CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04450368Updated Jun 18, 2023

Clinical Feasibility of a Non-invasive Wearable Acoustic Device for Measuring Air Trapping in COPD

An observational study in COPD and COPD Exacerbation, sponsored by Respira Labs, Inc. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-18.

Sponsored by Respira Labs, Inc · Observational

Why this study was terminated
Site failed to hit recruitment targets
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
8
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a pilot observational study during which the investigators will conduct a longitudinal assessment of air trapping (with up to 2 visits) in 40 patients with COPD and variable degrees of air trapping and 20 healthy controls using ARIA. The investigators will characterize the clinical phenotype of the subjects by administering health and symptom-based questionnaires and obtaining lung function testing at rest and during exertion, and will then correlate and validate the ARIA-based indices with those of the more traditional physiologic measures of static and dynamic air trapping.

Read the detailed description

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is the fourth leading cause of hospitalization in the United States. Exacerbations, a worsening or "flare up" of symptoms cause most COPD hospitalizations. Early detection of lung function deterioration would facilitate early intervention and help prevent hospitalizations, since most exacerbations can be treated with changes of inhalers and/or oral medications. Air trapping, defined as an abnormal increase in the volume of air remaining in the lungs after exhalation, is a common finding in all forms of COPD. Air trapping has been shown to increase during exacerbations and decrease when exacerbations resolve. Moreover, increasing recent evidence indicates that air trapping is an earlier harbinger of deteriorating lung function than spirometric changes. Recent research shows that lung air trapping can be measured by low-frequency ultrasound (1-40 kHz). Thus, acoustic monitoring of air trapping could provide clinicians with a non-invasive tool to when medical intervention is needed to avoid unnecessary ER visits and hospitalizations. The investigators have developed a low-cost, non-invasive, acoustic-based wearable device, Sylvee that is capable of continuous monitoring of lung resonance. The device has machine-learning algorithms that can detect minor changes in lung resonance, which our preliminary results suggest corresponds to changes in air trapping. The overall objective of this pilot project is to validate Sylvee's algorithms in a cohort of 60 patients with COPD and variable degree of air trapping. Ultimately, Sylvee will allow physicians to remotely monitor their patients' lung function and adjust their medications to reduce healthcare costs and improve patients' quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • COPD
  • COPD Exacerbation
03

In context

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

4,131 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 697 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 8 is below the median of 180 across 1,066 observational studies indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Respira Labs, Inc as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Outpatients People who have a condition but who are not being seen as patients Students Staff of UCSF or affiliated institutions

Inclusion criteria

  1. Men or women over 40 years old.
  2. Spirometric COPD.
  3. A history of smoking at least 20 pack-years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to perform lung function testing.
  2. Inability to complete the study and return for follow-up visits.
  3. Pregnancy.
  4. A serious and active heart condition, defined by stable or unstable angina, recent myocardial infarction (within the last 2 years), active or decompensated congestive heart failure or cardiomyopathy.
  5. End-stage liver disease.
  6. Patients unable to do mild exercise (patients with orthopedic-neurologic problems; patients who have severe heart failure characterized by an ejection fraction of \<20% or by New York Heart Association Class IV disease; patients who should be at complete rest, confined to a bed or chair; or patients for whom physical activity brings on discomfort and for whom symptoms occur at rest).
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
8 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cases with Air Trapping

    20 COPD patients with lung volumes representing air trapping (RV/TLC and functional residual capacity to TLC \[FRC/TLC\])

    Device: Sylvee

  • Cases without Air Trapping

    20 COPD patients without lung volumes representing air trapping (RV/TLC and functional residual capacity to TLC \[FRC/TLC\])

    Device: Sylvee

  • Healthy Controls

    Non COPD patients and non-smokers

    Device: Sylvee

Interventions

  • DeviceSylvee

    The investigators have developed a small sensor that has the same characteristics as a combined hearing aid used for Tinnitus. It has a noise generator intended to transmit white noise (2 - 20 KHz) and a microphone similar to those used in hearing aids to provide sound amplification. Our sensor is substantially equivalent to legally FDA approved marketed devices that can be used for several hours per day. Although it will introduce new indications for use (lung resonance capture), it has the same technological characteristics and will not introduce new hazards or safety risks. Several sound-based devices are already in use for clearing mucus from the lungs by generating and delivering low frequency sound that vibrates the airways and lung secretions, causing them to thin and become expelled. The devices are placed on the patient's chest for up to 3-4 hours in COPD, cystic fibrosis (CF) and other lung diseases.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change and variability fo acoustic resonance

    The change and variability of acoustic resonance features before, during, and after all pulmonary tests, including those where dynamic hyperinflation will be tested: metronome-paced IC, 6-minute walk test and cardio-pulmonary exercise \[every session\]. Acoustic features will be extracted from the measurements with an active acoustic sensor worn on the chest, establishing a baseline before and after all tests. Acoustic resonance changes and their rate of change will be recorded.

    Time frame: 4 hours

  2. Correlation between acoustic resonance measurements with clinical testing

    The correlation between acoustic resonance measurements and other measurements from pulmonary function tests and wearable devices (respiratory rate, heart rate and oxygen saturation with 80% accuracy rate) before, during (every minute) and after all tests \[every session\]. Acoustic features will be extracted from the measurements with active acoustic sensors worn on the chest. Other measurements will be measured using medical graded devices such as pulse-oximeters and wearables.

    Time frame: 2 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation between acoustic resonance and symptoms

    The correlation between acoustic resonance measurements and patient symptoms and vitals before, during and after all pulmonary function tests, including those where dynamic hyperinflation will be tested: metronome-paced IC, 6-minute walk test and cardio-pulmonary exercise \[every session\]. Acoustic features will be extracted from the measurements with an active acoustic sensor worn on the chest. Patient symptoms and vitals will be collected before and after all tests.

    Time frame: 1 hour

  2. Data quality and user experience with medical-grade adhesive

    The correlation between medical-grade adhesive options, session length, data quality and patient experience with sensor attachment and detachment procedures. For example: Medical-grade adhesive options will be presented to users at different sessions. Ease of setup, attachment, detachment and data quality will be recorded on a questionnaire for further correlation. A questionnaire with scales from easy-to-hard will be prepared to allow for quantification of different options. The correlation between companion app screens and flows: ease of performing tasks, reading measurements and free-form feedback. Pre-selected alternative application screens, flows and options will be shown to the user in the mobile app and their feedback recorded (free form notes) for User Experience iteration.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • El Camino Hospital
    Mountain View, California 94040, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04450368
Lead sponsor
Respira Labs, Inc
Collaborators
Palo Alto Medical Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 29, 2020
Start date
Mar 1, 2022
Primary completion
May 30, 2023
Completion
Jun 1, 2023
Last update
Jun 18, 2023

Study contacts

Ganesh Krishna, MD
principal investigator · Principal Investigator

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion