CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04419259STOP RosUpdated Jun 11, 2020

Efficacy and Tolerability of Erenumab in the Management of Persistent Redness and Flushing in Rosacea

A Phase 2 interventional study of AMG 334 in Rosacea, sponsored by Messoud Ashina. Status unknown at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-06-11.

Sponsored by Messoud Ashina · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2020), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

An exploratory open-label study of rosacea patients to study the efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in the prophylactic treatment of persistent redness and flushing attributed to rosacea. Approximately 30 subjects will be included in the study and receive erenumab 140 mg for three months. The study will begin June 2020 and is expected to last nine months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rosacea

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women between ages 18 - 65 years who have suffered from rosacea for at least 12 months.
  • If patient has concurrent migraine, a daily headache diary must be filled out

Criteria to be met prior to enrollment in the 4-week run-in period:

•Erythematotelangiectatic rosacea with a minimum of 15 days of either:

  • PSA > 2, and/or
  • Moderate, severe or extreme flushing measured by the Flushing Assessment Tool (FAST)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic treatment for rosacea ended less than five half-lives or 28 days ago, whichever is longest
  • Topical treatment for rosacea ended less than five half-lives or 28 days ago, whichever is longest
  • Cardiovascular disease of any kind, including cerebrovascular disease
  • Hypertension on the experimental day (systolic blood pressure > 150 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure > 100 mmHg)
  • Hypotension on the experimental day (systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure \< 50 mmHg)
  • Ongoing psychiatric disease of any kind - unless it has been effectively treated with a stable treatment for at least 2 months.
  • Anamnestic or clinical symptoms of any kind that are deemed relevant for study participation by the physician who examines the patient
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women expecting to conceive during the study
  • Women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to use an acceptable method of effective contraception during treatment through 16 weeks after the last dose of erenumab. Acceptable methods of effective birth control include not having intercourse (true abstinence, when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject), hormonal birth control methods (pills, shots/injections, implants, or patches), intrauterine devices, surgical contraceptive methods (vasectomy with medical assessment of the surgical success of this procedure or bilateral tubal ligation), or two barrier methods (each partner must use one barrier method) with spermicide - males must use a condom with spermicide; females must choose either a diaphragm with spermicide, OR cervical cap with spermicide, OR contraceptive sponge with spermicide. Female subjects not of childbearing potential are defined as any female who: is post-menopausal by history, defined as:

    • Age ≥ 55 years with cessation of menses for 12 or more months, OR
    • Age \< 55 years but no spontaneous menses for at least 2 years, OR
    • Age \< 55 years and spontaneous menses within the past 1 year, but currently amenorrhoeic (e.g. spontaneous or secondary to hysterectomy), AND with postmenopausal gonadotropin levels (luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels > 40 IU/L) or postmenopausal estradiol levels (\< 5 ng/dL) or according to the definition of "postmenopausal range" for the laboratory involved OR Underwent bilateral oophorectomy OR Underwent hysterectomy OR Underwent bilateral salpingectomy
  • Known sensitivity to any component of erenumab
  • Previously randomized into an erenumab study
  • Member of investigational site staff or relative of the investigator
  • Unlikely to be able to complete all protocol required study visits or procedures, and/or to comply with all required study procedures to the best of the subject's and investigator's knowledge
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Erenumab

    30 subjects with rosacea will be allocated to receive monthly subcutaneous injections of 140 mg erenumab at three time points (week 0, week 4, week 8)

    Drug: AMG 334

Interventions

  • DrugAMG 334

    30 subjects with rosacea will be allocated to receive monthly subcutaneous injections of 140 mg erenumab at three time points (week 0, week 4, week 8)

    Also known as: Erenumab

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Effect of erenumab on days of flushing

    Mean change in number of days with moderate, severe or extreme flushing from Baseline to week 12. Evaluated by the Flushing Assessment (FAST) Tool part II (moderate, severe or very severe flushing is defined as a score of 4-10 on FAST)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effect of erenumab on erythema

    Mean change in erythema from Baseline to week 4, 8 and 12. Will be evaluated by Clinicians Erythema Assessment (CEA)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Effect of erenumab on quality of life: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)

    Mean change in quality of life from Baseline to week 4, 8 and 12. Will be evaluated by Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Proportion of patients that reach a 50% reduction in number of days with flushing

    To evaluate the proportion of patients with at least 50% reduction in number of days with moderate, severe or extreme flushing. Evaluated by the Flushing Assessment (FAST) Tool part II (moderate, severe or very severe flushing is defined as a score of 4-10 on FAST)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Effect of erenumab on days of flushing

    Mean change in number of days with moderate, severe or extreme flushing from Baseline to week 4 and 8. Evaluated by the Flushing Assessment (FAST) Tool part II (moderate, severe or very severe flushing is defined as a score of 4-10 on FAST)

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  5. Effect of erenumab on depression

    Mean change in depressive symptoms from Baseline to week 4, 8 and 12. Evaluated by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Effect of erenumab on overall rosacea symptoms

    Proportion of patients with Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) '0' or '1' with an at least 2-point reduction from baseline to week 4, 8 and 12.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  7. Effect of erenumab on inflammatory lesions

    Mean change in Inflammatory Lesion Count (ILC) from baseline to week 4, 8 and 12

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  8. Proportion of patients that reach a 50% reduction in self-assessed rosacea symptoms

    Proportion of patients with at least 50% reduction in number of days with Patient's Self-Assessment (PSA) above 2 from Baseline to week 4, 8 and 12.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  9. Effect of erenumab on self-assessed rosacea symptoms

    Mean change in Patient's Self-Assessment (PSA) above 2 from Baseline to week 4, 8 and 12.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  10. Effect of erenumab on depressive symptoms

    Mean change in Quicky Inventory Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) from Baseline to week 4, 8 and 12

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  11. Effect of erenumab on overall rosacea severity

    Mean change in overall rosacea severity from Baseline to week 4, 8 and 12. Evaluated by Rosacea Area and Severity Index (RASI)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  12. Effect of erenumab on rosacea symptoms

    Mean change in rosacea symptoms from Baseline to week 4, 8 and 12. Evaluated by Rosacea Clinical Scorecard (RCS)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  13. Effect of erenumab on rosacea-specific quality of life: Rosacea-specific Quality-of-Life index (RosaQoL)

    Mean change in rosacea-specific quality of life from Baseline to week 4, 8 and 12. Evaluated by the Rosacea-specific Quality-of-Life index (RosaQoL)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Tolerability of erenumab in patients with rosacea

    To evaluate the tolerability of erenumab in patient with rosacea through assessment of adverse events at every visit from Baseline to week 4, 8 and 12.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Danish Headache Center
    Glostrup, Dk-2600, Denmark
    • Nita Wienholtz, MD · Contact
    • Messoud Ashina, MD, PhD, DMSc · Principal investigator
    • Nita Wienholtz, MD · Sub investigator
    • Thien Do, MD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04419259
Lead sponsor
Messoud Ashina
Collaborators
Danish Headache Center, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
Responsible party
Messoud Ashina (Professor, MD, PhD, DMSc, Danish Headache Center) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 5, 2020
Start date
Jun 9, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 11, 2020

Study contacts

Nita KF Wienholtz, MD
Contact
nita.wienholtz@regionh.dk
0045-38634612
Messoud Ashina, Professor
principal investigator · Danish Headache Center
Nita KF Wienholtz, MD
study director · Danish Headache Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion