CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04414891Updated Aug 9, 2021

Non Invasive Ventilation With NAVA vs ASV for AECOPD

An interventional study of Non invasive ventilation in Acute Exacerbation of COPD, sponsored by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh. Completed at 1 site in India. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-09.

Sponsored by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2019, registered May 2020).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
76
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Non invasive ventilation is the standard of care in managing patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However no optimal mode of NIV delivery is established; failure rates remain high, attributed to asynchrony and leak associated with NIV. Neurally adjust ventilator assist is a new mode that may improve patient ventilator interactions, improve synchrony and contribute to improved outcomes. Likewise ASV is a mode principled on the closed loop system and is associated with reduction of work associated with breathing and improved outcomes. In this randomised, non-blinded trial, we study these two modes of NIV delivery in patients of AECOPD with hypothesis being that better synchrony with NAVA may translate to better clinical outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Study hypothesis We hypothesize that NIV-NAVA would be superior to ASV in reducing the NIV failure rates in patients with AECOPD. In this study, we plan to compare the ASV with NAVA during NIV in patients with AECOPD.

Methods All consecutive patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be screened and assessed for eligibility. Informed consent will be sought and those enrolled would be randomized to to receive NIV using either the ASV or the NIV-NAVA mode. The NIV will be delivered using a oro-nasal mask with supplemental oxygen as needed.

Delivery of NAVA NAVA will be delivered using Servo-i ventilator (Maquet, Getinge Group, Sweden) with software to compensate for air leaks.

NAVA initiation would involve calibration of the Edi module, placement of the nava catheter nasogastrically, verification of position and selecting appropriate nava level on the basis of required pressure support. In case a favourable response is not obtained, NAVA level will beincreased by 0.2 cm/µV until favourable response is seen (tidal volume 6-8mL/kg, respiratory rate \< 25/min)

Delivery of ASV ASV will be delivered using a Galileo GOLD ventilator (Hamilton Medical, AG, Switzerland).The patients will be ventilated with an initial setting of 100%-minute volume and will be titrated in increments of 10% as per clinical parameters (respiratory rate, tidal volume).

Monitoring All the patients will be monitored every 15 minutes for respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure, Glasgow coma score, pulse oximetry, and signs of respiratory fatigue (paradox), fit of mask and any peri-mask leak. Arterial blood gas analysis will be done at initiation of NIV and then at 1 hour, 4 hours and 24 hours and then at least once a day till primary end point is met.

All the subjects will receive standard of care for acute exacerbation of COPD regardless of their allotted treatment arm.

Randomization Randomization will be done by a computer-generated sequence with blocks of 8 to receive non-invasive ventilation using either the ASV or NAVA. The order of randomisation will be sealed in an opaque envelope, and opened by the physician not directly involved in the study or analysis, at the time of recruitment of patient.

Statistical analysis Results will be presented in a descriptive fashion as mean ± standard deviation (SD), median (interquartile range) or number and percentage. The differences between means of continuous and categorical variables will be analysed using the Student-t-test and chi-square tests, respectively. For data that is not normally distributed the data will be analysed using non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney U).Trends in clinical (respiratory rate and mean arterial blood pressure), arterial blood gas parameters (pH, PaO2, PaCO2) and NIV parameters (peak inspiratory pressure, PEEP, tidal volume) will be analyzed using mixed model technique for repeated measures analysis of variance; the within-groups factor will be time (baseline, one, four and 24 hours), and the between-groups factor will be NIV success. A P value of \<0.05 will indicate statistical significance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Exacerbation of COPD

Keywords

  • AECOPD
  • NIV
  • NAVA
  • ASV
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh is the lead sponsor of 290 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Consecutive subjects with AECOPD will be eligible for inclusion in the study if they meet all the following: (a) an acute (\<7 days) sustained worsening of any of the patient's respiratory symptoms (cough, sputum quantity or character, dyspnea) beyond the normal day-to-day variation; (b) arterial blood gas analysis showing a PaCO2 >45 mm Hg with either pH between 7.10 and 7.35 or respiratory rate (fR) >30 breaths/minute; and, (c) exclusion of other causes of acute breathlessness such as acute heart failure, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, and pneumothorax.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with any one of the following criteria will be excluded from the current study:

  1. Non-COPD acute hyper-capneic respiratory failure
  2. Hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg)
  3. Severe impairment of consciousness (Glasgow coma scale score \<8)
  4. Inability to clear respiratory secretions
  5. Abnormalities that preclude proper fit of the NIV interface (agitated or uncooperative patient, facial trauma or burns, facial surgery, or facial anatomical abnormality
  6. Subjects who have an artificial airway like tracheostomy tube or T-tube
  7. Contraindications for insertion of naso-/orogastric feeding tube (facial/nasal trauma, recent upper airway surgery, esophageal surgery, esophageal varices, upper gastrointestinal bleeding)
  8. Unwillingness to undergo placement of nasogastric catheter
  9. Known phrenic nerve lesions
  10. Suspected diaphragmatic weakness
  11. Patient already on home NIV therapy for chronic respiratory failure
  12. Failure to provide informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
76 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    NAVA arm

    Delivery of NIV-NAVA NIV NAVA will be administered using Servo-i ventilator (Maquet, Getinge Group, Sweden) with software to compensate for air leaks. Subjects randomised to this arm will undergo placement of Edi catheter and will be initiated on NIV. Appropriate NAVA level will be selected based on the scalars corresponding to stable ventilation in pressure support mode. During NAVA, the NAVA level would be increased in multiples of 0.2 cm H2O/µV to attain favourable response (tidal volume 6-8mL/kg RR ≤25). Once the patient's clinical condition stabilises, and the Edi maximum starts declining or remains unchanged with stable tidal volumes, NAVA level will be decreased in steps of 0.2 cm H2O/μV every 2 hours. If response to new settings is not favourable earlier settings will be restored. If favourable response is attained the weaning is continued until peak pressure is \<12cm H20 and PEEP requirement is \<5cm H2O. NIV will be replaced by a venture mask to titrate SpO2 between 88-92%

    Device: Non invasive ventilation

  • Active comparator
    ASV arm

    Patients randomised to the ASV arm will receive NIV using a Galileo GOLD ventilator (Hamilton Medical, AG, Switzerland). The patients will be ventilated with an initial setting of 100%-minute volume (MV%). Increments of 10% will be made every 15 minutes to achieve clinical response (relief of dyspnea, RR\<30, and tidal volume 6-8mL/kg). The expiratory trigger sensitivity will be set at 35% and adjusted accordingly. PEEP will be commenced at 3-4 cm H2O and increased by 1 cm of H2O to achieve SpO2 between 89-92% and maximum PEEP of 10 cm of H2O. Weaning would be performed by reducing the MV% gradually in decrements of 10%/hour to a MV% of 60% after the peak inspiratory pressure decreases to \<8 cm of H2O, and the respiratory rate is \< 28 breaths per minute and patient is able to maintain SpO2 \> 90% at FiO2\< 30%. Once the patient is comfortable on these settings, NIV will be replaced with oxygen supplementation using a venturi mask to maintain SpO2 between 89 and 92%.

    Device: Non invasive ventilation

Interventions

  • DeviceNon invasive ventilation

    Non invasive ventilation will be delivered using an oro-facial interface in both arms. NIV NAVA will be administered using Servo-i ventilator (Maquet, Getinge Group, Sweden) with software to compensate for air leaks. ASV arm will receive NIV using a Galileo GOLD ventilator (Hamilton Medical, AG, Switzerland).

    Also known as: NIV

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of NIV failure

    NIV failure will be considered in case of • Endotracheal intubation

    Time frame: From initiation of NIV to either intubation or re-initiation of NIV or successful weaning

Secondary outcomes

  1. 28-day mortality rate

    28-day mortality including ICU and hospital deaths will be assessed

    Time frame: 28 days

  2. 90-day mortality rate

    90-day mortality including deaths after discharge

    Time frame: 90 days

  3. Time to NIV failure

    From initiation of NIV to either intubation or re-initiation of NIV

    Time frame: 28 days

  4. Time to successful weaning

    Time to successful weaning will be defined as the duration between initiation of NIV and successful weaning from NIV

    Time frame: 28 days

  5. Physician's ease of use of the mode on visual analogue scale

    Ease of use will be recorded on a scale of 100 mm, with 0 being very easy and 100 very difficult

    Time frame: Assessed every 8 hours until primary outcome

  6. Patient assessed level of comfort using visual analogue scale

    Level of comfort will be assessed on a scale of 100 mm, 0 being very comfortable and 100 very uncomfortable

    Time frame: 28 days

  7. Average number of manipulations

    Assessed daily for 5 days or until primary outcome whichever occurs first

    Time frame: 28 days

  8. Asynchrony index

    Assessed daily until primary outcome or 5 day period, whichever occurs first

    Time frame: 28 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, PGIMER
    Chandigarh, 160012, India
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sehgal IS, Kalpakam H, Dhooria S, Aggarwal AN, Prasad KT, Agarwal R. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Noninvasive Ventilation with Pressure Support Ventilation and Adaptive Support Ventilation in Acute Exacerbation of COPD: A Feasibility Study. COPD. 2019 Apr;16(2):168-173. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2019.1620716. Epub 2019 Jun 4. PubMed 31161812 ↗
  • Chen C, Wen T, Liao W. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist versus pressure support ventilation in patient-ventilator interaction and clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. Ann Transl Med. 2019 Aug;7(16):382. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.07.60. PubMed 31555696 ↗
  • Tajamul S, Hadda V, Madan K, Tiwari P, Mittal S, Khan MA, Mohan A, Guleria R. Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist Versus Noninvasive Pressure Support Ventilation in COPD Exacerbation: The NAVA-NICE Trial. Respir Care. 2020 Jan;65(1):53-61. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07122. Epub 2019 Oct 22. PubMed 31641071 ↗
  • Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, Aggarwal AN, Behera D, Agarwal R. Asynchrony index in pressure support ventilation (PSV) versus neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NAVA) during non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for respiratory failure: systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Nov;42(11):1813-1815. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4508-z. Epub 2016 Aug 25. No abstract available. PubMed 27562243 ↗
  • Wang DQ, Luo J, Xiong XH, Zhu LH, Zhang WW. [Effect of non-invasive NAVA on the patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Nov 15;96(42):3375-3378. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.42.004. Chinese. PubMed 27866528 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 9, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04414891
Lead sponsor
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Responsible party
Inderpaul singh (Assistant Professor, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 4, 2020
Start date
Dec 1, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2020
Completion
Dec 31, 2020
Last update
Aug 9, 2021

Study contacts

Inderpaul Singh Sehgal, MD DM
principal investigator · Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion