to the 1: 1 randomization: culture of the oocytes and embryos in the culture medium with a pH at 7.38 ± 0.02 or a pH at 7.22 ± 0.02.

In case of pregnancy after embryo transfer, patients will be followed until delivery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Embryo Growth Disorder
  • Humans
  • Pregnancy

Keywords

  • pH
  • embryo culture
  • In Vitro Fertilization
  • live birth rate
  • randomized trial
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Toulouse is the lead sponsor of 805 studies on the registry; 215 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Couples whose woman is 18 to 40 years old and man is 18 to 60 at the time of inclusion.
  • Infertile couple with a medical indication of IVF-ICSI according to criteria applied in each center.
  • First or second ICSI attempt with fresh embryo transfer.
  • Signature of informed consent by both partners of the couple
  • Affiliation to a social security scheme or equivalent for both partners of the couple.
  • Fitting the inclusion criteria for IVF according the the French law.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of spermatozoa extracted by testicular biopsy.
  • Freeze-al strategy (without fresh embryo transfer) decided before embryo culture
  • Absence of mature oocyte (metaphase II) at the day of the puncture
  • Uterine pathology affecting implantation (uterine malformation, diffuse adenomyosis ...)
  • One of the two partners (or both) is (are) infected with HIV, HCV or HBV in the year before the inclusion
  • One of the two partners (or both) is (are) in safeguarding justice, under guardianship or trusteeship.
  • Couple having already participated once in the study.
  • Couple enrolled in another interventional clinical study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
429 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    pH 7.38 ± 0.02

    IVF-ICSI will be performed according to the usual procedure and the day of the oocyte puncture, the embryologist will proceed to the culture of the oocytes and embryos in the culture medium with a pH at 7.38 ± 0.02

    Procedure: pH at 7.38 ± 0.02

  • Experimental
    pH 7.22 ± 0.02

    IVF-ICSI will be performed according to the usual procedure and the day of the oocyte puncture, the embryologist will proceed to the culture of the oocytes and embryos in the culture medium with a pH at 7.22 ± 0.02

    Procedure: pH at 7.22 ± 0.02

Interventions

  • ProcedurepH at 7.38 ± 0.02

    In the 3 centers of the study, IVF-ICSI will be performed according to the usual procedure: ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval, sperm microinjection by ICSI, embryo culture in Global® Total HSA medium, embryo selection and transfer at day 3. The day of the oocyte puncture, the embryologist will proceed to the 1: 1 randomization: culture of the embryos in a medium with a pH at 7.38 ± 0.02. We have chosen to study specifically the early stages of fertilization and embryo development (until day 3), stages for which extracellular pH control is more critical because the intracellular pH regulatory mechanisms are somewhat limited and could be exceeded.

  • ProcedurepH at 7.22 ± 0.02

    In the 3 centers of the study, IVF-ICSI will be performed according to the usual procedure: ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval, sperm microinjection by ICSI, embryo culture in Global® Total HSA medium, embryo selection and transfer at day 3. The day of the oocyte puncture, the embryologist will proceed to the 1: 1 randomization: culture of the embryos in a medium with a pH at 7.22 ± 0.02. We have chosen to study specifically the early stages of fertilization and embryo development (until day 3), stages for which extracellular pH control is more critical because the intracellular pH regulatory mechanisms are somewhat limited and could be exceeded.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Live birth delivery rate

    Number of deliveries that resulted in at least one live birth (gestational age ≥ 22 weeks) / Number of oocyte retrievals

    Time frame: month 9

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fertilization rate

    Number of 2PN zygotes at day 1 post-injection / Number of matures injected oocytes

    Time frame: day 1

  2. Cleavage rate

    Number of embryos with at least 2 blastomeres at day 2 / Number of diploid zygotes at day 1 post-injection

    Time frame: day 2

  3. Percentage of top embryos

    Number of 7 to 10-blastomeres embryos at day 3 with less than 10% fragments / Total number of embryos at day 3

    Time frame: day 3

  4. Embryo freezing rate

    Number of frozen embryos / Total number of obtained embryos

    Time frame: day 6

  5. Implantation rate

    Number of gestational sacs observed with ultrasonography (5 weeks after embryo transfer) divided by the number of embryos transferred (expressed as a percentage)

    Time frame: week 5

  6. Clinical ongoing pregnancy rate by transfer

    Number of pregnancies diagnosed by ultrasonographic of at least one fetus with a discernible heartbeat at 5 weeks after embryo transfer / Number of embryo transfers

    Time frame: week 5

  7. Clinical ongoing pregnancy rate by oocyte retrieval

    Number of pregnancies diagnosed by ultrasonographic of at least one fetus with a discernible heartbeat at 5 weeks after embryo transfer / Number of oocyte retrieval

    Time frame: week 5

  8. Miscarriage rate

    Number of spontaneous loss of an intrauterine pregnancy prior to 22 completed weeks of gestational age / Number of pregnancies

    Time frame: week 22

  9. Malformation rate diagnosed at birth

    Number of malformations according to Eurocat classification (in total and in Eurocat subgroups) / Total number of newborns

    Time frame: month 9

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • CHU de BORDEAUX
    Bordeaux, France
  • Centre AMP BIOPYRENEES
    Pau, France
  • CHU de TOULOUSE
    Toulouse, France
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2020 to primary completion in Jun 2024, 44 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 29, 2020
First posted
Jul 2, 2020
StartActual
Oct 14, 2020
Primary completionActual
Jun 19, 2024
CompletionActual
Jun 19, 2024
Last update
Jan 13, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 13, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04456478
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 2, 2020
Start date
Oct 14, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 19, 2024
Completion
Jun 19, 2024
Last update
Jan 13, 2025

Study contacts

Nicolas GATIMEL, ph
principal investigator · University Hospital, Toulouse

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion