CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04420858Updated Nov 4, 2020

Effect of Video Education on Patients' Knowledge and Attitudes of Privacy in Prenatal Genetics

An interventional study of Enhanced (experimental) education and Standard (control) education. in Aneuploidy, Genetic Disease and Pregnancy Related, sponsored by Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-04.

Sponsored by Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
162
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial to assess baseline maternal knowledge of and attitudes toward commercial prenatal genetic testing laboratories' genetic privacy practices, and to determine whether a brief educational intervention alters these attitudes.

Read the detailed description

The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial to assess baseline maternal knowledge of and attitudes toward commercial prenatal genetic testing laboratories' genetic privacy practices, and to determine whether a brief educational intervention alters these attitudes. Pregnant women undergoing specialized fetal anatomic ultrasound surveys at Women and Infants' maternal fetal medicine prenatal diagnostic imaging centers will be recruited to participate. Volunteers will be randomized to receive either standard education about prenatal genetic testing or standard education plus additional education about federal genetic privacy protections. Next, the participants view the educational materials to which they were randomized. Finally, all volunteers will take the same survey, which will assess baseline demographic variables as well as their knowledge of and attitudes toward broad sharing of data obtained from prenatal genetic testing. Once finished with the survey, volunteers will have completed their participation in this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aneuploidy
  • Genetic Disease
  • Pregnancy Related

Keywords

  • Genetic privacy
  • Aneuploidy screening
  • Pregnancy
  • Data use
  • Data sharing
  • Protected health information
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant patients undergoing a scheduled L2 ultrasound at the Women and Infants Prenatal Diagnosis Center (PDC)
  • Singleton pregnancies
  • English speaking
  • Results available from cell-free DNA screening for this pregnancy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior L2 ultrasound at the PDC during the current pregnancy (to avoid test-retest or multiple approach)
  • Prior participation in this study
  • Gestational age \<17'0 weeks or >23'6 weeks
  • Suboptimally dated pregnancies (i.e. dated by ultrasound after 22 weeks gestation)
  • Unscheduled / add-on L2 ultrasounds
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
162 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Control

    The control arm will receive standard education about cell-free DNA screening that would typically be presented during a prenatal visit.

    Behavioral: Standard (control) education.

  • Experimental
    Experimental

    The experimental arm will receive additional education about federal legislation that protects the privacy of genetic information (Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, GINA).

    Behavioral: Enhanced (experimental) education

Interventions

  • BehavioralEnhanced (experimental) education

    See arm description.

  • BehavioralStandard (control) education.

    See arm description.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Knowledge about broad sharing of genetic data for non-clinical research purposes

    Using a newly designed survey instrument (the Prenatal Testing Opinions Survey), the investigators aim to answer the following question: What is patient knowledge about the potential sharing of their genetic data for non-clinical research purposes? Outcome will be measured on the Likert scale.

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed immediately after exposure to education (day 0)

  2. Acceptability of broad sharing of genetic data for non-clinical research purposes

    Using a newly designed survey instrument (the Prenatal Testing Opinions Survey), the investigators aim to answer the following question: What is patient acceptance of laboratory-initiated sharing of their de-identified genetic data for non-clinical purposes? Outcome will be measured on the Likert scale.

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed immediately after exposure to education (day 0)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Acceptability of retention of genetic data for non-clinical purposes

    Using a newly designed survey instrument (the Prenatal Testing Opinions Survey), the investigators aim to answer the following question: What is patient acceptance of retaining their de-identified genetic data to potentially use it for non-clinical purposes? Outcome will be measured on the Likert scale.

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed immediately after exposure to education (day 0)

  2. Acceptability of use of genetic data for non-clinical purposes

    Using a newly designed survey instrument (the Prenatal Testing Opinions Survey), the investigators aim to answer the following question: What is patient acceptance of using their de-identified genetic data for non-clinical purposes such as research and development? Outcome will be measured on the Likert scale.

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed immediately after exposure to education (day 0)

  3. Knowledge and understanding of aneuploidy screening and results

    Are patients aware that they underwent aneuploidy screening with cell-free fetal DNA (cfDNA)? Are they aware of their results? Outcome will be measured on the Likert scale.

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed immediately after exposure to education (day 0)

  4. Knowledge and understanding of carrier testing and results

    Using a newly designed survey instrument (the Prenatal Testing Opinions Survey), the investigators aim to answer the following question: Are patients aware that they underwent carrier testing? Are they aware of their results? Outcome will be measured on the Likert scale.

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed immediately after exposure to education (day 0)

  5. Acceptability of retention, use, and broad sharing of fetal genetic data for non-clinical research purposes

    Using a newly designed survey instrument (the Prenatal Testing Opinions Survey), the investigators aim to answer the following question: Assess maternal acceptance of each of these outcomes. Outcome will be measured on the Likert scale.

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed immediately after exposure to education (day 0)

  6. Maternal rationale for pursuing cfDNA

    Using a newly designed survey instrument (the Prenatal Testing Opinions Survey), the investigators aim to answer the following question: What prompted patient to pursue cfDNA testing? Outcome will be measured on the Likert scale.

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed immediately after exposure to education (day 0)

  7. Maternal knowledge of different commercial cfDNA providers

    Using a newly designed survey instrument (the Prenatal Testing Opinions Survey), the investigators aim to answer the following question: Are patents who have undergone cfDNA testing aware that multiple companies offer this service? Outcome will be measured on the Likert scale.

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed immediately after exposure to education (day 0)

  8. Maternal knowledge pertaining to Down Syndrome and the genetics of trisomies.

    Using a newly designed survey instrument (the Prenatal Testing Opinions Survey), the investigators aim to answer the following question: To what extent do mothers who have undergone cfDNA screening and are participating in this study understand these topics? Outcome will be measured on the Likert scale.

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed immediately after exposure to education (day 0)

  9. Maternal perceptions of the de-identifiability of genetic data

    Using a newly designed survey instrument (the Prenatal Testing Opinions Survey), the investigators aim to answer the following question: To what extent do mothers who have undergone cfDNA screening believe that deidentified genetic information is not re-identifiable? Outcome will be measured on the Likert scale.

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed immediately after exposure to education (day 0)

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Women and Infants Hospital
    Providence, Rhode Island 02905, United States
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Parobek CM, Thorsen MM, Has P, Lorenzi P, Clark MA, Russo ML, Lewkowitz AK. Video education about genetic privacy and patient perspectives about sharing prenatal genetic data: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;227(1):87.e1-87.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.047. Epub 2022 Mar 26. PubMed 35351406 ↗
  • Parobek CM, Has P, Lorenzi P, Russo ML, Clark MA, Lewkowitz AK. What test did I have? Patient uncertainty about prenatal genetic screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep;225(3):341-342. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.030. Epub 2021 May 27. No abstract available. PubMed 34051169 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Non-identifiable data will be freely shared with other researchers upon request for facilitate reproducibility or future systemic review, pending approval from local institutional review board.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04420858
Lead sponsor
Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 9, 2020
Start date
Jul 21, 2020
Primary completion
Oct 16, 2020
Completion
Oct 16, 2020
Last update
Nov 4, 2020

Study contacts

Christian Parobek
principal investigator · Department of OB/GYN, Women and Infants Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion