CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04428034Updated Mar 21, 2023Results posted

Learning Skills Together Pilot Study

An interventional study of Learning Skills Together in Family Caregiving, Complex Care and Self Efficacy, sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-21.

Sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
41
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Learning Skills Together (LST) program is a synchronous web-based educational intervention developed to address the essential need for training to equip family caregivers to someone with mid-stage Alzheimer's disease to confidently provide complex care tasks.The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility of delivering LST, the program's acceptability to caregivers, and likelihood of effecting caregivers self-efficacy and mastery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Family Caregiving
  • Complex Care
  • Self Efficacy
  • Intervention
03

In context

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio is the lead sponsor of 435 studies on the registry; 88 are open to participants now.

Of its 62 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 31 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Family member (including families of choice) to an individual living with Alzheimer's disease who has received a diagnosis from a physician
  • Ages 18 and old
  • Provides assistance with at least two instrumental activities of daily living or one activity of daily living
  • Care recipient is described as being within mid-stage Alzheimer's Disease
  • There are no plans to place the care recipient in a skilled nursing facility within the next 3 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The caregiver is paid to provide care
  • The caregiver does not have reliable access to a computer and internet
  • The caregiver is unable to read and speak English
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
41 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Learning Skills Together Intervention

    Participants in the Learning Skills Together program will begin their participation with a one-on-one phone call with an interventionist, who will ensure the participant is prepared to to attend the group sessions (e.g., familiar with videoconference technology) and will help the participant to set individual goals. The caregiver participant will then attend 4, group-based sessions lasting approximately 1.5 hours each, to learn about common complex care tasks managed by family caregivers to someone with mid-stage Alzheimer's disease, such as managing behavioral symptoms of dementia, incontinence, nutrition, transferring, medication management, and more. Sessions will integrate interactive activities, such as videos, case studies, and discussions. Approximately four weeks later, caregivers will be asked to attend a group reflection session to discuss application of what was learned and progress in meeting individual goals.

    Behavioral: Learning Skills Together

Interventions

  • BehavioralLearning Skills Together

    Information provided in arm/group description.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Caregiver Competency

    This will be measured using the Caregiving Competence Scale. This measure includes 3-items pertaining to caregiver's confidence (e.g., "I feel confident that I am meeting the needs of my relative"). There are five response options to each statement ("Strongly Disagree" \[1\] to "Strongly Agree" \[5\]), such that scores may range from 3 to 15. A lower score indicates a lower level of confidence that the caregiver is meeting their relative's needs (i.e., higher scores are better). The outcome measure will use the average change score from baseline scores.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks post-intervention; and to 8 weeks post-intervention

  2. Change in Caregiver Mastery

    This will be measured using the Caregiver Mastery Scale. This 7-item scale asks participants the extent to which they feel they have control over various parts of their lives (e.g., "I have little control over the things that happen to me"). Participants may respond that they "Strongly Disagree (1) to Strongly agree (4) with each statement, such that scores range from 7 to 28. The lower the score, the less control the caregiver feels that they have control (i.e., higher scores are better). The mean score for this measure among caregivers to frail older adults was previously reported as 19.42 (SD 3.29), with Cronbach's alpha of 0.78. The outcome measure will use the average change score from baseline scores.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks post-intervention; and to 8 weeks post-intervention

07

Results

Posted Mar 4, 2022
Limitations and caveats
Application of a. pre- and post-test design means that changes in self-efficacy cannot be attributed to the intervention alone Results from this study are subject to selection bias given participant dropout between survey collection times The small size of the analytic sample may have contributed to Type II error for some outcomes

Participant flow

Enrollment to Intervention Completion
Participant flow — Enrollment to Intervention Completion
MilestoneLearning Skills Together Intervention
Started41
Attended at least 2 intervention sessions in one cohort35
Completed35
Not completed6
Withdrew: Protocol violation6
4-Week Follow Up Survey
Participant flow — 4-Week Follow Up Survey
MilestoneLearning Skills Together Intervention
Started35
Completed29
Not completed6
8-Week Follow Up Survey
Participant flow — 8-Week Follow Up Survey
MilestoneLearning Skills Together Intervention
Started29
Completed27
Not completed2

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Caregiver Competency

This will be measured using the Caregiving Competence Scale. This measure includes 3-items pertaining to caregiver's confidence (e.g., "I feel confident that I am meeting the needs of my relative"). There are five response options to each statement ("Strongly Disagree" \[1\] to "Strongly Agree" \[5\]), such that scores may range from 3 to 15. A lower score indicates a lower level of confidence that the caregiver is meeting their relative's needs (i.e., higher scores are better). The outcome measure will use the average change score from baseline scores.

Time frame:
Change from baseline to 4 weeks post-intervention; and to 8 weeks post-intervention
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Caregiver Competency
score on a scaleLearning Skills Together Intervention
4-Weeks Post-Intervention1.0 ± 1.6
8-Weeks Post-Intervention1.0 ± 2.2
PrimaryChange in Caregiver Mastery

This will be measured using the Caregiver Mastery Scale. This 7-item scale asks participants the extent to which they feel they have control over various parts of their lives (e.g., "I have little control over the things that happen to me"). Participants may respond that they "Strongly Disagree (1) to Strongly agree (4) with each statement, such that scores range from 7 to 28. The lower the score, the less control the caregiver feels that they have control (i.e., higher scores are better). The mean score for this measure among caregivers to frail older adults was previously reported as 19.42 (SD 3.29), with Cronbach's alpha of 0.78. The outcome measure will use the average change score from baseline scores.

Time frame:
Change from baseline to 4 weeks post-intervention; and to 8 weeks post-intervention
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Caregiver Mastery
score on a scaleLearning Skills Together Intervention
4-Weeks Post-Intervention0.7 ± 2.3
8-Weeks Post-Intervention0.5 ± 2.9

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected over 1 year.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Learning Skills Together Intervention1/35 (2.9%)0/35 (0%)3/35 (8.6%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventLearning Skills Together Intervention
Adverse Event: Identification of Severe DepressionPsychiatric disorders3/35

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics are described for the analysis population, which includes participants who were eligible according to initial criteria, but who also: 1) attended at least 2 program sessions and 2) completed the program in the same cohort (i.e., did not start in one cohort and complete "make up" sessions in the following cohort.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Learning Skills Together Intervention
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years18
>=65 years17
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Learning Skills Together Intervention
Female29
Male6
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Learning Skills Together Intervention
Race and Ethnicity — African American/Black3
Race and Ethnicity — Asian3
Race and Ethnicity — Caucasian/white19
Race and Ethnicity — Hispanic10
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Learning Skills Together Intervention
United States35
Caregiver Competency
Caregiver Competency(units on a scale)Learning Skills Together Intervention
Mean11.6 ± 2.6
Caregiver Mastery
Caregiver Mastery(units on a scale)Learning Skills Together Intervention
Mean16.6 ± 2.8
08

Study locations

1 site
  • UT Health San Antonio
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Pearlin LI, Schooler C. The structure of coping. J Health Soc Behav. 1978 Mar;19(1):2-21. No abstract available. PubMed 649936 ↗
  • Pearlin LI, Mullan JT, Semple SJ, Skaff MM. Caregiving and the stress process: an overview of concepts and their measures. Gerontologist. 1990 Oct;30(5):583-94. doi: 10.1093/geront/30.5.583. PubMed 2276631 ↗
  • Chan EY, Glass G, Chua KC, Ali N, Lim WS. Relationship between Mastery and Caregiving Competence in Protecting against Burden, Anxiety and Depression among Caregivers of Frail Older Adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(10):1238-1245. doi: 10.1007/s12603-018-1098-1. PubMed 30498832 ↗
  • Robertson, SM, Zarit, SH, Duncan, LG, Rovine, MJ, & Femia, EE. Family caregivers' patterns of positive and negative affect. Family Relations. 2007; 56(1): 12-23.

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 3, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — De-identified study data will be made available to other researchers if requested.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 21, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04428034
Lead sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 11, 2020
Start date
Sep 3, 2020
Primary completion
Aug 15, 2021
Completion
Sep 9, 2021
Results posted
Mar 4, 2022
Last update
Mar 21, 2023

Study contacts

Carole L White, PhD, RN
principal investigator · UT Health San Antonio

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion